Table 5. Characterization of candidate proteins affected feed efficiency in Korean native steers

Spot¹⁾	Name²⁾	Accession number²⁾	MW / pI³⁾	Score	Sequence coverage (%)	Spot intensity		Fold change⁴⁾
Spot¹⁾	Name²⁾	Accession number²⁾	MW / pI³⁾	Score	Sequence coverage (%)	HF	LF	Fold change⁴⁾
1	Tenascin X	Q9BE40	22.30 / 5.57	22.43	16.32	0.05	0.13	0.35
2	EH-domain contaning 2	Q2KJ47	61.22 / 5.95	17.57	15.65	0.01	0.04	0.32
3	Enolase 1	Q3ZC09	47.10 / 7.60	47.55	28.80	0.14	0.32	0.44
4	Tropomodulin 4	Q0VC48	39.18 / 4.71	32.59	16.81	0.31	0.11	2.79
5	Annexin V	Q3ZCH0	73.74 / 5.97	47.64	50.63	0.04	0.24	0.19
6	MyoZ 1	Q8SQ24	31.67 / 9.17	32.44	33.99	0.23	0.09	2.56
7	MLC 1/3 skeletal muscle isoform	A0JNJ5	20.93 / 4.96	57.99	60.42	2.08	0.20	10.33
8	Carbonic anhydrase II	P00921	29.11 / 6.41	24.75	35.89	0.42	0.09	4.57
9	Desmoplakin	E1BKT9	33.24 / 6.47	101.97	12.63	0.07	0.19	0.40
10	LRRC20 protein	A6qLD3	20.71 / 6.22	11.30	27.17	0.00	0.15
11	Heat shock protein beta-6	Q148F8	17.47 / 5.95	15.39	28.66	0.52	1.14	0.45
12	Coflin 2	Q148F1	18.74 / 7.66	16.229	45.18	0.00	0.42

The spot number refers to Fig. 1.
Database protein names and accession numbers: UniProt (www.uniprot.org).
Molecular weight (MW) and isoelectric point (pI) of each protein were determined by 2-DE.
The expression ratios of spot intensity at high feed efficiency (HF) versus low feed efficiency (LF) group.