Table 6. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the IMF content and sensory scores for the fresh and cooked Longissimus lumborum (LL) and Semitendinosus (ST) muscles1)
| Fresh pork muscle | Cooked pork muscle |
Marbling | Drip | Acceptability | Flavor | Juiciness | Tenderness | Umami | Palatability |
Within LL (N = 32) | 0.24 (0.19) | 0.09 (0.61) | 0.18 (0.32) | 0.00 (1.00) | 0.31 (0.09) | 0.27 (0.14) | 0.22 (0.23) | 0.19 (0.29) |
Within ST (N = 32) | −0.05 (0.77) | IE | −0.25 (0.17) | −0.12 (0.52) | 0.18 (0.32) | 0.09 (0.63) | −0.30 (0.09) | −0.41 (0.02) |
LL + ST (N = 64) | −0.20 (0.12) | 0.73 (< 0.01) | −0.32 (0.01) | 0.62 (< 0.01) | 0.77 (< 0.01) | 0.68 (< 0.01) | 0.57 (< 0.01) | 0.45 (< 0.01) |
See Tables 3 and 5 for the IMF contents and sensory scores, respectively.
The p-values are shown in parentheses.
IMF, intramuscular fat; IE, inestimable.