PDF Download
PubReader
Export Citation
Email the Author
Share Facebook
Share Twitter
Cited by 0 Article
Metrics (View:694)- Effects of an extra-high slaughter weight and a low-lysine diet on growth and meat quality of finishing gilts
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Effects of the slaughter weight of non-lean finishing pigs on their carcass characteristics and meat quality
J Anim Sci Technol 2022;64(2):353-364.
Various levels of copra meal supplementation with
J Anim Sci Technol 2017;59:19
Effects of lysine concentration of the diet on growth performance and meat quality in finishing pigs with high slaughter weights
J Anim Sci Technol 2023;65(6):1242-1253.
Effects of increasing dietary lysine and energy levels on growth efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat carcass traits in growing-finishing pigs
J Anim Sci Technol 2023
High-level dietary crude protein decreased backfat thickness and increased carcass yield score in finishing Hanwoo beef cattle (
J Anim Sci Technol 2021;63(5):1064-1075.
Effects of an extra-high slaughter weight and a low-lysine diet on growth and meat quality of finishing gilts
Abstract
The present study aimed to find out the feasibility of increasing the meat quality of finishing gilts by increasing their slaughter weight (SW) to an extra-high (XH) level and also by using a low-lysine (lys) diet in XH-weight pig production. Twenty-four gilts and eights barrows were divided into four treatments (T) by gender, SW, and diet: T1 [barrow; 116-kg SW; Medium (Med)-lys (0.80%) diet], T2 [gilt; 116-kg SW; Med-lys], T3 [gilt; XH (150 kg) SW; Med-lys], and T4 [gilt; XH SW, Low-lys (0.60%)]. Growth performance from 85 kg of body weight to SW was measured only for T3 and T4. All animals were slaughtered at their target SW, followed by physicochemical analyses and sensory evaluation on the <italic>Longissimus </italic><italic>lumborum</italic> muscle (LL). Average daily gain did not differ between T3 and T4. Dressing percentage was greater for T3 vs. T2. Backfat thickness was greater for T1 vs. T2 and T3 vs. T2, not being different between T3 and T4. The LL pH was lower and Warner-Bratzler Shear force value was greater for T3 vs. T2. Other physicochemical measurements including the intramuscular fat content were not different or different narrowly if different at all (<italic>p</italic> < 0.05) between T3 and T2 or T4, but not between T1 and T2. The percentages of major fatty acids including 16:0, 18:0, 18:1, and 18:2 in LL, which did not differ between T2 and T3, differed between T3 and T4 apparently resulting from a difference in composition of the ingredients of the two diets. The sensory texture score was greater for T3 vs. T2 in fresh LL; in cooked LL, juiciness and umami scores were greater for T3 vs. T2, flavor score being less for T4 vs. T3. The gender effects on physicochemical and sensory pork quality were small, if any. Overall, the meat quality of finishing gilts could be improved by increasing the SW to the XH level, but not by using the Low-lys diet, suggesting that it will be feasible to produce XH-weight market gilts if the increased meat quality can make up for the expected decrease in production efficiency accompanying the increased SW.