INTRODUCTION
One of the main goals in swine production is to maximize pork productivity. Consequently, the swine industry constantly requires efficient livestock and nutritional management to increase growth performance that has been used for decades [1,2]. Therefore, the swine industry has been used antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) which has two major impacts; growth promoting and disease prevention[1,3]. However, there is a potential risk and a concern by the society about the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in human pathogenic bacteria and their transmission into the human population by the abuse of AGP [1–4]. Thus the use of AGP in animal diets has been banned or reduced internationally and at the same time alternatives for AGP have been increasingly demanded. Moreover, the cost of main ingredients in swine diets, such as soybean meal and corn, have been remarkably increased due to the competition among animal feed, human food, and biofuel industries [5–8]. Especially, soybean meal which is one of main protein sources for swine, but unfortunately it contains various anti-nutritional factors (ANFs) that can inhibit protein utilization by pigs [9–11].
Potential solutions for the issues mentioned above are strongly required to replace the AGP without the risk regarding antimicrobial resistant microbes and to improve the utilization of protein and other nutrients in pig diets efficiently. Inclusion of exogenous enzyme in pig diets is one of plausible strategies for improvement of nutrient utilization efficiency [12,13]. Among the exogenous enzymes available, dietary protease (PRO) is an enzyme to catalyze the hydrolysis of proteins with ANFs to small peptides or amino acids and is generally used as a part of enzyme cocktails [14–19] or used as a mono-component protease [20–22] in non-ruminant diets. Previous studies reported the supplementation of PRO which improved growth performance and nutrient digestibility at various stages of different age of pigs [14,17,22–24], but the beneficial effects of PRO on pig performance and nutrient digestibility have not been further confirmed particularly at the latest pig growth period. Therefore, the objective of this study was to verify whether addition of PRO could improve growth performance and nutrient digestibility of growing-finishing pigs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The experimental protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea. This study was performed at the research facility of Chungnam National University.
A total of eighty-four pigs [Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire); average initial body weight (BW) of 25.3 ± 2.16 kg] were used and randomly assigned to three diets (7 replicates/treatment, 2 barrows and 2 gilts/replicate) in a randomized complete block design (block = sex). The diets were as follows; (1) positive control (PC) as a typical growing-finishing diet based on corn and soybean meal, (2) PC added with 0.015% of PRO (PCPRO), and (3) negative control (NC) added with 0.015% of PRO (NCPRO) (Table 1). The NC had a lower level of crude protein compared with PC. The PRO was a commercial product (Ronozyme® ProAct, DSM Nutritional Products, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland) that contained 75,000 protease units/g derived from Nocardiopsis prasina produced in Bacillus licheniformis. There were 2 experimental periods which consisted of 6 weeks of growing period followed by a 5 weeks finishing period. All pigs were housed in an environmentally controlled room with free access to feed and water during the overall experimental period.
Provided per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 12,000 IU; vitamin D3, 2,500 IU; vitamin E, 30 IU; vitamin K3, 3 mg; D-pantothenic acid, 15 mg; nicotinic acid, 40 mg; choline, 400 mg; and vitamin B12, 12 μg; Fe, 90 mg from iron sulfate; Cu, 8.8 mg from copper sulfate; Zn, 100 mg from zinc oxide; Mn, 54 mg from manganese oxide; I, 0.35 mg from potassium iodide; Se, 0.30 mg from sodium selenite.
The BW of pigs and the amount of feed offered and feed residual in each pen were weighed at the initial and end of each experiment period (growing and finishing periods). Growth performance [average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed efficiency (G:F ratio, gain-to-feed ratio)] was measured throughout. In the last week of each experimental period, a respective experimental diet containing 0.2% of chromic oxide as an indigestible marker was provided during that week. Fecal samples from randomly selected two pigs per pen were collected daily by rectal palpation for the last 3 d after 4 d adaptation period. Diet samples were collected from each batch of manufactured feed and subsequently pooled and stored at −20°C until analysis. Diet and fecal samples were dried in a forced-air drying oven at 60°C and ground using a cyclone mill (Foss Tecator Sycltec 1093, Hillerød, Denmark) before analysis.
In the last day of the experiment, all feed was withdraw 4 hours previous to all pigs being transported from the farm to the nearest local commercial slaughterhouse. The slaughter procedure and carcass characteristics measurements were performed under the supervision of the Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation. The pigs were washed with water for reducing stress. To all pigs, water was freely accessible during lairage, and were allowed to rest for about 4 hours. The final BW of each pig was noted and processed with conventional slaughter process with the electrical stunning and scalding-singeing.
Diet and fecal samples were analyzed for dry matter (DM) [25], crude protein (CP) [25], gross energy (GE) using a bomb calorimeter (Parr 1281 Bomb Calorimeter, Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL, USA), and chromium contents using an absorption spectrophotometer (Hitachi Z-5000 Absorption Spectrophotometer, Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan). Apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of DM, CP, and GE of growing and finishing pigs was calculated based on Stein et al. [26]. The dressing percentage was calculated by comparing final live BW and hot carcass weight. After splitting, the backfat thickness was directly measured between 11th and 12th thoracic vertebras and between the last thoracic vertebras as well as the 1st lumbar vertebra. The average of two measurements was expressed as a backfat thickness for each pig.
All data was analyzed with the PROC General Linear Models (GLM) of SAS (SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA). The pen was used as an experimental unit. The statistical model for growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass characteristics included dietary treatments as a fixed effect and sex as a covariate. The results are presented as a mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical significance and tendency were considered at p < 0.05 and 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10, respectively.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Pigs fed PCPRO and NCPRO had higher ADG and G:F ratio during growing (p < 0.10) and finishing (p < 0.05) periods than those fed PC (Table 2). Similarly, the PCPRO and NCPRO increased ADG (p < 0.10) and G:F ratio (p < 0.05) during overall experimental period compared with PC. These results are consistent with the results from previous studies reported that PRO improved growth rate of growing-finishing pigs [20,21,27]. These beneficial effects of PRO may be contributed by improved availability of more degraded protein with improved apparent ileal N digestibility reduced ANFs by PRO in pig diets [22,28–30]. The beneficial effect of mono-component protease on pig performance which was observed in this study was also reported by the work done by O’Doherty and Forde [27]. Those workers found improvements in the weight gain (0.862 vs 0.887 kg/day) of growing and finishing pigs. Generally, weaned pigs have a low activity of digestive enzymes in the stomach and pancreatic epithelium tissue, but growing or finishing pigs have a more developed digestive system [31–33]. Supplementation of dietary enzymes including PRO was complementary to the endogenous digestive systems. PRO was able to degrade certain nutrients that were not well digested by endogenous enzymes secreted from the animal digestive systems. Similarly, the application of PRO in the diets of animals may be able to neutralize certain ANFs, resulting in an increase of nutrient digestibility and utilization efficiency [14,28,31].
Pigs fed PCPRO and NCPRO had higher ATTD of CP during growing period (p < 0.05) and ATTD of CP and GE during finishing period (p < 0.05) than those fed PC (Table 3). These results are consistent with previous work that showed the improvement of nutrient digestibility of growing-finishing pigs [29,30,34], but did not show an improvement of growth performance of pigs fed PRO. However, some studies did not observe the positive effects of PRO on nutrient digestibility of growing pigs, but found only improvement of growth performance of pigs fed PRO [20–22]. The beneficial impact of PRO in present study may be related to more opportunities for pigs to better utilize more hydrolyzed protein by PRO in the experimental diets, resulting in the improvement of both growth performance and nutrient digestibility.
There were no significant differences between treatments on carcass characteristics of pigs by addition of PRO in the pig diets (Table 4). Similar results were observed in previous studies [20,21,35], but other previous work did show changed of carcass characteristics of pigs when PRO was added in the diets [35,36]. The inconsistent results may be due to different type of PRO used and the conditions and stages of pig age when PRO were added into the diets. Future research is needed to investigate in detail amino acid digestibility profile and to verify whether PRO can modify carcass characteristics of pigs.
