RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of hot melt extrusion processed nano-iron on growth performance, blood composition, and iron bioavailability in weanling pigs

JunHyung Lee1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7937-7817, Abdolreza Hosseindoust1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-0613, MinJu Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6950-0458, KwangYeol Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3723-2978, YoHan Choi1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-4731, Joseph Moturi1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0626-0255, ChangHyun Song1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2630-2619, SongYi Lee2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1694-982X, HyunJong Cho2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-9371, ByungJo Chae1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-698X
Author Information & Copyright
1College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
2College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
*Corresponding author: ByungJo Chae, Department of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24231, Korea. Tel: +82-33-250-8616, E-mail: bjchae@kangwon.ac.kr

© Copyright 2019 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jun 08, 2019 ; Revised: Jul 08, 2019 ; Accepted: Jul 09, 2019

Published Online: Jul 31, 2019

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of hot melt extrusion (HME) nano-iron as an alternative for the common ferrous sulfate on iron (Fe) bioavailability, growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and intestinal microbiota of weanling pigs. A total of 200 piglets (Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc) were randomly allotted to seven treatments on the basis of initial body weight (BW) and sex. Treatments were the INO100 (100 ppm Fe as FeSO4), HME-Fe levels (50, 75, and 100 ppm nano-Fe as FeSO4). ORG100 (100 ppm Fe as iron methionine). In phase 1, the HME50 pigs showed the lowest Fe content in feed and feces. Plasma Fe concentration was increased in HME100 and ORG100 pigs. In phase 2, there were significantly lower concentration of Fe in feed and feces of HME50 pigs (p < 0.01). A lower Fe concentration in the plasma and liver were observed in HME50 pigs compared with HME100 pigs. Concentration of red blood cell (RBC) was the lowest (p < 0.01) for HME50 pigs. During phase 2, the HME100, HME75, and ORG100 pigs showed a higher RBC and hemoglobin values compared with HME50 pigs. Digestibility of gross energy (GE) and crude protein (CP) were significantly higher in HME100 pigs compared with HME50 pigs. There was an increased (p < 0.01) villus height in the duodenum and jejunum of HME100 pigs compared with HME50 pigs. It is concluded that dietary Fe does not improve growth performance of weanling pigs; however, increasing the dietary iron concentration in weanling piglets increased the RBC and hemoglobin. In addition, the potential ability of HME to be used at a lower level (HME75) was observed.

Keywords: Weanling pigs; Nanoparticle; Iron; Hemoglobin; Villus height; Growth performance

Background

Iron (Fe), an essential trace element for pigs, is needed for proper blood hemostasis and count of hemoglobin [1,2]. It is also a component of some crucial antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase that decrease the peroxides damage during stressful condition [3]. Anemia is a common problem in suckling piglets due to the deficient transfer of Fe from the placenta to the fetus, as well as the limited content of Fe in sow milk [4]. Therefore, weanling piglets eventually suffer from the carry over effects of iron deficiency from the suckling period. The high growth rate in modern swine farms increases the susceptibility of heavy piglets to iron deficiency than small and medium-sized piglets due to the higher blood volume and hemoglobin utilization capacity [2]. The demand for dietary iron is high at weaning, however, the unstable intestinal microbiota due to change in feed form from milk to solid may decrease the absorption efficiency during the weaning period.

Inorganic form of Fe as ferrous sulfate had been used widely in swine diets. However, inorganic type had been known to have a lower absorption or having a high fluctuation in bioavailability ratio based on the source of diet, and the dietary content of ascorbic acid, pectin, phytate, protein, amino acid, and other mineral source [3,5]. To compensate the low absorption rate, the organic form of mineral was introduced with higher bioavailability due to a lower binding capacity with chelates [3,6]. Apart from the interactions between minerals and chelates in intestine, the size of particles is the key factor responsible for nutrient absorption through gastrointestinal mucosa [7]. Desai et al. [8] suggested that nutrients with 100 nm or lower particle size can directly increase the absorption rate for at least 10 times compared with big particles. The smaller particle size increases the availability and accessibility of particles in the intestinal mucosa [9]. Hot melt extrusion (HME) technique had been introduced as an effective nano-process in the pharmacology field [10]. In this method, inorganic Fe (ferrous sulfate, FeSO4) was diffused and mixed with insolvent to prepare the nano particles in this study. In HME processing, target molecules overpassed the compounding and extruding step and achieved a homogenous dispersion. We hypothesized that Fe nanoparticles prepared through HME process will improve absorption and utilization of Fe in weanling pigs and thus may be more efficient in comparison to common inorganic Fe. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of supplementation of HME processed Fe on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood metabolites of Fe in weanling pigs.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of HME Fe

FeSO4, Span 80, Tween 80 and PEG 6000 were mixed at 20:12:4:64 ratio prior to the feeding process. That processed mixture was moved to a feed hopper at a 45 g/min speed. Twin-screw system worked with hot-melt extruder (STS-25HS, Hankook E.M. Ltd., Pyeongtaek, Korea) connected with a round-shaped die (1 mm diameter) was used for the preparation of extruded materials [10]. The temperatures of barrel and die section were maintained at 45°C and 40°C, respectively. The speed of screw was 0.025 × g during HME process. By passing through conveying and kneading sections in the barrel, samples were extruded from the die section. Extruded substances were solidified and they were milled by the HBL-3500S grinder (Samyang Electronics Co., Gunpo, Korea). Particle properties of FeSO4 nanoparticles dispersed in distilled water were elucidated. The hydrodynamic size, polydispersity index, and zeta potential of FeSO4 nanoparticles were measured by dynamic light scattering and laser Doppler methods (ELS-Z1000; Otsuka Electronics, Tokyo, Japan). Powder of FeSO4 extrudate was dispersed in DW at 20 mg/mL and their particle properties were tested. The particle shape of FeSO4 extrudate was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The dispersion of FeSO4 nanoparticles was loaded onto the copper grid with film and dried for 10 min. That sample was then observed by TEM (JEM 1010; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Animals and experimental design

A total of 200 weanling pigs (Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc, 21 ± 1 day old) were randomly allotted with an average initial body weight (BW) of 6.76 ± 1.14 kg on the basis of initial BW according to a randomized complete block (RCB) design in the Research Center of Animal Life Sciences at Kangwon National University. There were 4 replicates in five treatments and each treatment with 10 pigs/replicate. The treatment included: Inorganic Fe (INO100, 100 ppm Fe as FeSO4), HME Fe (HME50, 50 ppm Fe; HME75, 75 ppm Fe; HME100, 100 ppm Fe as FeSO4), Organic Fe (ORG100, 100 ppm Fe as FeSO4). The organic Fe was purchased from TMC Company (Gimhae, Korea). The experimental diets were fed for 28 days in 2 phases (phase 1, d 0 to 14; and phase 2, d 15 to 28). The diets were formulated to provide all of the nutrients to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements (Table 1) listed in swine nutrient specification [11] with the exception of Fe.

Table 1. Formula and chemical composition of experimental basal diets (as-fed basis)
Item Phase I Phase II
(0-14 d) (15-28 d)
Ingredient (g/kg) 1,000 1,000
 Corn 380.7 465.7
 Whey powder 170 153.8
 Fish meal (60%) 50 30
 Soybean meal dehulled 244.9 294.9
 Soy protein concentrate 50 -
 Soy oil 33.8 26
 Mono calcium phosphate 4 3.6
 Limestone 7.7 8.3
 Salt 3 3
 DL-Methionine (98%) 1.4 0.8
 L-Lysine (98%) 3.3 2.8
 L-Threonine (98.5%) 1.4 1.3
 L-Tryptophan (10%) 2.2 1.7
 Vitamin premix 2.5 2.5
 Mineral premix 2.5 2.5
 Choline-chloride (50%) 0.5 0.5
 Phytase 0.1 0.1
 Chromic oxide 2.5 2.5
 Lactose 39.5 -
Calculated composition (%)
 ME (MJ/kg) 14.226 14.226
 CP 23 21
 Ca 0.8 0.7
 Av.P 0.4 0.33
 SID. Lys 1.35 1.23
 SID. Met 0.41 0.36
 SID. Met + Cys 0.74 0.68
 SID. Thr 0.79 0.73
 SID. Trp 0.22 0.2
 Lactose 15 10

1) Supplied per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 20,000 IU; vitamin D3, 4,200 IU; vitamin E, 10 IU; vitamin K3, 5.6 mg; vitamin B1, 2.8 mg; vitamin B2, 5.5 mg; vitamin B6, 4.2 mg; vitamin B12, 0.042 mg; pantothenic acid, 14 mg; niacin, 42 mg; biotin, 0.105 mg; folic acid, 1.05 mg.

2) Supplied per kilogram of diet: 0.3 mg Se; 0.20 mg Co; 30 mg Cu; 30 mg Mn; 20 mg Zn; 0.35 mg I; Fe based on the treatments.

Download Excel Table
Experimental procedure and sampling
Concentration of Iron

To measure the level of iron concentration from experimental diet, feces and serum, inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP) was used with the method of AOAC [12]. Diet and fecal samples were collected by 1 g and dried in a muffle furnace for 1 hour (600°C; 24h for diet and 48h for feces). Then, those samples were dissolute with 10 mL of HCl 50% (v/v) for 24 hrs. After this step, dried samples were filtered via Whatman filter paper in 100 mL flask and diluted with distilled water and measured a concentration through ICP. The 1 mL of serum samples was moved into crucible and burned in a muffle furnace (600°C; 1 h). The liver samples were collected after slaughtering at the end of phase 2 to investigate the iron concentration. Then, those samples were dried (105°C; 24h) and ground by the mixer. A 1 g of liver sample also burned in a muffle furnace (600°C; 1 h). The serum and liver samples were dissolute with 10 mL of HCl 50% (v/v) for 24 hrs and filtered via Whatman filter paper in 100 mL flask and measured an iron concentration by ICP.

Blood sampling

To measure a white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin and hematocrit, blood samples were collected via the jugular vein from 6 pigs per treatment, which randomly selected on the last day of each phase. To analyze WBC and RBC, Natt-Herrick solution was used and microhaematocrit method was used to hematocrit analysis. For hemoglobin analysis, cyanmethaemoglobin method was used to measure hemoglobin concentration [13]. Blood samples were centrifuged at 25,000 × g at 4°C for 15 min to obtain the serum. The haemolysis-free serum was transferred immediately and frozen at −80°C until further biochemical analyses.

Growth performance

The BW was recorded in first day of this experiment and end of each phase. In feed intake, after the end of each phase, remained feed weight from each feeder was used to calculate for average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR).

Nutrient digestibility

The nutrient balance examine was conducted after each phase 1 and phase 2 of feeding trial to investigate total digestibility, dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and gross energy (GE). Prior to the end of each phase, day 7 (phase 1) and day 28 d (phase 2), 2 pigs from each replicate were allotted in individual cages (one pig / cage) to collect excreta samples. For analysis, fed a 2.5 g kg−1 chromium oxide in the diet as an indigestible marker during experiment. Excreta samples were collected during 12–14 d (phase 1) and 26–28 d (phase 2). These collected samples were dried in a forced air-drying oven (60°C, 72 h) and minced with a Wiley laboratory mill (Thomas Model 4 Wiley®Mill, Thomas schientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) by 1 mm screen.

The proximate analysis for experimental diet and feces was followed by AOAC [12] method and DM and CP were analyzed. For GE analysis, bomb calorimeter (Model 1261, Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL., USA) was used and spectrophotometer (Jasco V-650, Jasco Crop., Tokyo, Japan) was used for analysis of Cr2O3 concentration.

The total nutrient utilization used this formula as:

Total nutrient utilization  ( % ) = 100 [ 100 ( Cr in feed ( % ) Cr in excreta  ( % ) × Nutrient in excreta ( % ) Nutrient in feed ( % ) ) ]
Microbial analyses

To determine microbiology, fecal samples were carried out at the end of each phase and sealed. The analysis was conducted on the same day of fecal collection. In those samples, total anaerobic bacteria (TAB, plate count agar, Difco laboratories, Detriot, MI, USA), Lactobacillus spp. (MRS agar + 0.200 g/L NaN3 + 0.500 g/L L-cystine hydrochloride monohtdrate) and Clostridium spp. (Tryptose sulphite cycloserine agar, Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) were analyzed for this experiment. For microbial groups, anaerobic conditions were generated and gaspak anaerobic system (BBL, No. 260678, Difco, MI, USA) was used. The microbial populations were calculated by colony-forming unit (CFU) and transformed into log10 before statistical analysis.

Small intestinal morphology

A total of 15 pigs was chosen to male pigs with respect to mean of BW in the group. Carcasses were dissected to get samples. After carcasses were dissected, the intestines were removed and laid out on a plastic surface. Three 5 cm segments were taken from the sections at 28%, 50%, and 75% of the total intestinal length, each of which was referred to proximal duodenal, jejunal, and ileal segment. The small intestine samples were stored at 10% neutral buffered formalin solution (pH 7.2–7.4) for 24 h. Three cross-sections of each intestinal sample were prepared after staining with azure A and eosin using standard paraffin embedding procedures [14]. Well-oriented crypt-villus groups (total 10 intact) were chosen in triplicates for analyzing each intestinal cross-section. Crypt depth was characterized as the depth of the invagination between the following villi and height of villus was determined from the villus crypt junction to the edge of the villi. By using an image which is processing and analyzing system all of the morphological characteristics were measured (crypt depth or villus height) in 10-μm increments (Media Cyber genetics, Optimus software version 6.5, North Reading, MA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the current experimental data was completed by using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary NC) in a completely randomized design. Pen replicate was the experimental unit for all measurements. Treatment means were separated by Tukey multiple range tests at p < 0.05 statistical level.

Results

Iron concentration

The effects of dietary Fe concentration and source on feed, feces and plasma presented in Table 2. During phase 1, there were significant differences observed in the concentration of feed, feces, and plasma (p < 0.01), and the HME50 pigs showed the lowest Fe content in feed and feces. Plasma Fe concentration was higher in HME100 and ORG100 pigs. In phase 2, there were significantly lower concentration of Fe in feed and feces of HME50 pigs (p < 0.01). A lower Fe concentration of the plasma and liver were observed in HME50 pigs compared with HME100 pigs.

Table 2. Effect of dietary Fe concentration and source on Fe concentration of feed, feces and plasma in weanling pigs
Item Inorganic (ppm) HME (ppm) Organic (ppm) SEM p-value
100 50 75 100 100
Phase I (d 14)
 Feed (mg/kg) 173 130 151 177 171 4.32 0.001
 Feces (mg/kg) 268 221 245 267 266 4.67 0.001
 Plasma (ug/dL) 103 92 102 108 106 1.79 0.027
Phase II (d 28)
 Feed (mg/kg) 176 131 154 174 172 4.10 <0.001
 Feces (mg/kg) 260 217 232 245 254 3.77 <0.001
 Plasma (ug/dL) 114 96 108 116 114 2.22 <0.001
 Liver 238 217 245 252 242 6.01 0.004

ab Values with different superscripts of the row significantly differ (p < 0.05).

HME, hot melt extrusion; SEM, standard error of means.

Download Excel Table
Serum profiles

The effects of dietary Fe concentration and source on serum profiles are presented in Table 3. In phase 1, there were no significant differences in WBC and hematocrit. However, RBC concentration was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in HME50 pigs. There was a significant (p < 0.05) difference in blood hemoglobin between pigs fed the HME100 and HME50 diets. During phase 2, the WBC and hematocrit did not show any significant differences among treatments. The HME100, HME75, and ORG100 pigs showed a higher (p < 0.01) counts of RBC and concentration of hemoglobin compared with HME50 pigs.

Table 3. Effect of dietary Fe concentration and source on complete blood count in weanling pigs
Item Inorganic (ppm) HME (ppm) Organic (ppm) SEM p-value
100 50 75 100 100
Phase I (d 14)
 WBC (103/μL) 21.21 19.22 21.44 21.90 21.45 0.98 0.076
 RBC (106/μL) 6.42 6.22 6.40 6.53 6.42 0.04 <0.001
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 11.52 11.42 11.54 11.86 11.78 0.13 0.028
 Hematocrit (%) 43.82 43.08 42.84 46.82 44.73 1.52 0.093
Phase II (d 28)
 WBC (103/μL) 22.59 21.33 22.21 23.54 22.62 0.74 0.54
 RBC (106/μL) 6.46 6.26 6.50 6.73 6.50 0.07 <0.001
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 11.50 11.28 11.58 11.75 11.60 0.09 <0.001
 Hematocrit (%) 48.43 48.00 47.38 50.27 47.90 1.22 0.117

a-c Values with different superscripts of the row significantly differ (p < 0.05).

HME, hot melt extrusion; SEM, standard error of means; RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell.

Download Excel Table
Growth performance

The effects of dietary Fe concentration and source on growth performance presented in Table 4. There was no difference in ADG, ADFI, and FCR in phase 1 and phase 2. The overall experimental period also showed no significant difference in ADG, ADFI, and FCR.

Table 4. Effect of dietary Fe concentration and source on growth performance in weanling pigs
Item Inorganic (ppm) HME (ppm) Organic (ppm) SEM p-value
100 50 75 100 100
Phase I (0-14 d)
 ADG (g) 281 277 283 282 279 6.13 0.999
 ADFI (g) 394 395 389 411 413 6.33 0.723
 FCR 1.40 1.45 1.37 1.46 1.49 0.03 0.684
Phase II (15-28 d)
 ADG (g) 420 406 419 431 433 6.17 0.708
 ADFI (g) 704 680 692 724 722 6.03 0.068
 FCR 1.68 1.68 1.66 1.69 1.68 0.03 0.999
Overall (0-28 d)
 ADG (g) 350 342 351 356 356 4.88 0.901
 ADFI (g) 549 537 541 567 568 4.75 0.098
 FCR 1.57 1.58 1.54 1.59 1.60 0.02 0.893

HME, hot melt extrusion; SEM, standard error of means; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio.

Download Excel Table
Nutrient digestibility

The effects of dietary Fe concentration and source on apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients presented in Table 5. No difference was observed in digestibility of DM, GE, and CP in phase 1. In phase 2, there was no significant difference in DM digestibility. However, digestibility of GE and CP were significantly higher in HME100 pigs compared with HME50 pigs.

Table 5. Effect of dietary Fe concentration and source on apparent total tract digestibility (%) of nutrients in weanling pigs
Item Inorganic (ppm) HME (ppm) Organic (ppm) SEM p-value
100 50 75 100 100
Phase I (d 14)
 DM 80.67 81.09 82.02 82.41 81.75 0.80 0.177
 GE 80.20 76.15 77.28 78.71 77.43 0.50 0.087
 CP 77.64 79.85 80.81 81.31 80.73 1.18 0.172
Phase II (d 28)
 DM 81.04 80.36 81.26 81.86 81.18 0.68 0.185
 GE 75.50 74.82 75.63 77.06 75.51 0.49 0.005
 CP 81.17 79.16 81.32 81.99 81.11 0.40 0.004

ab Values with different superscripts of the row significantly differ (p < 0.01).

HME, hot melt extrusion; SEM, standard error of means; DM, dry matter; GE, gross energy; CP, crude protein.

Download Excel Table
Intestinal morphology

The effects of dietary Fe concentration and sources on small intestinal morphology presented in Table 6. In the duodenum and jejunum, there were no significant differences in crypt depth and VH/CD ratio among the treatments. However, there was an increased (p < 0.01) villus height in the duodenum and jejunum of HME100 pigs compared with HME50 pigs. There were no differences in villus height, crypt depth and VH/CD ratio in the ileum.

Table 6. Effect of dietary Fe concentration and source on small intestinal morphology of weanling pigs (d 28)
Item Inorganic (ppm) HME (ppm) Organic (ppm) SEM p-value
100 50 75 100 100
Duodenum
 Villus height (VH; μm) 449 430 436 459 444 7.30 0.025
 Crypt depth (GD; μm) 237 233 231 223 229 3.75 0.856
 VH/CD 1.87 1.86 1.86 2.06 1.95 0.03 0.481
Jejunum
 Villus height (μm) 357 344 359 371 364 7.11 0.045
 Crypt depth (μm) 237 233 223 226 221 4.65 0.515
 VH/CD 1.51 1.49  1.61 1.64 1.73 0.03 0.282
Ileum
 Villus height (μm) 239 229 247 253 238 3.82 0.347
 Crypt depth (μm) 142 140 146 141 142 1.66 0.455
 VH/CD 1.64 1.65 1.69 1.79 1.75 0.02 0.335

ab Values with different superscripts of the row significantly differ (p < 0.05).

HME, hot melt extrusion; SEM, standard error of means..

Download Excel Table
Fecal microflora

The effects of dietary Fe concentration and source on fecal microflora presented in Table 7. During phase 1, there was no difference in the population of TAB and Lactobacillus spp. However, the population of coliforms was increased in ORG100 pigs compared with HME100 pigs (p < 0.05). In phase 2, there was no significant difference observed in TAB. HME100 and ORG100 pigs showed an increased Lactobacillus spp. population compared with pigs fed HME50 diet (p < 0.01). The population of Coliforms analysis showed that pigs fed HME50 diet had a higher colonization of coliforms compared with HME100 and ORG100 pigs (p < 0.01).

Table 7. Effect of dietary Fe concentration and source on fecal microflora in weanling pigs
Item Inorganic (ppm) HME (ppm) Organic (ppm) SEM p-value
100 50 75 100 100
Phase I (d 14)
 Total anaerobic bacteria 9.37 9.53 9.42 9.39 9.35 0.08 0.190
Lactobacillus spp. 8.19 8.16 8.15 8.18 8.13 0.02 0.096
Coliforms spp. 6.59 6.61 6.69 6.56 6.74 0.04 0.013
Phase II (d 28)
 Total anaerobic bacteria 9.67 9.70 9.65 9.49 9.55 0.24 0.275
Lactobacillus spp. 8.44 8.36 8.50 8.58 8.54 0.05 0.006
Coliforms spp. 5.96 6.06 5.97 5.87 5.91 0.04 0.002

ab Values with different superscripts of the row significantly differ (p < 0.05).

HME, hot melt extrusion; SEM, standard error of means.

Download Excel Table

Discussion

It was reported that supplementation of Fe is required for optimal performance [15]. In the present study, no difference was observed in ADG between the treatments. The former reference suggested that a dietary level of 90 ppm Fe can sufficiently maximize growth performance and feed intake [16]. Feng et al. [17] reported that the ADG of weanling piglets responded with a linear increase of dietary organic Fe to 120 ppm. Lewis et al. [18] observed that increased dietary Fe supplementation up to 200 ppm resulted in higher ADFI, ADG, and gain to feed ratio in weanling pigs. However, in agreement with the results of this study, several studies showed that growth performance is not a sensitive criterion for Fe-related biological response [5,15]. Interestingly, no relationship was shown between the ADG and digestibility of nutrients in spite of the significant contribution of Fe to increased nutrient digestibility. Higher concentrations of dietary Fe increased the dry matter and CP digestibility in broiler chickens were under the iron depleted conditions [6].

Crypt hyperplasia and villus atrophy occur during weaning [19]. The present study indicated that villus height in the duodenum was increased in HME100 and ORG100 piglets. Furthermore, villus height in the jejunum was increased only by HME100 or INO100 supplementation. Recent literature has also indicated improved villus height in the jejunum and duodenum of weanling pigs fed Fe supplemented diets [20]. Intestinal morphology status indicates the capability of nutrient digestion [19,21]. An increase in villus height may lead to improved nutrient digestion capacity in weanling pigs. Higher digestibility of GE and CP in HME100 pigs during the phase 2 may be associated with the improved villus height.

One of the aims of the present study was to evaluate the bioavailability of different Fe sources. A higher dietary dose of Fe can be reflected in Fe concentration of plasma [2,5]. Fe is absorbed and subsequently transported to the bloodstream, as plasma Se was higher in HME100 or ORG100 pigs than HME50. Ferrous methionine as an organic Fe absorbs via methionine transporters and convert to ferrous in the liver to provide Fe for heme synthesis [6]. The previous studies reported the use of organic sources, such as ferrous glycine is superior to inorganic sources [3]. In contrast, this study does not show the superior absorption of Fe in ORG pigs and no difference was observed between HME75 and ORG100 in plasma Fe concentration. A Fe atom normally spends no longer than two hours in plasma [4]. The higher plasma Fe due to increasing levels of dietary Fe in this study is similar to results reported by Perri et al. [2]. Yu et al. [5] also reported a linear plasma Fe when dietary Fe concentration increased. In case of fecal Fe content, HME and ORG Fe sources were more efficient than the INO at 100 ppm/kg of diet. A different absorption pathway of organic mineral, and a smaller particle size of HME may contribute to the higher intestinal absorption. Particle size is a key parameter to improve absorption efficiency. The smaller size of Fe nanoparticle (around 200 nm) allows Fe to be absorbed through the intestinal mucus barrier [22]. In addition, the lower dietary Fe or decreased plasma Fe may explain the reduced Fe concentration in liver of HME50 pigs. Underwood and Suttle [23] indicated that the liver Fe depletion occurs during Fe deprivation. Therefore, the concentration of Fe in the liver can be decreased in weanling pigs fed lower Fe. For this experiment, mean liver Fe concentration (239 mg/kg) was within the normal range for the weanling pig reported by Rincker et al. [4]. Feng et al. [3] also reported that the hepatic Fe concentration of pigs was linearly increased when supplemental Fe was increased from 0 to 120 mg/kg. However, comparing the influence of the three different Fe sources, no difference was detected. Regarding the role of liver as a major storage site for nutrients, the liver Fe content may be mobilized when the demand for Fe is high.

Fe status is commonly evaluated by several indicators such as hemoglobin content in blood. Hemoglobin is responsible for the diverse biological pathways and also transports oxygen and carbon dioxide from the organs to the lung [24]. We studied the effect of different Fe sources on blood profile of weanling pigs and found that the plasma hemoglobin and RBC in the HME100 pigs was higher than that of the HME50. A whole blood hemoglobin concentration of 10.0 g/dL is considered sufficient, whereas 8.0 g/dL suggests to be a borderline anemia [25]. The hemoglobin of piglets in this study fall in adequate range. The differences in blood hemoglobin between weanling pigs fed low and high Fe is an expected result due to the positive connection between dietary Fe level and hemoglobin production. Considering the significant differences in the phase 2 and insignificant result in phase 1, this study shows that in a long term, high blood Fe may reflect in higher plasma hemoglobin and RBC. The Fe availability influences the blood hemoglobin in weanling pigs [2,18]. The increase in blood hemoglobin in HME100 and ORG100 pigs is in line with previous literature, in which the hemoglobin in blood from either inorganic Fe [4] or the organic source [5]. Hemoglobin is commonly used as an indicator of iron status, because hemoglobin includes 80% to 90% of the total iron present in the piglet [26]. A linear increase in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and plasma transferrin of suckling pigs was reported by Rincker et al. [4] when dietary Fe increased to 150 ppm. Feng et al. [17] also found the hemoglobin, and plasma Fe concentrations increased linearly as the supplemental feeding level of Fe increased to 120 ppm.

Along with hemoglobin, other indicators such as blood RBC and hematocrit are also determinant factors for assessing iron status in piglets. Iron deficient weanling pigs have fewer RBC and containing less hemoglobin, compared with normal piglets [2]. Hematocrit is proportional to the volume of RBCs in blood. Initial mean hematocrit for weanling pigs in this study were in the same range reported by Rincker et al. [4]. The hydration status affects hematocrit of the animal, with a falsely hematocrit by high dehydration [4]. The hydration state of pigs can be affected by stress at weaning. The result of this study showed only a tendency for higher hematocrit when dietary Fe levels increased in phase 1. These results are in agreement with those of Dove and Haydon [27] and Rincker et al. [4], who reported higher percentages of hematocrit after 28 days as the dietary concentration of Fe increased. Yu et al. [5] also showed a linear increase in hematocrit as the dietary level of Fe enhanced up to 120 mg Fe/kg. A limitation to this study is the use of a single Fe dose of organic and inorganic sources, and according to these results the best dose of Fe as HME cannot be recommended for weanling pigs in different phases. In addition, a confirmed optimal dose for nano-Fe has not been determined and the recommended dietary level for Fe is still under debate. The high cost of nanoparticle and organic sources has restricted their consumption compared to the common inorganic source. However, apart from the cost, the environmental issues have to be taken into consideration. Therefore, it is crucial for sustainable swine industry to use highly absorbable Fe to decrease environmental pollution.

In conclusion, the weanling pigs fed the HME75 diet exhibited a decreased fecal Fe content compared with INO100, HME100, and ORG100 without any adverse effects in blood hemoglobin. According to the nutrient digestibility and blood parameters results, a higher dose of Fe is recommended during the weaning period.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through Agri-Bio industry Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (No. 116073-03-2-CG000).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Cho HJ, Chae BJ.

Data curation: Lee JH, Song CH.

Formal analysis: Kim MJ.

Methodology: Kim KY, Choi YH.

Software: Hosseindoust A.

Validation: Lee JH, Lee SY.

Investigation: Kim KY, Moturi J.

Writing - original draft: Lee JH.

Writing - review & editing: Hosseindoust A.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project underwent proper ethical standards and the experiments (KW-170519-1) were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea.

References

1.

Hansen SL, Trakooljul N, Liu HC, Moeser AJ, Spears JW. Iron transporters are differentially regulated by dietary iron, and modifications are associated with changes in manganese metabolism in young pigs. J Nutr. 2009; 139:1474-9.

2.

Perri AM, Friendship RM, Harding JCS, O’Sullivan TL. An investigation of iron deficiency and anemia in piglets and the effect of iron status at weaning on post-weaning performance. J Swine Health Prod. 2016; 24:10-20

3.

Feng J, Ma WQ, Xu ZR, He JX, Wang YZ, Liu JX. The effect of iron glycine chelate on tissue mineral levels, fecal mineral concentration, and liver antioxidant enzyme activity in weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2009; 150:106-13.

4.

Rincker MJ, Hill GM, Link JE, Rowntree JE. Effects of dietary iron supplementation on growth performance, hematological status, and whole-body mineral concentrations of nursery pigs. J Anim Sci. 2004; 82:3189-97.

5.

Yu B, Huang W, Chiou PW. Bioavailability of iron from amino acid complex in weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2000; 86:39-52.

6.

Shinde PL, Ingale SL, Choi JY, Kim JS, Pak SI, Chae BJ. Efficiency of inorganic and organic iron sources under iron depleted conditions in broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2011; 52:578-83.

7.

Bunglavan SJ, Garg AK, Dass RS, Sameer S. Use of nanoparticles as feed additives to improve digestion and absorption in livestock. Livestock Res Int. 2014; 2:36-47

8.

Desai MA, Mutlu M, Vadgama P. A study of macromolecular diffusion through native porcine mucus. Experientia. 1992; 1:22-6.

9.

Qiu K, Durham PG, Anselmo AC. Inorganic nanoparticles and the microbiome. Nano Res. 2018; 11:4936-54.

10.

Lee SY, Nam S, Choi Y, Kim M, Koo JS, Chae BJ, et al. Fabrication and characterizations of hot-melt extruded nanocomposites based on zinc sulfate monohydrate and soluplus. Appl Sci. 2017; 7:902.

11.

National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2012

12.

AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1998

13.

Kececi T, Oguz H, Kurtoglu V, Demet O. Effects of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone, synthetic zeolite and bentonite on serum biochemical and haematological characters of broiler chickens during aflatoxicosis. Br Poult Sci. 1998; 39:452-8.

14.

Hosseindoust A, Lee S, Nho WG, Song YH, Shin JS, Ingale SL, et al. A dose–response study to evaluate the effects of pH-stable β-mannanase derived from Trichoderma citrinoviride on growth performance, nutrient retention, and intestine morphology in broiler chickens. Ital J Anim Sci. 2018; :1-8.

15.

Lee SH, Shinde P, Choi J, Park M, Ohh S, Kwon IK, et al. Effects of dietary iron levels on growth performance, hematological status, liver mineral concentration, fecal microflora, and diarrhea incidence in weanling pigs. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2008; 126Suppl 1:57-68.

16.

National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th ed Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 1998

17.

Feng J, Ma WQ, Xu ZR, Wang YZ, Liu JX. Effects of iron glycine chelate on growth, haematological and immunological characteristics in weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2007; 134:261-72.

18.

Lewis A, Miller PS, Wolverton C. Bioavailability of iron in two different sources for weanling pigs. Neb Swine Rep. 1996; 187:22-4

19.

Hosseindoust AR, Lee SH, Kim JS, Choi YH, Noh HS, Lee JH, et al. Dietary bacteriophages as an alternative for zinc oxide or organic acids to control diarrhoea and improve the performance of weanling piglets. Vet Med. 2017; 62:53-61.

20.

Zhuo Z, Yu X, Li S, Fang S, Feng J. Heme and non-heme iron on growth performances, blood parameters, tissue mineral concentration, and intestinal morphology of weanling pigs. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019; 187:411-7.

21.

Kim JS, Hosseindoust A, Lee SH, Choi YH, Kim MJ, Lee JH, et al. Bacteriophage cocktail and multi-strain probiotics in the feed for weanling pigs: effects on intestine morphology and targeted intestinal coliforms and Clostridium. Animal. 2017; 11:45-53.

22.

Kachuee R, Abdi-Benemar H, Mansoori Y, Sanchez-Aparicio P, Seifdavati J, Elghandour MMMY, et al. Effects of sodium selenite, L-selenomethionine, and selenium nanoparticles during late pregnancy on selenium, zinc, copper, and iron concentrations in Khalkhali Goats and their kids. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019; :1-14.

23.

Underwood EJ, Suttle NF. The mineral nutrition of livestock. 3rd ed New York, NY: CABI Publishing. 1999.

24.

Kang OD, Park YS. Effect of age on heart rate, blood lactate concentration, packed cell volume and hemoglobin to exercise in Jeju crossbreed horses. J Anim Sci Technol. 2017; 59:2.

25.

Zimmerman DR. Iron in swine nutrition.In National Feed Ingredient Association literature review on iron in animal and poultry nutrition. West Des Moines, IA: National Feed Ingredients Association. 1980

26.

Miller ER, Ullrey DE, Ackermann I, Schimidt DA, Luecke RW, Hoefer JA. Swine hematology from birth to maturity. II. Erythrocyte population, size and hemoglobin concentration. J Anim Sci. 1961; 20:890-7.

27.

Dove CR, Haydon KD. The effect of copper addition to diets with various iron levels on the performance and hematology of weanling swine. J Anim Sci. 1991; 69:2013-9.

2019 JCR Impact Factor: 1.685

The 2019 Journal Citation Reports (JCR) was announced, and the impact factor of JAST was determined to be 1.685.

We would like to ask for your continued interest and support in our journal.

Thank you.

JAST Editorial Office


I don't want to open this window for a day.