Article

Behavioral changes of sows with changes in flattening rate

Ka-Young Yang1, Dong-hwa Jang1, Kyeong-seok Kwon1, Taehwan Ha1, Jong-bok Kim1, Jae Jung Ha2, Jun Yeob Lee1, Jung Kon Kim1,*
Author Information & Copyright
1National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju-Gun 55365, Korea.
2Gyeongsangbuk-do Livestock Research Institute, Young-Ju 36052, Korea.
*Corresponding Author: Jung Kon Kim, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju-Gun 55365, Korea, Republic of. E-mail: kjk9207@korea.kr.

© Copyright 2022 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this study, considering the difficulties for all farms to convert farm styles to animal welfare-based housing, an experiment was performed to observe the changes in the behavior and welfare of sows when the slat floor was changed to a collective breeding ground. Twenty-eight sows used in this study were between the second and fifth parities to minimize the influence of parity. Using a flats floor cover, the flattening rates were treated as 0%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%. Data collection was the behavior of sows visually observed using a camera (e.g., standing, lying, fighting and excessive biting behaviors, and abnormal behaviors) and the animal welfare level measured through field visits. Lying behavior was found to be higher (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01) as the flattening rate increased, and sows lying on the slatted cover also increased as the flattening rate increased (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01). Fighting behavior was higher when the flattening rate was 0% and 20%, and chewing behavior was higher (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) as the flattening rate increased. The animal welfare level of sows, ‘good feeding’, it was found that all treatment groups for body condition score and water were good at 100 (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). 'Good housing' was the maximum value in each treatment group was 100, as the percentage of floor increased, the minimum increased from 0% to 78, from 20% to 87, from 30% to 89, from 40% to 94, and from 50% to 96%. The 'good health' was the maximum value of the 0% and 20% treatment groups with the flattening rate was 100, and it was analyzed to be 98 in 30% and 50%, and 99 in 40%. ‘Appropriate behavior’ was the score was significantly lower than that of other items, but when the flattening ratio was 0% and 20%, the maximum and minimum values ​​were 10. At 40% and 50%, the maximum values ​​were 39 and 49, respectively, and the minimum values ​​were analyzed as 19 for both 40% and 50%. These results will be used as basic data about sow welfare for farmers to successfully transition to group housing and flat floors.

Keywords: Behavior; Floor; Group housing; Sow; Welfare