RESEARCH ARTICLE

Changes in ruminoreticular temperature and body activity in pregnant Hanwoo cows (Bos taurus coreanae) after lumpy skin disease vaccination

Jaejung Ha1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6785-6346, Daejung Yu2,#https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9870-9734, Jisu Kim3https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3459-5271, Jiyeon Han3https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2510-3310, Mirae Kim3https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9620-5832, Gunhoo Kim3https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2919-269X, Jongil Jeong3https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7434-7121, Gyeong-Min Gim4,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9352-094X, Daehyun Kim3,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-4438
Author Information & Copyright
1Gyeongsangbuk-Do Livestock Research Institute, Yeongju 36052, Korea
2Chonnam Agricultural Research & Extension Services Livestock Institute, Gangjin 59213, Korea
3Department of Animal Science, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
4LARTBio Inc., Seoul 06221, Korea

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

*Corresponding author: Gyeong-Min Gim, LARTBio Inc., Seoul 06221, Korea, E-mail: tty4447@naver.com
*Corresponding author: Daehyun Kim, Department of Animal Science, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea, E-mail: kimdhbio@jnu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2025 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Dec 11, 2023; Revised: Feb 26, 2024; Accepted: Mar 18, 2024

Published Online: May 31, 2025

Abstract

The first outbreak of lumpy skin disease (LSD) occurred in South Korea in October 2023, and cattle are being vaccinated countrywide to prevent its spread. However, studies regarding the changes in body temperature and activity after LSD vaccination during pregnancy are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the ruminoreticular temperature and body activity of 18 pregnant and 28 non-pregnant cows using a bolus sensor after LSD vaccination. Two days after LSD vaccination, the ruminoreticular temperature of all the experimental groups increased and that of the pregnant cows remained very high 3 to 5 days after vaccination compared with that in the non-pregnant cows. The rate of maintaining ≥ 40°C was 12.8% in non-pregnant cows and up to 20.8% in pregnant cows. Body activity also temporarily increased in pregnant cows compared with that in the non-pregnant cows on the 1st and 4th days after vaccination. The results of this study may be applied to prevent the rise in ruminoreticular temperature and used as raw data by veterinarians when LSD vaccine is administered during pregnancy.

Keywords: Lumpy skin disease; Lumpy skin disease vaccination; Ruminoreticular temperature; Body activity; Pregnant cows, Hanwoo

INTRODUCTION

Lumpy skin disease (LSD) in cattle and buffalo is caused by the LSD virus belonging to the family Poxviridae and genus Capripoxvirus [13]. Mosquitoes, especially Aedes aegypti, can transmit the LSD virus for at least 6 days without significant loss of titer [3,4]. The incubation period for LSD is approximately 7 days. The main symptom is sporadic swelling of the skin, with the appearance of nodules having diameter 0.5–5 cm [3,5,6]. Other symptoms include high fever of > 40°C, rapid reduction in milk production, loss of appetite, nasal discharge, salivation, swollen lymph nodes, weight loss, miscarriage, and infertility [13,5,711].

LSD was first reported in 1929 in Zambia, from where it spread to numerous places, including South Africa, North Africa, the Middle East, Europe, and Asia [1,3,1214]. According to a recent report by the World Animal Health Information System and the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), Republic of Korea, LSD first broke out in Republic of Korea in Seosan city on October 20, 2023.

To prevent the spread of LSD, the immediate slaughter of all cattle that have come in contact with infected cattle and elimination of the initial source of infection are recommended [3,12,15].

However, if the disease has already spread widely, vaccination is recommended in most countries because this is the only method of prevention [6,15]. According to a report by MAFRA, 3 types of LSD vaccines were used in Republic of Korea. As of 14:00 on November 5, 2023, the status of LSD vaccination in Korea was 90.9% (3,766,000/4,076,000 cattle). To complete the nationwide vaccination by November 10, 2023, cows in areas at risk of LSD are being vaccinated by city/county vaccination groups (2,065 people from 931 classes nationwide) and farm owners (self-vaccination).

Studies have shown that cows demonstrate fever (83.9%), decreased feed intake (85.9%), and reduced milk production (94.6%) when the LSD vaccine is administered [16]. The analysis of changes in rectal temperature according to the LSD vaccination showed that compared with that of the control animals, the rectal temperature increased, and high-dose vaccinations resulted in rise of temperatures to ≥ 40°C [11]. Other studies showed that the highest rectal temperature was recorded 8 days after LSD vaccination, and milk production decreased by up to 16% [17].

While vaccination is required to prevent LSD, studies comparing body temperature and activity in pregnant and non-pregnant cows have not been conducted to date. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the patterns of changes in ruminoreticular temperature and body activity measured using a bolus sensor after LSD vaccination in pregnant and non-pregnant Hanwoo cows.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and management

The cows used in this study were bred at the Gyeongsangbuk-do Livestock Technology Research Institute, fed according to the Korean Feeding Standard for Hanwoo, and housed in pens (rearing space = 300 m2/15 cows) equipped with stanchions. Before beginning the experiment, cows with no abnormalities in the ovaries and uterus were selected by ultrasound examination. Finally, 46 cows (18 pregnant cows, 28 non-pregnant cows) were chosen for the study.

All the experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Gyeongsangbuk-do Livestock Research Institute (approval number: protocol code GAEC/140, approval date: December 14, 2021). Table 1 shows the age, parity, and pregnancy day of the cows used in the experiment.

Table 1. Information regarding experiment group (n = 46)
Group Number of cows Age of months Parity Days of pregnancy
Non-pregnant cows 28 51.2 ± 4.0 1.8 ± 0.1 173.6 ± 3.7
Pregnant cows 18 47.0 ± 3.5 1.6 ± 0.2
Total 46 49.7 ± 2.9 1.7 ± 0.1
Download Excel Table
Ruminoreticular temperature and body activity measurement

Six months before beginning the experiment, a bolus sensor (smaXtec, Tauranga, New Zealand) was orally administered and placed in the cow’s rumen or reticulum; the adaptation period was 6 months. Information regarding the sensor used in the experiment and the method of measuring temperature and activity in the rumen every 10 min have been described in detail previously [18].

Lumpy skin disease vaccination

LSD vaccine (Lumpyvax®, Republic of South Africa; each 1 mL [1 dose] of the vaccine contains 104 TCID50 of freeze-dried, live, attenuated virus) was administered after disinfecting the vaccination site using 70% alcohol. The powder was dissolved in the dilution solution and subcutaneously injected (1 mL/cow) into the neck of the cow using a disposable syringe.

Pregnancy test

Two weeks before beginning the experiment, a pregnancy test was conducted using rectal ultrasound equipment (DRAMINSKI iScan mini, Dramiński S.A., Gietrzwałd, Poland).

Statistical analysis

Changes in ruminoreticular temperature and body activity in pregnant and non-pregnant cows were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism (version 8.0.1, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The ruminoreticular temperatures of pregnant and non-pregnant cows were measured at 10-minute intervals before and after LSD vaccination using the sensor. The average temperature for 4 hours is shown in Fig. 1. Two days before LSD vaccination, the average ruminoreticular temperatures of the pregnant and non-pregnant cows were 38.89 ± 0.01°C and 38.74 ± 0.01°C, respectively (Fig. 1). Two days after LSD vaccination, the ruminoreticular temperatures in both the groups gradually increased; this continued until 6 days after vaccination (p < 0.001). The rise in ruminoreticular temperature was greater in pregnant cows than it was in non-pregnant cows 3–5 days after vaccination (p < 0.001).

jast-67-3-564-g1
Fig. 1. Changes in ruminoreticular temperature of pregnant and non-pregnant cows depending on days after lumpy skin disease vaccination (n = 46). □ represents the mean values for the pregnant group and ○, the mean values for the non-pregnant group. The day of vaccine administration is 0 day, and the error bar is presented as SEM. ***p < 0.001.
Download Original Figure

The body activity of pregnant and non-pregnant cows were measured at 10-minute intervals before and after LSD vaccination using the sensor. The average body activity for 4 hours is shown in Fig. 2. Two days before LSD vaccination, the mean body activity of the pregnant and non-pregnant cows were 2.41 ± 0.06 V and 2.81 ± 0.12 V, respectively (Fig. 2). No significant difference in the body activity of pregnant and non-pregnant cows was observed before and after LSD vaccination. However, the body activity of pregnant cows temporarily increased 1 and 4 days after vaccination compared with that in non-pregnant cows (p < 0.001).

jast-67-3-564-g2
Fig. 2. Changes in body activity in pregnant and non-pregnant cows depending on days after lumpy skin disease vaccination (n = 46). □ represents the mean values for the pregnant group and ○, the non-pregnant group. The day of vaccine administration is 0 day, and the error bar is presented as SEM. ***p < 0.001.
Download Original Figure

Additionally, the rate of rise in temperature of > 40°C was measured for 4 hours at 10-minute intervals for 9 days after LSD vaccination and analyzed by group. The rate at which a temperature of 40°C was maintained was higher in pregnant cows than it was in non-pregnant cows. A maximum of 12.8% non-pregnant cows and 20.8% pregnant cows demonstrated temperatures > 40°C between 5 and 6 days after vaccination (Fig. 3).

jast-67-3-564-g3
Fig. 3. Distribution of increased ruminoreticular temperature of > 40°C every 4 hours in (A) non-pregnant and (B) pregnant cows after lumpy skin disease vaccination (n = 46). The black bar represents the percentage of increased ruminoreticular temperature of > 40°C every 4 hours.
Download Original Figure

DISCUSSION

There are research reports comparing changes in ruminoreticular temperatures and body activity according to estrus [19], pregnancy [20], parturition [21], and foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccination [22], which are behavioral characteristics of cows using bolus sensors. Because the sensors are located in rumen or reticulum, ruminoreticular temperatures temporarily decreases rapidly due to the effect on water comsumption after ingestion of the feed, and body activity increases than usual because they are mixed with the feed due to feed intake [19,20,2325]. This characteristic is the result of normal feed intake, so it is also the basis for accurately determining whether cows consume feed.

Governments are encouraging vaccinations to prevent the outbreak of infectious diseases, such as LSD, Akabane disease, and FMD among animals [6,15,22,26,27], considering this is the most efficient way to prevent infection. [6,15,26]. However, the side effects of vaccination must be studied, and vaccination methods to minimize these side effects should be developed [11,16,17,22,23,26].

Recently, Abutarbush et al. [16] reported that LSD vaccination causes fever, decreased feed intake, and reduced milk production in dairy cows. Furthermore, Bamouh et al. [11] found that the rectal temperature increased significantly in the vaccinated group than it did in the non-vaccinated experimental group. Additionally, the body temperature was found to gradually increase up to 6 days after LSD vaccination [11], which conforms to the results of this study. Bamouh et al. [11] also showed that a high vaccine dose caused a rise in temperature to ≥ 40 degrees; this finding was similar to that of our study. Nevertheless, analyzing the changes in temperature depending on the dose of LSD vaccination in cows cannot help elucidate the changes in body temperature according to pregnancy status.

Katsoulos et al. [17] measured rectal temperature using digital thermometers after LSD vaccination and found that the highest rectal temperature was recorded 8 days after vaccination, and milk production decreased by up to 16%. However, analyzing milk production status after parturition also cannot help clarify the changes in body temperature after LSD vaccination according to pregnancy status.

Body temperature is very closely related to physiological mechanisms, and technologies have been developed to monitor body temperature using non-invasive methods, such as by using bolus sensors [22,26]. Our research team previously conducted a study to investigate changes in ruminoreticular temperature and body activity depending on estrus status [19], gestation period [20], and parturition [21]. A study has also been conducted to compare and analyze the ruminoreticular temperature after administering FMD vaccine to cows in early- and late-pregnancy stages [22].

However, to the best of our knowledge, changes in ruminoreticular temperature and activity after administering LSD vaccine during pregnancy have not been analyzed to date. Therefore, the contribution of our study, which shows the relative rise in ruminoreticular temperature of pregnant cows after LSD vaccination when compared with that of non-pregnant cows, is significant.

The current study shows that the rate at which a ruminoreticular temperature of > 40°C was maintained was higher in pregnant cows than it was in non-pregnant cows after LSD vaccination. Hence, prescribing antipyretic drugs and close monitoring are necessary to prevent miscarriage. While no miscarriage or stillbirth occurred while conducting this experiment, additional large-scale studies are required to investigate adverse reactions of LSD vaccination.

In conclusion, the results of this study can be used as raw data to understand the physiological changes in ruminoreticular temperature and body activity depending on pregnancy status after LSD vaccination in Hanwoo. In addition, based on the results of this study, we plan to conduct a study to investigate cases of miscarriage, premature birth, and stillbirth following LSD vaccination in the future and develop ways to prevent them.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This research was funded by the Rural Development Administration, Korea (Project No. RE-2024-00351672).

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. RE-2024-00351672)” Rural Development Administration, Korea.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Ha J, Yu D, Kim J, Han J, Kim M, Kim G, Jeong J, Gim GM, Kim D.

Data curation: Yu D, Kim J, Han J, Gim GM, Kim D.

Formal analysis: Ha J, Kim D.

Methodology: Ha J, Yu D, Kim M, Kim G, Gim GM, Kim D.

Software: Gim GM, Kim D.

Validation: Ha J, Kim G, Jeong J, Kim D.

Investigation: Ha J, Yu D, Kim J, Han J, Kim M, Kim G, Jeong J, Kim D.

Writing - original draft: Ha J, Yu D, Gim GM, Kim D.

Writing - review & editing: Ha J, Yu D, Kim J, Han J, Kim M, Kim G, Jeong J, Gim GM, Kim D.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Gyeongsangbuk-do Livestock Research Institute, Yeongju, Korea (protocol code: GAEC/140, approved on December 14, 2021).

REFERENCES

1.

Alkhamis MA, VanderWaal K. Spatial and temporal epidemiology of lumpy skin disease in the Middle East, 2012-2015. Front Vet Sci. 2016; 3:19

2.

Gari G, Bonnet P, Roger F, Waret-Szkuta A. Epidemiological aspects and financial impact of lumpy skin disease in Ethiopia. Prev Vet Med. 2011; 102:274-83

3.

Bianchini J, Simons X, Humblet MF, Saegerman C. Lumpy skin disease: a systematic review of mode of transmission, risk of emergence and risk entry pathway. Viruses. 2023; 15:1622

4.

Chihota CM, Rennie LF, Kitching RP, Mellor PS. Mechanical transmission of lumpy skin disease virus by Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Epidemiol Infect. 2001; 126:317-21

5.

Milovanović M, Dietze K, Milićević V, Radojičić S, Valčić M, Moritz T, et al. Humoral immune response to repeated lumpy skin disease virus vaccination and performance of serological tests. BMC Vet Res. 2019; 15:80

6.

Suwankitwat N, Bhakha K, Molee L, Songkasupa T, Puangjinda K, Chamchoy T, et al. Long-term monitoring of immune response to recombinant lumpy skin disease virus in dairy cattle from small-household farms in western Thailand. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023; 99:102008

7.

Abutarbush SM, Ababneh MM, Al Zoubi IG, Al Sheyab OM, Al Zoubi MG, Alekish MO, et al. Lumpy skin disease in Jordan: disease emergence, clinical signs, complications and preliminary-associated economic losses. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015; 62:549-54

8.

Annandale CH, Holm DE, Ebersohn K, Venter EH. Seminal transmission of lumpy skin disease virus in heifers. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014; 61:443-8

9.

Babiuk S, Bowden TR, Boyle DB, Wallace DB, Kitching RP. Capripoxviruses: an emerging worldwide threat to sheep, goats and cattle. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2008; 55:263-72

10.

Tasioudi KE, Antoniou SE, Iliadou P, Sachpatzidis A, Plevraki E, Agianniotaki EI, et al. Emergence of lumpy skin disease in Greece, 2015. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016; 63:260-5

11.

Bamouh Z, Hamdi J, Fellahi S, Khayi S, Jazouli M, Tadlaoui KO, et al. Investigation of post vaccination reactions of two live attenuated vaccines against lumpy skin disease of cattle. Vaccines. 2021; 9:621

12.

Ratyotha K, Prakobwong S, Piratae S. Lumpy skin disease: a newly emerging disease in Southeast Asia. Vet World. 2022; 15:2764-71

13.

Akther M, Akter SH, Sarker S, Aleri JW, Annandale H, Abraham S, et al. Global burden of lumpy skin disease, outbreaks, and future challenges. Viruses. 2023; 15:1861

14.

Abera Z, Degefu H, Gari G, Kidane M. Sero-prevalence of lumpy skin disease in selected districts of West Wollega zone, Ethiopia. BMC Vet Res. 2015; 11:135

15.

Namazi F, Khodakaram Tafti A. Lumpy skin disease, an emerging transboundary viral disease: a review. Vet Med Sci. 2021; 7:888-96

16.

Abutarbush SM, Hananeh WM, Ramadan W, Al Sheyab OM, Alnajjar AR, Al Zoubi IG, et al. Adverse reactions to field vaccination against lumpy skin disease in Jordan. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016; 63:e213-9

17.

Katsoulos PD, Chaintoutis SC, Dovas CI, Polizopoulou ZS, Brellou GD, Agianniotaki EI, et al. Investigation on the incidence of adverse reactions, viraemia and haematological changes following field immunization of cattle using a live attenuated vaccine against lumpy skin disease. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018; 65:174-85

18.

Hamilton AW, Davison C, Tachtatzis C, Andonovic I, Michie C, Ferguson HJ, et al. Identification of the rumination in cattle using support vector machines with motion-sensitive bolus sensors. Sensors. 2019; 19:1165

19.

Kim D, Kwon WS, Ha J, Moon J, Yi J. Increased accuracy of estrus prediction using ruminoreticular biocapsule sensors in Hanwoo (Bos taurus coreanae) cows. J Anim Sci Technol. 2023; 65:759-66

20.

Kim DH, Ha JJ, Yi JK, Kim BK, Kwon WS, Ye BH, et al. Differences in ruminal temperature between pregnant and non-pregnant Korean cattle. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol. 2021; 36:45-50

21.

Kim D, Ha J, Kwon WS, Moon J, Gim GM, Yi J. Change of ruminoreticular temperature and body activity before and after parturition in Hanwoo (Bos taurus coreanae) cows. Sensors. 2021; 21:7892

22.

Kim D, Ha J, Moon J, Kim D, Lee W, Lee C, et al. Increased ruminoreticular temperature and body activity after foot-and-mouth vaccination in pregnant Hanwoo (Bos taurus coreanae) cows. Vaccines. 2021; 9:1227

23.

Kim D, Kwon WS, Ha J, Kim J, Kim D, Lee W, et al. Effect of oestrus synchronisation through ovulation delay by vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease in Hanwoo (Bos taurus coreanae) cows. Vet Med Sci. 2023; 9:974-81

24.

Lee Y, Bok JD, Lee HJ, Lee HG, Kim D, Lee I, et al. Body temperature monitoring using subcutaneously implanted thermo-loggers from Holstein steers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016; 29:299-306

25.

Suthar VS, Burfeind O, Bonk S, Dhami AJ, Heuwieser W. Endogenous and exogenous progesterone influence body temperature in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2012; 95:2381-9

26.

Kim D, Moon J, Ha J, Kim D, Yi J. Effect of foot-and-mouth disease vaccination on acute phase immune response and anovulation in Hanwoo (Bos taurus coreanae). Vaccines. 2021; 9:419

27.

Konno S, Nakagawa M. Akabane disease in cattle: congenital abnormalities caused by viral infection. Experimental disease. Vet Pathol. 1982; 19:267-79