Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Study on the rumen fermentation, growth performance and carcass characteristics according to the supplementation of lupin flake in Hanwoo steers

Kyung-Hwan Um1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-6963, Byung-Ki Park1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5469-2012
1Department of Animal Science, Kangwon National University, Chunchoen 24341, Korea
*Corresponding author Byung-Ki Park, Department of Animal Science, Kangwon National University, Chunchoen 24341, Korea. Tel: +82-33-250-8697, E-mail: animalpark@kangwon.ac.kr

© Copyright 2022 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 02, 2022; Revised: Sep 27, 2022; Accepted: Sep 27, 2022

Published Online: Nov 30, 2022

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the rumen fermentation dynamics of lupin flakes and elucidate the effects of lupin flake supplementation on the growth performance, blood metabolites, and carcass characteristics of Hanwoo steers. In vitro and in situ trials of lupin grains and lupin flakes were conducted using three Hanwoo cows with rumen fistulas. The feeding trial included 40 early-fattening Hanwoo steers randomly divided into four groups: control, T1, T2, and T3. Their formula feed contained 0%, 3%, 6%, and 9% lupin flakes, respectively. In vitro rumen pH and ammonia concentrations were lower in the lupin flake group than in the lupin grain group after 6 and 24 h of incubation, respectively (p < 0.05). Concentrations of propionate, butyrate, and total volatile fatty acids were higher in the lupin flake group than in the lupin grain group after 12 h of incubation (p < 0.05), as was the crude protein disappearance rate at 9 and 12 h of rumen fermentation (p < 0.05). Supplementation with lupin flakes did not affect the average daily gain. Compared to that in the control group, dry matter intake was lower in the lupin flake–supplemented groups (p < 0.05); the feed conversion ratio was lower in T2 and T3 (p < 0.05); and plasma total protein concentration in 29-month-old steers was lower in T1 and T3 (p < 0.05). Plasma triglyceride concentration was lower in the lupin flake–supplemented groups than in the control group (p < 0.05). The incidence rate of yield grade A was higher in T1 and T2 than in the control group; the incidence rate of meat quality 1+ grade or higher was highest in T2. The carcass auction price was higher in T2 than in the other groups. Overall, compared to whole lupin grains, lupin flakes seem to more substantially affect rumen ammonia concentrations and crude protein disappearance rate. Additionally, we suggest that supplementation with 6% lupin flake formula feed exerts positive effects on the feed conversion ratio, yield grade, and quality grade of Hanwoo steers.

Keywords: Lupin flake; Rumen fermentation characteristics; Hanwoo steers; Growth performance; Carcass characteristics

INTRODUCTION

In Korea, interest in high-energy and high-protein feed is increasing to shorten the rearing period and decrease the production costs associated with Hanwoo steers [13]. In general, a difference exists in the supply of energy and protein according to the fattening stages of Hanwoo steers [3]. Recently, the Korean government decided to limit the crude protein content of the formula feed for early and late-fattening stages, to a maximum of 17% and 15%, respectively, to supply adequate protein for each fattening stage. The government plans to reduce the methane gas generation from Hanwoo steers by restricting the protein in the formula feeds [4]. In response, the need for raw material feed with a high protein content has increased.

Lupin has a high protein content [5], which varies from 32% to 40% depending on the processing method [6]. In addition, lupin contains tocopherol, lutein, α-carotene, β-carotene, and various polyphenols and is used as a raw material for food and livestock feed worldwide [79].

Previous studies [10,11] have reported that lupin-rich feeds improve digestibility, apparent metabolizable energy (AME), and average daily gain (ADG) in poultry. In swine feed, the supplementation level of lupin can be as high as 35%, owing to its excellent palatability [12]. However, the ADG is reported to decrease if the lupin supplementation level is >15% in swine feed [13]. Furthermore, lupin does not cause acidosis in beef cattle because of its low starch content [14]. The rumen by-pass protein and fiber contents of lupin were ≥ 30% and 39%, respectively. However, the digestibility of lupin is high (approximately 90%) because of its low lignin content (less than 1%) [15]. Lupin exerts a buffering effect on the rumen pH [16,17], and it has been reported that lupin has a highly effective protein degradability. Additionally, it has been shown that lupin promotes protein absorption because of its high content of β-conglutin, a protein that is easily decomposed as it lacks disulfide bonds [18,19]. Furthermore, previous studies [16] have reported that roughage intake was decreased in treatment fed lupin-supplemented formula feed, reducing feed costs.

A study [20] reviewed the shortening of the fattening period and the optimal nutritional level for Hanwoo steers. Lupin has been used as a high-energy, and high-protein source in various livestock feeds [21]; however, the optimal supplementation level of lupins in formula feed for beef cattle (especially Hanwoo steers) has not been previously determined. Thus, this study was conducted to determine the effects of the rumen fermentation characteristics of lupin flakes and supplementation with lupin flakes on the growth performance, blood metabolites, and carcass characteristics of Hanwoo steers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals, experimental materials, treatments, and management

This study was approved by the Kangwon National University Animal Experimental Ethics Committee (approval number: KW-200820-2). Three Hanwoo cows (423.0 ± 44.8 kg), each implanted with a ruminal fistula, were used. The experimental materials (lupins) were divided into whole grains and flakes, crushed with a Wiley mill (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) equipped with a 2 mm screen. Lupin flakes were supplied by Suni lupin (Seoul, Korea). The production conditions for lupin flakes were as follows: 100°C (chamber temperature), 3–4 mm (thickness). And the production yield were 100 tons/hour. The cows were raised in three pens (one cow per pen), and provided the formula feed and roughage twice daily at 09:00 and 18:00. The chemical compositions of the experimental diets are listed in Table 1. The cows had free access to water and mineral blocks. Other feeding management procedures were conducted according to the practices of the experimental farm.

Table 1. Chemical composition of lupin grains, lupin flakes, and experimental diets (DM basis)
Item Lupin grain Lupin flake Formula feed Rye grass
Dry matter (%) 89.22 ± 0.45 90.40 ± 0.42 90.73 ± 0.35 67.84 ± 0.46
Crude protein (%) 36.21 ± 1.11 35.84 ± 0.87 15.08 ± 0.14 13.48 ± 0.06
Ether extract (%) 6.29 ± 0.02 6.28 ± 0.02 3.06 ± 0.07 2.78 ± 0.01
Crude fiber (%) 13.39 ± 0.22 13.54 ± 0.14 3.87 ± 0.55 35.18 ± 0.16
NDF (%) 27.26 ± 0.71 26.32 ± 0.26 47.87 ± 0.91 59.80 ± 0.27
ADF (%) 21.03 ± 0.44 20.94 ± 0.58 10.40 ± 0.63 38.00 ± 0.16
TDN (%) 94.08 ± 1.28 94.57 ± 2.21 75.40 ± 0.35 63.80 ± 0.29

DM, dry matter; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; TDN, total digestible nutrients (calculated values).

Download Excel Table

A total of 40 early-fattening Hanwoo steers, each weighing 444.3 ± 32.9 kg, were randomly divided into the following four groups: control, T1, T2, and T3. They received unsupplemented, 3% lupin flake–supplemented, 6% lupin flake–supplemented, and 9% lupin flake–supplemented formula feeds, respectively. The steers were raised in eight pens (five steers per pen) and were given the formula feed and roughage three times daily at 08:30, 13:00, and 17:00. The ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets are listed in Table 2. The steers had free access to water and mineral blocks. Other feeding management procedures were conducted according to the practices of the experimental farm.

Table 2. The ingredient and chemical compositions of experimental diets
Item Treatment1) Rice straw
Control T1 T2 T3
Ingredient composition
 Concentrated feed2) (%) 30.0 22.0 19.0 17.0 -
 Lupin flake (%) - 3.0 6.0 9.0 -
 Corn flake (%) 25.0 27.3 30.0 31.0 -
 Corn gluten feed (%) 21.0 20.0 20.0 19.0 -
 Corn starch pulp (%) 9.5 11.0 8.2 6.0 -
 Ground almond hull (%) 8.0 10.0 10.0 11.0 -
 Cane molasses (%) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 -
 Limestone (%) 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 -
 Salt dehydrate (%) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 -
 Sodium bicarbonate (%) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 -
 Vitamin-mineral mix3) (%) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 -
Chemical composition (DM basis)
 Dry matter (%) 88.88 ± 0.21 88.93 ± 0.17 89.25 ± 0.20 89.33 ± 0.04 88.15 ± 0.58
 Crude protein (%) 15.58 ± 0.42 15.57 ± 0.05 15.59 ± 0.30 15.55 ± 0.24 6.44 ± 0.14
 Ether extract (%) 4.12 ± 0.31 4.31 ± 0.58 4.78 ± 0.35 4.62 ± 0.24 1.52 ± 0.03
 Crude fiber (%) 10.02 ± 0.47 9.16 ± 0.58 7.74 ± 0.71 9.35 ± 0.86 36.83 ± 0.52
 NDF (%) 29.97 ± 0.61 33.73 ± 1.57 37.39 ± 0.85 38.88 ± 0.66 70.41 ± 0.34
 ADF (%) 12.28 ± 0.58 12.43 ± 1.01 11.02 ± 0.33 10.80 ± 0.55 45.79 ± 0.79
 Ca (%) 0.70 ± 0.02 0.70 ± 0.03 0.70 ± 0.01 0.80 ± 0.02 0.20 ± 0.01
 P (%) 0.50 ± 0.01 0.50 ± 0.01 0.40 ± 0.01 0.40 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.01
 TDN (%) 82.46 ± 0.21 84.31 ± 0.17 85.21 ± 0.18 85.58 ± 0.04 44.3 ± 0.05

Contorl, 0% lupin flake-supplemented formula feed; T1, 3% lupin flake-supplemented formula feed; T2, 6% lupin flake-supplemented formula feed; T3, 9% lupin flake-supplemented formula feed.

Concentrated feed contained the following percentage of ingredients: corn, 23.5%; cane molasses, 4.0%; cassava residue, 6.0%; wheat bran, 12.5%; corn gluten feed, 12.5%; soybean meal, 10.0%; rapeseed meal, 7.0%; coconut meal, 11%; palm kernel meal, 10%; animal fat, 0.3%, salt dehydrate, 0.7%; limestone, 1.9%; sodium bicarbonate, 0.5%, vitamin-mineral premix, 0.1%.

Vitamin-mineral premix provided the following quantities of vitamins and minerals per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 10,000 IU; vitamin D3, 1,500 IU; vitamin E, 25 IU; Fe, 50 mg; Cu, 7 mg; Zn, 30 mg; Mn, 24 mg; I, 0.6 mg; Co, 0.15 mg; Se, 0.15mg.

DM, dry matter; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; TDN, total digestible nutrients (calculated values).

Download Excel Table
Evaluation of in vitro rumen fermentation

Ruminal fluid was collected from the ruminal fistula of Hanwoo cows before feeding in the morning and filtered through four layers of cheese cloth, before being stored at 39°C in a thermos flask. After that, O2-free CO2 gas was infused for 30 s to eliminate air. The collected ruminal fluid was transferred to the laboratory and allowed to stand for 1 h in an incubator at 39°C to eliminate feed particles, and was used as an inoculum for in vitro incubation.

In vitro cultures were established by adding 400 mL of rumen inoculum to 1,596 mL of previously prepared artificial saliva (i.e., buffer solutions A: 1,330 mL and B 266 mL) following McDougall’s method [22]. Table 3 shows the composition of buffer solutions A and B.

Table 3. Composition of in vitro buffer solution
Item g/L
Buffer solution A
 KH2PO4 10.0
 MgSO4·7H2O 0.5
 NaCl 0.5
 CaCl2·2H2O 0.1
 Urea (regent grade) 0.5
Buffer solution B
 Na2CO3 15.0
 Na2S·9H2O 1.0
Download Excel Table

In total, 70 mL of the prepared in vitro culture solution was placed in a 100 mL bottle (4 oz glass bottle) containing 2 g of ground lupin grains and lupin flakes, and O2-free CO2 gas was infused for 5 s to eliminate air from the culture bottle. The bottles were then incubated for 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 h in a shaking incubator (HB- 201SLI, Hanbaek Scientific, Bucheon, Korea) at 39°C.

The in vitro ruminal pH was measured using a pH meter (Corning 445, Corning, NY, USA) in a 100 mL bottle for each incubation time. To analyze ammonia concentration, after centrifugation (3,000×g, 15 min, 4°C) of 10 mL of rumen fluid collected at each incubation time, 5 mL of the supernatant and 0.05 mL of HgCl2 were mixed and centrifuged again (3,000×g, 15 min, 4°C). One milliliter of the supernatant was collected, and the ammonia concentration was analyzed according to the method of Chaney and Marbach [23].

To analyze the volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, 10 mL of the culture solution was collected in a 100 mL bottle for each incubation time. This was followed by the addition of 1 mL of 20% HPO3 and 0.5 mL of saturated HgCl2, and centrifugation at 1,250×g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then collected, and the VFA concentration was measured by gas chromatography (6890N, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Evaluation of in situ rumen disappearances

Experiments were performed by collecting nylon bags at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 h after a 14 d feed adaptation period in Hanwoo equipped with rumen fistulas. In detail, five grams of sample was placed in a nylon bag (ANKOM 5 × 10 concentrate bags), and were inserted into the rumen via a fistula before feeding in the morning. The nylon bag was washed until the water ran clear and dried in a 70°C forced air drying oven for 72 h. The dried samples were weighed and used to calculate dry matter disappearance rates. The samples were ground to a particle size of 1.0 mm, and their chemical composition was analyzed to determine the disappearance of crude protein, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF).

Evaluation of growth performance and blood metabolites

ADG was calculated by measuring body weight at the beginning and end of the experimental period. Feed intake was calculated by measuring the quantity of residual feed before feeding in the morning. The feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated based on dry matter intake (DMI) and ADG values.

Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein of the steers before feeding in the morning, using a 10 mL vacutainer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). To analyze the metabolites in the blood, heparinized blood samples were centrifuged at 2,000×g for 15 min to separate the plasma. Plasma metabolites were analyzed using an automatic blood analyzer (Hitachi 7020, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The following plasma parameters were analyzed: glucose (GLU), non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), albumin (ALB), total protein (TP), cholesterol (CHOL), triglyceride (TG), creatinine (CREA), calcium (Ca), inorganic phosphorus (IP), and magnesium (Mg).

Evaluation of carcass characteristics

All steers were slaughtered at a local slaughterhouse. Carcass yield (carcass weight, back-fat thickness, and rib-eye area) and quality grades (marbling score, meat color, fat color, texture, and maturity) were examined according to the criteria of the Korean carcass grading system [24]. Each carcass was chilled for 24 h, and the weight of the cold carcass was measured. Next, the left side of each carcass was cut between the thirteenth rib and the first lumbar vertebrae, and used to determine the quality grade.

The quality grade was determined by assessing the degree of marbling and firmness in the cut surface of the rib-eye based on the maturity, meat color, and fat color of the carcass. According to the Korean beef quality grading system, quality grades were evaluated as follows: 1++ (excellent quality), 1+, 1, 2, and 3 (low quality). The rib-eye area was measured from the longissimus muscle at the thirteenth rib. Back-fat thickness was measured at the thirteenth rib. The yield index was calculated as follows: [(11.06398–1.25149 × back-fat thickness (mm)] + [0.28293 × rib-eye area (cm2)] + [0.56781 × carcass weight (kg)] / [carcass weight (kg) ×100]. Yield grades were classified according to the Korean beef yield grading system as A (high yield), B, and C (low yield) based on the yield index (grade A ≥ 67.20, grade 67.20 > B ≥ 63.30, and grade C < 63.30). The score was determined using a color standard [24]. The texture and maturity scores were calculated using the KIAPQE reference index [24]. The marbling scores were graded on a scale of 1 to 9, with higher numbers indicating better quality (1 = devoid, 9 = abundant). Additional scores included those for meat color (1 = bright red, 7 = dark red), fat color (1 = creamy white, 7 = yellowish), and texture (1 = soft, 3 = firm).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses to obtain the average values and standard differences were performed using the IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) software. Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used to calculate the average value for each treatment group. One-way ANOVA was performed using Duncan’s multiple range test [25]. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

In vitro rumen fermentation and in situ disappearance rates

Table 4 shows the changes in pH and ammonia concentration in the in vitro rumen fluid of lupin grain and lupin flake. The pH was lower in lupin flake than in lupin grain at all incubation times, except at hour 3 (p < 0.05). The ammonia concentration was higher in lupin flake than in lupin grain at 24 and 48 h of incubation (p < 0.05).

Table 4. Changes in in vitro ruminal pH and ammonia concentrations according to flaking treatment for lupin
Item Time (h) Lupin grain Lupin flake p-value
pH 0 6.73 ± 0.01 6.74 ± 0.01 0.10
3 6.14 ± 0.01 6.12 ± 0.01 0.07
6 5.45 ± 0.01a 5.03 ± 0.01b 0.01
9 5.14 ± 0.01a 4.78 ± 0.01b 0.01
12 5.03 ± 0.01a 4.74 ± 0.01b 0.01
24 4.86 ± 0.01a 4.51 ± 0.01b 0.01
48 4.75 ± 0.01a 4.32 ± 0.01b 0.01
NH3-N (mg/dL) 0 22.75 ± 1.15a 18.05 ± 0.22b 0.01
3 34.34 ± 1.26 34.74 ± 1.23 0.88
6 36.98 ± 2.31 36.92 ± 2.46 0.94
9 40.20 ± 2.26 41.83 ± 2.14 0.45
12 43.21 ± 1.66 44.88 ± 1.56 0.56
24 44.88 ± 3.19b 52.73 ± 1.45a 0.03
48 56.25 ± 3.68b 62.24 ± 2.58a 0.01

Means followed by different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Download Excel Table

Table 5 shows the changes in the concentration of VFAs in the in vitro rumen fluid of lupin grain and lupin flake. Acetate concentrations were higher in lupin flake than lupin grain after 24 h of incubation (p < 0.05). Concentrations of propionate, butyrate, and total VFA were higher in lupin flake than in lupin grain after 12 h of culture (p < 0.05).

Table 5. Changes in in vitro ruminal volatile fatty acid concentrations according to flaking treatment for lupin
Item Time (hr) Lupin grain Lupin flake p-value
Acetate (mg/dL) 0 64.08 ± 6.24 62.35 ± 5.26 0.78
3 127.96 ± 1.45 123.44 ± 13.61 0.67
6 158.31 ± 21.62 152.99 ± 16.62 0.80
9 169.59 ± 12.71 193.36 ± 1.22 0.06
12 177.76 ± 7.48 199.67 ± 10.59 0.08
24 194.87 ± 1.10b 249.04 ± 6.70a 0.01
48 223.87 ± 4.16b 282.48 ± 7.57a 0.01
Propionate (mg/dL) 0 25.37 ± 1.99 25.34 ± 1.32 0.99
3 69.20 ± 0.70 70.82 ± 6.55 0.75
6 96.67 ± 6.37 103.47 ± 10.43 0.48
9 111.52 ± 6.37b 140.72 ± 3.08a 0.01
12 120.17 ± 4.93b 154.94 ± 8.19a 0.01
24 121.13 ± 4.48b 168.96 ± 1.44a 0.01
48 137.02 ± 2.21b 176.58 ± 4.83a 0.01
Butyrate (mg/dL) 0 10.92 ± 0.90 9.97 ± 1.14 0.41
3 17.34 ± 0.05 18.64 ± 1.76 0.35
6 20.47 ± 0.45 23.26 ± 2.42 0.19
9 22.97 ± 1.35b 28.77 ± 0.93a 0.01
12 25.79 ± 0.99b 30.99 ± 1.47a 0.01
24 31.60 ± 0.35b 41.80 ± 0.66a 0.01
48 36.09 ± 0.62b 45.91 ± 1.20a 0.01
Total-VFA (mg/dL) 0 100.37 ± 9.10 97.67 ± 7.23 0.76
3 214.49 ± 1.54 212.89 ± 21.83 0.92
6 275.45 ± 28.14 279.71 ± 28.80 0.89
9 304.08 ± 19.56b 362.85 ± 4.99a 0.02
12 323.73 ± 13.40b 385.59 ± 20.25a 0.02
24 347.60 ± 3.84b 459.80 ± 7.21a 0.01
48 396.98 ± 6.83b 504.96 ± 13.23a 0.01

Means followed by different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Download Excel Table

Table 6 shows the changes in the disappearance rates of dry matter, crude protein, NDF, and ADF of lupin grain and lupin flake in the rumen. The disappearance rates of dry matter were slightly, but not significantly, higher in lupin flake than in lupin grain at all incubation times. Furthermore, the disappearance rates of crude protein were higher in lupin flake than in lupin grain at hours 9 and 12 (p < 0.05). The disappearance rates of NDF were higher in lupin flake than in lupin grain until hour 9 (p < 0.05). The rates of ADF were also slightly, but not significantly, higher in lupin flake than in lupin grain.

Table 6. Changes in ruminal nutrients disappearance rates according to flaking treatment for lupin
Item Time (hr) Lupin grain Lupin flake p-value
DM (%) 0 41.76 ± 7.54 47.05 ± 6.78 0.19
3 50.65 ± 7.19 55.20 ± 6.80 0.25
6 54.07 ± 8.28 56.22 ± 3.24 0.56
9 56.18 ± 6.37 61.12 ± 3.10 0.13
12 58.85 ± 12.35 65.70 ± 6.49 0.24
24 69.98 ± 9.19 71.46 ± 4.21 0.75
48 83.79 ± 9.21 84.77 ± 2.97 0.93
CP (%) 0 60.91 ± 1.42 58.56 ± 2.26 0.28
3 61.36 ± 0.31 61.40 ± 0.53 0.92
6 63.96 ± 1.78 66.41 ± 0.29 0.13
9 65.77 ± 0.63b 70.97 ± 1.04a 0.01
12 66.28 ± 0.20b 77.81 ± 0.61a 0.01
24 78.72 ± 2.14 79.17 ± 0.19 0.78
48 90.11 ± 0.34 90.71 ± 0.12 0.08
NDF (%) 0 50.95 ± 6.76 47.50 ± 0.67 0.51
3 54.78 ± 0.14b 57.60 ± 0.58a 0.01
6 62.24 ± 0.20b 63.90 ± 0.52a 0.01
9 68.54 ± 1.14b 70.98 ± 0.36a 0.04
12 72.57 ± 2.50 73.33 ± 0.98 0.71
24 80.63 ± 0.31 78.11 ± 1.29 0.06
48 89.90 ± 0.61 90.15 ± 1.88 0.87
ADF (%) 0 39.49 ± 9.68 46.27 ± 8.70 0.19
3 50.90 ± 9.23 56.74 ± 8.73 0.24
6 55.29 ± 10.63 58.05 ± 8.73 0.56
9 58.00 ± 8.18 64.33 ± 3.99 0.13
12 61.42 ± 15.6 70.22 ± 8.33 0.10
24 75.71 ± 11.80 77.61 ± 5.40 0.23
48 86.22 ± 10.91 93.31 ± 2.44 0.25

Means followed by different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).

DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber.

Download Excel Table
Growth performance and plasma parameters

Table 7 shows the effects of lupin flake-supplemented formula feed on the growth performance of Hanwoo steers. Lupin flake supplementation did not affect the ADG of Hanwoo steers. Formula feed and total digestible nutrient (TDN) intake were higher in lupin flake-supplemented groups than in the control group (p < 0.05). Rice straw and DMI were lower in the lupin flake-supplemented groups than in the control group (p < 0.05). The FCR was slightly, but not significantly, lower in the T2 and T3 groups than in the control group.

Table 7. Effect of lupin flakes on growth performance of Hanwoo steers
Item Control T1 T2 T3 p-value
Body weight (kg)
 16 months of age 447.0 ± 40.6 443.5 ± 31.6 445.2 ± 39.1 441.4 ± 22.5 0.99
 19 months of age 555.6 ± 49.5 551.9 ± 41.1 560.5 ± 41.8 553.9 ± 42.6 0.95
 26 months of age 692.4 ± 39.1 698.3 ± 39.2 718.5 ± 42.8 738.0 ± 64.1 0.15
 29 months of age 759.8 ± 43.91 745.5 ± 34.76 755.3 ± 62.28 760.6 ± 87.23 0.87
 ADG (whole period) 0.74 ± 0.06 0.72 ± 0.05 0.74 ± 0.08 0.76 ± 0.19 0.88
Intake (dry matter kg/steer/day)
 Concentrate 7.98 ± 0.03b 8.18 ± 0.04a 8.23 ± 0.04a 8.25 ± 0.06a 0.05
 Rice straw 1.63 ± 0.02a 1.11 ± 0.04b 1.02 ± 0.02b 0.98 ± 0.07b 0.05
 DMI 9.60 ± 0.04a 9.29 ± 0.04b 9.26 ± 0.04b 9.21 ± 0.11b 0.04
 Crude protein 1.30 ± 0.01 1.31 ± 0.01 1.32 ± 0.01 1.32 ± 0.01 0.07
 TDN 7.30 ± 0.02c 7.39 ± 0.02b 7.47 ± 0.01a 7.48 ± 0.07a 0.01
 Feed conversion ratio 12.98 ± 0.05 12.91 ± 0.05 12.51 ± 0.03 12.11 ± 0.15 0.08

Means followed by different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).

ADG, average daily gain (16 to 29 months of age); DMI, dry matter intake; TDN, total digestible nutrients.

Download Excel Table

Fig. 1 shows the effects of lupin flake-supplemented formula feed on the blood metabolites of Hanwoo steers. The plasma NEFA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations were lower in the T2 group than in the control group at 19 months of age (p < 0.05), and the plasma BUN concentration increased with the supplementation level of lupin flake at 19 months of age (p < 0.05). The plasma TP concentrations were lower in the T1 and T3 groups than at 29 months of age (p < 0.05). The triglyceride and IP concentrations were lower in the lupin flake-supplemented groups than at 29 months of age (p < 0.05). Plasma glucose, NEFA, BUN, and ALT concentrations were not significantly different between the treatments at 29 months.

jast-64-6-1077-g1
Fig. 1. Effect of lupin flakes on blood chemical values of Hanwoo steers
Download Original Figure

Table 8 shows the effects of lupin flake-supplemented formula feed on the carcass characteristics of Hanwoo steers. The yield index showed a tendency to improve in the T1 and T2 groups compared to the control groups, and the incidence rate of yield grade A tended to improve in the T1 and T2 groups compared to the control groups. The marbling score was slightly, but not significantly, higher in the lupin flake-supplemented groups than in the control group. The incidence rate of meat quality 1++ grade was higher in the lupin flake-supplemented groups than in the control group, and the incidence rate of meat quality 1+ grade or higher was the highest in the T2 group. The highest carcass auction price was found in the 6% lupin flake-supplemented group.

Table 8. Effect of lupin flakes on carcass characteristics of Hanwoo steers
Item Control T1 T2 T3 p-value
Yield traits1)
 Carcass weight (kg) 444.1 ± 28.8 447.8 ± 23.2 453.2 ± 33.1 458.1 ± 53.5 0.86
 Rib-eye area (cm2) 88.70 ± 5.64 94.90 ± 5.36 89.80 ± 8.77 93.00 ± 12.00 0.39
 Back-fat thickness (mm) 9.70 ± 2.45 9.00 ± 3.35 9.20 ± 4.12 11.60 ± 3.17 0.34
 Yield index 62.21 ± 0.93 62.74 ± 0.95 62.33 ± 1.49 61.85 ± 1.50 0.51
 Yield grade (A : B : C, %) 50 : 50 : 0 80 : 20 : 0 70 : 20 : 10 30 : 50 : 20 -
Quality traits2)
 Marbling score 4.60 ± 1.11 4.90 ± 1.64 5.40 ± 1.36 5.40 ± 2.11 0.65
 Meat color 4.90 ± 0.30 4.80 ± 0.60 4.70 ± 0.46 5.00 ± 0.45 0.56
 Fat color 3.00 ± 0.00 3.00 ± 0.00 3.00 ± 0.00 3.00 ± 0.00 1.00
 Texture 1.70 ± 0.78 2.20 ± 1.17 1.40 ± 0.49 2.30 ± 1.10 0.15
 Maturity 3.00 ± 0.00 2.90 ± 0.30 2.90 ± 0.30 3.00 ± 0.45 0.81
 Quality grade (1++ : 1+ : 1 : 2, %) 0 : 30 : 50 : 20 10 : 30 : 40 : 20 10 : 60 : 20 : 10 30 : 20 : 30 : 20 -
Carcass auction price 20,216 ± 2,906 20,911 ± 2,658 21,177 ± 2,559 20,432 ± 2,746 0.85

Area was measured from longissimus muscle taken at 13th rib and back-fat thickness was also measured at 13th rib; Yield index was calculated using the following equation: 68.184 - (0.625 × back-fat thickness (mm)) + (0.130 × rib eye area (cm2)) − (0.024 × dressed weight amount (kg)); Carcass yield grades from C (low yield) to A (high yield).

Grading ranges are 1 to 9 for marbling score with higher numbers for better quality (1 = devoid, 9 = abundant); meat color (1 = bright red, 7 = dark red); fat color (1 = creamy white, 7 = yellowish); texture (1 = soft, 3 = firm); quality grades from 3 (low quality) to 1++ (very high quality).

Download Excel Table

DISCUSSION

In vitro rumen fermentation and in situ disappearance rates

Flaking is a processing method that increases the digestibility of grains through physical shape change and gelatinization of grains, and is used for processing grains such as corn, lupin, sorghum, barley, and wheat [26]. The rumen pH is lowered because of the influence of VFAs and organic acids produced during the fermentation of feed by microorganisms [27]. Cho et al. [28] reported similar results, showing that the in vitro rumen pH of processed lupin was lower, whereas the ammonia concentration was higher than that of lupin grain. Therefore, similar to previous studies [28], it is considered that rumen pH is decreased, but ammonia concentration is increased by flaking lupin in this study.

Nowak and Wylegala [19] reported similar results, showing that the acetate concentration of in vitro rumen fluid was higher in processed (e.g., heated, ground, etc.) lupin than in lupin grains. In addition, the increase in digestibility because of gelatinization following flaking is also considered to be the cause of acetate concentration in the rumen fluid of those with the lupin flake diet. Nonstructural carbohydrates, such as starch, are converted to lactic acid and propionate by rumen microbes thereby affecting rumen pH [29,30]. Propionate is absorbed through the rumen wall and used as an energy source after converting GLU in the liver [31]. In this study, propionate and butyrate concentrations were higher in lupin flake than in lupin grain, which is considered to be the because of the increase in digestibility from the flaking treatment (Table 5).

Similar to the results of this study, Zaman et al. [32] reported that the by-pass rate of lupin in the rumen was about 30%, and the disappearance rates of dry matter of lupin grain and lupin flake after 24 h of fermentation were 69.98 and 71.46%, respectively. In addition, in a previous study [28] and in this study, the higher disappearance rate of lupin flake compared to lupin grain is considered to be because of the flaking treatment. Moreover, in this study, the disappearance rates of crude protein and NDF were higher in lupin flake than in lupin grain. This is related to the phenomenon of increased disappearance of dry matter because of the flaking treatment for lupin.

Growth performance and plasma parameters

Vicenti et al. [33] and Sami et al. [34] reported a result similar to the one in this study, suggesting that using lupin-supplemented formula feed reduced feed intake for the fattening period. Kwak and Kim [35] reported similar results, indicating that the supplementation of lupin up to 15% in the formula feed did not affect the growth performance of Hanwoo steers. Similarly, Ahn et al. [36] reported that high-energy formula feed did not affect the ADG of late-fattening Hanwoo steers. Meanwhile, previous studies [33,34,37] have reported that ADG decreased with lupin supplementation. Conversely, some previous studies [38, 39] have reported that ADG was increased by supplementation with lupin. Robinson and McNiven [40] reported that the contents of rumen degradable proteins in lupin were higher than those in soybean meal. The protein composition of lupin is inferior to that of soybean meal [33]. In addition, lupin did not markedly improve ADG, potentially because it does not contain glutamic acid or sulfur-containing amino acids, such as methionine and cystine [41]. Thus, in the results of this study, it is thought that the supplementation of lupin flake had no effect on the ADG of Hanwoo steers and the difference in energy level had no effect on the ADG of Hanwoo steers.

Lovati et al. [42] reported that γ-conglutin in lupin exerts plasma glucose-lowering effects in ruminants. In this study, the plasma glucose concentration showed a tendency to decrease with the supplementation of lupin flakes, but this indicated that lupin did not markedly affect the plasma glucose concentrations. This might have occurred because of variations in the concentrations of γ-conglutin, depending on the processing method and supplementation level of lupin [43].

In ruminants, it is known as an indicator of body energy levels [44]. It is known that the higher the concentration of NEFA in the blood, the greater the decomposition of body fat [45]. Lestingi et al. [46] reported that supplementation of lupin increased the blood NEFA concentration of beef cattle. However, in this study, only the NEFA concentration temporarily increased because of decreased energy intake in the early fattening period in the lupin flake-unsupplemented group; nevertheless, it is considered that the effect of lupin flakeis small on the plasma NEFA concentration of Hanwoo steers.

Plasma albumin accounts for 60% of the total plasma protein, whereas globulin-based proteins account for 40% of the total plasma protein. Plasma TP concentrations illustrate protein metabolism and systemic nutritional status [47]. Previous studies have reported that supplementation with lupin upregulated plasma TP concentrations in pigs [41]. Consistent with the findings of this study, Lestingi et al. [46,48] reported that supplementation with lupin did not affect plasma TP concentrations. In this study, the plasma TP concentrations decreased with the supplementation of lupin flakecompared to the lupin flake-unsupplemented group at 29 months of age. Therefore, we consider that the decrease in the plasma TP concentration according to the supplementation of lupin flakemay be related to the decrease in the concentration of plasma albumin.

Spielmann et al. [49] reported that proteins in lupin decreased the plasma concentration of triglycerides by downregulating the expression of the sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c in the liver, similarly to the results of this study.

Because the blood mineral concentration is maintained at a constant level, compared to other blood metabolites, it has been reported that it is possible to diagnose the nutritional status of livestock even with a small change in concentration [50]. Plasma IP is an important component of cells and is involved in energy metabolism, muscle contraction, oxygen supply, maintenance of body fluid pH, and the activation of vitamins and enzymes [51]. In this study, the plasma IP concentration at 29 months of age was decreased by supplementation with lupin flakes, which is considered to be caused by the decrease in feed intake in the lupin flake-supplemented groups.

Jeon et al. [1] reported that high-energy formula feed had not effects on carcass weight, rib-eye area, back-fat thickness and meat quality. King [52] reported that lupin increased back-fat thickness in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, supplementation with lupin flake did not significantly affect back-fat thickness in this study, which is similar to the findings of Kwak and Kim [35]. Dawson [53] reported that lupin flake supplementation did not affect the marbling score. In contrast, Vicenti et al. [33] reported that the combination of lupin and soybean increased the marbling score. In the present study, although the overall effect of lupin flake supplementation on the individual carcass characteristics of Hanwoo steers was small, we consider that the 6% lupin flake-supplemented formula feed had positive effects on the yield and quality grade of Hanwoo steers.

CONCLUSION

Overall, lupin flake had positive effects on ammonia and crude protein disappearance rates without negative effects on VFA concentrations in the rumen. In addition, we suggest that the supplementation of 6% lupin flake to formula feed had a positive effect on feed conversion ratio, yield grade and quality grade in Hanwoo steers.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This study was supported by 2021 Research Grant from Kangwon National University.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Park BK.

Data curation: Um KH.

Formal analysis: Um KH.

Methodology: Park BK.

Software: Park BK.

Validation: Park BK.

Investigation: Um KH.

Writing - original draft: Um KH.

Writing - review & editing: Um KH, Park BK.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Animal Experimental Ethics Committee of the Kangwon National University, Korea (approval number: KW-200820-2), and the management and experimental procedures of the experiment animals complied with the regulations of the Animal Experimental Ethics Committee.

REFERENCES

1.

Jeon S, Lee M, Seo J, Kim JH, Kam DK, Seo S. High-level dietary crude protein decreased backfat thickness and increased carcass yield score in finishing Hanwoo beef cattle (Bos taurus coreanae). J Anim Sci Technol. 2021; 63:1064-75

2.

Chae YW, Yun JW, Kim SS. Economic analysis on the technology to shorten the raising term for Korean cattle-based on the results of empirical farm that manufactures and feeds his own TMR feed. J Korea Acad Ind Coop Soc. 2020; 21:833-42

3.

Chung KY, Lee SH, Cho SH, Kwon EG, Lee JH. Current situation and future prospects for beef production in South Korea: a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018; 31:951-60

4.

MAFRA [Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affair]. Standards and specifications of feed, etc. in accordance with the feed management method. Sejong: MAFRA. 2021

5.

Bertoglio JC, Calvo MA, Hancke JL, Burgos RA, Riva A, Morazzoni P, et al. Hypoglycemic effect of lupin seed γ-conglutin in experimental animals and healthy human subjects. Fitoterapia. 2011; 82:933-8

6.

Sujak A, Kotlarz A, Strobel W. Compositional and nutritional evaluation of several lupin seeds. Food Chem. 2006; 98:711-9

7.

Boschin G, Arnoldi A. Legumes are valuable sources of tocopherols. Food Chem. 2011; 127:1199-203

8.

Wang S, Errington S, Yap HH. Studies on carotenoids from lupin seeds. In: ‘Lupins for Health and Wealth’ Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference. 2008 Canterbury, New Zealand.

9.

Elbandy M, Rho JR. New flavone-di-C-glycosides from the seeds of Egyptian lupin (Lupinus termis). Phytochem Lett. 2014; 9:127-31

10.

Kocher A, Choct M, Hughes RJ, Broz J. Effect of food enzymes on utilisation of lupin carbohydrates by broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2000; 41:75-82

11.

Brenes A, Marquardt RR, Guenter W, Viveros A. Effect of enzyme addition on the performance and gastrointestinal tract size of chicks fed lupin seed and their fractions. Poult Sci. 2002; 81:670-8

12.

Kim JC, Pluske JR, Mullan BP. Nutritive value of yellow lupins (Lupinus luteus L.) for weaner pigs. Aust J Exp Agric. 2008; 48:1225-31

13.

van Barneveld RJ. Understanding the nutritional chemistry of lupin (Lupinus spp.) seed to improve livestock production efficiency. Nutr Res Rev. 1999; 12:203-30

14.

White CL, Staines VE, Staines MH. A review of the nutritional value of lupins for dairy cows. Aust J Agric Res. 2007; 58:185-202

15.

Petterson DS. The use of lupins in feeding systems - review -. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2000; 13:861-82

16.

Park HO. Nutritional and feed value of lupine seeds. Feed. 2005; 4:55-63

17.

Guemes-Vera N, Martinez-Herrera J, Hernandez-Chavez JF, Yanez-Fernandez J, Totosaus A. Comparison of chemical composition and protein digestibility, carotenoids, tanins and alkaloids content of wild lupinus varieties flour. Pak J Nutr. 2012; 11:774-80

18.

Aufrère J, Graviou D, Melcion JP, Demarquilly C. Degradation in the rumen of lupin (Lupinus albus L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed proteins: effect of heat treatment. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2001; 92:215-36

19.

Nowak W, Wylegala S. The effect of rapeseed oil on the ruminal degradability and intestinal protein digestibility of rapeseed meal, soyabean and lupin seed. J Anim Feed Sci. 2005; 14:295-8

20.

Jeong J, Seong NI, Hwang IK, Lee SB, Yu MS, Nam IS, et al. Effects of level of CP and TDN in the concentrate supplement on growth performances and carcass characteristics in Hanwoo steers during final fattening period. J Anim Sci Technol. 2010; 52:305-12

21.

Nalle CL, Ravindran V, Ravindran G. Nutritional value of narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) for broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2011; 52:775-81

22.

McDougall EI. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochem J. 1948; 43:99-109

23.

Chaney AL, Marbach EP. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem. 1962; 8:130-2

24.

KIAPQE [Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation]. Animal products grading statistical yearbook [Internet]. KIAPQE. 2019[cited 2020 Dec 29]https://www.law.go.kr/%ED%96%89%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99/%EC%B6%95%EC%82%B0%EB%AC%BC%20%EB%93%B1%EA%B8%89%ED%8C%90%EC%A0%95%20%EC%84%B8%EB%B6%80%EA%B8%B0%EC%A4%80

25.

Duncan DB. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 1955; 11:1-42

26.

Chuck-Hernandez C, Perez-Carrillo E, Serna-Saldivar SO. Production of bioethanol from steam-flaked sorghum and maize. J Cereal Sci. 2009; 50:131-7

27.

Cooper R, Milton T, Klopfenstein TJ, Clark D. Economic evaluation of corn processing for finishing cattle. In: Nebraska beef cattle reports. Lincoln, NE. 2001; p p. 51-4

28.

Cho YB, Kim EJ, Lee HG, Song BC, Maeng WJ. A study on the fermentation characteristics and on fermentation control of processed grain and meal in the rumen: II. a study on the fermentation control of processed corn, lupin seed and soybean in the rumen. Korean J Anim Nutr Feedstuffs. 1994; 18:292-6

29.

Keles G, Demirci U. The effect of homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on conservation characteristics of baled triticale–Hungarian vetch silage and lamb performance. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2011; 164:21-8

30.

Nishino N, Wada H, Yoshida M, Shiota H. Microbial counts, fermentation products, and aerobic stability of whole crop corn and a total mixed ration ensiled with and without inoculation of Lactobacillus casei or Lactobacillus buchneri. J Dairy Sci. 2004; 87:2563-70

31.

Bauman DE, Davis CL, Bucholtz HF. Propionate production in the rumen of cows fed either a control or high-grain, low-fiber diet. J Dairy Sci. 1971; 54:1282-7

32.

Zaman MS, McNiven MA, Grimmelt B, MacLeod JA. Effects of roasting of lupins (Lupinus albus) and high protein variety of soybeans (AC Proteus) on chemical composition and in situ dry matter and nitrogen disappearance in dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1995; 51:329-35

33.

Vicenti A, Toteda F, Di Turi L, Cocca C, Perrucci M, Melodia L, et al. Use of sweet lupin (Lupinus albus L. var. Multitalia) in feeding for Podolian young bulls and influence on productive performances and meat quality traits. Meat Sci. 2009; 82:247-51

34.

Sami AS, Schuster M, Schwarz FJ. Performance, carcass characteristics and chemical composition of beef affected by lupine seed, rapeseed meal and soybean meal. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2010; 94:465-73

35.

Kwak BO, Kim C. The effect of different flaked lupin seed inclusion levels on the growth of growing Korean native bulls. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2001; 14:1129-32

36.

Ahn JS, Son GH, Kim MJ, Choi CS, Lee CW, Park JK, et al. Effect of total digestible nutrients level of concentrates on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat composition of Korean Hanwoo steers. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019; 39:388-401

37.

Tracy VA, Barton BA, Anderson GW, Williams MS. Comparison of sweet white lupin seeds with soybean oil meal as a protein supplement for sheep. J Anim Sci. 1988; 66:499

38.

Bayourthe C, Moncoulon R, Enjalbert F. Effect of extruded lupin seeds as a protein source on lactational performance of dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1998; 72:121-31

39.

Ephrem N, Tegegne F, Mekuriaw Y, Yeheyis L. Nutrient intake, digestibility and growth performance of Washera lambs supplemented with graded levels of sweet blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) seed. Small Rumin Res. 2015; 130:101-7

40.

Robinson PH, McNiven MA. Nutritive value of raw and roasted sweet white lupins (Lupinus albus) for lactating dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1993; 43:275-90

41.

Prandini A, Morlacchini M, Moschini M, Fusconi G, Masoero F, Piva G. Raw and extruded pea (Pisum sativum) and lupin (Lupinus albus var. Multitalia) seeds as protein sources in weaned piglets’ diets: effect on growth rate and blood parameters. Ital J Anim Sci. 2005; 4:385-94

42.

Lovati MR, Manzoni C, Castiglioni S, Parolari A, Magni C, Duranti M. Lupin seed γ-conglutin lowers blood glucose in hyperglycaemic rats and increases glucose consumption of HepG2 cells. Br J Nutr. 2012; 107:67-73

43.

Mane SP, Johnson SK, Duranti M, Pareek VK, Utikar RP. Lupin seed γ-conglutin: extraction and purification methods: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2018; 73:1-11

44.

Wathes DC, Cheng Z, Bourne N, Taylor VJ, Coffey MP, Brotherstone S. Differences between primiparous and multiparous dairy cows in the inter-relationships between metabolic traits, milk yield and body condition score in the periparturient period. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2007; 33:203-25

45.

Sun F, Cao Y, Cai C, Li S, Yu C, Yao J. Regulation of nutritional metabolism in transition dairy cows: energy homeostasis and health in response to post-ruminal choline and methionine. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11e0160659

46.

Lestingi A, Facciolongo AM, Caputi Jambrenghi A, Ragni M, Toteda F. The use of peas and sweet lupin seeds alone or in association for fattening lambs: effects on performance, blood parameters and meat quality. Small Rumin Res. 2016; 143:15-23

47.

Steiger M, Senn M, Altreuther G, Werling D, Sutter F, Kreuzer M, et al. Effect of a prolonged low-dose lipopolysaccharide infusion on feed intake and metabolism in heifers. J Anim Sci. 1999; 77:2523-32

48.

Lestingi A, Toteda F, Vicenti A, De Marzo D, Facciolongo AM. The use of faba bean and sweet lupin seeds alone or in combination for growing lambs, 1. Effects on growth performance, carcass traits, and blood parameters. Pak J Zool. 2015; 47:989-96

49.

Spielmann J, Shukla A, Brandsch C, Hirche F, Stangl GI, Eder K. Dietary lupin protein lowers triglyceride concentrations in liver and plasma in rats by reducing hepatic gene expression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c. Ann Nutr Metab. 2007; 51:387-92

50.

Ndlovu T, Chimonyo M, Okoh AI, Muchenje V, Dzama K, Raats JG. Assessing the nutritional status of beef cattle: current practices and future prospects. Afr J Biotechnol. 2007; 6:2727-34

51.

Soetan KO, Olaiya CO, Oyewole OE. The importance of mineral elements for humans, domestic animals and plants: a review. Afr J Food Sci. 2010; 4:200-22

52.

King RH. Lupin-seed meal (Lupinus albus cv. Hamburg) as a source of protein for growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1981; 6:285-96

53.

Dawson LER. The effect of inclusion of lupins/triticale whole crop silage in the diet of winter finishing beef cattle on their performance and meat quality at two levels of concentrates. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2012; 171:75-84