Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of illite or bentonite on cytotoxicity, antibacterial and adsorption capacity in porcine intestinal epithelial cells

Seyeon Chang1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-2982, Jihwan Lee2,#https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8161-4853, Seungwon Jung1,#https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5592-7097, Dongcheol Song1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5704-603X, Sehyun Park1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-9496, Kyeongho Jeon1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2321-3319, Hyuck Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5280-0734, Jinho Cho1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-0778
1Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
2Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea
*Corresponding author: Jinho Cho, Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea., Tel: +82-43-261-2544, E-mail: jinhcho@chungbuk.ac.kr

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

© Copyright 2026 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Aug 07, 2024; Revised: Nov 05, 2024; Accepted: Nov 05, 2024

Published Online: Mar 31, 2026

Abstract

This study investigated the cytotoxicity of illite and bentonite using porcine intestinal epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) as a primary screening verification method for the effect of supplementing illite and bentonite. Also, it evaluated the antibacterial activity and adsorption capacity of illite and bentonite by infecting IPEC-J2 cells with pathogenic Escherichia coli. The addition levels of illite and bentonite in IPEC-J2 cells medium were set as follows; CON, 0%; I1, illite 1%, I1.5, illite 1.5%; I2, illite 2%; B1, bentonite 1%; B1.5, bentonite 1.5%; B2, bentonite 2%. The treatment time of illite and bentonite on IPEC-J2 cells was set to 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours. Cytotoxicity and wound healing assays were analyzed without E. coli challenge. Cell viability and E. coli adhesion ability were assessed through illite or bentonite treatment with E. coli challenge. All experiments were performed with three independent replicates, with six technical replicates per experiment. The B1.5 and B2 treatment groups showed higher (TRT, p < 0.05) cytotoxicity than the CON and illite groups. There was no significant difference in cytotoxicity according to the illite and bentonite treatment time. For wound closure rate, when illite and bentonite were treated for 6 hours, a significantly higher (Time, p < 0.05) healing rate was shown than that of the 2 and 4-hour treatments. The B1 with E. coli challenge group showed a significantly higher (TRT, p < 0.05) live cell count than the non-supplementation with E. coli challenge and B2 with E. coli challenge groups. In conclusion, except for 1.5% and 2% addition levels of bentonite, the illite and bentonites did not induce cytotoxicity in IPEC-J2 cells regardless of the treatment time. They were thought to be effective in wound healing ability in IPEC-J2 cells.

Keywords: Clay mineral; Weaned pigs; Viability

INTRODUCTION

Post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) is a multifactorial disease that occurs during the first 14 days after weaning and is caused by factors such as separation from the sow, change to solid feed, and mixing with other piglets [13]. The main causative agent of PWD is pathogenic Escherichia coli [4]. Weaning pigs with underdeveloped mucosal immunity and impaired intestinal barrier function are highly susceptible to pathogenic bacteria [5,6]. The PWD causes dehydration, growth retardation and increased mortality and is reported to be one of the largest causes of economic loss in swine production [7,8]. Antibiotics or high doses of zinc oxide are used in weaned pigs’ diets to prevent PWD, but their use is currently restricted worldwide due to antibiotic resistance and environmental pollution problems [8]. Therefore, new strategies are needed to improve the robustness and growth performance of weaned pigs from a nutritional perspective.

Clay minerals (CM) are naturally occurring rock or soil materials, which are mainly particulate aluminosilicate minerals, characterized by high hygroscopicity [9]. Illite and bentonite from the phyllosilicate family are among the best-known CMs, with reported effects such as a lack of primary toxicity and the absorption of feed contaminants through their high binding capacity [10,11]. Phyllosilicate has a conformational structure in which tetrahedral silica and octahedral aluminum layers are repeatedly stacked [9]. When pathogens or enterotoxins and CMs contact the animal’s body, they are adsorbed onto the surface or middle layer of the CM structure through hydrogen bonds, which reduces the number of pathogens in the intestines [12]. When CMs are fed to weaned pigs, the rate at which digesta passes through the intestines is delayed, and the activity of pathogenic bacterial enzymes is reduced, which can alleviate PWD [13,14]. However, the positive effects of adsorption may be influenced by the amount of CM supplemented [15], and since CM cytotoxicity according to the dose has been reported [16], additional research is needed to determine the CM dose.

Intestinal epithelial cells form a physical interface separating the lumen contents from the host environment and serve as an efficient barrier to prevent the invasion of pathogens and toxins [17,18]. The intestinal porcine enterocyte cell lines (IPEC-J2) originating from pig jejunum can easily observe immune and toxic responses, and they are specialized for studying the effects of various substances on intestinal epithelial cells [19,20]. Therefore, this study investigated the toxicity of illite and bentonite using IPEC-J2 cells as a primary screening verification method for the effect of supplementing illite and bentonite and evaluated the antibacterial activity and adsorption capacity of illite and bentonite by infecting IPEC-J2 cells with pathogenic E. coli. This study hypothesizes that appropriate doses of illite and bentonite do not affect cytotoxicity and that the adsorption capacity of illite and bentonite will inhibit the growth of pathogenic E. coli, thereby improving cell viability and wound healing ability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental design

The addition levels of illite and bentonite in IPEC-J2 cells medium were set as follows; CON, 0%; I1, illite 1%, I1.5, illite 1.5%; I2, illite 2%; B1, bentonite 1%; B1.5, bentonite 1.5%; B2, bentonite 2%. They were completely dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; GenDEPOT) according to each addition level. Afterward, they were added in a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium and Ham’s F-12 Nutrient Mixture (DMEM/F-12; Welgene) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Corning Cellgro) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S; Gibco) and used as illite or bentonite medium. The total DMSO volume in the illite or bentonite medium was set not to exceed 1% considering the cytotoxicity of DMSO. Additionally, to confirm the effect of the treatment time of illite and bentonite on IPEC-J2 cells, the treatment time was set to 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours. All experiments were performed with three independent replicates, with six technical replicates per experiment.

Epithelial cell line and bacterial strains

The IPEC-J2 cell lines of intestinal porcine enterocytes was isolated from the jejunum of newborn piglets (ACC 701, Leibniz Institute DSMZ). The IPEC-J2 cells were cultured in growing medium (GM) containing 10% FBS and 1% P/S in a DMEM/F-12 containing 15 mM hydroxyethyl piperazine ethane sulfonic acid (HEPES), and cultivated in an incubator at 37℃ and 5% CO2. All experiments used IPEC-J2 cells within seven cell passages (passages 3 to 10). The IPEC-J2 cells were seeded at a density of 3,000 cells/cm2 on 58 cm2 cell plates (SPL Life Sciences) and cultured until more than 90% confluent. The 58 cm2 cell plates were coated with 8 μg/cm2 collagen from calf skin (Sigma-Aldrich). The GM was changed every 2 days.

To infect IPEC-J2 cells with pathogenic E. coli, E. coli KCTC 2571 was supplied from Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC) in a lyophilized state and suspended in sterile distilled water. The 10 μL of the suspended E. coli was added to Luria-Bertani broth (LB broth; KisanBio) and cultured at 37℃ for 18 hours with shaking. After culture was complete, the suspension was vortexed and centrifuged at 4℃, 1,200 rpm, and 10 minutes. The supernatant was removed and washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After that, 1 mL of antibiotic-free GM (supplemented with 10% FBS in DMEM/F-12) was added and pipetted. After serially diluting to 10–6 with PBS, 100 μL of the dilution was plated on LB agar (KisanBio) and cultured at 37℃ for 18 hours. The number of E. coli was counted to calculate the colony forming unit (CFU). After recording the CFU of E. coli, the supernatant of each E. coli solution was filtered using a 0.22 μm filter (Sigma-Aldrich) to remove any remaining bacterial cells and stored at –80℃ until use in the experiment as an E. coli challenge medium.

Preparations of illite and bentonite

Illite (YonggungIllite) is composed of 67.4% SiO2, 20.3% Al2O3, 5.5% K2O, and other minerals (Fe2O3, Na2O, TiO2, etc.). Bentonite is sodium-bentonite and is mostly composed of montmorillonite. Illite and bentonite were completely dissolved in DMSO according to each supplementing amount and then added to DMEM/F-12.

Cytotoxicity

The IPEC-J2 cells were seeded at 5 × 104 cells/well in a 96-well cell plate and cultured with GM for 24 hours at 37℃ and 5% CO2. After 24 hours, each treatment medium was added and cultured according to each treatment time (2, 4, and 6 hours). Cytotoxicity was analyzed using the Quanti-MAX WST-8 assay (Biomax) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After incubation, 100 μL of GM and 10 μL of WST-8 assay solution were dispensed into each well and then cultured for 4 hours. Afterward, the cell absorbance of each well was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (INNO, LTekc).

Wound healing assay

The cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells/well in a 24-well cell plate and cultured with GM for 24 hours at 37℃ and 5% CO2. After 24 hours, each treatment medium was added and cultured according to each treatment time. After incubation, the cells were washed once with Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS; Welgene) and then scratched using a SPLScar Scratcher (SPL Life Sciences). After removing floating cell debris through three DPBS washes, the area of the scratch was measured under an inverted microscope (EVOS M5000 Imaging System, Thermo Fisher Scientific). After 12 and 24 hours, the change in the area of the scratch was measured.

Cell viability

To confirm the effects of illite and bentonite on cell viability during E. coli infection, an E. coli challenge treatment were as followed; No-challenge, no E. coli challenge; E. coli challenge; EI1, E. coli challenge + illite 1%; EI1.5, E. coli challenge + illite 1.5%; EI2, E. coli challenge + illite 2%; EB1, E. coli challenge + bentonite 1%; EB1.5, E. coli challenge + bentonite 1.5%; EB2, E. coli challenge + bentonite 2%. The treatment times were the same at 2, 4, and 6 hours. The cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells/well in a 24-well cell plate and cultured with GM for 24 hours at 37℃ and 5% CO2. After 24 hours, each treatment medium was added and cultured according to each treatment time. To adapt to antibiotic-free GM before E. coli challenge, all treatment groups were dispensed with antibiotic-free GM and cultured for 30 minutes. After that, the E. coli challenge treatment group was infected with E. coli for 5 hours with E. coli challenge medium having a multiplicity of infection (MoI) of 300. This MoI and culture time were selected through preliminary experiments to allow partial cell damage. The no-challenge group was dispensed with antibiotic-free GM and cultured for 5 hours. After 5 hours, the cells were detached with Trypsin-EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich). To assess cell viability, aliquots of the collected cells were mixed with trypan blue and loaded onto a hemocytometer. The total number of cells and dead cells were counted.

Bacterial adhesion ability

To confirm the E. coli adhesion inhibition ability of illite and bentonite, an E. coli challenge was conducted on all treatment groups. The treatment times were the same at 2, 4, and 6 hours. The cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells/well in a 24-well cell plate and cultured with GM for 24 hours at 37℃ and 5% CO2. After 24 hours, each treatment medium was added and cultured according to each treatment time. To adapt to antibiotic-free GM before E. coli challenge, all treatment groups were dispensed with antibiotic-free GM and cultured for 30 minutes. After that, the E. coli challenge treatment group was infected with E. coli for 5 hours with E. coli challenge medium having 300 MoI. After the E. coli challenge, the cells were washed once with DPBS to remove any removing E. coli residues, then GM was added and cultured for 24 hours. To remove non-attached E. coli, the cells were washed three times with PBS and then lysed with 1% Triton-X 100 (Sigma-Aldrich). The cell lysate was serially diluted, plated on LB agar, and incubated at 37℃ for 24 hours to measure the number of E. coli.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed with three independent replicates, with six technical replicates per experiment. The mean of the technical replicates was calculated for each experiment. The effects of illite and bentonite’s addition levels, the illite or bentonite’s treatment time, and possible interactions between each of these were analyzed using means of multifactor variance analysis (MANOVA) for repeated measurements of each cell. The measurements were considered repeated over time and were entered as independent variables in the MANOVA. The data on scratch width were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA by calculating the change in width according to the illite and bentonite treatment time, and then Tukey’s multiple tests were performed as a post-hoc test. Statistical analyses and visualized graphs were performed using JMP Pro 16 (SAS Institute) and GraphPad Prism (Version 9.1.0; GraphPad Software), respectively. All data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). A probability level of p < 0.05 was indicated to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Cytotoxicity

The effects of the addition levels of illite and bentonite and the treatment time on cytotoxicity are shown in Fig. 1. The B1.5 and B2 treatment groups showed higher (TRT, p < 0.05) cytotoxicity than the CON and illite groups. There was no significant difference in cytotoxicity according to the treatment time of illite and bentonite.

jast-68-2-487-g1
Fig. 1. Effects of addition levels of illite and bentonite and the treatment time on cytotoxicity in porcine intestinal epithelial cells (IPEC-J2). All data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). A–CValues with different letters within a row are different at p < 0.05 (TRT). CON, growing medium (GM); I1, GM with illite 1%; I1.5, GM with illite 1.5%; I2, GM with illite 2%; B1, GM with bentonite 1%; B1.5, GM with bentonite 1.5%; B2, GM with bentonite 2%.
Download Original Figure
Cell healing rate

The effects of the addition levels of illite and bentonite and the treatment time on cell healing rate are shown in Figs. 2, 3, 4, and 5. When treated with illite and bentonite for 2 hours, the scratch width of the illite treatment groups and the B1.5 treatment group significantly decreased (p < 0.05) compared to the B2 treatment group and showed a similar width to the CON group after 12 hours (Fig. 2A and 3). After 24 hours, it was confirmed that all scratches in the I1 treatment group had recovered. When treated with illite and bentonite for 4 hours, the scratch width of the I1.5 treatment group significantly decreased (p < 0.05) compared to the CON group after 12 hours, and there was no significant difference among the treatment groups after 24 hours (Fig. 2B and 4). When treated with illite and bentonite for 6 hours, the I1 treatment group showed a significantly lower (p < 0.05) scratch width than the B1.5 and B2 treatment groups after 12 hours (Fig. 2C and 5). For wound closure rate, when illite and bentonite were treated for 6 hours, a significantly higher (Time, p < 0.05) healing rate was shown than that of the 2 and 4-hour treatments (Fig. 2D).

jast-68-2-487-g2
Fig. 2. Effects of addition levels of illite and bentonite and the treatment time on cell healing rate in porcine intestinal epithelial cells (IPEC-J2). (A) Cells were pretreated with illite and bentonite for 2 hours and scratched. After scratching, the width was measured at 12 hours and 24 hours. (B) Cells were pretreated with illite and bentonite for 4 hours and scratched. After scratching, the width was measured at 12 hours and 24 hours. (C) Cells were pretreated with illite and bentonite for 6 hours and scratched. After scratching, the width was measured at 12 hours and 24 hours. (D) The wound closure rate is expressed as a ratio of the migration distance after 24 hours compared with the distance immediately after scratching. All data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). A,BValues with different letters within a row are different at p < 0.05 (Time). a,bValues with different letters within a row are different at p < 0.05. *Values with different letters within a row are different at p < 0.05. CON, growing medium (GM); I1, GM with illite 1%; I1.5, GM with illite 1.5%; I2, GM with illite 2%; B1, GM with bentonite 1%; B1.5, GM with bentonite 1.5%; B2, GM with bentonite 2%.
Download Original Figure
jast-68-2-487-g3
Fig. 3. Representative image of wound-healing assay. Cells were pretreated with illite and bentonite for 2 hours and scratched. The dashed lines indicate wound edges. Scale bar: 400 μm. CON, growing medium (GM); I1, GM with illite 1%; I1.5, GM with illite 1.5%; I2, GM with illite 2%; B1, GM with bentonite 1%; B1.5, GM with bentonite 1.5%; B2, GM with bentonite 2%.
Download Original Figure
jast-68-2-487-g4
Fig. 4. Representative image of wound-healing assay. Cells were pretreated with illite and bentonite for 4 hours and scratched. The dashed lines indicate wound edges. Scale bar: 400 μm. CON, growing medium (GM); I1, GM with illite 1%; I1.5, GM with illite 1.5%; I2, GM with illite 2%; B1, GM with bentonite 1%; B1.5, GM with bentonite 1.5%; B2, GM with bentonite 2%.
Download Original Figure
jast-68-2-487-g5
Fig. 5. Representative image of wound-healing assay. Cells were pretreated with illite and bentonite for 6 hours and scratched. The dashed lines indicate wound edges. Scale bar: 400 μm. CON, growing medium (GM); I1, GM with illite 1%; I1.5, GM with illite 1.5%; I2, GM with illite 2%; B1, GM with bentonite 1%; B1.5, GM with bentonite 1.5%; B2, GM with bentonite 2%.
Download Original Figure
Cell viability

When treated with illite and bentonite for 2 hours, the live cell count and cell viability were significantly higher (Time, p < 0.05) than when treated for 4 and 6 hours (Fig. 6A and 6C). The EB1 treatment group showed a significantly higher (TRT, p < 0.05) live cell count than the E. coli challenge and EB2 treatment groups (Fig. 6B). The E. coli challenge group showed significantly lower (TRT, p < 0.05) cell viability than the no-challenge group (Fig. 6D).

jast-68-2-487-g6
Fig. 6. Effects of addition levels of illite and bentonite and the treatment time on cell viability in porcine intestinal epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) with Escherichia coli challenge. (A) The time effect of illite and bentonite on live cell counts in cells with E. coli challenge. (B) The treatment effect of illite and bentonite on live cell counts in cells with E. coli challenge. (C) The time effect of illite and bentonite on cell viability in cells with E. coli challenge. (D) The treatment effect of illite and bentonite on cell viability in cells with E. coli challenge. All data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). A,BValues with different letters within a row are different at p < 0.05 (Time). a,bValues with different letters within a row are different at p < 0.05 (TRT). No-challenge, no E. coli challenge; E. coli challenge; EI1, E. coli challenge + illite 1%; EI1.5, E. coli challenge + illite 1.5%; EI2, E. coli challenge + illite 2%; EB1, E. coli challenge + bentonite 1%; EB1.5, E. coli challenge + bentonite 1.5%; EB2, E. coli challenge + bentonite 2%.
Download Original Figure
Escherichia coli adhesion ability

The effects of the addition levels of illite and bentonite and the treatment time on E. coli adhesion ability are shown in Fig. 7. There was no significant difference in E. coli adhesion ability according to the treatment of illite and bentonite.

jast-68-2-487-g7
Fig. 7. Effects of addition levels of illite and bentonite and the treatment time on Escherichia coli adhesion ability in porcine intestinal epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) with E. coli challenge. All data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). E. coli challenge; EI1, E. coli challenge + illite 1%; EI1.5, E. coli challenge + illite 1.5%; EI2, E. coli challenge+ illite 2%; EB1, E. coli challenge + bentonite 1%; EB1.5, E. coli challenge + bentonite 1.5%; EB2, E. coli challenge + bentonite 2%.
Download Original Figure

DISCUSSION

This study aimed to secure basic data for the application of illite and bentonite in weaned pigs’ diets by evaluating the toxicity of illite and bentonite and cell viability through their absorption capacity using IPEC-J2 cells. Illite and bentonite, which are representative examples of phyllosilicates, have attracted much scientific attention due to their wide range of applications [21,22]. In particular, bentonite has been studied as a toxin binder in livestock diets such as broiler and pigs [23,24]. However, bentonites may negatively affect the immune response or growth performance of broilers or pigs [25,26]. Baek et al. [16] reported that montmorillonite, the main component of bentonite, induced oxidative stress and cell membrane damage at 20–1,000 μg/mL in normal human intestinal cells (INT-407), and that long-term exposure resulted in cytotoxicity. In this study, 1.5% and 2% bentonite were observed to be cytotoxic compared to the CON group. Illite showed a survival rate similar to that in the CON group but lower cytotoxicity than bentonite. The bentonite type we used was sodium-bentonite. This refined bentonite has a higher absorption capacity than the original form because the surface area and porosity of the material are larger [26,27]. High absorption capacity can cause cytotoxicity by binding not only toxins but also essential nutrients [26]. In contrast, illite has a structure similar to bentonite but has a weaker absorption capacity than bentonite [28]. Accordingly, it is thought that illite did not show cytotoxicity even at higher addition doses than bentonite. Also, in this study, no cytotoxicity was observed in IPEC-J2 cells according to the treatment time with illite and bentonite. Although exposure to illite and bentonite for up to 6 hours did not appear to affect cytotoxicity, the retention time of CMs in the intestines may vary when ingested by weaned pigs, so further studies in animal models are needed.

Wounds are self-repaired in IPEC-J2 cells through the proliferation and migration of epithelial cells, and the self-repair ability of intestinal epithelial cells plays an important role in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal barrier [29,30]. In this study, we artificially scratched IPEC-J2 cells to evaluate the effects of illite and bentonite on their wound-healing ability. When treated with illite for 2, 4, and 6 hours, the scratch width was reduced compared to the B1.5 and B2 treatment groups, and a fast-healing rate was observed. Cells treated with illite and bentonite for 6 hours showed a higher healing rate than those treated for 2 and 4 hours. This suggests that illite can help alleviate intestinal damage in weaned pigs by accelerating the self-recovery of wound healing in intestinal epithelial cells. The healing rate in the B2 group was significantly slower than in the other treatment groups, and the image showed almost no recovery. This may have been due to the cytotoxicity of the processed bentonite mentioned above.

The PWD caused by pathogenic E. coli in weaned pigs causes systemic inflammation and damage to the intestinal epithelium [4,31]. The intestinal mucosal barrier is the first line of defense against the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms and toxins into the intestine [32]. Pathogenic E. coli induces abnormal intestinal barrier function and affects intestinal health by reducing the expression of tight junction proteins and increasing permeability in intestinal epithelial cells [3335]. IPEC-J2 cells have typical epithelial cell characteristics and are a permissive host for commensal bacteria and enteric pathogens, making them an excellent model for studying the interaction between bacteria and IPEC-J2 cells [36]. In this study, when IPEC-J2 cells were infected with E. coli at 300 MoI, they showed significantly lower cell viability than the uninfected treatment group. In live cell counts, the EB1 group showed a higher cell count and higher cell viability than the E. coli group. Since bentonite is characterized by high adsorption ability, it was expected to show higher E. coli adhesion than illite. However, this study found no difference between illite and bentonite. Thus, the effects should be further studied through more in-depth cell experiments and animal experiments.

CONCLUSION

Illite and bentonite treatments, except for 1.5% and 2% bentonite, did not induce cytotoxicity regardless of the treatment time in IPEC-J2 cells. When treated with illite for 2, 4, and 6 hours, the scratch width was reduced compared to the B1.5 and B2 treatment groups, and a fast-healing rate was observed. When IPEC-J2 cells were infected with E. coli, the number of live cells was similar to that of the uninfected group when treated with 1% bentonite. In conclusion, this study can be used as basic data on illite and bentonite for the intestinal health of weaned pigs.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This research was supported by “Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS)” through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2021RIS-001).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Chang S, Lee J, Jung S, Cho J.

Data curation: Chang S, Lee J, Jung S.

Formal analysis: Chang S, Song D.

Methodology: Park S.

Software: Jeon K.

Validation: Jeon K, Kim H.

Investigation: Lee J, Cho J.

Writing - original draft: Chang S, Lee J, Jung S, Song D, Park S, Jeon K, Kim H, Cho J.

Writing - review & editing: Chang S, Lee J, Jung S, Song D, Park S, Jeon K, Kim H, Cho J.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

REFERENCES

1.

Campbell JM, Crenshaw JD, Polo J. The biological stress of early weaned piglets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013; 4:19.

2.

Poonsuk K, Zimmerman J. Historical and contemporary aspects of maternal immunity in swine. Anim Health Res Rev. 2018; 19:31-45.

3.

Eriksen EØ, Kudirkiene E, Christensen AE, Agerlin MV, Weber NR, Nødtvedt A, et al. Post-weaning diarrhea in pigs weaned without medicinal zinc: risk factors, pathogen dynamics, and association to growth rate. Porc Health Manag. 2021; 7:54.

4.

Kim K, Song M, Liu Y, Ji P. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection of weaned pigs: intestinal challenges and nutritional intervention to enhance disease resistance. Front Immunol. 2022; 13:885253.

5.

Moeser AJ, Pohl CS, Rajput M. Weaning stress and gastrointestinal barrier development: implications for lifelong gut health in pigs. Anim Nutr. 2017; 3:313-21.

6.

Pluske JR, Miller DW, Sterndale SO, Turpin DL. Associations between gastrointestinal-tract function and the stress response after weaning in pigs. Anim Prod Sci. 2019; 59:2015-22.

7.

Cao S, Hou L, Sun L, Gao J, Gao K, Yang X, et al. Intestinal morphology and immune profiles are altered in piglets by early-weaning. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022; 105:108520.

8.

Tang Q, Lan T, Zhou C, Gao J, Wu L, Wei H, et al. Nutrition strategies to control post-weaning diarrhea of piglets: from the perspective of feeds. Anim Nutr. 2024; 17:297-311.

9.

Damato A, Vianello F, Novelli E, Balzan S, Gianesella M, Giaretta E, et al. Comprehensive review on the interactions of clay minerals with animal physiology and production. Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:889612.

10.

Song M, Liu Y, Soares JA, Che TM, Osuna O, Maddox CW, et al. Dietary clays alleviate diarrhea of weaned pigs. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90:345-60.

11.

Adegbeye MJ, Reddy PRK, Chilaka CA, Balogun OB, Elghandour MMMY, Rivas-Caceres RR, et al. Mycotoxin toxicity and residue in animal products: prevalence, consumer exposure and reduction strategies – a review. Toxicon. 2020; 177:96-108.

12.

Trckova M, Vondruskova H, Zraly Z, Alexa P, Hamrik J, Kummer V, et al. The effect of kaolin feeding on efficiency, health status and course of diarrhoeal infections caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains in weaned piglets. Vet Med. 2009; 54:47-63.

13.

Castro MJ. Use of additives on the feeding of monogastric animals. Cuban J Agric Sci. 2005; 39:439-45.

14.

Vondruskova H, Slamova R, Trckova M, Zraly Z, Pavlik I. Alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in prevention of diarrhoea in weaned piglets: a review. Vet Med. 2010; 55:199-224.

15.

Brouillard MY, Rateau JG. Adsorption of bacterial enterotoxins by smectite and kaolin clays-in vitro study in cell-culture and in the newborn mouse. Gastroen Clin Biol. 1989; 13:18-24.

16.

Baek M, Lee JA, Choi SJ. Toxicological effects of a cationic clay, montmorillonite in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2012; 8:95-101.

17.

Baumgart DC, Dignass AU. Intestinal barrier function. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2002; 5:685-94.

18.

Kim HW, Lee SY, Hur SJ, Kil DY, Kim JH. Effects of functional nutrients on chicken intestinal epithelial cells induced with oxidative stress. J Anim Sci Technol. 2023; 65:1040-52.

19.

Klingspor S, Martens H, Çaushi D, Twardziok S, Aschenbach JR, Lodemann U. Characterization of the effects of Enterococcus faecium on intestinal epithelial transport properties in piglets. J Anim Sci. 2013; 91:1707-18.

20.

Loss H, Aschenbach JR, Tedin K, Ebner F, Lodemann U. The inflammatory response to enterotoxigenic E. coli and probiotic E. faecium in a coculture model of porcine intestinal epithelial and dendritic cells. Mediators Inflamm. 2018; 2018:9368295.

21.

Srinivasan R. Advances in application of natural clay and its composites in removal of biological, organic, and inorganic contaminants from drinking water. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2011; 2011:872531.

22.

Ghadiri M, Chrzanowski W, Rohanizadeh R. Biomedical applications of cationic clay minerals. RSC Adv. 2015; 5:29467-81.

23.

Ghazalah AA, Abd-Elsamee MO, Moustafa KEME, Khattab MA, Rehan AEAA. Effect of nanosilica and bentonite as mycotoxins adsorbent agent in broiler chickens’ diet on growth performance and hepatic histopathology. Animals. 2021; 11:2129.

24.

Deng Z, Jang KB, Jalukar S, Du X, Kim SW. Efficacy of feed additive containing bentonite and enzymatically hydrolyzed yeast on intestinal health and growth of newly weaned pigs under chronic dietary challenges of fumonisin and aflatoxin. Toxins. 2023; 15:433.

25.

Khatoon A, Khan MZ, Abidin Z, Bhatti SA. Effects of feeding bentonite clay upon ochratoxin A–induced immunosuppression in broiler chicks. Food Addit Contam A. 2018; 35:538-45.

26.

Horky P, Nevrkla P, Kopec T, Bano I, Skoric M, Skladanka J, et al. Is a new generation of mycotoxin clay adsorbents safe in a pig’s diet?. Porc Health Manag. 2022; 8:31.

27.

Zhang M, Lu Y, Li X, Chen Q, Lu L, Xing M, et al. Studying the cytotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by two kinds of bentonite particles on human B lymphoblast cells in vitro. Chem Biol Interact. 2010; 183:390-6.

28.

Kumari N, Mohan C. Basics of clay minerals and their characteristic properties.In In: Do Nascimento GM, editor.editor Clay and clay minerals. IntechOpen. 2021; p p. 1-29.

29.

Dorscheid DR, Patchell BJ, Estrada O, Marroquin B, Tse R, White SR. Effects of corticosteroid-induced apoptosis on airway epithelial wound closure in vitro. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006; 291:L794-801.

30.

Leppkes M, Roulis M, Neurath MF, Kollias G, Becker C. Pleiotropic functions of TNF-α in the regulation of the intestinal epithelial response to inflammation. Int Immunol. 2014; 26:509-15.

31.

Fu Q, Lin Q, Chen D, Yu B, Luo Y, Zheng P, et al. β-Defensin 118 attenuates inflammation and injury of intestinal epithelial cells upon enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli challenge. BMC Vet Res. 2022; 18:142.

32.

Pitman RS, Blumberg RS. First line of defense: the role of the intestinal epithelium as an active component of the mucosal immune system. J Gastroenterol. 2000; 35:805-14.

33.

Salim SY, Söderholm JD. Importance of disrupted intestinal barrier in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011; 17:362-81.

34.

Xu CM, Li XM, Qin B, Liu B. Effect of tight junction protein of intestinal epithelium and permeability of colonic mucosa in pathogenesis of injured colonic barrier during chronic recovery stage of rats with inflammatory bowel disease. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2016; 9:148-52.

35.

Campbell HK, Maiers JL, DeMali KA. Interplay between tight junctions & adherens junctions. Exp Cell Res. 2017; 358:39-44.

36.

Zakrzewski SS, Richter JF, Krug SM, Jebautzke B, Lee IFM, Rieger J, et al. Improved cell line IPEC-J2, characterized as a model for porcine jejunal epithelium. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8e79643.