Table 5. The effect of dietary marine derived Ca-Mg complex supplementation to gestating and lactating sows in four successive parities on fecal score before and after farrowing1)
Items | Parity 1 | Parity 2 | Parity 3 | Parity 4 | SEM | p-value |
CON2) | CM1 | CM2 | CON | CM1 | CM2 | CON | CM1 | CM2 | CON | CM1 | CM2 | Parity | Treatment | P × T |
Before farrowing | 2.27 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 2.27 | 2.24 | 2.25 | 2.24 | 2.25 | 2.24 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.24 | 0.020 | NS | NS | NS |
After farrowing | 2.31 | 2.29 | 2.29 | 2.32 | 2.29 | 2.29 | 2.28 | 2.31 | 2.30 | 2.28 | 2.30 | 2.30 | 0.021 | NS | NS | NS |
Values represent the means of 24 sows per treatment.
Fecal score data before and after farrowing were also analyzed using chi-square test. The fecal score before and after farrowing were found to be non-significant during all four subsequent parities.
Fecal score: 1, hard, dry pellet in a small, hard mass; 2, hard, formed stool that remains firm and soft; 3, soft, formed, and moist stool that retains its shape; 4, soft, unformed stool that assumes shape of the container; 5, watery, liquid stool that can be poured.
CON, basal diet; CM1, Basal diet – MgO - 0.3% limestone + 0.40% marine derived Ca-Mg complex; CM2, basal diet - MgO - 0.7% limestone + 0.40% marine derived Ca-Mg complex.
P × T, interactive effects between parity and dietary treatments; NS, non-significant.