Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Dietary inclusion of glucose oxidase supplementation to corn-wheat-based diet enhance growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile of lactating sows

Shanmugam Sureshkumar1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-3114, Yan Jie Liu2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2876-5542, Ning Bo Chen2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6833-0653, In Ho Kim1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6652-2504
1Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
2Jinan Bestzyme-Bio Engineering, Jinan 250000, China
*Corresponding author: In Ho Kim, Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea. Tel: +82-41-550-3652, E-mail: inhokim@dankook.ac.kr

© Copyright 2021 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jan 11, 2021; Revised: Feb 08, 2021; Accepted: Apr 15, 2021

Published Online: Jul 31, 2021

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of dietary glucose oxidase (GOx) supplementation on the reproductive performance, litter performance, total tract digestibility, and blood profile of lactating sows fed corn-wheat-based diet. A total of twenty multiparous sows (Landrace × Yorkshire) were allocated into one of four treatments with five replicates per treatment. The dietary treatments were as follows: CON (Basal diet), GO1 (basal diet + 200 U GOx/kg), GO2 (basal diet + 300 U GOx/kg), GO3 (basal diet + 400 U Gox/kg). Dietary GOx supplementation did not affect lactating sow’s reproduction performance as well as body weight, backfat thickness, and body condition score during pre and post farrowing, and at weaning (p > 0.05). However, after farrowing to weaning period lactating sow’s fed GOx supplement has linearly (p = 0.0196) decreased the bodyweight loss. While, there were no effects (p > 0.05) observed on sows backfat thickness loss, average daily feed intake, and estrus interval among treatment groups. Dietary supplementation of GOx has linearly improved the body weight gain (p = 0.049) and average daily gain (p = 0.040) of suckling piglets. The total tract digestibility of dry matter and nitrogen was linearly increased with the graded level of GOx supplement. Also, a linear effect was observed on the glucose and superoxide dismutase of blood profile with the dietary inclusion of GOx. In summary, our finding indicates that the dietary inclusion of GOx supplement with corn-wheat-based diet had a beneficial effect on the nutrient digestibility and blood profile of lactating sows and improved the growth performance of suckling piglets.

Keywords: Glucose oxidase; Lactating sows; Suckling piglets; Reproduction performance

INTRODUCTION

Modern livestock industries aim to increase the production performance through the selection of sows with large litter sizes. However, during the gestation and lactation period sows have to tackle various stress factors such as body weight loss and changes in their housing [1,2]. Besides, these anxieties may reduce their immune function and increase the risk of pathogenic disease susceptibility in their intestinal tract, which leads to huge economic loss in swine production [3]. Furthermore, the biological and immunological health status of highly producing sows, not only affects their progeny performance but also affects their reproductive performance. To defeat this situation antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) have been used in swine feed for many years to improve their health and feed intake but the use of AGP in livestock feed causes various health issues to animals as well to consumers due to its antimicrobial resistance [4]. Owing to the demand for high quality livestock products, it is important to explore effective and natural feed additives that can stimulate productivity as well improve the health status of swine. Consequently, many researchers were a quest to find a suitable nutritional strategy that can enhance the health status of sows as well as livestock production. In such research, glucose oxidase (GOx) was found to be an excellent alternative

GOx is a small stable enzyme that could oxidizes gluconolactone, oxygen into hydrogen peroxide [5]. They are predominantly produced from Aspergillus niger and Penicilliumglaucum through the fermentation method [6] and found on the surface of fungi. It plays a vital role in a commercial application such as increasing the texture and color of food materials, palate, and shelf life of food products [7] and helps to prevent bacterial infection. During the fermentation processes, GOx could be used as a biosensor to determine D-glucose content in body fluids, foodstuffs, and beverages [8,9]. Due to the high production cost and low fermentation capacity, the use of GOx in livestock feed is not vigorously implemented. Previously, Biagi et al. [10] and Tang et al. [11] pointed out that GOx supplement had a beneficial effect on the growth performance of piglets. Also, Wu et al. [12] demonstrated that the GOx supplement has significantly increased the growth performance of average daily gain (ADG) and feed and gain ratio (G:F) of broilers. Earlier studies have shown that GOx supplement could reduce oxidative stress and intestinal mycotoxin poisoning thereby, improving the immunity to ameliorate the growth performance and productivity of animals [1315]. Wheat contains variable amounts of non-starch polysaccharides (NSP), main arabinoxylans which can interfere with nutrient digestibility, feed efficiency, and growth performance of poultry and piglets [16,17], such wheat has not been commonly used in sows diet. Though previous literature showed a positive effect on the application of GOx in the livestock industry, still now there was no information presented on the supplementation of GOx with corn-wheat-based diet. Therefore, we initiate this study to evaluate the effect of GOx with corn-wheat diet on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood profile of lactating sows. We hypothesized that the GOx supplement with corn-wheat-based diet could improve the nutrient digestibility and blood profile of lactating sows and the growth performance of piglets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The protocol of this experiment was reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Dankook University (DK-2-1942) Cheonan, Korea. The source of GOx supplement was obtained from the commercial company (Jinan Bestzyme-Bio Engineering, Jinan, China) and expressed by Aspergillus niger. One unit (U) of GOx activity is defined as the amount of enzyme which oxidates 1 μmol β-D-glucose per minute to D-gluconic acid and H2O2 at 37°C and pH 5.5.

A total of 20 multiparous sows (Landrace × Yorkshire) with an average parity of 2.8 (SD = 0.89) (In brief, Parity 1 consist of 1 sow, whereas parity 2 and 3 consists 7 sows, and parity 4 consist-5 sows) were randomly allocated into one of four treatments with five replicates per treatment. The dietary treatments were as follows: CON (basal diet), GO1 (basal diet + 200 U GOx/kg), GO2 (basal diet + 300 U GOx/kg), GO3 (basal diet + 400 U Gox/kg). During gestation period, the sows were caged in separate stalls, which had partially slatted and specific strips floor consisting of a 0.80 × 1.05 m. Experimental diets were fed from day 100 to day 135 of the feeding trial, sows were weighed and transferred to farrowing room at 107th day of gestation, and fed 2.5 kg per day feed to allow for adjustment to the lactation diet before parturition. However, sows were not fed on the day of farrowing. The nutrient diets were formulated to meet or exceed the nutrition criteria of NRC, 2012 (Table 1 [gestation] & Table 2 [lactation]). The farrowing crate contained an air-conditioned for newborn pigs at the same time temperature of the farrowing house was maintained at least 20°C with additional ventilation generated by heat lamps. Within 24 h of birth, all piglets were treated with 1 mL of iron injection, ear notching, needle teeth clipping and tail docking. within 5 days of postpartum male piglets were castrated. During lactation the feed intake of sow had raised up to 7 kg, until day 21 the piglets were continued to weaned in the farrowing room. Water was available ad libitum to both the sows and piglets throughout the experimental. Piglets were not offered creep feed. Sow milk was the only feed available to the piglets during lactation.

Table 1. Composition of gestation sow diets (as fed-basis)
Items Gestation
CON1) GO1 GO2 GO3
Ingredients (%) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
 Corn 56.35 56.33 56.31 56.3
 Wheat 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
 Soybean meal (48%) 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82
 Rapeseed meal 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
 Tallow 2.82 2.82 2.83 2.83
 Molasses 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
 DCP 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
 Limestone 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22
 Salt 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
 Lysine (78%) 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
 Threonine (99%) 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
 Tryptophan (99%) 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
 Mineral mix2) 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
 Vitamin mix3) 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
 Choline (25%) 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
 GOx - 0.02 0.03 0.04
Calculated value
 Crude protein (%) 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
 Ca (%) 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
 P (%) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
 LYS (%) 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68
 MET (%) 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24
 ME (kcal/kg) 3200 3200 3200 3200
 Fat (%) 5.39 5.39 5.40 5.40
 Fiber (%) 3.34 3.34 3.33 3.33
 Ash (%) 4.56 4.56 4.56 4.56

CON, basal diet; GO1, basal diet + 200 U GOx/kg; GO2, basal diet + 300 U GOx/kg; GO3, basal diet + 400 U Gox/kg.

Provided per kg diet: Fe, 150 mg as ferrous sulfate; Cu, 12 mg as copper sulfate; Mn, 24 mg as manganese oxide; Zn, 60 mg as zinc oxide; I, 0.6 mg as potassium iodide; and Se, 0.4 mg as sodium selenite.

Provided per kilograms of diet: vitamin A, 16,800 IU; vitamin D3, 2,400 IU; vitamin E, 108 IU; vitamin K3, 7.2 mg; vitamin B1, 2.7 mg; vitamin B2, 18 mg; vitamin B6, 6.6 mg; vitamin B12, 0.06 mg; biotin, 0.8 mg; folic acid, 6.6 mg; niacin, 81 mg; D-calcium pantothenate, 46 mg.

DCP, dicalcium phosphate; GOx, glucose oxidase; P, phosphorus; LYS, lysine; MET, methionine; ME, metabolizable energy.

Download Excel Table
Table 2. Composition of lactation sow diets (as fed-basis)
Items Lactation
 CON1) GO1 GO2 GO3
Ingredients (%) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
 Corn 42.77 42.74 42.73 42.72
 Wheat 23.00 23.00 23.00 23.00
 Soybean meal (48%) 21.71 21.71 21.71 21.71
 Bakery byproduct 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
 Tallow 4.89 4.90 4.90 4.90
 Molasses 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
 DCP 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18
 Limestone 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.52
 Salt 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
 Lysine (78%) 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
 Threonine (99%) 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
 Tryptophan (99%) 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
 Mineral mix2) 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
 Vitamin mix3) 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
 Choline (25%) 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
 GOx - 0.02 0.03 0.04
Calculated value
 Crude protein (%) 16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50
 Ca (%) 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
 P (%) 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54
 LYS (%) 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
 MET (%) 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
 ME (kcal/kg) 3400 3400 3400 3400
 Fat (%) 7.12 7.13 7.12 7.12
 Fiber (%) 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47
 Ash (%) 4.51 4.51 4.51 4.51

CON, basal diet; GO1, basal diet + 200 U GOx/kg; GO2, basal diet + 300 U GOx/kg;, GO3, basal diet + 400 U Gox/kg.

Provided per kg diet: Fe, 150 mg as ferrous sulfate; Cu, 12 mg as copper sulfate; Mn, 24 mg as manganese oxide; Zn, 60 mg as zinc oxide; I, 0.6 mg as potassium iodide; and Se, 0.4 mg as sodium selenite.

Provided per kilograms of diet: vitamin A, 16,800 IU; vitamin D3, 2,400 IU; vitamin E, 108 IU; vitamin K3, 7.2 mg; vitamin B1, 2.7 mg; vitamin B2, 18 mg; vitamin B6, 6.6 mg; vitamin B12, 0.06 mg; biotin, 0.8 mg; folic acid, 6.6 mg; niacin, 81 mg; D-calcium pantothenate, 46 mg.

DCP, dicalcium phosphate; GOx, glucose oxidase; P, phosphorus; LYS, lysine; MET, methionine; ME, metabolizable energy.

Download Excel Table

At the beginning of the experiment, before farrowing, after farrowing, and at the weaning period individual sows body weight and backfat thickness were measured using real-time ultrasound instruments (Pig lot 105, SFK Technology, Copenhagen, Denmark). After farrowing litter size was recorded according to numbers of alive piglets or dead litter to calculate the survival ratio. Feed consumption and residual were measured after feeding to calculate the daily feed intake of sows’ Body condition score was recorded within a few hours, a day after farrowing, after farrowing to weaning, and weaning to 21-day of lactation. Each piglet body weight was measured at initial birth and 21 days of lactating (weaning). During gestation and lactation, the consumption of feed was recorded on each pen to calculate the ADG, average daily feed intake (ADFI). In order to determine the survival rate, the piglets were recorded to report on farrowing day to weaning day. Each sow weaning estrus interval was noted after weaning. After weaning, sows were transferred to pens, which is very near to mature boar and also, they have direct exposer two times a day (08:00 and 16:00 h) for estrus detection. The presence of a boar, a sow was assumed to be in estrus when displaying a standing reaction caused by a back-pressure test.

To calculate total tract digestibility of dry matter (DM), nitrogen (N), and energy (E), 0.20% chromium oxide was added to the diet as an indigestible marker for 7 days prior to fecal collection at end of the lactation period. Sows rectum was gently massaged by the trainer and fresh fecal samples were collected, pooled (pen basis) and stored at −20°C until analyzed. All feed and fecal samples were freeze-dried and finely ground to pass through a 1 mm screen. DM and N digestibility were determined using methods established by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [18]. UV absorption spectrophotometry (UV-1201, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to determine the chromium absorption in the diets and feces. Parr 6100 oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr Instrument, Moline, IL, USA) was used to analyze energy by measuring the heat of combustion in the samples. N was analyzed using Kjeltec 8600 (Foss Tecator AB, Hoeganaes, Sweden). The calculation of total tract digestibility formula was used according to Sales and Janssens [19]. The blood samples were collected via puncturing the vena cava of sows before feeding at farrowing, after farrowing, and at weaning. For serum analysis, approximately 3 mL blood samples were centrifuged at 4,000 (rpm)×g for 15 min at 4°C to obtain serum samples and then stored at −20°C until analysis. The serum antioxidant activities of glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione (GSH), and glutathione disulfide (GSSG) were detected using the ELISA kit (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) in serum was measured using a commercial kit from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The blood glucose concentrations were analyzed by an automatic biochemistry blood analyzer (HITACHI 747, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

All data in this experiment were analyzed in accordance with a completely randomized design using the general linear models (GLM procedure) in SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The significance of differences between treatment means was determined using Linear and quadratic polynomial contrasts to examine the responses of supplemental graded levels of GOx in the basal diet. A p < 0.05 was considered significant, p < 0.1 was considered a trend.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Dietary inclusion of GOx supplement in the diet of lactating sows failed to affect the reproductive performance as well as body weight, backfat thickness, and body condition score before farrowing, after farrowing, and weaning (21 days) (p > 0.05) (Table 3). However, from farrowing to weaning, lactating sow’s bodyweight loss was linearly decreased in the GOx treatment groups (p = 0.020). Moreover, there were no effects on sow backfat thickness loss, ADFI, and estrus interval among the treatments (p > 0.05). Previously, Wu et al. [12] reported that dietary inclusion of GOx supplementation had significantly enhanced growth performance and gut health of chicken. Moreover, Baudon and Hancock [20] demonstrated that low feed intake results sows with excessive body weight loss. Furthermore, Bergsmaet al. [21] pointed out that decreased feed intake during the lactation period may leads to excessive body weight loss of sows that can decrease milk production and subsequent litter development. Whilst, Eissen et al. [22] demonstrated that enhanced feed intake during lactation can help the sow to reduce back fat thickness loss and body weight loss. However, in this study, there were no significant difference (p <0.05) observed on the ADFI and body weight loss (BWL) in sows before farrowing and after farrowing, and at weaning (21 days). To date, no literature has been presented on the application of GOx in sow diet. However, Tang et al. [23] noted that the dietary inclusion of GOx supplementation has increased growth hormone content, and modified the fecal microbiota, thereby improving he growth efficiency in weaned piglets fed a corn-based diet. Previously Gatrell et al. [24] pointed out the supplementation of corn and wheat as a dominant energy sources in poultry diets due to their high energy content. However, the presence of NSP in wheat and corn may negatively affect nutrient utilization and performance of monogastric animal [25,26]. Apart from this, the NSP-degrading enzymes in diets has been shown to improve apparent ileal digestibility of NSP constituents, other than galactose [27], and this, in turn, results in improved digestibility of organic matter, amino acids and energy [28,29]. However, with an opposing result, Han et al. [30] stated that pigs fed wheat-based diet has improved growth performance and meat quality of pigs. Similarly, Seerly et al. [31] and Van Lunen and Schulze [32] reported that pigs fed wheat-based diet had a significantly higher ADFI than those fed a corn-based diet. Besides, some researchers reported that there was no significant difference between corn and wheat diets [33]. We assume that the discrepancies results might be due the difference on animals age or due to the concentration of wheat-based diet.

Table 3. The effect of dietary glucose oxidase supplementation on reproduction performance in lactating sows
Items CON1) GO1 GO2 GO3 SEM p-value2)
Linear Quadratic
Parity 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 0.4 1.000 1.000
Litter size
 Total birth (head) 12.4 11.8 12.0 12.4 0.7 0.953 0.512
 Total alive (head) 11.8 11.6 11.8 11.6 0.8 0.917 1.000
 Stillbirth (head) 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.3 1.000 0.219
 Mummification, (head) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.205 0.337
 SUR1 (%) 94.8 98.3 98.5 93.6 2.9 0.791 0.177
Body weight (kg)
 Before farrowing 225.9 224.8 223.8 222.9 4.7 0.638 0.986
 After farrowing 208.4 206.1 205.6 205.5 4.9 0.681 0.824
 Weaning 192.6 190.7 190.3 191.2 5.0 0.836 0.784
Body weight loss 13) 17.5 18.7 18.3 17.4 1.5 0.907 0.518
Body weight loss 23) 15.8a 15.4ab 15.3ab 14.3b 0.4 0.020 0.470
Backfat thickness (mm)
 Before farrowing 18.8 18.6 18.4 18.6 0.9 0.847 0.829
 After farrowing 17.8 17.4 17.6 17.6 1.0 0.929 0.843
 Weaning 15.8 16.0 16.0 16.2 0.9 0.758 1.000
Backfat thickness loss 14) 1.0 1.2 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.641 1.000
Backfat thickness loss 24) 2.0 1.4 1.6 1.4 0.3 0.309 0.563
Body condition score
 Before farrowing 3.1 3.4 3.3 3.2 0.2 0.790 0.2476
 After farrowing 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.0 0.1 0.629 0.090
 Weaning 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.7 0.1 1.000 0.469
ADFI (kg)
 Pregnant 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 0.03 0.752 0.410
 Lactation 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.3 0.05 0.261 0.436
Estrus interval (d) 4.0 3.8 3.8 3.4 0.4 0.350 0.813

CON, basal diet; GO1, basal diet + 200 U GOx/kg; GO2, basal diet + 300 U GOx/kg; GO3, basal diet + 400 U Gox/kg.

Means in the same row with different superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05).

Body weight difference: 1, 2 weeks Before farrowing to After farrowing; 2, After farrowing to Weaning.

Backfat thickness difference: 1, 2 weeks Before farrowing to After farrowing; 2, After farrowing to Weaning.

SUR1, survival rate of number of alive pigs per number of totals born pigs; ADFI, average daily feed intake.

Download Excel Table

In an earlier study Park et al. [34] stated that a high-energy diet has reduced the body weight (BW) of sows and enhance the growth performance of piglets until weaning period. The present study indicates that GOx supplementation had no linear effects on the initial number and final number of suckling piglets, and their survival rate (p > 0.05). However, sows fed GOx supplementation has a beneficial effect on the growth performance of their piglets by linearly increasing their BW during the weaning period (p = 0.049). In addition, linearly enhanced ADG (p = 0.04) was observed on piglets during the overall experiment period (Table 4) was agreed with Biagi et al. [10] who reported that GOx supplementation has enhanced the growth performance of piglet’s especially after weaning. Likewise, Tang et al. [15] reported that adding 100 U/1 kg GOx supplement to soybean meal-based diet had enhanced the BWG and feed conversion ratio of piglets. Also, Mu et al. [35] stated that the dietary inclusion of 0.04% GOx (250 U/g) had enhanced the SOD concentrations, serum glutathione, and growth performance of weaning pigs. According to Cabrera et al. [36] weaning weight of piglet has a direct effect on their post weaner performance. After weaning, pigs with high weaning weight can grow faster than those with lighter weaning weight [37]. The growth performance can represent a beneficial impact on the digestibility of nutrients. However, the present study did not assess the nutrient digestibility of suckling piglets.

Table 4. The effect of dietary glucose oxidase supplementation on growth performance in suckling piglets
 Items CON1) GO1 GO2 GO3 SEM p-value2)
Linear Quadratic
INO 11.8 11.6 11.8 11.6 0.8 0.917 1.000
FNO 11.2 11.2 11.0 10.8 0.8 0.698 0.901
SUR2 (%) 95.2 96.8 94.0 92.7 3.1 0.475 0.667
Body weight (kg)
 Birth weight 1.40 1.46 1.44 1.42 0.10 0.913 0.707
 Weaning 6.47 6.67 7.02 7.74 0.10 0.049 0.675
Average daily gain (g)
 Overall 241b 247ab 245ab 251a 3 0.040 0.940

CON, basal diet), GO1, basal diet + 200 U GOx/kg; GO2, basal diet + 300 U GOx/kg; GO3, basal die t+ 400 U Gox/kg.

Means in the same row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).

INO, the number of initial suckling piglet; FNO, the number of finish suckling piglet; SUR2, survival rate during lactation.

Download Excel Table

At the end of this experiment, the apparent total digestibility of DM (p = 0.045), and N (p = 0.084) in lactating sows showed a linear, and trend to increase with a graded level of GOx. However, there were no effects observed on energy (p > 0.05) digestibility (Table 5). Previously, many researchers had reported that the pigs fed cellulose or enzyme mixture supplementation has improved the apparent nutrient digestibility of DM, energy, and crude protein, thereby enhancing the growth performance of pigs [3840]. In addition, Wu et al. [12] demonstrated that total tract digestibility was regulated by the intestinal microbiota. As reported by Liu et al. [41], effective nutrient absorption and better performance are usually associated with enhanced villus height and decreased crypt depth. However, the present study has failed to measure intestinal morphology. Therefore, we assume that the enhanced nutrient digestibility (with GOx) may be associated with intestinal microflora. There were limited research results available on the enhanced performance of lactating sows’ nutrient digestion with GOx supplement, so we could not able to make more comparison with other studies.

Table 5. The effect of dietary glucose oxidase supplementation on nutrient digestibility in lactating sows
Items (%) CON1) GO1 GO2 GO3 SEM p-value2)
Linear Quadratic
Weaning
 Dry matter 71.64b 72.93ab 73.88ab 74.13a 2.97 0.045 0.864
 Nitrogen 70.15b 70.21ab 70.3ab 71.5a 2.81 0.084 0.839
 Digestible energy 70.84 71.58 72.04 72.37 2.72 0.514 0.914

CON, basal diet; GO1, basal diet + 200 U GOx/kg; GO2, basal diet + 300 U GOx/kg; GO3, basal diet + 400 U Gox/kg.

Means in the same row with different superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05).

Download Excel Table

Dietary supplementation of GOx linearly improved SOD (p = 0.050) after farrowing. Similarly, weaning period lactating sows had a linear effect on observed SOD, and glucose (p = 0.049, and 0.042, respectively), without effects on GPx, GSSG, and GSH in GOx-supplementation diets (p > 0.05) (Table 6). Yoon et al. [42] reported that dietary inclusion of 0.05% β-mannanase enhanced the blood profile glucose level in finishing pigs. In contrast, Tan et al. [43] stated that dietary inclusion of corn starch supplementation significantly reduced the serum glucose in the sow’s gestation and lactation period and improved ADFI. In, 2019, Yang et al [44] demonstrated that glucose receptors are present in the brains center, and a reduce in the plasma glucose concentration of corn-starch fed sows possibly means the decline of neuronal signaling for the metabolism of glucose, thereby promoting sow feed intake. During normal respiration in mitochondria, the biological system could produce superoxide, which might have strong damage to the organism and cells. Fan et al. [45] demonstrated that the anti-oxidant ability of sows at farrowing was mainly modulated by SOD, which consists of sows’ defense system with other anti-oxidant enzymes in order to manage the oxidative damage caused by excessive activists. Blood profiles of SOD, GPX, GSH, and GSSG is considered the most representative markers of oxidation status invivo [46]. Waisundara [47] reported that an increase in antioxidant enzyme level could reduce oxidative stress. An early study, Michiels et al. [48] demonstrated that the oxidative state of the weaned piglet has been found to influence factors such as birth weight. GSH acts as a major endogenous antioxidant with respect to the gut, GPX transforms GSH to its GSSG oxidized type. Oxidative stress will increase the GSSG level along with a corresponding decrease in SOD, GPX, and GSH concentrations [49,50]. Therefore, we believe that dietary inclusion of GOx has been shown to improve blood profile glucose and SOD of lactating sows by enhancing the immune system. However, there was no information presented on the effects of GOx supplementation on the blood profile of lactating sows’ diets, so adequate justifications could not be made. Thus, more trials are needed to know the exact cause for the lack of results in this study.

Table 6. The effect of dietary glucose oxidase supplementation on blood profile in lactating sows
Items CON1) GO1 GO2 GO3 SEM p-value2)
Linear Quadratic
Before farrowing
 Glucose (mg/dL) 89.5 86.75 95 90.5 2.76 0.386 0.758
 SOD (U/mL) 0.54 0.29 0.55 0.55 0.13 0.620 0.339
 GPx (μmol/L) 8.95 9.18 9.98 9.41 0.38 0.231 0.327
 GSSG (μg/μL) 0.92 1.14 0.96 1.19 0.09 0.144 0.989
 GSH (ng/μL) 8.19 10.21 9.14 10.31 0.7 0.128 0.559
After farrowing
 Glucose (mg/dL) 82 83.5 88.75 85.75 2.25 0.136 0.344
 SOD (U/mL) 0.76b 0.87ab 1.1a 1.08ab 0.12 0.050 0.580
 GPx (μmol/L) 8.86 8.86 9.46 9.43 0.47 0.301 0.973
 GSSG (μg/μL) 0.93 1.04 1.14 0.98 0.08 0.503 0.101
 GSH (ng/μL) 10.54 9.89 11.46 9.39 0.76 0.596 0.374
Weaning
 Glucose (mg/dL) 100.25b 103.5ab 110.5a 109.25ab 3.35 0.049 0.518
 SOD (U/mL) 0.75ab 0.73b 0.88ab 0.99a 0.08 0.042 0.450
 GPx (μmol/L) 9.53 9.07 9.33 10.3 0.67 0.411 0.311
 GSSG (μg/μL) 0.98 1.1 0.95 1.04 0.08 0.964 0.875
 GSH (ng/μL) 9.13 10.23 9.29 10.03 0.62 0.548 0.777

CON, basal diet; GO1, basal diet + 200 U GOx/kg; GO2, basal diet + 300 U GOx/kg; GO3, basal diet + 400 U Gox/kg.

Means in the same row with different superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05).

SOD, superoxide dismutase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GSSG, glutathione disulfide; GSH, glutathione.

Download Excel Table

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that the inclusion of GOx supplement to corn-wheat-based diet had a beneficial effect on the reproductive performance of lactating sows, as well as it enhanced the growth performance of body weight and ADG of suckling piglets. In addition, gradually increased levels of GOx supplementation in the diet of lactating sows had linearly improved DM, N digestibility, and blood profile. Besides, current results will provide a novel insight on the applications of the GOx diet as an excellent alternative solution to promote the growth efficiency of lactating sows in the future.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Sureshkumar S, Liu YJ, Chen NB.

Data curation: Sureshkumar S, Liu YJ.

Formal analysis: Chen NB.

Investigation: Sureshkumar S, Chen NB, Kim IH.

Writing - original draft: Sureshkumar S.

Writing - review & editing: Liu YJ, Chen NB, Kim IH.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experiment protocols used in the study were approved by the Animal Care and Used Committee of Dankook University (DK-2-1942).

REFERENCES

1.

Spoolder HAM, Geudeke MJ, Van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Soede NM. Group housing of sows in early pregnancy: a review of success and risk factors. Livest Sci. 2009; 125:1-14

2.

Van Kranendonk MJ, Smithies RH, Hickman AH, Champion DC. Review: secular tectonic evolution of Archean continental crust: interplay between horizontal and vertical processes in the formation of the Pilbara Craton, Australia. Terra Nova. 2007; 19:1-38

3.

Nowland TL, Plush KJ, Barton M, Kirkwood RN. Development and function of the intestinal microbiome and potential implications for pig production. Animals. 2019; 9:76

4.

Cheng G, Hao H, Xie S, Wang X, Dai M, Huang L, et al. Antibiotic alternatives: the substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry?. Front Microbiol. 2014; 5:217

5.

Viswanathan S, Li P, Choi W, Filipek S, Balasubramaniam TA, Renugopalakrishnan V. protein-carbon nanotube sensors: single platform integrated micro clinical lab for monitoring blood analytes. Methods Enzymol. 2012; 509:165-94

6.

Hatzinikolaou DG, Hansen OC, Macris BJ, Tingey A, Kekos D, Goodenough P, et al. A new glucose oxidase from Aspergillus niger: characterization and regulation studies of enzyme and gene. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996; 46:371-81

7.

Khurshid S, Kashmiri MA, Quershi Z, Ahmad W. Optimization of glucose oxidase production by Aspergillus niger. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011; 10:1674-8

8.

Bankar SB, Bule MV, Singhal RS, Ananthanarayan L. Glucose oxidase: an overview. Biotechnol Adv. 2009; 27:489-501

9.

Rauf S, Ihsan A, Akhtar K, Ghauri MA, Rahman M, Anwar MA, et al. Glucose oxidase immobilization on a novel cellulose acetate-polymethylmethacrylate membrane. J Biotechnol. 2006; 121:351-60

10.

Biagi G, Piva A, Moschini M, Vezzali E, Roth FX. Effect of gluconic acid on piglet growth performance, intestinal microflora, and intestinal wall morphology. J Anim Sci. 2006; 84:370-8

11.

Tang H, Gao X, Yao B, Li X, Wang X. Study on feed effects of glucose oxidase applied in piglets. China Feed. 2013; 19:21-3

12.

Wu S, Li T, Niu H, Zhu Y, Liu Y, Duan Y, et al. Effects of glucose oxidase on growth performance, gut function, and cecal microbiota of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2019; 98:828-41

13.

Zhao Y, Cui Y, Chen B, Sun HY, Li SX, Li TZ. Glucose oxidase: effects on body weight and intestinal flora of mice with moldy feed. Anim Nutr. 2014; 26:3531-6

14.

Cui YL, Zhao YJ, Sun HY, Chen BJ, Liu SX. Effects of glucose oxidase on serum indexes, antioxidative ability and histological structure of livers in mice. Anim Husbandry Vet Med. 2015; 47:47-51

15.

Tang H, Gao X, Yao B, Zhang G, Wang Z, Li X. Effects of glucose oxidase on growth performance, serum parameters and slaughter performance of meat ducks and its antidotal effect on aflatoxin B. Anim Nutr. 2015; 27:2361-7

16.

Carneiro MSC, Lordelo MM, Cunha LF, Freire JPB. Effects of dietary fibre source and enzyme supplementation on faecal apparent digestibility, short chain fatty acid production and activity of bacterial enzymes in the gut of piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2008; 146:124-36

17.

Tsai T, Dove CR, Cline PM, Owusu-Asiedu A, Walsh MC, Azain M. The effect of adding xylanase or β-glucanase to diets with corn distillers dried grains with solubles (CDDGS) on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in nursery pigs. Livest Sci. 2017; 197:46-52

18.

AOAC [Association of Official Analytical Chemists] Internationl. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC Internatinoal. 2000

19.

Sales J, Janssen GP. Methods to determine metabolizable energy and digestibility of feed ingredients in the domestic pigeon (Columba livia domestica). Poult Sci. 2003; 82:1457-61

20.

Baudon EC, Hancock JD. Pelleted diets for lactating sows. Swine Day. 2003; :33-5

21.

Bergsma R, Kanis E, Verstegen MWA, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Knol EF. Lactation efficiency as a result of body composition dynamics and feed intake in sows. Livest Sci. 2009; 125:208-22

22.

Eissen JJ, Apeldoorn EJ, Kanis E, Verstegen MWA, de Greef KH. The importance of a high feed intake during lactation of primiparous sows nursing large litters. J Anim Sci. 2003; 81:594-603

23.

Tang H, Yao B, Gao X, Yang P, Wang Z, Zhang G. Effects of glucose oxidase on the growth performance, serum parameters and faecal microflora of piglets. S Afr J Anim Sci. 2016; 46:14-20

24.

Gatrell S, Lum K, Kim J, Lei XG. Nonruminant nutrition symposium: potential of defatted microalgae from the biofuel industry as an ingredient to replace corn and soybean meal in swine and poultry diets. J Anim Sci. 2014; 92:1306-14

25.

Yegani M, Korver DR. Factors affecting intestinal health in poultry. Poult Sci. 2008; 87:2052-63

26.

Jahanian R, Golshadi M. Effect of dietary supplementation of butyric acid glycerides on performance, immunological responses, ileal microflora, and nutrient digestibility in laying hens fed different basal diets. Livest Sci. 2015; 178:228-36

27.

Nitrayová S, Heger J, Patráš P, Kluge H, Brož J. Effect of xylanase on apparent ileal and total tract digestibility of nutrients and energy of rye in young pigs. Arch Anim Nutr. 2009; 63:281-91

28.

Nortey TN, Patience JF, Sands JS, Trottier NL, Zijlstra RT. Effects of xylanase supplementation on the apparent digestibility and digestible content of energy, amino acids, phosphorus, and calcium in wheat and wheat by-products from dry milling fed to grower pigs. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86:3450-64

29.

Kiarie E, Owusu-Asiedu A, Simmins PH, Nyachoti CM. Influence of phytase and carbohydrase enzymes on apparent ileal nutrient and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in growing pigs fed wheat and barley-based diets. Livest Sci. 2010; 134:85-7

30.

Han YK, Soita HW, Thacker PA. Performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs fed wheat or corn-based diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2005; 18:704-10

31.

Seerley RW, Vandergrift WL, Hale OM. Effect of particle size of wheat on performance of nursery, growing and finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 1988; 66:2484-9

32.

Van Lunen TA, Schulze H. Influence of Trichoderma longibrachiatum xylanase supplementation of wheat and corn based diets on growth performance of pigs. Can J Anim Sci. 1996; 76:271-3

33.

Carr SN, Rincker PJ, Killefer J, Baker DH, Ellis M, McKeith FK. Effects of different cereal grains and ractopamine hydrochloride on performance, carcass characteristics, and fat quality in late-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2005; 83:223-30

34.

Park MS, Yang YX, Choi JY, Yoon SY, Ahn SS, Lee SH, et al. Effects of dietary fat inclusion at two energy levels on reproductive performance, milk compositions and blood profiles in lactating sows. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 2008; 58:121-8

35.

Mu S, Li N, Yan J, Zheng Z, Ma Y, Li Q, et al. Effect of glucose oxidase on growth performance and serum biochemical indexes of piglets. China Anim Husban Veteri Medic. 2018; 45:2212-8

36.

Cabrera RA, Boyd RD, Jungst SB, Wilson ER, Johnston ME, Vignes JL, et al. Impact of lactation length and piglet weaning weight on long-term growth and viability of progeny. J Anim Sci. 2010; 88:2265-76

37.

Klindt J. Influence of litter size and creep feeding on preweaning gain and influence of preweaning growth on growth to slaughter in barrows. J Anim Sci. 2003; 81:2434-9

38.

Varel VH, Pond WG, Yen JT. Influence of dietary fiber on the performance and cellulase activity of growing-finishing swine. J Anim Sci. 1984; 59:388-93

39.

Caine WR, Sauer WC, Tamminga S, Verstegen MWA, Schulze H. Apparent ileal digestibilities of amino acids in newly weaned pigs fed diets with protease-treated soybean meal. J Anim Sci. 1997; 75:2962-9

40.

Yin YL, McEvoy JDG, Schulze H, Hennig U, Souffrant WB, McCracken KJ. Apparent digestibility (ileal and overall) of nutrients and endogenous nitrogen losses in growing pigs fed wheat (var. Soissons) or its by-products without or with xylanase supplementation. Livest Prod Sci. 2000; 62:119-32

41.

Liu X, Lee SI, Kim IH. Achyranthes japonica extracts supplementation to growing pigs positively influences growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial shedding, and fecal gas emission. Anim Biosci. 2021; 34:427-33

42.

Yoon SY, Yang YX, Shinde PL, Choi JY, Kim JS, Kim YW, et al. Effects of mannanase and distillers dried grain with solubles on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass characteristics of grower-finisher pigs. J Anim Sci. 2010; 88:181-91

43.

Tan C, Zhai Z, Ni X, Wang H, Ji Y, Tang T, et al. Metabolomic profiles reveal potential factors that correlate with lactation performance in sow milk. Sci Rep. 2018; 8:10712

44.

Yang Y, Hu CJ, Zhao X, Xiao K, Deng M, Zhang L, et al. Dietary energy sources during late gestation and lactation of sows: effects on performance, glucolipid metabolism, oxidative status of sows, and their offspring. J Anim Sci. 2019; 97:4608-18

45.

Fan Z, Xiao Y, Chen Y, Wu X, Zhang G, Wang Q, et al. Effects of catechins on litter size, reproductive performance and antioxidative status in gestating sows. Anim Nutr. 2015; 1:271-5

46.

Olofsson EM, Marklund SL, Karlsson K, Brännström T, Behndig A. In vitro glucose-induced cataract in copper-zinc superoxide dismutase null mice. Exp Eye Res. 2005; 81:639-46

47.

Waisundara VY. Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of Scutellaria baicalensis and its constituents in diabetic rats. [Ph.D. dissertation], Singapore: National University of Singapore. 2010

48.

Michiels J, De Vos M, Missotten J, Ovyn A, De Smet S, Van Ginneken C. Maturation of digestive function is retarded and plasma antioxidant capacity lowered in fully weaned low birth weight piglets. Br J Nutr. 2012; 109:65-75

49.

Wen YF, Zhao JQ, Bhadauria M, Nirala SK. Baicalin prevents cadmium induced hepatic cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and histomorphometric alterations. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2013; 65:189-96

50.

Wang J, Zhu H, Zhang C, Wang H, Yang Z. Baicalein ameliorates cadmium-induced hepatic and renal oxidative damage in rats. Indian J Anim Res. 2019; 53:523-7