Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology
Research Article

Prediction of Pork Belly Fat Percentage Based on Backfat Thickness Measurements in Pork Carcasses

Sanghyun Doh1, Jiwoo Kang1, Sanghun Park1, Gyutae Park1, Beobmo Ku1, Minjun Kim1, Nayoung Choi1, Daeseung Kim1, Jaeyoung Kim2, Youngtae Kim3, Jungseok Choi4,*
1Graduate Student Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
2Doctor Degree Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
3Livestock and Food Research Institute, Farmsco, Seongnam 13558, Korea.
4Professor Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
*Corresponding Author: Jungseok Choi, Professor Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea, Republic of. Phone: +82-43-261-2551. E-mail: jchoi@chungbuk.ac.kr.

© Copyright 2026 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 21, 2026; Revised: Aug 19, 2026; Accepted: Sep 12, 2026

Published Online: Sep 29, 2026

Abstract

This study developed and internally evaluated a two-input candidate model for estimating VCS2000-derived belly fat percentage (BFP) in slaughterhouses without automated carcass evaluation equipment. Data from 1,753 LYD (Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc) pigs slaughtered in Korea were analyzed. Hot carcass (HC) traits were obtained using VCS2000, whereas corresponding chilled carcass (CC) backfat traits were measured manually. Multiple linear regression models were assessed using influence diagnostics, sensitivity analyses, cross-validation, and comparisons with machine learning algorithms. In HC measurements, BFP was strongly associated with multifidus muscle middle backfat thickness (MBT) and backfat thickness at the first thoracic vertebra (FTBT). Under the CC/manual condition, the MBT association remained relatively strong, whereas the FTBT association was weaker. The HC full and reduced models showed no substantial difference in explanatory or cross-validated predictive performance, whereas the CC/manual reduced model showed lower performance. The evaluated machine learning methods did not meaningfully outperform multiple linear regression. Measurement concordance was lower for FTBT than for MBT and grading backfat thickness, although the effects of carcass state and measurement procedure could not be separated. These findings provide a basis for further development of the two-input model as a candidate approach for BFP estimation.

Keywords: Pork belly; Belly fat percentage; Backfat thickness; VCS2000; Multiple linear regression