Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Standardized ileal digestible lysine requirements based on growth performance of White Pekin ducks for 21 days after hatch

Myunghwan Yu1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4479-4677, Yu Bin Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7720-128X, Hyun Min Cho1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-8824, Jun Seon Hong1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2142-9888, Shan Randima Nawarathne1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-9155, Elijah Ogola Oketch1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-460X, Jung Min Heo1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-1320
1Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
*Corresponding author: Jung Min Heo, Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea, Tel: +82 42-821-5777, E-mail: jmheo@cnu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2025 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 04, 2024; Revised: Feb 16, 2024; Accepted: Feb 19, 2024

Published Online: Mar 31, 2025

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the optimal standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine (Lys) requirement for male White Pekin ducklings with a specific focus on growth performance for the 3 weeks following hatching. A total of 384 one-day-old male White Pekin ducklings were allocated to six different dietary treatments, each containing varying levels of digestible Lys content ranging from 0.72% to 1.12%. All amino acids in the diets remained consistent except for Lys. The ducklings were randomly distributed into 24-floor pens, with each treatment group comprising eight pens, and each pen housing eight ducklings. The diets were offered ad-libitum throughout the study. Weekly measurements of body weight and feed intake were recorded to calculate the feed conversion ratio. The SID Lys requirement was determined by analyzing the data using both linear-plateau and quadratic-plateau models and calculating the mean value. The results demonstrated a significant linear (p < 0.001) and quadratic (p < 0.001) improvement in body weight gain and feed efficiency with increasing SID Lys content in the diet. According to the linear-plateau regression analysis, the estimated SID Lys requirements for final body weight, weight gain, and feed efficiency were 1.00%, 1.00%, and 0.98%, respectively. Conversely, the quadratic-plateau regression analysis yielded estimated SID Lys requirements of 1.11%, 1.11%, and 1.10%, respectively, for the same parameters. In summary, this study established that the recommended SID Lys levels for White Pekin ducklings for the 3 wk period after hatching were found to be 1.05%, 1.05%, and 1.04% for achieving the finest final body weight, daily gain, and feed efficiency, respectively.

Keywords: Linear-plateau model; Lysine requirement; Quadratic-plateau model; Standardized ileal digestible lysine; White Pekin duck

INTRODUCTION

As the second limiting amino acid (AA) in corn and soybean meal diets for poultry, lysine (Lys) is commonly utilized as a reference AA to establish the ideal AA ratios [1,2]. Lys plays a central role in supporting the growth performance of poultry by promoting nutrient utilization and muscle development as well as protein synthesis and production of enzymes, hormones, and antibodies [3,4]. Accordingly, determining the optimal dietary Lys content is necessary for achieving efficient duck production.

Based on observations in the marketing of various poultry species, it is evident that the industry has made significant strides in the development of cut and processed duck products. This progress can be attributed to the implementation of genetic selection and advancements in duck management, particularly in the realm of nutrition. As a result, the meat yield of ducks has experienced a notable increase, while carcass fatness has concurrently decreased [5,6]. Hence, it becomes imperative to formulate updated nutrient requirements to meet the evolving demands of genetic enhancements in meat-type ducks.

Numerous investigations have been carried out to ascertain the Lys requirement for White Pekin ducks [79]. However, there is the suggestion that using standardized ileal digestible (SID) AA could offer a more accurate means of determining these requirements in animals, as it accounts for the bioavailability of AA from various feed ingredients [10,11]. This method assesses the disappearance of AA in the small intestine, providing a more reliable indicator of AA digestibility without disrupting the hindgut [12]. Despite this rationale, limited attention has been given to recent studies that focus on estimating the SID Lys requirements during the starter period (up to 21 days of age) in White Pekin ducks. Moreover, a range of regression models, such as the linear broken line and the quadratic broken line can be effectively employed to estimate the digestible Lys requirements for ducks, as demonstrated by the research conducted by [13]. The utilization of distinct estimation models provides diverse dietary Lys requirements, facilitating the determination of optimal nutritional Lys concentrations for enhancing animal breeding practices [14,15]. Therefore, this study aims to determine the SID Lys requirement for ducks from hatch to 21 days of age, utilizing both the linear broken-line and quadratic line models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal ethics

The Animal Ethics Committee of Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea, approved the protocols used in this experiment (approval number: 202109A-CNU-114).

Experimental diets

The experimental diets (detailed in Table 1) comprised six variations with progressively increasing SID Lys concentrations. SID values for AA in corn, soybean meal, and corn distillers’ dried grains with solubles (DDGS) were sourced from a prior investigation [16]. These dietary formulations encompassed SID Lys concentrations ranging from 0.72% to 1.12%, incremented by every 8 points. Each experimental diet was meticulously crafted to either meet or surpass recommended specifications [17], except for Lys, which was adjusted to align with the requirements of ducklings at 3 weeks of age. Indispensable AA concentrations, excluding Lys, were calibrated based on ideal AA ratios to avert deficiencies. The experimental diets were provided in crumble form.

Table 1. Ingredients and chemical compositions of the experimental diets (as-fed basis, %)
Item Standardized ileal digestible lysine concentrations (%)
0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96 1.04 1.12
Corn 41.67 41.58 41.47 41.36 41.26 41.16
Corn DDGS 38.53 38.53 38.53 38.53 38.53 38.53
Soybean meal 16.70 16.70 16.70 16.70 16.70 16.70
Limestone 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Dicalcium-phosphate 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Salt 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Vitamin-mineral premix1) 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
L-Lysine-HCl 0.00 0.10 0.21 0.31 0.41 0.51
Calculated values
 ME (kcal/kg) 2,872 2,873 2,875 2,876 2,877 2,878
 Crude protein 21.95 22.03 22.13 22.22 22.31 22.39
 Calcium 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
 Non-phytate phosphorus 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
 Total lysine 0.90 0.98 1.06 1.14 1.22 1.30
Standardized ileal digestible amino acids (%)
 Arginine 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01
 Histidine 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49
 Isoleucine 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72
 Leucine 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98
 Lysine 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96 1.04 1.12
 Methionine 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
 Cysteine 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28
 Phenylalanine 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
 Threonine 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63
 Tryptophan 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
 Valine 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87

Provided per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 12,000 IU; vitamin D3, 2,500 IU; vitamin E, 30 IU; vitamin K3, 3 mg; D-pantothenic acid, 15 mg; nicotinic acid, 40 mg; choline, 400 mg; and vitamin B12, 12 μg; Fe, 90 mg from iron sulfate; Cu, 8.8 mg from copper sulfate; Zn, 100 mg from zinc oxide; Mn, 54 mg from manganese oxide; I, 0.35 mg from potassium iodine; Se, 0.30 mg from sodium selenite.

DDGS, distiller’s dried grains with soluble.

Download Excel Table
Birds and housing

The experiment was carried out in two consecutive periods, with 192 birds in each period, within the same research facility due to space constraints. Consistent procedures and environmental conditions were maintained throughout. The experiment was conducted using 384 male White Pekin ducklings from hatch to 3 weeks of age. One-day-old male White Pekin ducklings were obtained from a local hatchery (Charmfre, Jincheon, Korea) for the experiment. Upon arrival, the ducklings were weighed and randomly allocated to one of the six dietary treatments with varying digestible Lys levels. Each pen, measuring 1.7 m × 1.3 m × 1.0 m, housed eight birds with a mean body weight (BW) of 53.05 ± 0.201 g (mean ± SEM). The floor pens were lined with rice husk as litter, following the recommendation of a previous study we conducted [18], and each pen was equipped with tree nipple drinkers and a feeder. The ducklings had ad-libitum access to the experimental diets and fresh water for 21 days. Continuous lighting was provided for 24 h, and the ambient temperature was maintained at 30-32°C for the first week, gradually decreasing to 25°C until 21 days of age.

Performance measurements and chemical analysis

The initial BW of the birds was recorded upon arrival, and subsequent BW and feed consumption were measured weekly (on days 7, 14, and 21) throughout the experiment. Based on these measurements, the average daily gain (ADG), mortality-corrected average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated for each cage during each respective week. The AA composition of the experimental diets was determined using standard procedures (AOAC method 982.30 E) [19]. The analyzed AA content of the experimental diets is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Analyzed amino acid composition of the experimental diets containing 6 concentrations of standardized ileal digestible lysine (as-fed basis, %)
Item Standardized ileal digestible lysine concentrations (%)
0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96 1.04 1.12
Indispensable amino acids (%)
 Arginine 1.04 1.07 0.98 0.96 1.06 1.01
 Histidine 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.49 0.46
 Isoleucine 0.69 0.73 0.69 0.67 0.75 0.73
 Leucine 1.85 1.90 1.81 1.81 1.95 1.88
 Lysine 0.66 0.77 0.80 0.89 1.03 1.12
 Methionine 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.33 0.38 0.38
 Phenylalanine 0.85 0.87 0.82 0.82 0.90 0.85
 Threonine 0.54 0.56 0.52 0.50 0.57 0.55
 Tryptophan 0.17 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.18
 Valine 0.80 0.82 0.80 0.77 0.86 0.83
Download Excel Table
Statistical analyses

The collected data were analyzed according to a completely randomized design using the general linear model procedure for the one-way ANOVA using SPSS software (Version 26, IBM SPSS, IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). Each pen served as the experimental unit for all growth performance measurements. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were conducted to assess the significance of linear or quadratic effects of SID Lys levels on all measurements. When significant treatment effects were observed (p < 0.05), means were separated using Tukey’s multiple range test in SPSS software. Linear-plateau and quadratic-plateau regression analysis, performed with the Nutritional Responses Model version 1.3 [13], were used to estimate the SID Lys requirements.

RESULTS

Throughout the entire 3 weeks experiment, the ducklings remained in good health and performed well. Different levels of dietary SID Lys ranging from 0.72% to 1.12% across 6 treatments in the experimental diets resulted in notable enhancements (p < 0.001) in BW, ADG, and feed efficiency for 3 weeks after hatching, with linear and quadratic manners (Table 3). SID Lys requirements for White Pekin ducks during the 3 weeks after hatch were estimated (Table 4) using two different response models. When data were analyzed using a linear-plateau model, the estimated requirements were 1.00% and 1.00% for maximum final BW and ADG, respectively, while the requirement for minimum FCR was 0.98% (Figs. 1, 2, and 3). On the other hand, the quadratic-plateau model yielded estimates of 1.11% and 1.11% for maximum final BW and ADG respectively, and 1.10% for minimum FCR (Figs. 1, 2, and 3). By averaging the values obtained from both response models, the recommended SID Lys requirements for White Pekin ducks during the 2 wk after hatching were determined as 1.05%, 1.05%, and 1.04% for maximum final BW, ADG, and minimum FCR, respectively.

Table 3. Growth performance of White Pekin ducks from 1 to 21 days of age fed diets containing different dietary standardized ileal digestible lysine concentrations1)
Item Standardized ileal digestible lysine concentrations (%) SEM2) p-value Polynomial contrast3)
0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96 1.04 1.12 Lin Quad
BW (g)
 Day 1 52.73 53.11 53.03 53.47 53.04 52.91 0.201 0.937 0.778 0.639
 Day 7 173.92a 174.05a 174.56a 189.25b 189.31b 182.69ab 1.049 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
 Day 14 494.42ab 474.06a 540.58bc 573.17c 580.56c 549.72c 4.532 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
 Day 21 1,039.75ab 1,021.06a 1,106.34bc 1,168.49c 1,180.88c 1,170.50c 7.616 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
ADG (g/bird/d)
 Day 7 17.31a 17.28a 17.36a 19.40b 19.47b 18.54ab 0.148 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
 Day 14 45.79ab 42.86a 52.29bc 54.29c 55.89c 52.43bc 0.656 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
 Day 21 77.90a 78.14a 80.82ab 85.05ab 85.76ab 88.68b 0.856 0.002 < 0.001 < 0.001
 Day 1–21 47.00ab 46.09a 50.16bc 53.10c 53.71c 53.22c 0.357 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
ADFI (g/bird/d)
 Day 7 26.78 26.56 26.51 26.73 26.64 26.47 0.045 0.304 0.244 0.510
 Day 14 79.06 75.08 78.03 77.32 74.65 77.76 0.634 0.299 0.525 0.553
 Day 21 141.14 134.54 134.47 137.72 134.51 137.72 1.161 0.493 0.561 0.318
 Day 1–21 82.33 78.73 79.67 80.59 78.60 80.65 0.521 0.323 0.473 0.295
FCR (g/g)
 Day 7 1.55b 1.54b 1.53b 1.39a 1.37a 1.43ab 0.011 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
 Day 14 1.74b 1.76b 1.50a 1.41a 1.34a 1.50a 0.018 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
 Day 21 1.82b 1.73ab 1.68ab 1.62ab 1.59ab 1.55a 0.023 0.021 < 0.001 0.001
 Day 1–21 1.76c 1.71bc 1.59ab 1.52a 1.47a 1.52a 0.014 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Values are the mean of eight replicates per treatment.

Pooled standard error of the mean.

Orthogonal polynomial contrast coefficients were used to determine linear (Lin) and quadratic (Quad) effects of increasing digestible lysine.

Values in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).

BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio.

Download Excel Table
Table 4. Estimated standardized ileal digestible lysine requirements and recommendations for White Pekin ducks from hatch to 21 days of age based on linear-plateau and quadratic-plateau regression analysis
Item Requirement (%)1) SE R 2 p-value Recommendation (%)2)
Final BW (g)
 LP 1.00 0.060 0.90 < 0.001 1.05
 QP 1.11 0.176 0.84 0.008
ADG (g/bird/day)
 LP 1.00 0.061 0.90 < 0.001 1.05
 QP 1.11 0.181 0.84 0.009
FCR (g/g)
 LP 0.98 0.029 0.97 < 0.001 1.04
 QP 1.10 0.097 0.95 0.002

Standardized ileal digestible lysine requirement based on regression analysis.

Standardized ileal digestible lysine recommendation for each parameter based on both regression analyses.

BW, body weight; LP, linear-plateau regression analysis; QP, Quadratic-plateau regression analysis; ADG, average daily gain; FCR, feed conversion ratio.

Download Excel Table
jast-67-2-383-g1
Fig. 1. Standardized ileal digestible lysine requirements of White Pekin ducks from hatch to 21 days of age for final body weight determined by a quadratic-plateau model was 1.11 [Y = 1179.14-1152.68(1.11-x)2, R2 = 0.84] (open line), and by a linear-plateau model was 1.00 [Y = 1175.69-589.38(1.00-x), R2 = 0.90] (closed line). Data points (●) represent least squares means of dietary treatment (n = 8).
Download Original Figure
jast-67-2-383-g2
Fig. 2. Standardized ileal digestible lysine requirements of White Pekin ducks from hatch to 21 days of age for average daily gain determined by a quadratic-plateau model was 1.11 [Y = 53.43-52.41(1.11-x)2, R2 = 0.84] (open line), and by a linear-plateau model was 1.00 [Y = 53.46-27.96(1.00-x), R2 = 0.90] (closed line). Data points (●) represent least squares means of dietary treatment (n = 8).
Download Original Figure
jast-67-2-383-g3
Fig. 3. Standardized ileal digestible lysine requirements of White Pekin ducks from hatch to 21 days of age for feed conversion ratio determined by a quadratic-plateau model was 1.10 [Y = 1.49+2.04(1.10-x)2, R2 = 0.95] (open line), and by a linear-plateau model was 0.98 [Y = 1.50+1.05(0.98-x), R2 = 0.97] (closed line). Data points (●) represent least squares means of dietary treatment (n = 8).
Download Original Figure

DISCUSSION

Our study aimed to assess the SID Lys requirement for achieving the ideal growth performance during 3 wk after the hatch in White Pekin ducks. Although numerous studies have investigated the SID Lys values in feed formulations to determine the ideal Lys requirements for broiler chickens [15,20,21], there exists a notable scarcity of published data specific to White Pekin ducks in this regard.

A comparative analysis of AA digestibility was conducted between broiler chickens and Pekin ducks [22]. The findings strongly indicate that utilizing values derived from feedstuffs formulated for broiler chickens should be avoided when formulating diets specifically for ducks. This recommendation is primarily attributed to the higher levels of basal endogenous AA losses observed in ducks in comparison to broiler chickens. As a result, it is imperative to consider these contrasting factors in diet formulation to ensure the best nutrient utilization for ducks. For these reasons, the formulation of experimental diets was based on the consideration of SID AA content in this study. The utilization of SID AA content as a measure is considered more precise compared to total or dietary AA content, as it reflects the nutrient availability for birds [23]. The SID AA values for the diets were determined by incorporating digestible coefficients specific to ducks [12], as well as the total AA content of the ingredients.

The present study observed increasing the SID Lys level had a non-linear impact on various performance parameters, including BW, ADG, ADFI, and feed efficiency. This finding aligns with previous research by Bons et al. [7] and Xie et al. [9], which also demonstrated a non-linear improvement in performance indicators of male White Pekin ducks with increasing Lys levels.

Precise identification of an appropriate statistical model holds paramount importance in accurately estimating nutrient requirements, as the choice of model can significantly influence the derived requirement values [24]. The variation in nutrient recommendations can arise due to the application of different estimation models, which is a common practice observed in similar experiments [13]. This highlights the need for careful consideration when selecting an appropriate model to derive accurate and consistent nutrient requirement estimations. The linear plateau model, although it may exhibit a satisfactory statistical fit, has a tendency to underestimate the optimal nutrient requirements of the animal groups studied due to their failure to consider the physiological variances present within the population [25]. Conversely, the quadratic plateau model estimates higher nutritional requirements compared to the linear plateau model [26]. Therefore, a combined approach, averaging the results of the linear plateau and quadratic plateau models, was employed to estimate Lys requirements for White Pekin ducks during the critical 21 d period after hatching.

In the current investigation, the linear plateau and quadratic-plateau regression analyses determined that the minimum requirement of SID Lys for achieving maximum BW and ADG was determined to be 1.05%, while the minimum requirement for attaining optimal FCR was found to be 1.04%. These findings align with the study conducted by Bons et al. [7], which indicated that reaching 95% of the asymptote in ADG for White Pekin ducks occurred at a total Lys concentration of 1.17% (day 1 to 21). Additionally, for efficient FCR, male Pekin ducks required a 1.06% Lys concentration from day 1 to 21. Similarly, Xie et al. [9] reported Lys requirements of 0.84% for ADG and 0.90% for feed conversion efficiency of male White Pekin ducklings from day 7 to 21, both of which exceeded the recommendations of NRC [17]. These differences in Lys requirements can be attributed to variations in response criteria, research methodologies (including experimental diets based on digestible AAs), and the enhanced growth potential resulting from the genetic selection of Pekin ducks [27]. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the response to Lys may be affected by the concentrations of other AA in the diet [28]. Furthermore, the selection of an appropriate mathematical model can have a significant impact on the estimation process [29].

CONCLUSION

The findings of this research demonstrate that augmenting the SID Lys content has a positive impact on ADG and feed efficiency during the 3 weeks after hatching in White Pekin ducks. By employing both linear- and quadratic-plateau models, it was determined that the recommended SID Lys levels for optimal final BW, ADG, and feed efficiency in White Pekin ducks from hatch to 21 d are 1.05%, 1.05%, and 1.04%, respectively.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This work was supported by “Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS)” through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2021RIS-004).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Yu M, Kim YB, Heo JM.

Data curation: Yu M.

Formal analysis: Yu M.

Methodology: Yu M, Kim YB.

Software: Yu M, Hong JS.

Validation: Cho HM, Heo JM.

Investigation: Yu M, Kim YB, Nawarathne SR, Oketch EO.

Writing - original draft: Yu M.

Writing - review & editing: Yu M, Kim YB, Cho HM, Hong JS, Nawarathne SR, Oketch EO, Heo JM.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Animal Ethics Committee of Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea, approved the protocols used in this experiment (approval number: 202109A-CNU-114).

REFERENCES

1.

Ruan D, Fouad AM, Zhang YN, Wang S, Chen W, Xia WG, et al. Effects of dietary lysine on productivity, reproductive performance, protein and lipid metabolism-related gene expression in laying duck breeders. Poult Sci. 2019; 98:5734-45

2.

Kim E, Wickramasuriya SS, Shin TK, Cho HM, Kim HB, Heo JM. Estimating total lysine requirement for optimised egg production of broiler breeder hens during the early-laying period. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020; 62:521-32

3.

Fouad AM, Chen W, Ruan D, Wang S, Xia W, Zheng C. Effects of dietary lysine supplementation on performance, egg quality, and development of reproductive system in egg-laying ducks. J Appl Anim Res. 2018; 46:386-91

4.

Linh N, Dong NTK, Thu NV. Effect of dietary lysine and energy levels on apparent nutrient, nitrogen, and amino acids digestibility of local Muscovy ducks. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 2022; 10:253-62

5.

Baéza E. Nutritional requirements and feed management of meat type ducks. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2016; 72:5-20

6.

Zhou Z, Li M, Cheng H, Fan W, Yuan Z, Gao Q, et al. An intercross population study reveals genes associated with body size and plumage color in ducks. Nat Commun. 2018; 9:2648

7.

Bons A, Timmler R, Jeroch H. Lysine requirement of growing male Pekin ducks. Br Poult Sci. 2002; 43:677-86

8.

Adeola O. Review of research in duck nutrient utilization. Int J Poult Sci. 2006; 5:201-18

9.

Xie M, Guo Y, Zhang T, Hou S, Huang W. Lysine requirement of male white Pekin ducklings from seven to twenty-one days of age. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2009; 22:1386-90

10.

Tansil F, Pezzali JG, Cargo-Froom C, Huber LA, Kiarie EG, Courtney-Martin G, et al. Evaluation of standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids and metabolic availability of methionine, using the indicator amino acid oxidation method, in black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2023; 101:skac420

11.

An SH, Kong C. Influence of age and type of feed ingredients on apparent and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022; 64:740-51

12.

Kong C, Adeola O. Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in feedstuffs for White Pekin ducks. Poult Sci. 2010; 89:545-50

13.

Wickramasuriya SS, Yi YJ, Yoo J, Kim JC, Heo KN, Heo JM. Lysine requirements of Korean native ducklings for three weeks after hatch. J Appl Poult Res. 2016; 25:464-73

14.

Cemin HS, Vieira SL, Stefanello C, Kipper M, Kindlein L, Helmbrecht A. Digestible lysine requirements of male broilers from 1 to 42 days of age reassessed. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12e0179665

15.

An SH, Kang HK, Kong C. Standardized ileal digestible lysine requirements of 21–28 days old male broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2022; 292:115409

16.

Oketch EO, Kim YB, Yu M, Cho HM, Hong JS, Nawarathne SR, et al. Research note: evaluation of standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in feed ingredients for Pekin ducks. Poult Sci. 2023; 102:102899

17.

NRC (National Research Council). Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 1994

18.

Oketch EO, Kim YB, Yu M, Hong JS, Nawarathne SR, Heo JM. Differences in bedding material could alter the growth performance of white Pekin ducks raised for 42 days. J Anim Sci Technol. 2023; 65:377-86

19.

AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed Washington, DC: AOAC International. 2006

20.

Lee J, Sung Y, Kong C. Standardized ileal digestible lysine requirement of male broilers at the age of 0–10 days. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2018; 241:55-62

21.

An SH, Lee B, Choi YM, Kong C. Standardized ileal digestible lysine requirements based on growth performance and histochemical characteristics of male broilers from 10 to 21 d of age. Anim Nutr. 2023; 12:145-50

22.

Kong C, Adeola O. Comparative amino acid digestibility for broiler chickens and White Pekin ducks. Poult Sci. 2013; 92:2367-74

23.

Lemme A, Ravindran V, Bryden WL. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in feed ingredients for broilers. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2004; 60:423-38

24.

Nørgaard JV, Pedersen TF, Soumeh EA, Blaabjerg K, Canibe N, Jensen BB, et al. Optimum standardized ileal digestible tryptophan to lysine ratio for pigs weighing 7–14 kg. Livest Sci. 2015; 175:90-5

25.

Pomar C, Pomar J, Rivest J, Cloutier L, Letourneau-Montminy MP, Andretta I, et al. Estimating real-time individual amino acid requirements in growing-finishing pigs: towards a new definition of nutrient requirements in growing-finishing pigs?. In: In: Sakomura NK, Gous R, Kyriazakis I, Hauschild L, editors. editors Nutritional modelling for pigs and poultry. WallingfordOxfordshire: CABI 2015; p:157-74

26.

Heger J, Křižová L, Šustala M, Nitrayová S, Patráš P, Hampel D. Assessment of statistical models describing individual and group response of pigs to threonine intake. J Anim Feed Sci. 2007; 16:420-32

27.

Zhou YF, Liu YQ, Wei HK, Peng J. Estimation of the optimum digestible lysine level for Cherry Valley ducks. Poult Sci. 2017; 96:838-43

28.

Hickling D, Guenter W, Jackson ME. The effects of dietary methionine and lysine on broiler chicken performance and breast meat yield. Can J Anim Sci. 1990; 70:673-8

29.

Liu SY, Rochell SJ, Maynard CW, Caldas J, Kidd MT. Digestible lysine concentrations and amino acid densities influence growth performance and carcass traits in broiler chickens from 14 to 35 days post-hatch. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2019; 255:114216