Article

Effect of insect protein and protease on growth performance, blood profiles, fecal microflora and gas emission in growing pig.

Young Bin Go1, Ji Hwan Lee2, byong kon lee1, Han Jin Oh1, Yong Ju Kim1, Jae Woo An1, Se Yeon Chang1, Hyun Ah Cho1, Dong Cheol Song1, Hae Ryoung Park4,*, Ji Yeon Chun3,**, Jin Ho Cho1,***
Author Information & Copyright
1chungbuk national university, cheongju 28644, Korea.
2Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States, Georgia 30609, United States.
3Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea.
4Korea Agriculture Technology Promotion Agency, Iksan 54667, Korea.
***Corresponding Author: Hae Ryoung Park, Korea Agriculture Technology Promotion Agency, Iksan 54667, Korea, Republic of. E-mail: sunrp@koat.or.kr.
***Corresponding Author: Ji Yeon Chun, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea, Republic of. E-mail: chunjiyeon@jejunu.ac.kr.
***Corresponding Author: Jin Ho Cho, chungbuk national university, cheongju 28644, Korea, Republic of. E-mail: jinhcho@chungbuk.ac.kr.

© Copyright 2022 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of <italic>Hermetia illucens</italic> larvae (HIL) as protein and protease on growth performance, blood profiles, fecal microflora, and gas emission in growing pig. In experiment 1, the seventy-two crossbred growing pigs ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) with an initial body weight (BW) of 27.98 ± 2.95 kg were randomly allotted to one of four dietary treatments (3 pigs per pen and 6 replicates pen per treatments). The experimental design was a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments evaluating two diets (Poultry offal diets and HIL diets) without or with supplementing protease. The poultry offal in basal diet has been replaced by HIL. In experiment 2, the four crossbred growing pigs ([Landrace × Yorkshire] x Duroc) with an initial body weight of 28.2 ± 0.1 kg were individually accepted in stainless steel metabolism cages. The dietary treatments included: 1) PO- (PO-; poultry offal diet), 2) PO+ (PO- + 0.05% protease), 3) HIL- (3% PO of PO- diet was replacement 3% HIL), 4) HIL+ (HIL- + 0.05% protease).  In experiment 1, From weeks 0 to 2, average daily gain (ADG) and feed efficiency (G:F) were significantly increased in the PO diet group compared with the HIL group. From weeks 2 to 4, ADG and G:F were higher for protease group than for non-protease group. At weeks 2 and 4, the PO diet group had lower blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels than HIL diet group. In experiment 2, Crude protein (CP) and nitrogen (N) retention were decreased by HIL diet at weeks 2 and 4. The fecal microflora and gas emission were not affected by HIL and protease. The HIL diet showed lower CP digestibility than AP diet and total essential amino acids digestibility tended to be higher in the PO diet than the HIL diet. In summary, the present study revealed that replacement of the PO protein with the HIL protein and the additive of protease in growing pig diets during the overall experimental period had no negative effect.

Keywords: hermetia illucens larvae; protease; growth performance; nutrient digestibility; amino acids