Table 4. Effect of feed form and microbial enzymes supplementation on energy utilization of broiler chickens

Feed form Enzyme AME MEI (KJ/d) Energy utilization (KJ/d) Energy retained (KJ/d) as Efficiency of ME use for
NEp HP Protein Fat Energy Protein Lipid
Mash No enzyme 11.8b 747.5b 424.1ab 323.4 226.2bc 240.7 0.50c 0.27d 0.28
AXB 12.4ab 777.7ab 461.7ab 316.0 242.0abc 242.6 0.53bc 0.28cd 0.28
QB 12.4ab 812.1ab 413.6b 398.4 217.1c 235.0 0.54bc 0.28bcd 0.31
AXB + QB 12.6ab 823.6ab 479.1ab 344.5 246.5ab 271.5 0.60ab 0.31abc 0.34
Pellet No enzyme 12.5ab 847.7ab 487.8ab 359.9 257.5a 255.1 0.61ab 0.32a 0.32
AXB 12.9a 857.8ab 506.3ab 351.5 259.4a 269.8 0.63a 0.32a 0.34
QB 13.1a 824.9ab 501.0ab 323.8 247.3ab 259.5 0.63a 0.31abc 0.33
AXB + QB 13.4a 876.0a 504.0a 372.0 259.9a 267.3 0.62ab 0.32a 0.33
SEM 0.101 10.4 8.18 11.1 3.02 5.11 0.012 0.005 0.007
Significance
Feed form 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.783 0.001 0.138 0.001 0.001 0.065
Enzyme 0.005 0.285 0.191 0.795 0.010 0.397 0.391 0.523 0.429
Feed form × enzyme 0.947 0.399 0.455 0.245 0.419 0.698 0.446 0.348 0.348
Means with different superscripts within the columns are different (p < 0.05).
Values are means of 6 replicates (10 birds per replicate).
AXB, axtra XB (xylanase and beta-glucanase composite); QB, quantum blue (phytase); SEM, standard error of the mean; AME, apparent metabolizable energy; MEI, metabolizable energy intake; NEp, net energy for production; HP, heat production.