RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of dry period length on milk production and physiological responses of heat-stressed dairy cows during the transition period

Dong-Hyun Lim1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8575-0198, Da Jin Sol Jung1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9892-5698, Kwang-Seok Ki1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0971-1389, Dong-Hyeon Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0756-8419, Manhye Han1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-4587, Younghoon Kim2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6769-0657
Author Information & Copyright
1Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea
2Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*Corresponding author: Younghoon Kim, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. Tel: +82-2-880-4808, E-mail: ykeys2584@snu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2023 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 17, 2022; Revised: Nov 12, 2022; Accepted: Nov 14, 2022

Published Online: Jan 31, 2023

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of a traditional dry period (60 d) versus a no dry period (0 d) on the milk production, physiological response, and metabolic status of dairy cows exposed to heat stress during the transition period. Holstein dairy cows (n = 15) with similar expected calving dates were randomly assigned to two different dry period lengths: (1) no dry period (n = 7) and (2) a traditional dry period of 60 days (n = 8). All cows were studied from 8 weeks before expected calving to 10 weeks after calving and experienced heat stress during the transition period. The results showed that cows with no dry period decreased their milk yield in subsequent lactation, but compensated for the loss of milk yield accounted for by additional milk yield before calving. The energy balance at postpartum was improved in cows with no dry period compared to cows with a traditional dry period. There were no significant differences in the physiological response and blood metabolites at postpartum between the dry period lengths of dairy cows exposed to heat stress during the transition period. Taken together, our results showed that omitting the dry period improved the milk production and metabolic status of dairy cows exposed to heat stress during the transition period.

Keywords: Dairy cows; Heat stress; Dry period length; Milk production; Blood metabolites

INTRODUCTION

The transition period is commonly defined as the period from 3 weeks before to 3 weeks after calving and is critically important to the health, production, and profitability of dairy cows [1]. For 3 weeks before calving, the nutrient requirements of the fetus reach maximal levels, but dry matter intake (DMI) decreases by 10%–30% [2]. Until the first 2 to 3 months in early lactation, the energy requirements for milk yield increase rapidly, exceeding the energy intake [3,4]. For these reasons, transition cows experience a negative energy balance (EB), which occurs when the energy requirement for a cow cannot be met by the energy she consumes. Under negative EB, mobilization of body reserves to compensate for this energy deficit is associated with altered metabolic status, greater incidence of metabolic diseases such as ketosis, displaced abomasum, mastitis and decreased fertility [4,5].

Many studies have reported that a dry period (DP) is optimal for 42 to 60 days [6]. Decreasing the DP is associated with the reduction of milk production in subsequent lactation [3,7,8]. Some researchers have reviewed the effects of shortening or omitting the DP on lactation performance, metabolic status, health and fertility of dairy cows [9,10]. For high-yielding cows with shortening or omitting of the DP, dairy cows have to produce less milk the next lactation but could obtain less metabolic load and negative EB in early lactation [3,4,11]. However, studies on the effect of omitting the DP when applied to transition cows under heat stress are very limited.

Heat stress is a major factor that negatively affects milk productivity, reproduction, health, and welfare, leading to economic burdens on dairy farms [1216]. Lactating dairy cows have significantly more metabolic heat and additional heat from radiant energy and greater difficulty dissipating the heat stress compared with nonlactating cows [17]. Heat stress during the DP carries over into the postpartum period, which causes a decrease in milk production and negatively affects hepatic metabolism [18]. It is unclear whether omitting the DP abates the negative effect of heat stress pre- and postpartum and the subsequent performance. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of traditional DP (60-d DP) versus no DP (0-d DP) on EB, milk production, milk composition, and metabolic status of dairy cows exposed to heat stress from 8 weeks before calving to 10 weeks after calving.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals, housing, and experimental design

Holstein dairy cows were housed at the Department of Animal Resources Development, which is located at the National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS) in Cheonan, South Korea. All dairy cows were maintained as stated in standard guidelines, and the experimental protocol involved in this experiment was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at NIAS (study approval number: IACUC 2020-435). Multiparous dairy cows (n = 15; Parity 2.33 ± 0.47) were selected with expecting calving dates between June and July. All cows were randomly allocated to two different DP lengths: no DP (0-d DP, n = 7) or a traditional DP of 60 days (60-d DP, n = 8). All cows were studied from 8 weeks before expected calving to 10 weeks postpartum and experienced heat stress during the transition period. All cows yielded at least 15 kg milk per day at 8 weeks prepartum and had a healthy udder. Cows in the 60-d DP group received the far-off ration (total mixed ration [TMR]-1) from 7 days before drying-off, were milked once a day for 4 days before drying-off, and were administered an intramammary antibiotic therapy (Cloxagel® 500, Virbac, Carros, France) in each quarter during the last milking to dry off. During the DP, the cows were fed ad libitum TMR-1 ration, and received the producing lactation ration after calving (TMR-2) (Table 1). Cows in the 0-d DP group received the TMR-2 lactation ratio in the period before and after parturition. All cows were housed in an open loose barn, which was designed with the overshot roof of a ridge exhaust and fans to move and exchange the air in summer. The feed was offered once a day at 09:00 hr. TMR samples were taken monthly and stored at −20°C until analysis. Water was provided ad libitum.

Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of the dry ration and the lactation ration offered to Holstein dairy cows during the prepartum and postpartum periods
Item TMR-11) TMR-2
Ingredient (% of DM)
 Concentrates 8.1 26.0
 Beet pulp - 2.3
 Whole cottonseed - 2.3
 Soybean meal - 1.1
 Copra cake meal 2.0 -
 Corn silage 65.1 52.0
 Hay mixture 24.4 10.2
 Alfalfa - 3.4
 Timothy - 2.3
 Bypass fat - 0.1
 Sodium bicarbonate - 0.1
 Yeast culture 0.2 0.1
 Vitamin-mineral mixture 0.1 0.1
Chemical composition (% of DM)
 DM 51.62 51.47
 Crude protein 11.55 15.60
 Crude fat 4.87 5.75
 Crude fiber 25.64 20.48
 Crude ash 6.85 7.31
 NDF 51.18 42.80
 ADF 29.45 24.14
 NFE 51.09 50.86
 TDN 58.24 65.19
 NEL2) (Mcal/kg) 1.31 1.52

1) TMR-1 was fed to cows with a 60-d DP from 7 days before drying-off to calving; TMR-2 was fed to cows with a 0-d DP during the prepartum and postpartum periods and to cows with a 60-d DP after calving.

2) NEL, net energy for lactation; calculated using NRC [19] according to the chemical composition of the dietary ingredients.

DM, dry matter; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; AD, acid detergent fiber; NFE, nitrogen-free extract; TDN, total digestible nutrients.

Download Excel Table
Measurement of physiological responses, milk production and energy balance

DMI was determined daily on an individual basis by subtracting the weight of the leftovers at 08:30 h the next day from the total amount of feed offered at 09:00 h each day. Rectal temperature (RT), respiratory rate (RR), and the surface temperature of rumen (STR) and udder (STU) were first measured at 13:30 h every week, blood samples were collected, and then body weight (BW) was measured. Daily milk yield was the sum of the morning (06:00 h) and afternoon (17:00 h) milking. The EB was calculated according the method of the National Research Council [19]. Net energy for maintenance (NEM, Mcal/d) was calculated as 0.08 × BW0.75. The energy requirement for milk production (NEL) was calculated as daily milk production (kg) × [(0.0929 × Fat) + (0.0563 × Protein) + (0.0396 × Lactose)]. Net energy intake (NEI) was estimated by multiplying feed intake (kg) with Mcal per (kg) according to the feed analysis of each delivered ration. EB was calculated as EB = NEI × (NEL + NEM).

Sampling and laboratory analysis of milk and blood

Milk samples of individual cows were collected at each morning (06:00 am) and afternoon (17:00 pm) milking for one day every week. Milk samples were immediately analyzed with LactoScop (MK2, Delta Instruments, Drachten, The Netherlands). From the results of this analysis, fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) was calculated as FPCM = (0.337 + 0.116 × Fat % + 0.06 × Protein %) × milk production (kg/d). Blood samples were taken once weekly at approximately 14:00 h from the last 8 weeks before expected calving until 10 weeks after calving in vacutainer tubes (containing heparin). Serum samples were decanted from the collected blood samples and stored at -20°C until later analysis. Serum was analyzed for glucose, urea, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), and β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) by a Blood Antoanalyzer (Hitachi 7180, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Cortisol, insulin and insulin like growth factor (IGF)-I concentrations in serum were analyzed using the Bovine ELISA kit (Cusabio Biotech, Wuhan, China).

Collection of environmental data and calculation of the temperature humidity index

Ambient temperature (Ta, °C) and relative humidity (RH, %) were continuously measured every 30 min using a thermohygrometer (Testo 174H, Testo, West Chester, PA, USA) with an accuracy of ± 0.5°C and ± 3% RH. The thermohygrometer was installed in the feeding area at a height of 2.0 m above the ground. The temperature and humidity index (THI) was calculated based on the mathematical equation proposed by Mader et al. [20]: THI = (0.8 × Ta) + [RH × (Ta – 14.4)] + 46.4. The maximum and minimum means of Ta, RH, and THI were calculated from the maximum and minimum daily values, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Data were analyzed separately for the pre- and postpartum data. One-way ANOVA was performed for differences in daily Ta (°C), RH (%), and THI between pre- and postcalving, the gestation period and birth weight of calf between 0-d and 60-d DP. Repeated measures ANOVA was performed for the differences in milk yield, milk composition, DMI, BW, EB, RT, RR, STR, STU, and blood metabolites using PROC MIXED. Prepartum, milk production and milk composition were analyzed for the 0-d DP treatment but were not available for the 60-d DP treatment. Milk yield, FPCM, and milk composition variables after calving, DMI, BW, EB, RR, RT, STR, STU, and blood metabolites variables were analyzed with DP length (0-d or 60-d DP), week (wk -8 to -1 for prepartum; wk 0 to 10 for postpartum), and the relevant interaction terms included in the model as fixed effects. For comparison of DP lengths, p values are presented after a Bonferroni adjustment. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to separate the means when significance was indicated. Differences were considered significant if p < 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Environmental conditions

The environmental conditions, including Ta, RH, and THI, from -8 to 10 weeks relative to calving of dairy cows were similar during this study, as shown in Table 2. The daily average Ta and THI were higher in the postcalving period (26.02 ± 0.30°C and 76.22 ± 0.46, respectively) than in the precalving period (22.37 ± 0.31°C and 70.30 ± 0.53, respectively; p < 0.05), which indicates heat stress.

Table 2. Environmental conditions during the experimental periods
Item Precalving1) Postcalving2) SEM p-value
Daily Ta (°C)
 Maximum 27.26 32.50 0.32 < 0.001
 Minimum 17.98 21.67 0.25 < 0.001
 Average 22.37 26.02 0.24 < 0.001
Daily RH (%)
 Maximum 97.09 98.65 0.30 0.010
 Minimum 56.61 56.11 1.00 0.805
 Average 79.59 82.01 0.63 0.055
Daily THI
 Maximum 75.87 82.62 0.39 < 0.001
 Minimum 64.34 70.99 0.44 < 0.001
 Average 70.30 76.22 0.39 < 0.001

1) Precalving was defined as the last 8 weeks before the actual calving date.

2) Postcalving was defined as the first 10 weeks after the actual calving date.

Ta, air temperature; RH, relative humidity; THI, temperature and humidity index.

Download Excel Table
Gestation period and birth weight of calves

The actual DP was 56.13 ± 0.9 d (means ± SEMs) for cows with the conventional DP. Gestation period and calf birth weight did not significantly differ for cows with 0-d and 60-d DP (p > 0.05; Table 3). The birth weight of male calves tended to be higher in cows with 0-d DP (47.8 kg) than in cows with 60-d DP (42.8 kg; p < 0.10). Gulay et al. [21] reported no differences in calf birth weight for cows with 30-d and 60-d DP. Other studies reported that cows exposed to heat stress during the DP were reduced to several days (3 to 4 days) of gestation length and 6%–14% of fetal weight compared to nonstressed controls [2225]. Heat stress during late gestation compromises fetal growth, which is caused by the small decrease in DMI of heat-stressed cows (10%–15%) [18,2325]. As will be mentioned later (Table 4), these results may be related to the fact that the BW of calves born in the cows with 0-d DP was greater compared to cows with 60-d DP.

Table 3. Effects of dry period lengths (0-d and 60-d DP) in maternal cows on gestation length and calf birth weight
Item 0-d DP (n=7) 60-d DP (n=8) SEM p-value
Gestation length (day) 276.86 277.87 1.63 0.776
Birth weight of calf (kg)
 Female 39.0 38.6 5.28 0.307
 Male 47.8 42.8 7.66 0.092
 Total 42.9 40.7 6.58 0.497
Download Excel Table
Table 4. Effects of dry period lengths (0-d and 60-d DP) on physiological responses, and EB of dairy cows pre- and postcalving
Item 0-d DP (n=7) 60-d DP (n=8) SEM p-value
DP Wk DP × Wk
Precalving1)
 DMI (kg/d) 17.55 14.98 0.09 < 0.001 0.033 < 0.001
 BW (kg) 781.94 752.44 6.20 0.022 0.903 0.998
 RT (°C) 38.71 38.59 0.03 0.014 < 0.001 0.325
 RR (count/min) 53.91 44.47 0.78 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.803
 SRT (°C) 32.72 31.43 0.22 0.003 0.507 0.708
 SRU (°C) 30.38 30.19 0.17 0.572 0.580 0.044
 EB (Mcal NEL/d) -0.55 4.64 0.50 < 0.001 0.718 0.914
Postcalving2)
 DMI (kg/d) 18.94 18.90 2.55 0.781 < 0.001 0.105
 BW (kg) 658.58 629.15 5.50 0.010 < 0.001 0.885
 RT (°C) 38.97 38.94 0.03 0.730 0.002 0.144
 RR (count/min) 68.17 68.94 0.90 0.639 < 0.001 0.007
 SRT (°C) 34.33 34.34 0.09 0.946 < 0.001 0.007
 SRU (°C) 33.74 33.44 0.13 0.210 < 0.001 0.258
 EB (Mcal NEL/d) −3.87 −6.80 0.50 0.002 < 0.001 0.500

1) Precalving was defined as the last 8 weeks before the actual calving date.

2) Postcalving was defined as the first 10 weeks after the actual calving date.

DP, dry period; EB, energy balance; Wk, week related to calving; DMI, dry matter intake; BW, body weight; RT, rectal temperature; RR, respiratory rate; SRT, surface temperature of the rumen; SRU, surface temperature of the udder.

Download Excel Table
Physiological responses and energy balance

DMI during this experimental period was affected by the DP length, calving, and DP × calving (p < 0.05; Table 4 and Fig. 1). The DMIs of all DP lengths increased after calving compared with before calving (p < 0.05). The DMI at postcalving did not differ between 0-d and 60-d DP but was greater for cows with 0-d DP (17.55 ± 0.11 kg/d) than for cows with 60-d DP (14.98 ± 0.10 kg/d) at precalving (p < 0.05). BW was affected by the DP length pre- or postcalving (p < 0.05) and was significantly varied as it passed up to 10 weeks after calving (p < 0.05). EB decreased from precalving to postcalving in both DP lengths (p < 0.05; Fig. 2). At precalving, the EB of dairy cows with 60-d DP (4.64 ± 0.25 Mcal NEL/d) was higher than that of cows with 0-d DP (−0.55 ± 0.94 Mcal NEL/d) (p < 0.05). However, postpartum dairy cows with 0-d DP (−3.87 ± 0.68 Mcal NEL/d) had a lower EB reduction than cows with 60-d DP (−6.80 ± 0.65 Mcal NEL/d) (p < 0.05). Heat-stressed dairy cows reduce their DMI to decrease metabolic heat production and lead to large BW loss, which ultimately pushes the animal into negative EB [26]. In contrast, our study showed that BW change from prepartum to postpartum did not differ between cows in the 0-d or 60-d DP group (123.36 kg vs. 123.29 kg, respectively). Additionally, the average birth weight of calves tended to be higher in cows with 0-d DP (42.9 kg) than in cows with 60-d DP (40.7 kg; p > 0.10). These results were explained by Seyed Almoosavi et al. [27], who observed that heat stress in late pregnancy has a greater effect on fetal growth than on the BW loss of maternal cows. In this study, for postpartum, the EB of dairy cows with 0-d DP had a lower EB reduction than cows with 60-d DP, which is in line with previous studies [4]. The results showed that the more negative EB of cows with a 60-d DP after calving occurred earlier than in cows with a 0-d DP.

jast-65-1-197-g1
Fig. 1. Dry matter intake (A) and average body weight (B) of dairy cows with different dry period lengths (0-d or 60-d DP).
Download Original Figure
jast-65-1-197-g2
Fig. 2. Milk production (A) and energy balance (B) of dairy cows with different dry period lengths (0-d or 60-d DP).
Download Original Figure

RT, RR, and the STR were higher in cows with 0-d DP than in cows with 60-d DP for the prepartum period (p < 0.05; Table 4) but were not significantly different for the postpartum period (p < 0.05). During the prepartum period, RT and RR increased with week relative to calving (p < 0.05). After calving, the RT, RR, STR, and STU decreased with week relative to calving (p < 0.05). The interaction of DP length with week relative to calving was present for the STU during the prepartum period (p < 0.05) and for the RR and STR during the postpartum period (p < 0.05). RT and RR increased when evaporative heat loss from the skin surface was not sufficient [28] and were the main physiological indicators of heat stress in dairy cows [18]. Also, West [17] reported that lactating dairy cows have significantly more metabolic heat and additional heat from radiant energy and greater difficulty dissipating heat stress than nonlactating cows. Regardless of the DP length or heat stress at late gestation, heat stress in early lactation had no significant effect on physiological responses, such as RT, RR, and ST, between cows with 0-d and 60-d DP.

Milk production and composition

Prepartum, dairy cows with a 0-d DP had an extra milk production of 14.85 ± 0.5 kg/d (p < 0.05; Table 5 and Fig. 2). The total milk yield was 648.4 ± 92.5 kg for cows with a 0-d DP in the last 8 wk before calving. Postcalving, the mean daily milk yield was lower for cows with 0-d DP (26.07 ± 0.5 kg/d) than for cows with 60-d DP (30.60 ± 1.0 kg/d) (p < 0.05; Table 6). However, total milk production from the last 8 weeks before calving to the first 10 weeks after calving was 628.5 kg greater for 0-d DP (2,529.3 ± 208.53 kg) than for 60-d DP (1,900.8 ± 102.54 kg). FPCM yield and milk lactose yield were greater, whereas milk fat and lactose contents were lower, in cows with 0-d DP compared to those with 60-d DP (p < 0.05). Milk yield, FPCM yield, and milk composition contents and yields were differenced with week relative to calving, and were an interaction between treatment and week relative to calving during the postpartum period (p < 0.05). Many studies reported that milk yield decreased for cows that had 0-d DP compared with a 60-d DP. The milk yield loss of cows with a 0-d DP resulted in an 11% decrease during 10 wk [3], or 15.5% until 14 wk [4] of the subsequent lactation lower milk yield compared with a short DP. Capuco et al. [29] explained that the milk yield loss after calving occurred to reduce renewal of mammary epithelial cells in the last weeks before calving when cows had a conventional DP. Milk yield losses of cows with omitting DP are partially compensated by the additional milk yield before calving within the range from 438 to 1,186 kg [3,7,8,10]. Boustan et al. [30] reported that accounting for additional milk yield before calving completely compensated for the loss of milk production resulting from shortening the DP to 30 days or 45 days in high-producing dairy cows under heat stress. Milk fat content tended to increase in the subsequent lactation for cows with a 30-d DP compared with cows with a 60-d DP [3], but milk fat yield was not different between 30-d and 60-d DP [3] or between 0-d and 60-d DP [31]. The milk protein percentage for cows with shortened or omitted DP is higher than that for cows with a traditional DP [3,4,30]. Watters et al. [32] reported that there was a significant difference in lactose content for cows with shortened DP compared with cows with 60-d DP.

Table 5. Effects of dry period lengths (0-d and 60-d DP) on milk yield and milk composition of dairy cows pre- and post-calving
Item 0-d DP (n=7) 60-d DP (n=8) SEM p-value
DP Wk DP × Wk
Precalving1)
 Milk yield (kg/d) 14.85 - 0.51 - - -
 FPCM (kg/d) 16.87 - 1.08 - - -
 Fat (%) 5.02 - 0.08 - - -
 Protein (%) 4.23 - 0.09 - - -
 Lactose (%) 4.69 - 0.05 - - -
 Fa (kg/d) 0.75 - 0.06 - - -
 Protein (kg/d) 0.63 - 0.04 - - -
 Lactose (kg/d) 0.71 - 0.05 - - -
Postcalving2)
 Milk yield (kg/d) 26.07 30.60 0.35 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.003
 FPCM (kg/d) 25.29 28.81 0.85 0.003 < 0.001 0.010
 Fat (%) 4.14 3.33 0.07 < 0.001 0.037 0.036
 Protein (%) 4.16 3.96 0.12 0.261 < 0.001 1.000
 Lactose (%) 4.54 4.47 0.02 0.029 < 0.001 0.982
 Fat (kg/d) 1.06 1.07 0.03 0.804 < 0.001 0.357
 Protein (kg/d) 0.93 0.97 0.02 0.324 < 0.001 0.005
 Lactose (kg/d) 1.30 1.46 0.04 0.002 < 0.001 0.340

1) Precalving was defined as the last 8 weeks before the actual calving date.

2) Postcalving was defined as the first 10 weeks after the actual calving date.

DP, dry period; Wk, week related to calving; FPCM, fat- and protein-corrected milk.

Download Excel Table
Table 6. Dry matter intake and body weight of dairy cows at precalving controlled with a 0-d or 60-d DP
Item 0-d DP (n=7) 60-d DP (n=8) SEM p-value
DP Wk DP × Wk Before and after calving of each DP
0-d 60-d
Precalving1)
 Glucose (mg/dL) 41.76 49.48 1.49 0.011 0.457 0.913 0.483 0.431
 Urea (mg/dL) 13.93 10.63 0.42 < 0.001 0.080 0.490 < 0.001 0.971
 NEFA (μmol/L) 90.85 87.67 9.94 0.870 0.037 0.615 0.424 0.221
 BHBA (μmol/L) 651.65 529.97 16.05 < 0.001 0.433 0.065 0.553 0.002
 Cortisol (ng/mL) 1.19 0.64 0.12 0.025 0.564 0.741 0.099 0.453
 Insulin (μIU/mL) 109.34 45.17 8.41 < 0.001 0.460 0.217 < 0.001 0.004
 IGF-I (ng/mL) 88.36 77.20 6.58 0.407 0.826 0.369 0.590 0.215
Postcalving2)
 Glucose (mg/dL) 43.60 47.59 1.29 0.127 0.519 0.611
 Urea (mg/dL) 9.11 10.71 0.35 0.019 0.037 0.820
 NEFA (μmol/L) 115.69 125.30 14.07 0.696 <0.001 0.732
 BHBA (μmol/L) 608.71 663.22 31.16 0.390 0.600 0.608
 Cortiso (ng/mL) 0.84 0.54 0.06 0.009 0.634 0.257
 Insulin (μIU/mL) 26.34 24.86 1.99 0.705 0.134 0.963
 IGF-I (ng/mL) 106.66 91.46 5.93 0.204 0.518 0.443

1) Precalving was defined as the last 8 weeks before the actual calving date.

2) Postcalving was defined as the first 10 weeks after the actual calving date.

DP, dry period; Wk, week related to calving; NEFA, nonesterified fatty acids; BHBA, β-hydroxybutyrate; IGF, insulin like growth factor.

Download Excel Table
Blood metabolites

Prepartum, the glucose concentration was lower for cows with a 0-d DP than for cows with a 60-d DP (p < 0.05; Table 6). Urea, BHBA, cortisol, and insulin concentrations prepartum were greater in cows with a 0-d DP than in cows with a 60-d DP (p < 0.05). NEFA concentrations at prepartum were significantly different from the week related to calving. Postpartum, urea concentrations were lower for cows with a 0-d DP than for cows with a 60-d DP (p < 0.05). Cortisol concentration was higher in cows with a 0-d DP than in cows with a 60-d DP (p < 0.05). Urea and NEFA concentrations at postpartum were significantly different from the week related to calving (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the interaction of the DP and the week related to calving pre- and postpartum. Negative EB occurs when the nutrient requirements of dairy cows exceed feed intake in early lactation [2]. Negative EB induces the mobilization of body reserves, such as body fat, in dairy cows [5] and is characterized by an increase in NEFA and BHBA [1]. Anderson et al. [8] reported that omitting DP reduced the concentrations of NEFA and BHBA. Other studies reported that DP length did not affect the concentrations of NEFA, BHBA, glucose, and urea [3,9]. Boustan et al. [30] reported that urea concentrations were higher and glucose concentrations were lower for cows treated with 60-d DP than for those treated with 30-d DP under heat stress, similar to the results of the present study. Gao et al. [33] suggested that decreasing glucose and increasing urea concentrations occurred by increasing the amino acid utilization of dairy cows under heat stress.

CONCLUSION

The current study examined the effect of DP length (0-d and 60-d DP) on physiological responses, milk production, and metabolic status of dairy cows exposed to heat stress during the transition period. It was found that dairy cows that continuously milked by omitting the DP (0-d DP) were more susceptible to heat stress during the DP, showing higher RT, RR, and surface temperature than dairy cows that went through the typical DP (60-d DP). Dairy cows with 0-d DP had lower milk production in early lactation than dairy cows with 60-d DP, but this early reduced milk yield of cows with 0-d DP was compensated by the milk yield produced before calving. Additionally, cows with 0-d DP improved their EB without any difference in heat stress in early lactation compared to cows with 60-d DP. From our results, the omission of the DP for dairy cows expected calving in heat stress may improve the EB in the early period. To support these results, additional research will be needed in heat stress-associated consideration of the appropriate length of the DP, party, and additives for milk production of dairy cows as well as greenhouse gas emission in the research of dairy science [34,35,36].

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This study was carried out with the support of the Cooperative Research Program for Agricultural Science and Technology Development (Project title: A study on the milk quality and rumen environment in dairy cows through the feeding management focused on forage; Project No: PJ014896) of the Rural Development Administration of the Korea.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Lim DH, Jung DJS, Ki KS, Kim DH, Han M, Kim Y.

Data curation: Lim DH, Jung DJS , Kim Y.

Formal analysis: Lim DH, Jung DJS, Kim Y.

Writing - original draft: Lim DH, Jung DJS, Ki KS, Kim DH, Han M, Kim Y.

Writing - review & editing: Lim DH, Jung DJS, Ki KS, Kim DH, Han M, Kim Y.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by IACUC at NIAS because there were animal participants (study approval number: IACUC 2020-435).

REFERENCES

1.

Drackley JK. Biology of dairy cows during the transition period: the final frontier?. J Dairy Sci. 1999; 82:2259-73

2.

Bell AW. Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. J Anim Sci. 1995; 73:2804-19

3.

Rastani RR, Grummer RR, Bertics SJ, Gümen A, Wiltbank MC, Mashek DG, et al. Reducing dry period length to simplify feeding transition cows: milk production, energy balance, and metabolic profiles. J Dairy Sci. 2005; 88:1004-14

4.

van Knegsel ATM, Remmelink GJ, Jorjong S, Fievez V, Kemp B. Effect of dry period length and dietary energy source on energy balance, milk yield, and milk composition of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2014; 97:1499-512

5.

Collard BL, Boettcher PJ, Dekkers JCM, Petitclerc D, Schaeffer LR. Relationships between energy balance and health traits of dairy cattle in early lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2000; 83:2683-90

6.

Dix Arnold PT, Becker RB. Influence of preceding dry period and of mineral supplement on lactation. J Dairy Sci. 1936; 19:257-66

7.

Annen EL, Collier RJ, McGuire MA, Vicini JL, Ballam JM, Lormore MJ. Effect of modified dry period lengths and bovine somatotropin on yield and composition of milk from dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2004; 87:3746-61

8.

Andersen JB, Madsen TG, Larsen T, Ingvartsen KL, Nielsen MO. The effects of dry period versus continuous lactation on metabolic status and performance in periparturient cows. J Dairy Sci. 2005; 88:3530-41

9.

Chen J, Gross JJ, van Dorland HA, Remmelink GJ, Bruckmaier RM, Kemp B, et al. Effects of dry period length and dietary energy source on metabolic status and hepatic gene expression of dairy cows in early lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98:1033-45

10.

Kok A, van Knegsel ATM, van Middelaar CE, Engel B, Hogeveen H, Kemp B, et al. Effect of dry period length on milk yield over multiple lactations. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:739-49

11.

van Knegsel ATM, van der Drift SGA, Čermáková J, Kemp B. Effects of shortening the dry period of dairy cows on milk production, energy balance, health, and fertility: a systematic review. Vet J. 2013; 198:707-13

12.

St-Pierre NR, Cobanov B, Schnitkey G. Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. J Dairy Sci. 2003; 86:E52-77

13.

Lim DH, Kim TI, Park SM, Ki KS, Kim Y. Evaluation of heat stress responses in Holstein and Jersey cows by analyzing physiological characteristics and milk production in Korea. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021; 63:872-83

14.

Lim DH, Han MH, Ki KS, Kim TI, Park SM, Kim DH, et al. Changes in milk production and blood metabolism of lactating dairy cows fed Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture fluid under heat stress. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021; 63:1433-42

15.

Baek YC, Choi H, Jeong JY, Lee SD, Kim MJ, Lee S, et al. The impact of short-term acute heat stress on the rumen microbiome of Hanwoo steers. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020; 62:208-17

16.

Patra AK, Kar I. Heat stress on microbiota composition, barrier integrity, and nutrient transport in gut, production performance, and its amelioration in farm animals. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021; 63:211-47

17.

West JW. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2003; 86:2131-44

18.

do Amaral BC, Connor EE, Tao S, Hayen J, Bubolz J, Dahl GE. Heat-stress abatement during the dry period: does cooling improve transition into lactation?. J Dairy Sci. 2009; 92:5988-99

19.

NRC [National Research Council]. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2001

20.

Mader TL, Davis MS, Brown-Brandl T. Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci. 2006; 84:712-9

21.

Gulay MS, Hayen MJ, Bachman KC, Belloso T, Liboni M, Head HH. Milk production and feed intake of Holstein cows given short (30-d) or normal (60-d) dry periods. J Dairy Sci. 2003; 86:2030-8

22.

Adin G, Gelman A, Solomon R, Flamenbaum I, Nikbachat M, Yosef E, et al. Effects of cooling dry cows under heat load conditions on mammary gland enzymatic activity, intake of food and water, and performance during the dry period and after parturition. Livest Sci. 2009; 124:189-95

23.

Tao S, Bubolz JW, do Amaral BC, Thompson IM, Hayen MJ, Johnson SE, et al. Effect of heat stress during the dry period on mammary gland development. J Dairy Sci. 2011; 94:5976-86

24.

Tao S, Thompson IM, Monteiro APA, Hayen MJ, Young LJ, Dahl GE. Effect of cooling heat-stressed dairy cows during the dry period on insulin response. J Dairy Sci. 2012; 95:5035-46

25.

Tao S, Dahl GE. Invited review: heat stress effects during late gestation on dry cows and their calves. J Dairy Sci. 2013; 96:4079-93

26.

Polsky L, von Keyserlingk MAG. Invited review: effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:8645-57

27.

Seyed Almoosavi SMM, Ghoorchi T, Naserian AA, Khanaki H, Drackley JK, Ghaffari MH. Effects of late-gestation heat stress independent of reduced feed intake on colostrum, metabolism at calving, and milk yield in early lactation of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2021; 104:1744-58

28.

Strong RA, Silva EB, Cheng HW, Eicher SD. Acute brief heat stress in late gestation alters neonatal calf innate immune functions. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98:7771-83

29.

Capuco AV, Akers RM, Smith JJ. Mammary growth in Holstein cows during the dry period: quantification of nucleic acids and histology. J Dairy Sci. 1997; 80:477-87

30.

Boustan A, Vahedi V, Abdi Farab M, Karami H, Seyedsharifi R, Hedayat Evrigh N, et al. Effects of dry period length on milk yield and content and metabolic status of high-producing dairy cows under heat stress. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021; 53:205

31.

Rémond B, Ollier A, Miranda G. Milking of cows in late pregnancy: milk production during this period and during the succeeding lactation. J Dairy Res. 1992; 59:233-41

32.

Watters RD, Guenther JN, Brickner AE, Rastani RR, Crump PM, Clark PW, et al. Effects of dry period length on milk production and health of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91:2595-603

33.

Gao ST, Guo J, Quan SY, Nan XM, Sanz Fernandez MV, Baumgard LH, et al. The effects of heat stress on protein metabolism in lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:5040-9

34.

Ataallahi M, Nejad JG, Park KH. Selection of appropriate biomatrices for studies of chronic stress in animals: a review. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022; 64:621-39

35.

Kamali Y, Jo YH, Kim WS, Nejad JG, Lee JS, Lee HG. Dietary supplementation with L-glutamine enhances immunity and reduces heat stress in Hanwoo steers under heat stress conditions. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022; 64:1046-62

36.

Park GW, Ataallahi M, Ham SY, Oh SJ, Kim KY, Park KH. Estimating milk production losses by heat stress and its impacts on greenhouse gas emissions in Korean dairy farms. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022; 64:770-81