Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Genome-wide association studies on collagen contents trait for meat quality in Hanwoo

KyeongHye Won1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8112-2840, Dohyun Kim1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5421-9073, Inho Hwang3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2474-2733, Hak-Kyo Lee1,2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-1081, Jae-Don Oh1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7756-1330
1Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
2Department of Agricultural Convergence Technology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
3Department of Animal Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea

# These authors contributed equally to this work.

*Corresponding author: Jae-Don Oh, Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea. Tel: +82-63-270-5931, E-mail: oh5ow@naver.com

© Copyright 2023 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 26, 2022; Revised: Nov 17, 2022; Accepted: Nov 19, 2022

Published Online: Mar 31, 2023

Abstract

Beef consumers valued meat quality traits such as texture, tenderness, juiciness, flavor, and meat color that determining consumers’ purchasing decision. Most research on meat quality has focused on marbling, a key characteristic related to meat eating quality. However, other important traits such as meat texture, tenderness, and color have not much studied in cattle. Among these traits, meat tenderness and texture of cattle are among the most important factors affecting quality evaluation of consumers. Collagen is the main component of connective tissues.It greatly affects meat tenderness. The objective of this study was to determine significant variants and candidate genes associated with collagen contents trait (total collagen) through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Phenotypic and genomic data from 135 Hanwoo were used. The BLUPF90 family program and GRAMMAR method for GWAS were applied in this study. A total of 73 potential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) showed significant associations with collagen content. They were located in or near 108 candidate genes. TMEM135 and ME3 genes were identified to have the most significant SNPs associated with collagen contents trait. Data indicated that these genes were related to collagen. Biological processes and pathways for the prediction of biological functions of candidate genes were confirmed. We found that candidate genes were involved in positive regulation of CREB transcription factor activity and actin cytoskeleton related to tenderness and texture of beef. Three genes (CRTC3, MYO1C and MYLK4) belonging to these biological functions were related to tenderness. These results provide a basis for improving genomic characteristics of Hanwoo for the production of tender beef. Furthermore, they could be used they could be used as an index to select desired traits for consumers.

Keywords: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS); Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs); Collagen; Meat quality; Tenderness; Hanwoo

INTRODUCTION

Korean beef consumers prefer Hanwoo cattle meat because of its tenderness and excellent flavor [1,2]. In addition, consumers have considered meat quality such as tenderness, texture, juiciness, flavor and meat color as important factors affecting their purchasing decisions. Recently, consumers prefer tender meat to fatty meat. Among various meat traits, tenderness and texture of cattle are among the most important factors affecting the quality evaluation of consumers [35].

Most beef researches have focused on increasing marbling related to fat, a key characteristic associated with meat eating quality. On the other hand, tenderness in cattle has not been much studied. Increasing meat quality by increasing fat consumes a lot of production costs due to long feeding periods and expensive feed costs. This causes production of a large amount of methane gas that contributes to global warming, which is also related to the environment. Therefore, it is necessary to produce tender beef with a short-term of breeding.

Collagen is an abundant connective tissue protein. It is a contributing factor to meat tenderness and texture. Collagen also plays important roles in quality of cooked meat. Collagen fibers shrink when heated, resulting in loss of fluid and less tender meat. They also serve to hold muscle fibers together after contraction. Post-mortem degradation of collagen and the use of collagenases appear to play a role in providing desired tenderness and texture by altering connective tissue structure. Collagen is very important for maintaining an acceptable texture [68].

Meat sensory characteristics such as tenderness, flavor, juiciness, and color are important meat quality parameters affected by biological characteristics and proteolytic activities of muscles. Biological characteristics of muscles such as collagen, fiber type, and intramuscular adipose tissue can regulate meat tenderness and flavor. They are known to be influenced by genetic and nurturing factors [912].

Advances in genotyping technologies have made it possible to identify many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) distributed throughout the whole genome. This further deepens the search for genomic insights into complex traits [13]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) enables the detection of specific markers, genomic regions, and candidate genes associated with economically important traits. They have been conducted in livestock using high-density panels to enable large-scale genotyping [14].

Thus, the objective of this study was to detect significant variants and candidate genes associated with collagen contents trait (total collagen) using GWAS. Furthermore, this study will ultimately contribute to the the production of tender beef with short feeding periods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and phenotypic data

A total of 135 cattle of the Hanwoo (steers, n = 103; bull, n = 5; and cow, n = 27) were used in this study. Hanwoo were raised in the same feeding condition and slaughtered in Jeollabuk-do Province. After slaughter, their longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles were sampled and cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks. These muscle samples were vacuum-packed and stored at 4°C until 41 days postmortem [15].

Total collagen contents in each the sample was determined using the colorimetric method of Kolar [16] with suitable modifications. Briefly, 2 g of each sample was hydrolyzed with 7N H2SO4 at 105°C for 16 h. The hydrolysate was diluted with distilled water to 500 mL and filtered. Filter a part of the mixture into 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask, the filtrate is stable at least 2 weeks at 4°C. About 2 mL of diluted filtrate was taken and added with chloramine T solution into a tube and left at room temperature for 20 min. Thereafter, a 4-dimethylamino benzaldehyde solution was added and the mixture was heated at 60°C for 15 min. Absorbance values of samples and hydroxyproline standard were measured at 558 nm using a spectrophotometer. A standard calibration curve was plotted for 4-hydroxyproline and a regression line was drawn. Collagen content was expressed in mg/100 g sample after converting hydroxyproline into collagen with a conversion factor of 7.14. For insoluble (or heat stable) collagen contents, homogenized samples in Ringer’s solution [17] were heated at 77°C for 70 min, followed by centrifugation. Residual fractions were hydrolyzed in 7N H2SO4 for 16 h at 105°C. The hydroxyproline content of the hydrolysate was determined after neutralization according to the procedure of Kolar. The soluble collagen content was calculated based on the difference between total and insoluble collagen contents [18].

Genotypic data and quality control

A total of 135 Hanwoo, consisting of steers (n = 103), bulls (n = 5), and cows (n = 27) were genotyped using a Bovine SNP50k chip (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). A total of 52,195 SNPs were collected. We performed the process of quality control (QC) based on the following criteria to ensure the quality of genotypic data obtained: i) removing individuals with identical genotype using identity by state (IBS) distance test (> 0.99), ii) eliminating individuals with call rates less than 90%, iii) removing SNPs with minor allele frequency less than 1%, iv) filtering out SNPs with call rates less than 90%, and v) removing SNPs with significant departure from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (p < 10−7). These procedures were implemented with PLINK v1.07 [19] (Fig. 1).

jast-65-2-311-g1
Fig. 1. Flow chart related to GWAS analysis using genomic and phenotypic data. IBS, identity by state; QC, quality control; GWAS, genome-wide association studies; GWAS, genome-wide association studies; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; QQ, quantile-quantile.
Download Original Figure
Statistical analysis

BLUPF90 is, a software that comprises a family of program in Fortran 90/95 for mixed model computations in animal breeding [20]. It was used to estimate variance components and genetic parameters of collagen contents trait and residuals that were difference between the actual phenotype value and the estimated value in order to identify only genetic effects. First, QC data were renumbered and variance was estimated using RENUMF90. Second, we estimated variance components and genetic parameter using AIREMLF90 [21]. Third, we performed RENUMF90 analysis one more time to improve the accuracy of analysis using the estimated variance components and genetic parameters. Finally, these various components were then used to identify residuals. These procedures were performed using a multiple-trait model. Using the multiple-trait model, we estimated the variance component and genetic parameters of the collagen contents traits. The equation was as follows:

Y = X β + Za + e ;

Where Y was the vector of phenotypic observations for total collagen, heat insoluble collagen, or soluble collagen contents; β was the vector of fixed effects including contemporary group effects, time of slaughtering (year, month), time of age at slaughter (month, days, age) and sex (cow, bull, steer) as a linear covariate; a was the vector of direct additive effects; e was the vector of residual random effects; X was the incidence matrix relating the phenotypes to the fixed effects; and Z was the incidence matrix relating the animal to the phenotype [22].

Using genome-wide rapid association using mixed model and regression (GRAMMAR) [23] in PLINK and the residuals obtained, we estimated SNP effect that affected collagen contents trait in the meat of Hanwoo (Fig. 1).

Identification of significant SNPs and annotation of candidate genes

We obtained significant SNPs associated with the phenotype based on p- < 0.001. Candidate genes associated with significant SNPs were annotated within 500 kb downstream and upstream of detected SNPs based on the Bos taurus transfer format (GTF) (version ARS-UCD1.2.104) in Ensembl database.

Functional analysis

We performed Gene Ontology (GO) [24] and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [25] pathway analyses to investigate functions of candidate genes using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) [26].

RESULTS

Phenotypes and genotypes

We identified 129 individuals after removing six (ID: 002311515862, 002311652670, 002300057089, 002085007947, 002114973907 and 002112336318) out of 135 individuals by IBS distance test and outlier. We identified basic statistics for phenotypic data of 129 Hanwoo after QC. The estimates for collagen contents traits were on average 0.362, 0.250 and 0.114 respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. The basic statistics for phenotypic data
Traits N Min Max Mean SD
Total collagen (TC) 129 0.140 1.500 0.362 0.216
Heat insoluble collagen (HC) 129 0.030 1.310 0.250 0.194
Soluble collagen (SC) 129 −0.020 0.310 0.114 0.069
Download Excel Table

Through the QC test, 5,715 SNPs out of 52,195 SNPs were removed and 46,480 SNPs associated with collagen contents trait were finally used for GWAS analysis. We confirmed the difference in the number of available SNPs per chromosome and the interval size (kb) of each autosome of autosuomes 1 to 29 before and after QC. We identified the number of SNPs considered useful for Hanwoo per chromosome, ranging from a minimum of 799 to a maximum of 2,909. About 89.1% of total SNPs were selected as available SNPs. The average distance of adjacent SNPs for each chromosome was 54.343 kb (Table 2).

Table 2. The number of available SNPs and average interval distance between adjacent SNPs in Bovine SNP50k chip
BTA Number of SNPs Remove frequency (%) Mean of Interval SNP
Before QC After QC Before QC After QC
1 3,225 2,909 0.902 49.037 54.365
2 2,756 2,444 0.887 49.614 55.94
3 2,582 2,280 0.883 46.937 53.157
4 2,479 2,214 0.893 48.678 54.507
5 2,156 1,912 0.887 56.185 63.359
6 3,158 2,820 0.893 37.698 42.218
7 2,481 2,250 0.907 45.316 49.971
8 2,246 2,011 0.895 50.339 56.224
9 2,077 1,858 0.895 50.802 56.793
10 2,357 2,085 0.885 44.216 49.987
11 2,181 1,915 0.878 49.164 55.997
12 1,651 1,427 0.864 55.118 63.776
13 1,684 1,521 0.903 49.829 55.173
14 2,274 1,965 0.864 36.583 42.338
15 1,681 1,486 0.884 50.437 57.06
16 1,599 1,420 0.888 50.947 57.374
17 1,567 1,386 0.884 47.84 54.07
18 1,303 1,167 0.896 50.231 55.883
19 1,380 1,243 0.901 46.078 51.16
20 1,571 1,388 0.884 45.602 51.618
21 1,398 1,255 0.898 50.893 56.697
22 1,212 1,085 0.895 50.55 56.472
23 1,124 1,019 0.907 46.505 51.175
24 1,230 1,108 0.901 50.745 56.137
25 939 847 0.902 45.633 50.596
26 1,032 922 0.893 49.511 55.324
27 918 823 0.897 49.435 55.149
28 905 799 0.883 51.126 57.873
29 1,029 921 0.895 50.084 55.546
Total 52,195 46,480 0.891 48.453 54.343

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; QC, quality control.

Download Excel Table
GWAS analysis

We identified residuals using BLUPF90 for GWAS analysis. These residuals were differences between observed and estimated phenotypic values. In the total collagen contents trait, the observed value was 0.180 and the estimated value was 0.594. Thus, the residual value was the lowest at −0.414 (ID: 002083966119). Observed and estimated values were 1.500 and 0.625, respectively. The residual value was the highest at 0.875 (ID: 002083963503) (Table 3).

Table 3. The basic statistics for results of BLUPF90 analysis
Statistics N Min Max Range Mean Median SE VAR SD Coef.var
TC_observation 129 −0.209 1.5 1.709 0.359 0.31 0.019 0.049 0.221 0.615
TC_estimation 129 0.059 0.696 0.637 0.361 0.344 0.012 0.019 0.139 0.385
TC_residual 129 −0.414 0.875 1.289 0 −0.015 0.015 0.027 0.165 2.05E+17

VAR, variance; Coef.var, coefficient of variation.

Download Excel Table

The quantile-quantile (QQ) plot and inflation control (lambda) value were used to compare observed distributions of −log10(p) to the expected distribution under the no association model for total collagen contents trait (Fig. 2). The QQ plot for trait showed that the mixed linear model fitted the data well. Estimates of SNP effects associated with total collagen contents trait were within a range of −0.273 to 0.438 (Fig. 3).

jast-65-2-311-g2
Fig. 2. The QQ-plot for the studied total collagen contents trait. The dotted line represents the 95% concentration band under the null hypothesis no association between trait and SNPs. The green dots represent the p-values. QQ, quantile-quantile; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Download Original Figure
jast-65-2-311-g3
Fig. 3. The Manhattan plot of SNP effects for GWAS analysis using GRAMMAR methods in PLINK. SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; GWAS, genome-wide association studies.
Download Original Figure
Identification of significant SNPs and annotation of candidate genes

We prepared a Manhattan plot of −log10(p) for genomic positions of SNP markers using p-value from the SNP effect result to confirm the significant SNP associated with total collagen contents trait. Based on p < 0.001, a total of 73 SNPs were significantly associated with the trait (Fig. 4 and Table 4). A total of 108 candidate genes associated with significant SNPs were annotated based on Bos taurus genome. The most significant SNP was confirmed to be UA-IFASA-8514 (chr29:8936383) in Transmembrane protein 135 (TMEM135) and Malic Enzyme 3 (ME3) genes.

Table 4. Significant SNPs (total collagen)
SNP_id SNP (MinorA/ MajorB) Chr Genomic position Estimate SE p-value −LogP nAA nAB nBB σ2 (SNP)/ σ2 (trait) Gene_name
Hapmap38956-BTA-43309 [C/A] 1 97,366,225 0.1576 0.0440 0.0005 3.3186 1 10 119 0.0804 SLC7A14
ARS-BFGL-NGS-535 [G/A] 1 109,221,369 −0.0636 0.0185 0.0008 3.1119 27 52 51 0.0719 MFSD1, RSRC1
rs383007308 [A/G] 1 131,149,414 0.1204 0.0340 0.0006 3.2490 1 22 107 0.0893 ESYT3
ARS-BFGL-NGS-109828 [G/A] 2 77,033,601 0.1496 0.0415 0.0004 3.3557 1 13 116 0.0894 CNTNAP5
rs110414144 [A/C] 2 113,584,292 0.0834 0.0245 0.0009 3.0467 5 48 77 0.0886 DOCK10, NYAP2
3:101365765 [C/A] 3 101,365,765 0.1330 0.0337 0.0001 3.8871 1 22 107 0.1090 ZSWIM5, TMEM53
rs456169856 [A/G] 3 106,866,376 0.1053 0.0299 0.0006 3.2230 3 22 105 0.0783 MACF1
BTB-01834875 [G/A] 3 46,721,234 −0.0763 0.0215 0.0005 3.2758 11 47 72 0.0834 DPYD, PTBP2
ARS-BFGL-NGS-13158 [C/G] 3 19,337,220 0.0790 0.0228 0.0007 3.1439 8 48 74 0.0851 POGZ
BTB-00157833 [G/A] 3 111,842,741 0.0711 0.0198 0.0005 3.3249 19 57 54 0.0861 CSMD2
rs381136948 [A/C] 3 112,012,156 0.1779 0.0419 4.E-05 4.3832 1 11 118 0.1105 CSMD2, GIGYF2
Hapmap57254-rs29022776 [A/G] 3 113,433,557 0.0763 0.0218 0.0006 3.1947 12 62 56 0.0947 MROH2A
rs385230778 [A/G] 3 115,009,419 0.1587 0.0419 0.0002 3.6379 2 7 121 0.0750 AGAP1
ARS-BFGL-NGS-118221 [A/C] 5 90,684,739 0.0998 0.0276 0.0004 3.3663 2 40 88 0.1028 PLEKHA5
Hapmap41631-BTA-75177 [A/G] 5 114,405,063 0.0685 0.0199 0.0008 3.1054 16 45 69 0.0720 EFCAB6
ARS-BFGL-NGS-11339 [A/G] 4 45,128,142 0.3496 0.0689 1.E-06 5.8765 0 5 125 0.1695 RELN, LHFPL3
BTB-00182993 [C/A] 4 45,513,003 0.4383 0.0746 3.E-08 7.4631 0 4 126 0.2139 RELN, LHFPL3
BTA-70441-no-rs [G/A] 4 45,602,047 0.2001 0.0544 0.0003 3.4599 0 9 121 0.0984 RELN, LHFPL3, ENSBTAG00000048818
ARS-BFGL-NGS-110196 [G/A] 4 81,109,721 −0.0970 0.0262 0.0003 3.4935 4 33 93 0.0919 SUGCT, POU6F2
Hapmap23877-BTA-143906 [A/C] 6 36,829,725 0.1503 0.0435 0.0007 3.1284 0 16 114 0.0959 HERC6, NCAPG
BTB-01265106 [A/C] 6 116,779,750 0.2034 0.0514 0.0001 3.8972 0 11 119 0.1232 ZFYVE28, FGFR3
BTB-00348139 [A/G] 8 52,645,428 0.1334 0.0369 0.0004 3.3626 0 22 108 0.1013 PCSK5
ARS-BFGL-NGS-66538 [A/G] 8 64,011,227 −0.1006 0.0297 0.0009 3.0301 2 29 99 0.0825 GABBR2, COL15A1
ARS-BFGL-NGS-34771 [A/G] 8 21,943,761 0.1775 0.0513 0.0007 3.1288 1 6 123 0.0691 ENSBTAG00000053368
BTB-00960162 [A/G] 7 83,915,853 0.1482 0.0400 0.0003 3.5092 0 18 112 0.1040 VCAN, EDIL3
rs443739156 [C/A] 11 30,840,950 0.1851 0.0495 0.0003 3.5511 0 11 119 0.1021 STON1, FSHR
ARS-BFGL-NGS-83866 [A/G] 11 30,851,124 0.2519 0.0562 2.E-05 4.7918 0 8 122 0.1391 STON1, FSHR
BTB-01944534 [A/G] 11 30,826,527 0.1851 0.0495 0.0003 3.5511 0 11 119 0.1021 FSHR
ARS-BFGL-NGS-2573 [A/G] 11 101,602,103 0.3742 0.0908 0.0001 4.1669 0 3 127 0.1174 ABL1, PRRC2B, MED27
ARS-BFGL-NGS-94862 [G/A] 11 103,534,103 0.3660 0.0911 0.0001 3.9978 0 3 127 0.1123 NACC2
BTA-62308-no-rs [G/A] 10 29,176,267 0.2134 0.0542 0.0001 3.8626 0 9 120 0.1127 AVEN, FMN1
ARS-BFGL-NGS-3005 [C/A] 10 81,981,544 0.1212 0.0329 0.0003 3.4729 2 19 109 0.0871 SYNJ2BP
BTA-60292-no-rs [A/G] 10 7,308,238 0.1575 0.0370 4.E-05 4.3893 1 16 113 0.1175 CERT1, IQGAP2
ARS-BFGL-NGS-118392 [G/A] 10 84,632,536 0.1263 0.0364 0.0007 3.1479 1 18 111 0.0833 DPF3, PSEN1, MIDEAS
Hapmap41972-BTA-79298 [A/G] 10 85,547,284 0.1577 0.0311 1.E-06 5.8690 3 15 112 0.1357 LIN52, YLPM1
Hapmap39952-BTA-86345 [C/A] 10 99,626,471 0.0730 0.0202 0.0004 3.3565 28 69 33 0.0978 SPATA7
Hapmap44561-BTA-72345 [G/A] 10 60,168,183 0.1684 0.0492 0.0008 3.0779 1 7 122 0.0697 TRPM7, ATP8B4
ARS-BFGL-NGS-110504 [A/C] 10 70,556,929 0.1485 0.0383 0.0002 3.7812 1 15 114 0.0991 PSMA3
ARS-BFGL-NGS-116012 [G/A] 10 71,266,946 0.1678 0.0411 0.0001 4.0971 1 12 115 0.1070 KIAA0586, JKAMP
BTB-00434096 [G/A] 10 71,082,204 0.1779 0.0419 4.E-05 4.3862 1 11 118 0.1105 DAAM1
ARS-BFGL-NGS-23163 [A/G] 10 71,835,260 0.1944 0.0445 3.E-05 4.5979 1 9 120 0.1126 RTN1, PCNX4
BTB-01203179 [A/G] 10 72,694,329 0.0909 0.0220 0.0001 4.2010 9 52 69 0.1195 LRRC9, SLC38A6
ARS-BFGL-NGS-69839 [G/A] 10 74,011,076 0.2210 0.0435 1.E-06 5.8897 1 9 120 0.1455 PRKCH, SYT16
rs378634523 [A/G] 10 76,078,820 0.0913 0.0237 0.0002 3.7395 6 45 79 0.1048 GPHB5, MTHFD1
ARS-BFGL-NGS-116025 [T/A] 10 79,496,312 0.1353 0.0286 6.E-06 5.2450 2 30 98 0.1530 GPHN, RAD51B
ARS-BFGL-NGS-101050 [G/A] 12 19,868,800 0.0917 0.0199 9.E-06 5.0292 21 67 42 0.1504 RNASEH2B
BTA-21437-no-rs [C/A] 12 43,601,825 0.0932 0.0205 1.E-05 4.8732 14 51 60 0.1379 KLHL1
Hapmap45915-BTA-22734 [A/T] 12 46,867,626 0.0742 0.0212 0.0006 3.2022 12 48 70 0.0811 DACH1
Hapmap51092-BTA-93283 [A/G] 12 3,172,154 −0.0684 0.0197 0.0007 3.1424 19 54 57 0.0786 DIAPH3
ARS-BFGL-NGS-43617 [A/G] 15 35,138,494 0.1610 0.0463 0.0007 3.1627 0 13 117 0.0905 SERGEF, PLEKHA7
ARS-BFGL-NGS-118358 [G/A] 15 42,960,757 0.1453 0.0353 0.0001 4.1554 0 24 105 0.1310 SBF2, SWAP70, DENND5A
Hapmap40712-BTA-33406 [A/G] 13 67,101,174 0.1238 0.0365 0.0009 3.0383 1 18 111 0.0800 KIAA1755, PPP1R16B
ARS-BFGL-NGS-115847 [A/G] 14 40,458,050 0.2866 0.0805 0.0005 3.2804 0 4 125 0.0922 ZFHX4
ARS-BFGL-NGS-116702 [A/G] 16 79,720,573 0.1447 0.0411 0.0006 3.2188 0 17 113 0.0941 IGFN1, PPP1R12B
BTA-40408-no-rs [G/C] 17 17,408,409 −0.2725 0.0805 0.0010 3.0203 0 4 126 0.0827 RNF150, MAML3
ARS-BFGL-NGS-98331 [A/G] 21 22,057,989 0.1534 0.0421 0.0004 3.4121 0 16 114 0.0999 CRTC3, SLC28A1
Hapmap42198-BTA-39980 [G/A] 18 41,617,350 −0.0790 0.0200 0.0001 3.8824 30 68 32 0.1145 ZNF536
ARS-BFGL-NGS-111273 [A/G] 19 37,699,961 −0.0877 0.0258 0.0009 3.0501 4 40 86 0.0850 PHB, CALCOCO2, SKAP1
Hapmap60163-rs29015084 [G/A] 19 22,120,443 0.0910 0.0252 0.0004 3.3654 4 45 81 0.0988 MYO1C
ARS-BFGL-NGS-32460 [G/A] 19 40,716,234 0.0721 0.0209 0.0007 3.1266 14 56 60 0.0835 TNS4
BTB-00885986 [A/C] 24 31,423,445 −0.0754 0.0188 0.0001 3.9739 31 60 39 0.1040 ZNF521
BTB-00885964 [C/A] 24 31,457,933 −0.0771 0.0189 0.0001 4.0891 31 61 38 0.1088 ZNF521
Hapmap49083-BTA-21452 [A/G] 24 32,171,355 0.0820 0.0199 0.0001 4.1832 16 53 61 0.1088 ZNF521
BTB-00830153 [A/G] 22 4,534,118 0.3169 0.0633 2.E-06 5.7484 0 6 124 0.1665 RBMS3
ARS-BFGL-NGS-103489 [A/G] 23 49,135,538 0.1671 0.0479 0.0007 3.1708 0 13 117 0.0975 FARS2, CDYL
ARS-BFGL-NGS-27800 [A/G] 23 50,897,089 0.1354 0.0369 0.0004 3.4454 1 17 112 0.0913 SLC22A23, MYLK4, GMDS
ARS-BFGL-NGS-108494 [A/G] 23 51,241,585 0.1951 0.0471 0.0001 4.2057 0 12 118 0.1232 SERPINB6, GMDS
ARS-BFGL-NGS-13891 [A/G] 23 51,487,543 0.2238 0.0571 0.0001 3.8431 0 8 122 0.1098 GMDS
ARS-BFGL-NGS-27911 [A/G] 26 35,048,102 0.1982 0.0483 0.0001 4.1410 1 7 122 0.0965 ABLIM1, ATRNL1
UA-IFASA-8514 [C/A] 29 8,936,383 0.2864 0.0482 3.E-08 7.5884 0 11 119 0.2443 TMEM135, ME3
Hapmap27205-BTA-156398 [A/G] 29 18,203,037 0.4084 0.0897 1.E-05 4.9151 0 3 127 0.1399 GAB2, RSF1
ARS-BFGL-NGS-92926 [C/A] 25 4,131,112 0.1035 0.0296 0.0007 3.1795 3 23 104 0.0780 HMOX2, ENSBTAG00000026383
ARS-BFGL-BAC-42642 [A/G] 25 35,532,374 0.1930 0.0493 0.0001 3.8300 0 12 118 0.1206 CUX1

SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; Chr, chromosome.

Download Excel Table
jast-65-2-311-g4
Fig. 4. The Manhattan plot of GWAS for total collagen contents trait with significance thresholds indicated at −log10P > 1 × 10−3. The orange dots represent significant SNPs associated with total collagen contents trait. GWAS, genome-wide association studies; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Download Original Figure
Functional analysis

We identified functions of candidate genes associated with total collagen contents trait from GO and KEGG analysis using DAVID (Tables 5 and 6). In biological process from GO, we confirmed eight gene ontologies: negative regulation of peptidyl-serine dephosphorylation (GO:1902309), negative regulation of ubiquitin-protein transferase activity (GO:0051444), receptor localization to synapse (GO:0097120), T cell receptor signaling pathway (GO:0050852), negative regulation of epidermal growth factor-activated receptor activity (GO:0007175), somite development (GO:0061053), positive regulation of CREB transcription factor activity (GO:0032793), and amino acid transmembrane transport (GO:0003333). In cellular component, we identified seven gene ontologies: cytosol (GO:0005829), nucleoplasm (GO:0005654), actin cytoskeleton (GO:0015629), perinuclear region of cytoplasm (GO:0048471), cytoplasm (GO:0005737), nuclear speck (GO:0016607), and cell projection (GO:0042995). Through KEGG analysis, we identified regulation of actin cytoskeleton (bta04810) pathway.

Table 5. The results of gene ontology (GO) analysis of candidate genes associated with total collagen contents trait from GWAS analysis
GO ID Description #Genes Fold enrichment p-value Gene name
Biological process
 GO:1902309 Negative regulation of peptidyl-serine dephosphorylation 2 181.846 0.011 PPP1R16B, SWAP70
 GO:0051444 Negative regulation of ubiquitin-protein transferase activity 2 51.956 0.037 ABL1, PSEN1
 GO:0097120 Receptor localization to synapse 2 40.410 0.048 RELN, SYNJ2BP
 GO:0050852 T cell receptor signaling pathway 3 7.577 0.059 ABL1, PSEN1, SKAP1
 GO:0007175 Negative regulation of epidermal growth factor-activated receptor activity 2 30.308 0.063 ZFYVE28, PSEN1
 GO:0061053 Somite development 2 25.978 0.074 RAD51B, MTHFD1
 GO:0032793 Positive regulation of CREB transcription factor activity 2 24.246 0.079 CRTC3, RELN
 GO:0003333 Amino acid transmembrane transport 2 20.205 0.094 SLC7A14, SLC38A6
Cellular component
 GO:0005829 Cytosol 25 1.881 0.002 CRTC3, CALCOCO2, SLC7A14, GPHN, SPATA7, GIGYF2, ZFYVE28, DOCK10, POGZ, ABL1, DENND5A, CERT1, HERC6, PRKCH, PLEKHA5, YLPM1, MED27, PLEKHA7, DAAM1, MTHFD1, DPYD, SERGEF, SLC28A1, SKAP1, RBMS3
 GO:0005654 Nucleoplasm 20 2.037 0.003 RNASEH2B, CRTC3, SLC7A14, PLEKHA5, RSF1, EFCAB6, PSEN1, MED27, PLEKHA7, SPATA7, DOCK10, MYO1C, CUX1, POGZ, DPF3, MAML3, SERGEF, CERT1, SKAP1, HERC6
 GO:0015629 Actin cytoskeleton 5 6.402 0.008 MACF1, ABLIM1, MYO1C, SWAP70, ABL1
 GO:0048471 Perinuclear region of cytoplasm 7 3.399 0.016 PPP1R16B, CALCOCO2, ABL1, PSEN1, SYNJ2BP, CERT1, FGFR3
 GO:0005737 Cytoplasm 27 1.547 0.017 MACF1, CRTC3, NCAPG, FMN1, IQGAP2, GPHN, FARS2, ABLIM1, DACH1, RELN, GMDS, RSRC1, RNF150, TNS4, GABBR2, PRKCH, SWAP70, KLHL1, GAB2, CDYL, SERPINB6, PSMA3, MYO1C, DPYD, PPP1R12B, SKAP1, GPHB5
 GO:0016607 Nuclear speck 6 3.853 0.019 PPP1R16B, RSRC1, YLPM1, MAML3, CDYL, SLC28A1
 GO:0042995 Cell projection 3 6.031 0.087 PPP1R16B, MACF1, STON1

GWAS, genome-wide association studies.

Download Excel Table
Table 6. The results of KEGG pathway analysis of candidate genes associated with total collagen contents trait from GWAS analysis
KEGG ID Description #Genes Fold enrichment p-value Gene name
bta04810 regulation of actin cytoskeleton 5 5.610 0.011 DIAPH3, IQGAP2, PPP1R12B, FGFR3, MYLK4

KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; GWAS, genome-wide association studies.

Download Excel Table

DISCUSSION

Meat tenderness of beef is one of the most important factors affecting meat quality evaluation of consumers [27]. The production of beef in consideration of a recent consumption pattern that favors tender meat with low fat is required. For this, it is necessary to produce tender meat with a short-term of breeding. This will make it possible to reduce production costs and protect the environment. We studied collagen contents that contribute to meat tenderness and texture for the production of tender meat. In particular, since collagen is greatly affected by genetics [28], it is thought to be suitable for use as a selection index to soft Hanwoo meat production through genomic analysis. Therefore, we conducted this study to detect significant SNPs and candidate genes associated with collagen contents trait using GWAS.

We identified a total of 73 significant SNPs and 108 candidate genes associated with total collagen contents trait. We identified TMEM135 and ME3 genes in which the most significant SNPs associated with collagen contents trait were located. TMEM135 gene was essential for collagen production and secretion in human cells [29]. In mouse hearts, forced overexpression TMEM135 can lead to collagen accumulation [30]. ME3 gene has beem found to be related to COL14A1, which plays a role in cross-linking collagen 1 and developing fibrous structure [31]. These collagen cross-links are regulated by myofibrillar protein and diverse gene expression related to muscle development. They determine meat tenderness [32]. Since we confirmed that these genes were related to collagen, we predicted that variants in these genes might affect meat tenderness of Hanwoo. We then predicted biological functions and pathways associated with candidate genes to find out how these genes were related to the collagen contents trait. In biological process of GO, we found that CRTC3 (Cyclic adenosine monophosphate [cAMP] -regulated transcriptional coactivator 3) and RELN genes were involved in positive regulation of CREB transcription factor activity (GO:0032793). CRTC3 is a coactivator of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) that mediates the function of protein kinase A (PKA) signaling pathway. It is involved in various biological processes including lipid and energy metabolism. In porcine, CRTC3 expression is related to fat deposition in vivo. Furthermore, CRTC3 overexpression can increase lipid accumulation and the expression of mature adipocyte-related genes in cultured porcine subcutaneous adipocytes [33]. Lipid accumulation affects meat production and meat quality such as tenderness, juiciness, and flavor [34]. The deposition of subcutaneous and visceral fat directly influences backfat thickness and growth efficiency, while intramuscular fat (IMF) content directly affects meat quality including the flavor, juiciness, tenderness, and fatty acid (FA) composition [35]. In cellular component of GO and KEGG pathway, we found that candidate genes were involved in actin cytoskeleton (GO:0015629) and regulation of actin cytoskeleton (bta04810). A previous study has revealed that actin cytoskeleton-related cell junction is associated with lipid metabolism to influence the deposition of IMF. IMF is one important factor that can influence meat quality. A certain amount of IMF can enhance meat quality traits such as the flavor, juiciness, water holding capacity, and tenderness [36]. MYO1C (Myosin IC) and MYLK4 (Myosin Light Chain Kinase Family Member 4) genes belonging to these biological functions and pathways wererelated to meat tenderness. MYO1C has specialized functions in certain cell types such as muscles. Some researchers have linked myosins to meat tenderness [37]. MYLK4 regulates yak muscle contraction via phosphorylating myosin light chain molecules. Such phosphorylation can positively impact meat tenderness [38].

Variants and genes identified in this study are expected to provide important information for genomic selection of phenotypes to improve meat quality of Hanwoo. Furthermore, they provide a basis for further studies on consumption traits.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019R1A2C1089807) and the AGENDA project (PJ01621803), Rural Development Administration, Korea.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Hwang I, Oh JD.

Data curation: Hwang I, Lee HK.

Formal analysis: Won KH.

Methodology: Hwang I, Oh JD.

Software: Won KH.

Validation: Kim D, Hwang I.

Investigation: Kim D.

Writing - original draft: Won KH.

Writing - review & editing: Won KH, Kim D, Hwang I, Lee HK, Oh JD.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with national and university guidelines. The animal protocol reported in this study was approved by the Jeonbuk National University Animal Ethics Committee in accordance with the guidelines of the Korean Council on Animal Care (CBNU 2015-048 revised in 2015).

REFERENCES

1.

Bulik-Sullivan BK, Loh PR, Finucane HK, Ripke S, Yang J. Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, et al. LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2015; 47:291-5

2.

Strucken EM, Al-Mamun HA, Esquivelzeta-Rabell C, Gondro C, Mwai OA, Gibson JP. Genetic tests for estimating dairy breed proportion and parentage assignment in East African crossbred cattle. Genet Sel Evol. 2017; 49:67

3.

O’Quinn TG, Legako JF, Brooks JC, Miller MF. Evaluation of the contribution of tenderness, juiciness, and flavor to the overall consumer beef eating experience. Transl Anim Sci. 2018; 2:26-36

4.

Liu J, Ellies-Oury MP, Stoyanchev T, Hocquette JF. Consumer perception of beef quality and how to control, improve and predict it? Focus on eating quality. Foods. 2022; 11:1732

5.

Bedhane M, van der Werf J, Gondro C, Duijvesteijn N, Lim D, Park B, et al. Genome-wide association study of meat quality traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using imputed whole-genome sequence data. Front Genet. 2019; 10:1235

6.

McCormick RJ. Extracellular modifications to muscle collagen: implications for meat quality. Poult Sci. 1999; 78:785-91

7.

Zhu Y, Gagaoua M, Mullen AM, Kelly AL, Sweeney T, Cafferky J, et al. A proteomic study for the discovery of beef tenderness biomarkers and prediction of Warner–Bratzler shear force measured on longissimus thoracis muscles of young Limousin-Sired bulls. Foods. 2021; 10:952

8.

Lepetit J. Collagen contribution to meat toughness: theoretical aspects. Meat Sci. 2008; 80:960-7

9.

Bernard C, Cassar-Malek I, Le Cunff M, Dubroeucq H, Renand G, Hocquette JF. New indicators of beef sensory quality revealed by expression of specific genes. J Agric Food Chem. 2007; 55:5229-37

10.

Maltin C, Balcerzak D, Tilley R, Delday M. Determinants of meat quality: tenderness. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003; 62:337-47

11.

Mullen AM, Stapleton PC, Corcoran D, Hamill RM, White A. Understanding meat quality through the application of genomic and proteomic approaches. Meat Sci. 2006; 74:3-16

12.

Taye M, Kim J, Yoon SH, Lee W, Hanotte O, Dessie T, et al. Whole genome scan reveals the genetic signature of African Ankole cattle breed and potential for higher quality beef. BMC Genet. 2017; 18:11

13.

Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001; 157:1819-29

14.

Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10:381-91

15.

Lee SH, Kim CN, Ko KB, Park SP, Kim HK, Kim JM, et al. Comparisons of beef fatty acid and amino acid characteristics between Jeju black cattle, Hanwoo, and Wagyu breeds. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019; 39:402-9

16.

Kolar K. Colorimetric determination of hydroxyproline as measure of collagen content in meat and meat products: NMKL collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1990; 73:54-7

17.

Hill F. The solubility of intramuscular collagen in meat animals of various ages. J Food Sci. 1966; 31:161-6

18.

Kim YA, Van Ba H, Dashdorj D, Hwang I. Effect of high-pressure processing on the quality characteristics and shelf-life stability of Hanwoo beef marinated with various sauces. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2018; 38:679-92

19.

Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 81:559-75

20.

Hammami H, Rekik B, Soyeurt H, Bastin C, Bay E, Stoll J, et al. Accessing genotype by environment interaction using within- and across-country test-day random regression sire models. J Anim Breed Genet. 2009; 126:366-77

21.

VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91:4414-23

22.

Srivastava S, Lopez BI, de las Heras-Saldana S, Park JE, Shin DH, Chai HH, et al. Estimation of genetic parameters by single-trait and multi-trait models for carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle. Animals. 2019; 9:1061

23.

Aulchenko YS, de Koning DJ, Haley C. Genomewide rapid association using mixed model and regression: a fast and simple method for genomewide pedigree-based quantitative trait loci association analysis. Genetics. 2007; 177:577-85

24.

Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-9

25.

Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28:27-30

26.

Sherman BT, Hao M, Qiu J, Jiao X, Baseler MW, Lane HC, et al. DAVID: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50:W216-21

27.

Weston AR, Rogers RW, Althen TG. Review: the role of collagen in meat tenderness. Prof Anim Sci. 2002; 18:107-11

28.

Belbin GM, Odgis J, Sorokin EP, Yee MC, Kohli S, Glicksberg BS, et al. Genetic identification of a common collagen disease in puerto ricans via identity-by-descent mapping in a health system. eLife. 2017; 6e25060

29.

Zhang Z, Bai M, Barbosa GO, Chen A, Wei Y, Luo S, et al. Broadly conserved roles of TMEM131 family proteins in intracellular collagen assembly and secretory cargo trafficking. Sci Adv. 2020; 6:eaay7667

30.

Beasley HK, Rodman TA, Collins GV, Hinton A, Exil V. TMEM135 is a novel regulator of mitochondrial dynamics and physiology with implications for human health conditions. Cells. 2021; 10:1750

31.

McDonough JE, Kaminski N, Thienpont B, Hogg JC, Vanaudenaerde BM, Wuyts WA. Gene correlation network analysis to identify regulatory factors in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax. 2019; 74:132-40

32.

Phelps KJ, Johnson DD, Elzo MA, Paulk CB, Gonzalez JM. Effect of Brahman genetics on myofibrillar protein degradation, collagen crosslinking, and tenderness of the longissimus lumborum. J Anim Sci. 2017; 95:5397-406

33.

Liu J, Wang L, Chen W, Li J, Shan T. CRTC3 regulates the lipid metabolism and adipogenic differentiation of porcine intramuscular and subcutaneous adipocytes by activating the calcium pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2021; 69:7243-55

34.

Thompson JM. The effects of marbling on flavour and juiciness scores of cooked beef, after adjusting to a constant tenderness. Aust J Exp Agric. 2004; 44:645-52

35.

Nian Y, Moloney AP, Li C, Allen P, Harrison SM, Prendiville R, et al. A comparison of meat composition, tenderness and the fatty acid profile of three muscles from Holstein-Friesian bulls from production system resulting in final ages of either < 16 or 19 months. Anim Prod Sci. 2022; 62:368-80

36.

Cui HX, Liu RR, Zhao GP, Zheng MQ, Chen JL, Wen J. Identification of differentially expressed genes and pathways for intramuscular fat deposition in pectoralis major tissues of fast-and slow-growing chickens. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13:213

37.

Zhao C, Ji G, Carrillo JA, Li Y, Tian F, Baldwin RL, et al. The profiling of DNA methylation and its regulation on divergent tenderness in Angus beef cattle. Front Genet. 2020; 11:939

38.

Yang Y, Yang J, Ma J, Yu Q, Han L. iTRAQ-mediated analysis of the relationship between proteomic changes and yak longissimus lumborum tenderness over the course of postmortem storage. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:10450