Table 3. Effect of hydrocolloids on texture profile analysis of the cold-cut duck meat jelly

Treatments Control T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
Hardness (kg) 0.22 ± 0.03a 0.07 ± 0.02d 0.20 ± 0.03a 0.13 ± 0.02c 0.05 ± 0.03d 0.21 ± 0.04a 0.16 ± 0.01b
Springiness 0.49 ± 0.10d 0.96 ± 0.01a 0.32 ± 0.03e 0.73 ± 0.18b 0.92 ± 0.07a 0.63 ± 0.07bc 0.54 ± 0.15cd
Cohesiveness 0.19 ± 0.02e 0.65 ± 0.04a 0.18 ± 0.01e 0.34 ± 0.05c 0.58 ± 0.06b 0.24 ± 0.01d 0.27 ± 0.03d
Gumminess (kg) 0.04 ± 0.01ab 0.04 ± 0.01ab 0.04 ± 0.01b 0.05 ± 0.01a 0.03 ± 0.01c 0.05 ± 0.01a 0.04 ± 0.01ab
Chewiness (kg) 0.02 ± 0.01d 0.04 ± 0.01a 0.01 ± 0.00e 0.03 ± 0.01ab 0.02 ± 0.00cd 0.03 ± 0.01bc 0.02 ± 0.01cd
Mean ± standard deviation was presented with three replicates.
Different small letter in the same row means significant differences (p < 0.05).
Control, without hydrocolloid; T1, 0.5% alginate; T2, 0.5% carrageenan; T3, 0.5% konjac; T4, 0.25% alginate + 0.25% carrageenan; T5, 0.25% carrageenan + 0.25% konjac; T6, 0.25% alginate + 0.25% konjac.