Table 4. The effect of dietary marine derived Ca-Mg complex supplementation to gestating and lactating sows in four successive parities on the performance of their litters

Items Parity 1 Parity 2 Parity 3 Parity 4 SEM p-value
CON1) CM1 CM2 CON CM1 CM2 CON CM1 CM2 CON CM1 CM2 Parity Treatment P × T
Initial number 13.66bB 14.83a 14.58a 13.79bB 14.80a 14.66a 14.70bA 15.40a 14.90ab 14.79a 15.30 15.25 0.242 *** *** NS
Final number 13.40bB 14.83a 14.58a 13.50bB 14.60a 14.54a 14.30a 15 14.58 14.41a 15.08 15.04 0.258 ** *** NS
Survival rate (%) 98.20b 100a 100a 97.90 98.50 99.04 97.20 97.30 97.78 97.47 98.30 98.65 0.614 ** * NS
Birth weight (kg) 1.69 1.67 1.69 1.68 1.70 1.70 1.73 1.70 1.69 1.71 1.67 1.70 0.02 NS NS NS
Weaning weight (kg) 6.40b 6.75a 6.67a 6.45b 6.82a 6.80a 6.40b 6.80a 6.70a 6.46 6.74 6.72 0.05 NS *** NS
Average daily gain (g) 225b 242a 237a 227b 244a 241a 225b 243a 240a 227b 241a 240a 2.12 NS *** NS
CON, basal diet; CM1, basal diet – MgO - 0.3% limestone + 0.40% marine derived Ca-Mg complex; CM2, basal diet - MgO - 0.7% limestone + 0.40% marine derived Ca-Mg complex.
Different superscripts within a row indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) in response to treatment diets CM1 and CM2.
Different superscripts within a row indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among parity.
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01,
p <0.0001.
P × T, interactive effects between parity and dietary treatments; NS, non-significant.