RESEARCH ARTICLE

Biodiversity and identification of spore-forming bacteria in raw milk from Korean dairy farm environment using the culturomics approach

Won Seo Park1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2229-3169, Jayeon Yoo1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3593-5191, Daye Mun2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-7632, Hyun Woo Choi3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1365-1721, Sangnam Oh4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2428-412X, Jun Sang Ham1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-6631, Younghoon Kim2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6769-0657
Author Information & Copyright
1National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea
2Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
3Department of Agricultural Convergence Technology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
4Department of Food and Nutrition, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea
*Corresponding author: Jun Sang Ham, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea, Tel: +82-63-238-7366, E-mail: hamjs@korea.kr
*Corresponding author: Younghoon Kim, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, Tel: +82-02-880-4808, E-mail: ykeys2584@snu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2025 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 17, 2024; Revised: Jun 06, 2024; Accepted: Jun 07, 2024

Published Online: Sep 30, 2025

Abstract

Spores present in milk survive heat treatments and can persist during downstream processing. In Korea, the development of the dairy industry is also growing. However, studies related to the distribution and diversity of spore-forming bacteria for the quality control of raw milk and dairy products are insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the contamination levels of spore-forming species in raw milk derived from five dairy farm environments in Korea. The isolated strains were also identified using 16S rRNA sequencing and characterized based on the environmental factors in farms, which affect raw milk production. Representative spore-forming bacteria communities in the samples include Bacillaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Paenibacillaceae, and Caryophanaceae at the family level, and Bacillus, Clostridium, and Paenibacillus were the most diverse and predominant at the genus level. A total of 1,102 isolates of 16 genera could be assigned to the genus Bacillus (67.3% and 742 isolates), Clostridium (12.3% and 135 isolates), Paenibacillus (9.3% and 102 isolates), and Oceanobacillus (5.9% and 65 isolates). Among 173 species, the prominent members were Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus kochii, Bacillus clausii, and Clostridium sporogenes. Twenty-seven spore-forming species (Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus sonorensis, Bacillus sporothermodurans, Clostridium sporogenes, Clostridium tyrobutyricum, and Paenibacillus validus) detected in raw milk were the same species found in the dairy farm environments. Our result clearly shows that specific provinces have distinct proportions of spore formers that may cause spoilage of raw milk and milk products, such as cheese and yogurt. The biodiversity of spore-forming bacteria in the dairy farms were greatly influenced by several factors such as dairy farm conditions and milking environments. Recommending proper management of hygienic and production practices, including strengthening laws and implementing Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) principles, would be effective in eradicating contamination during the production of raw milk.

Keywords: Spore-forming bacteria; Dairy farm; Raw milk; Culturomics; Biodiversity

INTRODUCTION

In the dairy industry, the presence of spore-forming bacteria is a significant concern in dairy products. Spore-forming bacteria, such as Bacillus spp., Paenibacillus spp., and Clostridium spp., are commonly found in various dairy products and are ubiquitous in nature. They are also present in many raw materials and dry ingredients of processed foods. These organisms produce spores in response to environmental stresses, including nutrient limitation, osmotic pressure, and extreme temperature deviation [1,2]. These spores are resistant to chemicals, pH changes, heat, and osmotic shock. When conditions become suitable for growth, spores can germinate into vegetative cells [3]. Bacterial contamination of raw milk can arise from various sources, including air, milking equipment, feed, soil, feces, and grass [4]. In addition, spore-forming bacteria can survive pasteurization conditions and grow in pasteurized fluid milk during refrigeration [5,6], causing fluid milk spoilage and limiting further extension of its shelf life [7,8]. Bacillus and related genera are found in raw and pasteurized milk, as well as in various environmental samples from dairy farms. This ubiquity suggests their involvement in the milk production chain from diverse sources.

Bacillus and closely related genera have been associated with the spoilage of raw and pasteurized milk, as well as other dairy products, including Paenibacillus, Brevibacillus, Psychrobacillus, Viridibacillus, Anoxybacillus, Geobacillus, and Lysinibacillus. In previous studies, these organisms are mostly caused by thermostable proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes or by recontamination of the sterilized milk during filling [911]. However, several Bacillus species that form highly heat-resistant spores capable of surviving industrial high-temperature and short-time and ultrahigh-temperature milk processing have been isolated [12,13]. Clostridium and related species, such as Clostridium butyricum, Clostridium sporogenes, Clostridium tyrobutyricum, and Clostridium beijerinckii, are defined as Gram-positive, endospore-forming rods, with most species known to be obligate anaerobes with varying tolerance to oxygen. These species are associated with spoilage and the development of gas defects such as “late lowing” in cheeses. Incidences of butyric acid spoilage of cheese contributed by the presence of butyric acid bacteria spores in raw milk lead to considerable loss of product value and result in economic loss for the cheese industry [14]. C. butyricum, C. tyrobutyricum, and C. sporogenes, collectively known as ‘butyric acid spores,’ are commonly found in poor quality silage that has undergone aerobic deterioration. This deterioration results in insufficient acidification, thereby facilitating the germination and growth of Clostridium spores [15,16].

Culturomics refers to the strategy of directly culturing bacteria on a large scale to study the diversity and characteristics of microbial communities [17,18]. With advances in bacterial culture technology and the importance of characterizing individual bacteria, analysis from a culturomics perspective has become crucial [19].

The objective of this study is to investigate the existence and source of the organisms associated within dairy farm (bedding material, manure, drinking water, feed, barn bottom, and soil) and milking parlor environments (rinse water, teat, used tower, dairy bottom, cooling chamber bottom, and tank surface). Therefore, we performed an in-depth study on the occurrence of spore-forming bacteria and their diversity associated within the raw milk production in the dairy farms of Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection

Samples were collected at various sources (pen and milking parlor environments) from five dairy farms producing milk products in Korea. One farm is located in Chungnam (A) and two each in Jeonnam (B, C) and Jeonbuk (D, E). The pen environmental samples were collected in 6 points (bedding material, manure, drinking water, mixed feed, barn bottom, and soil) and the milking parlor environmental samples were collected from 7 points (rinse water, teat, used tower, dairy bottom, cooling chamber bottom, cooling tank surface, and raw milk). The information related to these samples is indicated in Table 1. All solid environmental samples (the bedding material, manure, soil, and mixed feed) were collected in sterilized packs and placed in a 25 g/mL stomacher bag added with 225 mL of 0.1% peptone water, which was homogenized for 2 min with a stomacher lab blender (FR/Bag Mixer, Interscience, St. Nom, France). Surface and bottom samples (barn bottom, teat, dairy bottom, cooling chamber bottom, and cooling tank surface) were collected by swabbing a 10 cm2 area using Quick swab (3M, St Paul, MN, USA).

Table 1. Sample list of dairy farm environmental factors
Samples
Pen environment Bedding material (P1), manure (P2), drinking water (P3), mixed feed (P4), barn bottom (P5), soil (P6)
Milking parlor environment Rinse water (M1), teat (M2), used tower (M3), dairy bottom (M4), cooling chamber bottom (M5), cooling tank surface (M6), raw milk (M7)
Download Excel Table
Quantitative microbiological analyses

Ten milliliters of each environmental sample were transferred into a sterile tube and heat-treated at 85°C for 10 min to kill vegetative cells and to select for spore-forming bacteria. Then, the samples were serially diluted in 0.1% peptone water and cultured at 37°C for 5 days under aerobic and anaerobic conditions on brain heart infusion agar (BHI agar, Difco, Tucker, GA, USA). The total number of spore-forming bacteria from the surface and bottom samples was determined in CFU/cm2, and the other samples (solid and liquid) as CFU/g or CFU/mL.

Isolation of spore-forming bacteria from dairy farm environments

Bacterial colonies present on the Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar of all heat-treated samples were visually examined, and 5–10 colonies with different morphologies were isolated and streaked for purity on the BHI agar, and incubated at 37°C for 48h under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Purified isolates were frozen at −80°C in 15% glycerol for further processing.

Identification of isolates by 16S rRNA sequencing

The genomic DNA was extracted from the isolates using the Powerfood Microbial DNA Isolation kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal primers, 27F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′) and 1492R (5′- GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT TC-3′), and the purified PCR products were sequenced using ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Forster, CA, USA). The sequences were aligned in the Gene bank database using the BLASTN program at the National Centre for Biotechnology information, and the percent homology score was obtained to identify the organism at the genus and species levels.

RESULTS

Culturomics approach for spore-forming bacteria

Because dairy farms are complex environments with various microbial ecosystems, especially those contaminated with spoilage and spore-forming bacteria, dairy hygiene management has an impact on raw milk at the stage of milk production. The aim was to count heat-resistant spore-forming bacteria under aerobic and anaerobic conditions from dairy environmental factors to evaluate the hygienic qualities. The average heat-resistant spore-forming bacteria counts for various control points (pen environment and milking parlor environment) in the selected five dairy farms are depicted in Table 2. Overall, the counts of soil, bedding material, manure, and feed in the pen environment were higher than those of the barn bottom, drinking water. The counts in the bedding material and manure of environmental samples from the five dairy farms ranged from 5.7 × 104 to 9.1 × 106 CFU/g and 2.8 × 104 to 1.7 × 106 CFU/g under aerobic culture conditions, respectively. Similarly, heat-treated bedding material and manure samples had the highest counts for spore-forming bacteria initially and throughout the refrigerated storage, starting at 4.25–6.64 Log CFU/g on day 1 and reaching 5.43–8.27 Log CFU/g on day 21 [5]. The impact of the farm environment (silage, feed, animal manures, bedding, soil, etc.) are associated with poor hygienic practices and affect the quality of raw milk [2022]. In the milking parlor environment, the counts in the rinse water, teat, used tower, and cooling tank surface of farm E were found to be undetectable under aerobic culture conditions. In contrast, the rinse water counts of farm A, B, and C were higher than the detectable levels. The dairy bottom, where the cattle milking takes place, from farms A–D showed higher counts at a range of 1.3 × 102–1.1 × 104 CFU/cm2, in contrast to farm E, which had < 2 CFU/cm2. The surface of the raw milk cooling tank from four out of five dairy farms showed a range of < 2 CFU–9.3 × 101 CFU/cm2, except for farm E. The heat-treated raw milk from farms A–E were detected to have higher counts (8.7 × 101–2.4 × 102 CFU/mL) under aerobic culture conditions. In a previous report, after heating at 80°C for 10 min, the mesophilic and thermophilic bacterial spore counts of raw and pasteurized camel’s milk were both 2 Log -CFU/mL [23]. Aerobic bacterial spores in dairy cow’s milk are within 2.3 Log CFU/mL [24], and this concentration is comparable to the concentration reported by El-Ziney and Al-Turki [25], which was 2.1 log CFU/mL.

Table 2. Enumeration of spore-forming bacteria from various sources in the dairy farm environment and raw milk in Korea
Isolation source Total microbial counts (CFU/mL or CFU/g or CFU/cm2)
A1) B C D E
Aerobic Anaerobic Aerobic Anaerobic Aerobic Anaerobic Aerobic Anaerobic Aerobic Anaerobic
Pen environmental factors Bedding material (P1) 5.7 × 1042) 1.5 × 104 7.2 × 106 5.8 × 105 9.1 × 106 1.5 × 105 2.0 × 106 7.9 × 105 1.3 × 106 7.0 × 105
Manure (P2) 2.8 × 104 7.7 × 104 1.7 × 106 7.8 × 104 1.1 × 106 1.1 × 104 3.1 × 105 3.0 × 104 1.6 × 105 1.0 × 105
Drinking water (P3) 2.3 × 101 6.7 × 101 7.0 × 103 3.3 × 100 6.5 × 103 2.2 × 101 5.6 × 103 2.6 × 103 1.3 × 101 ND
Mixed feed (P4) 2.6 × 104 2.4 × 104 2.8 × 105 6.1 × 105 1.1 × 106 9.4 × 104 1.1 × 106 1.4 × 104 1.0 × 105 1.3 × 105
Barn bottom (P5) 3.0 × 102 3.5 × 102 6.3 × 101 1.1 × 102 1.2 × 103 1.5 × 102 9.5 × 102 6.4 × 101 6.3 × 102 2.4 × 102
Soil (P6) 2.1 × 106 1.4 × 106 2.1 × 106 7.1 × 104 2.1 × 105 1.7 × 106 6.1 × 106 1.3 × 106 5.7 × 105 3.0 × 103
Milking parlor environmental factors Rinse water (M1) 1.9 × 103 3.3 × 102 3.7 × 102 3.3 × 101 1.7 × 102 6.7 × 101 3.3 × 101 ND ND 6.6 × 101
Teat (M2) 4.7 × 101 2.7 × 101 5.7 × 100 6.7 × 100 3.4 × 101 3.0 × 101 1.3 × 102 4.1 × 101 ND 3.1 × 101
Used tower (M3) 5.0 × 100 < 1 CFU 3.0 × 100 3.3 × 100 6.8 × 102 1.3 × 102 2.3 × 101 3.2 × 100 ND < 2 CFU
Dairy bottom (M4) 1.1 × 104 3.0 × 103 3.0 × 102 1.3 × 102 5.2 × 102 7.1 × 101 1.3 × 102 1.2 × 102 < 2 CFU 3.9 × 101
Cooling chamber bottom (M5) 3.3 × 101 1.7 × 101 8.7 × 100 7.7 × 100 9.2 × 102 4.5 × 101 4.7 × 102 5.3 × 101 6.2 × 104 2.0 × 101
Cooling tank surface (M6) < 2 CFU < 2 CFU 9.3 × 101 2.8 × 101 < 2 CFU 3.3 × 101 2.0 × 101 < 2 CFU ND 1.7 × 101
Raw milk (M7) 1.0 × 102 2.0 × 102 1.0 × 102 2.0 × 102 2.0 × 102 1.3 × 102 8.7 × 101 3.7 × 101 2.4 × 102 3.3 × 100

1) A to E indicate the location of each farm. A, Chungnam; B and C, Jeonnam; D and E, Jeonbuk.

2) Values are the means of three replicates of each sample.

ND, not detectable.

Download Excel Table

All the heat-treated environmental samples showed that spore formers survived the pasteurization process and grew under aerobic and anaerobic culture conditions. The dairy farm environment is a typical source of contamination for spore-forming bacteria in raw milk. This study provides a more accurate quantitative portrait of the microflora of spore formers and depicts that the composition of the dairy and milking environments varies from one farm to another. However, confirmation on these findings will only come with the analysis of the DNA sequences of the spore formers isolated from raw milk and environmental samples.

Richness of spore-forming bacteria isolates

This part of the study specifies an insight into the biodiversity of spore-forming bacteria from various sources of the dairy farm environment that contaminate raw milk. To succeed in this goal, we employed phenotypic and genotypic tactics involving the sequencing of taxonomically related target genes to identify spore-forming isolates of the Bacillus and Clostridium groups as precisely as possible. In our study, 1,102 spore-forming bacteria colonies were obtained from the samples collected from the five dairy farms, which are divided into the pen environment (n = 637) and milking parlor environment (n = 465). The selection of colonies was based on differences in the shape and color under aerobic and anaerobic culture conditions. A total of 1,102 isolates could be assigned to family Bacillaceae (842 isolates [76.4%] and 10 genera), Lachnospiraceae (135 isolates [12.3%] and 1 genus), Paenibacillaceae (110 isolates [10.0%] and 3 genera), and Caryophanaceae (15 isolates [1.4%] and 2 genera). The most diverse and abundant isolated family was Bacillaceae, with 842 isolates found in all five dairy farms (A, 80 isolates [59.7%]; B, 65 isolates [73.0%]; C, 219 isolates [80.5%]; D, 254 isolates [80.9%]; and E, 224 isolates [76.5%]) (Table 3, Fig. 1A).

Table 3. Taxonomic classification of spore-forming bacteria isolated from the dairy farm environmental factors in Korea
Farm1) Family Genus Pen environmental factors Milking parlor environmental factors
No of species No of isolates No of species No of isolates
A Total (8 genera) 35 89 19 45
Bacillaceae Bacillus 13 38 12 26
Lysinibacillus 3 3 - -
Oceanobacillus 3 7 1 5
Virgibacillus - 1 1
Caryophanaceae Solibacillus 1 1 - -
Lachnospiraceae Clostridium 7 27 4 10
Paenibacillaceae Brevibacillus 1 1 - -
Paenibacillus 9 12 1 3
B Total (7 genera) 30 71 9 18
Bacillaceae Bacillus 16 45 8 17
Psychrobacillus 1 1 - -
Terribacillus 1 1 - -
Virgibacillus 1 1 - -
Caryophanaceae Solibacillus 1 3 - -
Lachnospiraceae Clostridium 5 10 - -
Paenibacillaceae Paenibacillus 5 10 1 1
C Total (9 genera) 39 133 31 139
Bacillaceae Bacillus 19 97 18 115
Lysinibacillus 2 3 - -
Oceanobacillus 1 2 2 2
Caryophanaceae Rummeliibacillus 1 1 1 4
Solibacillus 1 2 - -
Lachnospiraceae Clostridium 6 17 1 3
Paenibacillaceae Aneurinibacillus 1 1 - -
Brevibacillus 2 3 2 3
Paenibacillus 6 7 7 12
D Total (8 genera) 66 206 36 108
Bacillaceae Bacillus 35 146 19 80
Fictibacillus 1 1 1 1
Lysinibacillus 3 4 2 3
Oceanobacillus 3 10 3 7
Virgibacillus - - 1 2
Caryophanaceae Solibacillus 1 1 - -
Lachnospiraceae Clostridium 12 24 8 12
Paenibacillaceae Paenibacillus 11 20 2 3
E Total (10 genera) 49 138 43 155
Bacillaceae Bacillus 25 89 18 89
Gracilibacillus 1 1 1 1
Lysinibacillus 1 1 1 1
Oceanobacillus 5 13 4 19
Ornithinibacillus 1 1 1 1
Pseudogracilibacillus - - 1 3
Virgibacillus 1 2 2 3
Caryophanaceae Solibacillus 1 2 1 1
Lachnospiraceae Clostridium 10 23 7 9
Paenibacillaceae Paenibacillus 4 6 7 28

1) 1)A to E indicate the location of each farm. A, Chungnam; B and C, Jeonnam; D and E, Jeonbuk.

Download Excel Table
jast-67-5-1111-g1
Fig. 1. Relative distribution of spore-forming bacteria at (a) family and (b) genera levels across different dairy farm environments and raw milk in Korea. Pen environmental factors (P), Milking parlor environmental factors (M). A to E indicate the location of each farm. A, Chungnam; B and C, Jeonnam; D and E, Jeonbuk.
Download Original Figure

Of the total 16 genera isolated, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, and Clostridium were found to be frequent with a greater number of isolates (Table 3, Fig. 1B). Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Solibacillus, and Clostridium were the only genera detected in all five dairy farms, whereas Lysinibacillus, Virgibacillus, and Oceanobacillus were prevalent in four dairy farms. Characteristically, the number of Oceanobacillus isolates from farms D and E was higher than that of other farms. Aneurinibacillus and Rummeliibacillus were present only on farm C. Fictibacillus, Gracilibacillus, and Pseudogracilibacillus were found to be only frequent with a lower number of isolates from dairy farms D and E.

The most diverse and abundant isolated genus was Bacillus (67.3%) with 742 isolates and 73 species found to be overly represented in all the five dairy environments (farms A, B, C, D, and E). More than 200 isolated genera of Bacillus were detected in farm D (226 isolates) and C (212 isolates), > 150 from farm E (178 isolates), and < 70 from farm A (64 isolates) and B (62 isolates). Aerobic spore-forming bacteria associated with the dairy environment predominantly belong to the genus Bacillus, and affects dairy contamination produced using raw milk [26]. The second most isolated genera (12.3%) were Clostridium (135 isolates, 34 species), followed by (9.3%) Paenibacillus (102 isolates, 33 species). Clostridium is an anaerobic spore-former that is problematic for the dairy industry, and the genus constitutes most of the groups. In this study, Clostridium was detected from all environmental factors of the five dairy farms, except from the milking parlor environment of farm B (Table 3, Fig. 1B). A previous study reported that Clostridium spp. were first detected in milk and dairy products during the early 20th century [27]. Paenibacillus spp. are another group of aerobic bacilli associated primarily with the spoilage of milk and milk products [5,28]. Previously, this genus has been found to comprise over 95% of the bacterial population present in milk after prolonged refrigeration and is strongly linked to the spoilage of milk stored for more than 10 days [28,29].

Diversity of spore-forming bacteria species

The abundance of spore-forming bacteria in the dairy environment and raw milk analyzed at the species level resulted in the identification of 173 species. Of the identified species, Solibacillus, Brevibacillus, Rummeliibacillus, Pseudogracilibacillus, Ornithinibacillus, Psychrobacillus, Terribacillus, and Aneurinibacillus were isolated to only one species. Among 73 species and 742 isolates of Bacillus identified in this study, B. licheniformis (32.3%) was especially more abundant in four dairy farms, except for farm B (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Table S1). Specifically, when analyzed on the basis of environmental factors, farms C and D had the most abundant and evenly distributed contaminants for both raw milk production from the pen and milking parlor environments (Table 4, Supplementary Table S2). Likewise, several studies reported that B. licheniformis were thermotolerant spore-forming organisms and along with B. amyloliquefaciens and B. pumilus may play a role in food poisoning associated with dairy food processing and dairy foods [3032]. The second, third, and fourth abundant species, B. kochii (5.8%), B. clausii (5.5%), and B. cereus (4.3%), respectively, were isolated from four dairy farms (except farm B) (Table 4, Supplementary Table S2). Previously, B. kochii has been reported to be detected in two farms from raw milk collected from four dairy farms in New Zealand during the summer and winter seasons [33], and the investigation was performed by comparing the aerobic spore-forming flora in milk from organic and conventional dairy farms, isolating B. clausii, a mesophilic spore-forming bacteria, from both of those conditions [4].

Table 4. Diversity of spore-forming bacteria isolated in the entire chain from the dairy environment to the raw milk production stage
Isolation source
Farm1) Species No of isolates Pen environmental factors Milking parlor environmental factors Raw milk
P12) P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6
C Total (7 species) 139
Bacillus clausii 12 1 1 2 3 2 2 1
Bacillus coagulans 3 1 1 1
Bacillus licheniformis 115 16 5 5 10 3 1 9 11 8 8 7 2 30
Bacillus paralicheniformis 2 1 1
Bacillus sporothermodurans 2 1 1
Oceanobacillus sojae 3 2 1
Paenibacillus validus 2 1 1
D Total (15 species) 173
Bacillus aryabhattai 2 1 1
Bacillus cereus 9 2 1 5 1
Bacillus gibsonii 3 2 1
Bacillus kochii 8 2 2 1 1 2
Bacillus licheniformis 79 26 18 3 3 5 2 4 2 2 14
Bacillus sonorensis 18 2 1 1 1 3 1 9
Bacillus subtilis 11 5 2 1 1 2
Bacillus tequilensis 10 5 1 1 1 2
Bacillus thermoamylovorans 3 2 1
Clostridium punense 2 1 1
Clostridium sporogenes 12 2 2 4 1 2 1
Clostridium tyrobutyricum 2 1 1
Oceanobacillus aidingensis 7 1 2 2 2
Oceanobacillus polygoni 5 1 3 1
Virgibacillus proomii 2 1 1
E Total (11 species) 134
Bacillus aerius 15 3 2 2 3 1 4
Bacillus circulans 3 1 1 1
Bacillus clausii 27 6 2 7 1 3 2 6
Bacillus kochii 26 9 1 1 7 1 6 1
Bacillus pumilus 19 2 2 7 4 1 3
Bacillus rhizosphaerae 6 1 1 2 1 1
Bacillus safensis 9 1 1 1 3 1 1 1
Bacillus tequilensis 3 1 2
Oceanobacillus aidingensis 8 1 1 1 5
Oceanobacillus caeni 2 1 1
Oceanobacillus polygoni 16 4 2 3 2 1 4

1) C to E indicate the location of each farm. C, Jeonnam; D and E, Jeonbuk.

2) P1, bedding material; P2, manure; P3, drinking water; P4, mixed feed; P5, barn bottom; P6, soil; M1, rinse water; M2, teat; M3, used tower; M4, dairy bottom; M5, cooling chamber bottom; M6, cooling tank surface.

Download Excel Table
jast-67-5-1111-g2
Fig. 2. Relative distribution of spore-forming bacteria at species levels across different dairy farm environments and raw milk in Korea. (A) Bacillus, (B) Clostridium, (C) Paenibacillus species, (D) other spore-forming bacteria species. A to E indicate the location of each farm. A, Chungnam; B and C, Jeonnam; D and E, Jeonbuk.
Download Original Figure

Next to the most abundant Bacillus species, among 34 species and 135 isolates of Clostridium identified in this study, C. sporogenes (25.9%), C. tyrobutyricum (8.1%), and C. amygdalinum (8.1%) dominated in the dairy farms (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Table S3). C. sporogenes was detected on four dairy farms (except farm B), but was particularly more abundant in farm D (12 out of 36 Clostridium genus isolates), which was detected in the pen (manure, feed, and barn bottom) and milking parlor environments (teat and dairy bottom), and even in raw milk. C. tyrobutyricum and C. amygdalinum were only isolated from farms A and D, and farm A, respectively, but C. tyrobutyricum was even identified in raw milk from farm D alone (Table 4, Supplementary Table S2). C. sporogenes is an anaerobic Gram-positive straight rod commonly found as a spoilage organism in canned foods and dairy products [14,34]. C. sporogenes, C. tyrobutyricum, and C. butyricum are the most important anaerobic bacteria involved in the spoiling of cheese.

Our study showed that spore-forming contaminants belonging to the family Paenibacillaceae were the third-largest flora. Among them, Paenibacillus spp. are the most common aerobic psychrotrophic thermophilic species associated primarily with the spoilage of milk (stored in an excess of 10 days) and milk products [5,28,29]. This genus has previously been found to comprise over 95% of the bacterial population present in milk after prolonged refrigeration [28,29]. Correspondingly, in our study, we identified 33 species and 102 isolates of Paenibacillus, with Paenibacillus timonensis (16.7%) and Paenibacillus jilunlii (7.8%) as the most abundant species dominating the dairy farms (Fig. 2C, Supplementary Table S4). In particular, P. timonensis was isolated from four dairy farms (except farm D); however, 14 out of 17 isolates as contaminants from the milking parlor environment (only rinse water) in farm E (Supplementary Tables S2 and S5).

The majority of the species of Bacillus, Clostridium, and Paenibacillus encountered in various factors of the dairy environment are also present wherever cows are raised or milked, and wherever raw milk is collected and stored. With respect to the other minor spore-former species (Fig. 2D, Supplementary Table S5), few species are isolated only once in a single or two farms. Species from Aneurinibacillus (1 species), Brevibacillus (4 species), Fictibacillus (2 species), Gracilibacillus (2 species), Ornithinibacillus (1 species), Pseudogracilibacillus (1 species), Psychrobacillus (1 species), Psychrobacillus (1 species), Rummeliibacillus (1 species), and Terribacillus (1 species) were the representative species. Six species of Oceanobacillus were found to be more dominant in farm E (32 out of 65 isolates) (Supplementary Table S5). Eight species of Lysinibacillus was absent in farms A–E (except farm B) (Supplementary Table S5).

DISCUSSION

The identification of a comprehensive dairy farm environment and raw milk collection (n = 1,102) of spoilage-associated spore-forming isolates revealed a very large taxonomic diversity covering as many as 173 species from 16 different genera with conditions of different stages of raw milk production. These results corroborate well with the findings of previous studies on dairy production environments. Ninety-five percent of the total isolates were assigned either to Bacillus, Clostridium, Paenibacillus, and Oceanobacillus, which is in line with previous reports listing these spore-forming genera as the prominent ones in the dairy sector.

For the spoilage-associated isolates, in the case of dairy farms A and B, the level of contamination with spore-forming bacteria isolated from dairy environments where cows are raised and milked did not lead to raw milk production in stages unlike other dairy farms (C, D, and E, Table 4). B. licheniformis were the most common spore-forming bacteria isolated from the farm environment and raw milk collected in farms C and D (Table 4). Previous studies [3537] have highlighted the prevalence of B. licheniformis among Bacillus species in raw milk and throughout the dairy processing chain. Although not recognized as a significant human pathogen, this species has the potential to spoil milk and dairy products, thereby affecting the organoleptic and functional characteristics [38]. Additionally, B. licheniformis, being psychrotolerant spore-forming bacteria, can thrive at refrigeration temperatures, posing a threat to the quality of dairy products [39]; however, some of these isolates were able to grow at a higher temperature of 55°C [40,41]. This study shows the distribution of the lesser-known B. clausii isolated from various dairy farm environments (manure, mixed feed, barn bottom, soil, dairy bottom, and cooling chamber bottom) and raw milk in dairy farm E (Supplementary Table S2). Detection of B. clausii in raw milk provides extra support for feed as an important source of contamination [4], even though this species is isolated from feed concentrate samples, but not from raw milk [42]. In the present study, B. coagulans is a spore-forming Gram-positive Bacillus and was only detected in the milking parlor environment (rinse water and dairy bottom) and raw milk in farm C (Table 4, Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Interestingly, this bacterium was known to exhibit lactic acid-producing and spore-forming capabilities similar to of Lactobacillus species, employing spore formation as a survival strategy within the host’s intestines and functioning as probiotics [2].

In this study, Clostridium species are abundant in mixed feed, barn bottom, soil, teat, and dairy bottom, showing that these are common sources of raw milk contamination. Spores from the pen environment can be transferred via feces and soil contamination of the udder, eventually contaminating milk during milking. In particular, C. tyrobutyricum, C. butyricum, and C. beijerinckii isolated from various dairy farm environments and raw milk samples in this study have been found to be associated with butyric acid fermentation and have potential to cause late blowing defects in different cheese types, including Gouda, Emmental, and Grana Pardano [43,44]. C. tyrobutyricum, considered as the principle causative agent of late blowing in cheeses, was detected in the raw milk samples investigated in the present study (dairy farm D). A total of two isolates of C. tyrobutyricum from farm D were identified, one from the barn bottom and the other from raw milk (Table 4, Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). However, C. butyricum and C. beijerinckii, associated with butyric acid fermentation and also late blowing in cheeses, were not detected in any of the raw milk samples in all five farms, but were isolated from the different dairy farm environments. A total of 33 species of Paenibacillus were identified in this study, of which one species (Paenibacillus lactis) in farm D and six species (P. amylolyticus, P. barengoltzii, P. borealis, P. jilunlii, P. pasadenensis, P. xylanexedens) in farm E were all detected from raw milk (Supplementary Table S2). In addition, Paenibacillus can contaminate the entire chain from the dairy farm environment to raw milk production stage, and two isolates of P. validus with one each detected on the surface of cooling tank and one each in the raw milk of farm C were confirmed (Table 4). In a previous study [45], C. tyrobutyricum, C. beijerinckii, and Paenibacillus spp. were detected with relatively small differences in their incidences in the different sample types (cow feces, silage, and cooling tank milk), with proportions of 67%, 58%, and 60% for C. tyrobutyricum, 44%, 59%, and 61% for C. beijerinckii, and 69%, 47%, and 36% for Paenibacillus spp., respectively. These three species indicate the occurrence of anaerobic conditions, despite the close contact with oxygen [46,47].

Other spore-forming bacteria species in this study, Oceanobacillus aidingensis and Oceanobacillus polygoni, were only detected in the entire chain from the dairy farm environment to the raw milk production stage from both farms D and E (Supplementary Tables S2 and S5). Oceanobacillus sojae was even identified in raw milk on farm C (Supplementary Table S2). Virgibacillus proomii is a facultative anaerobe and mesophilic spore-former, with two isolates detected in this study, one from the bottom of the cooling chamber and the other from raw milk in farm D (Table 4 and Supplementary Table S2).

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated the diversity and sources of the spore-forming bacteria in a milk chain of five dairy farms in the Republic of Korea. Based on the results of the diversity of spore-forming bacteria, the microbial distribution needs serious attention to prevent hampering the quality of raw milk and dairy products by properly managing hygienic and production practices.

CONCLUSION

This study provides new evidence of the presence of spore-forming bacteria, including Bacillus, Clostridium, Paenibacillus species, and others, which pose risks of food poisoning and public health issues. Bacillus and Clostridium spores are particularly relevant to the dairy industry due to their role in spoilage and as human pathogens. Our findings highlight the need to reduce spore-former levels in dairy products and identify contamination sources in raw milk. Developing hygienic practices and aseptic preservation techniques is crucial for milk handling. Overall, this information will be helpful for dairy farms to develop innovative production processes and comprehensive strategies to eliminate spoilage bacteria and eradicate its contamination in milk processing industries.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

jast-67-5-1111-suppl1.pdf

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This study was conducted with the support of the “Cooperative Research Program for Agricultural Science and Technology Development (Project title: Development for Reducing Spore-Forming Bacteria in Raw Milk Production Stages; Project No: PJ012029) of the Rural Development Administration of Korea.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets for this study can be obtained from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Park WS, Yoo J, Mun D, Choi HY, Oh S, Ham JS, Kim Y.

Data curation: Park WS, Yoo J, Mun D, Choi HY, Oh S, Ham JS, Kim Y.

Formal analysis: Park WS, Yoo J, Mun D, Choi HY, Oh S, Ham JS, Kim Y.

Methodology: Park WS, Yoo J, Mun D, Choi HY, Oh S, Ham JS, Kim Y.

Software: Park WS, Yoo J, Mun D, Choi HY, Oh S, Ham JS, Kim Y.

Validation: Park WS, Yoo J, Mun D, Choi HY, Oh S, Ham JS, Kim Y.

Investigation: Park WS, Yoo J, Mun D, Choi HY, Oh S, Ham JS, Kim Y.

Writing - original draft: Park WS, Yoo J, Mun D, Choi HY, Oh S, Ham JS, Kim Y.

Writing - review and editing: Park WS, Yoo J, Mun D, Choi HY, Oh S, Ham JS, Kim Y.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

REFERENCES

1.

Kim YJ, Cho SB, Song MH, Lee SI, Hong SM, Yun W, et al. Effects of different Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis ratios on nutrient digestibility, fecal microflora, and gas emissions of growing pigs. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022; 64:291-301

2.

Poudel S, Tabler GT, Lin J, Zhai W, Zhang L. Riboflavin and Bacillus subtilis effects on growth performance and woody-breast of Ross 708 broilers with or without Eimeria spp. challenge. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022; 64:443-61

3.

Lee JH, Kim TK, Cha JY, Jang HW, Yong HI, Choi YS. How to develop strategies to use insects as animal feed: digestibility, functionality, safety, and regulation. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022; 64:409-31

4.

Coorevits A, De Jonghe V, Vandroemme J, Reekmans R, Heyrman J, Messens W, et al. Comparative analysis of the diversity of aerobic spore-forming bacteria in raw milk from organic and conventional dairy farms. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008; 31:126-40

5.

Huck JR, Sonnen M, Boor KJ. Tracking heat-resistant, cold-thriving fluid milk spoilage bacteria from farm to packaged product. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91:1218-28

6.

Ivy RA, Ranieri ML, Martin NH, den Bakker HC, Xavier BM, Wiedmann M, et al. Identification and characterization of psychrotolerant sporeformers associated with fluid milk production and processing. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78:1853-64

7.

Fromm HI, Boor KJ. Characterization of pasteurized fluid milk shelf-life attributes. J Food Sci. 2004; 69:M207-14

8.

Durak MZ, Fromm HI, Huck JR, Zadoks RN, Boor KJ. Development of molecular typing methods for Bacillus spp. and Paenibacillus spp. isolated from fluid milk products. J Food Sci. 2006; 71:M50-6

9.

Janštová B, Lukášová J, Dračková M, Vorlová L. Influence of Bacillus spp. enzymes on ultra high temperature-treated milk proteins. Acta Vet Brno. 2004; 73:393-400

10.

Chen L, Coolbear T, Daniel RM. Characteristics of proteinases and lipases produced by seven Bacillus sp. isolated from milk powder production lines. Int Dairy J. 2004; 14:495-504

11.

Westhoff DC, Dougherty SL. Characterization of Bacillus species isolated from spoiled ultrahigh temperature processed milk. J Dairy Sci. 1981; 64:572-80

12.

Pettersson B, Lembke F, Hammer P, Stackebrandt E, Priest FG. Bacillus sporothermodurans, a new species producing highly heat-resistant endospores. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996; 46:759-64

13.

Scheldeman P, Herman L, Goris J, De Vos P, Heyndrickx M. Polymerase chain reaction identification of Bacillus sporothermodurans from dairy sources. J Appl Microbiol. 2002; 92:983-91

14.

Chaturvedi A, Shukla S, Gautam A, Singh VK. Incidence of spore forming Clostridium sporogenes in different dairy products and their industrial and public health significance. Pharma Innov J. 2015; 3:30-2

15.

Pahlow G, Muck RE, Driehuis F, Oude Elferink SJWH, Spoelstra SF. Microbiology of ensiling.In In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH, editors.editors Silage science and technology. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy : Crop Science Society of America : Soil Science Society of Americal. 2003; p p. 31-93

16.

Su YC, Ingham SC. Influence of milk centrifugation, brining and ripening conditions in preventing gas formation by Clostridium spp. in Gouda cheese. Int J Food Microbiol. 2000; 54:147-54

17.

Mun D, Kim H, Shin M, Ryu S, Song M, Oh S, et al. Decoding the intestinal microbiota repertoire of sow and weaned pigs using culturomic and metagenomic approaches. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021; 63:1423-32

18.

Lee D, Goh TW, Kang MG, Choi HJ, Yeo SY, Yang J, et al. Perspectives and advances in probiotics and the gut microbiome in companion animals. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022; 64:197-217

19.

Browne HP, Forster SC, Anonye BO, Kumar N, Neville BA, Stares MD, et al. Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature. 2016; 533:543-6

20.

Magnusson M, Svensson B, Kolstrup C, Christiansson A. Bacillus cereus in free-stall bedding. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 90:5473-82

21.

Meer RR, Baker J, Bodyfelt FW, Griffiths MW. Psychrotrophic Bacillus spp. in fluid milk products: a review. J Food Prot. 1991; 54:969-79

22.

Te Giffel MC, Beumer RR, Granum PE, Rombouts FM. Isolation and characterisation of Bacillus cereus from pasteurised milk in household refrigerators in The Netherlands. Int J Food Microbiol. 1997; 34:307-18

23.

Ziane M, Desriac N, Le Chevalier P, Couvert O, Moussa-Boudjemaa B, Leguerinel I. Identification, heat resistance and growth potential of mesophilic spore-forming bacteria isolated from Algerian retail packaged couscous. Food Control. 2014; 45:16-21

24.

Foltys V, Kirchnerová K. Mesophilic and psychrotrophic aerobe sporulating microorganisms in raw cow’s milk. Open Life Sci. 2006; 1:545-60

25.

El-Ziney MG, Al-Turki AI. Microbiological quality and safety assessment of camel milk (Camelus dromedaries) in Saudi Arabia (Quassim region). Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2007; 5:115-22

26.

Fritze D. Taxonomy of the genus bacillus and related genera: the aerobic endospore-forming bacteria. Phytopathology. 2004; 94:1245-8

27.

Hussong RV, Hammer BW. Anaerobic bacteria in dairy products: I. numbers of spores of anaerobic bacteria in milk and cream. J Bacteriol. 1930; 19:89-94

28.

Ranieri ML, Huck JR, Sonnen M, Barbano DM, Boor KJ. High temperature, short time pasteurization temperatures inversely affect bacterial numbers during refrigerated storage of pasteurized fluid milk. J Dairy Sci. 2009; 92:4823-32

29.

Ranieri ML, Ivy RA, Mitchell WR, Call E, Masiello SN, Wiedmann M, et al. Real-time PCR detection of Paenibacillus spp. in raw milk to predict shelf life performance of pasteurized fluid milk products. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78:5855-63

30.

Mikkola R, Andersson MA, Grigoriev P, Teplova VV, Saris NEL, Rainey FA, et al. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains isolated from moisture-damaged buildings produced surfactin and a substance toxic to mammalian cells. Arch Microbiol. 2004; 181:314-23

31.

Salkinoja-Salonen MS, Vuorio R, Andersson MA, Kämpfer P, Andersson MC, Honkanen-Buzalski T, et al. Toxigenic strains of Bacillus licheniformis related to food poisoning. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999; 65:4637-45

32.

Suominen I, Andersson MA, Andersson MC, Hallaksela AM, Kämpfer P, Rainey FA, et al. Toxic Bacillus pumilus from indoor air, recycled paper pulp, Norway spruce, food poisoning outbreaks and clinical samples. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2001; 24:267-76

33.

Gupta TB, Brightwell G. Identification and characterisation of spore-forming bacteria in bovine raw milk collected from four dairy farms in New Zealand. Dairy. 2023; 4:650-71

34.

Allison C, Macfarlane GT. Regulation of protease production in Clostridium sporogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990; 56:3485-90

35.

Scheldeman P, Herman L, Foster S, Heyndrickx M. Bacillus sporothermodurans and other highly heat‐resistant spore formers in milk. J Appl Microbiol. 2006; 101:542-55

36.

Reginensi SM, González MJ, Olivera JA, Sosa M, Juliano P, Bermúdez J. RAPD-based screening for spore-forming bacterial populations in Uruguayan commercial powdered milk. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011; 148:36-41

37.

Kalogridou-Vassiliadou D. Biochemical activities of Bacillus species isolated from flat sour evaporated milk. J Dairy Sci. 1992; 75:2681-6

38.

De Jonghe V, Coorevits A, De Block J, Van Coillie E, Grijspeerdt K, Herman L, et al. Toxinogenic and spoilage potential of aerobic spore-formers isolated from raw milk. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010; 136:318-25

39.

Gopal N, Hill C, Ross PR, Beresford TP, Fenelon MA, Cotter PD. The prevalence and control of Bacillus and related spore-forming bacteria in the dairy industry. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6:1418

40.

Ronimus RS, Parker LE, Turner N, Poudel S, Rückert A, Morgan HW. A RAPD-based comparison of thermophilic bacilli from milk powders. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003; 85:45-61

41.

Hossain MM, Cho SB, Kim IH. Strategies for reducing noxious gas emissions in pig production: a comprehensive review on the role of feed additives. J Anim Sci Technol. 2024; 66:237-50

42.

Vaerewijck MJM, De Vos P, Lebbe L, Scheldeman P, Hoste B, Heyndrickx M. Occurrence of Bacillus sporothermodurans and other aerobic spore‐forming species in feed concentrate for dairy cattle. J Appl Microbiol. 2001; 91:1074-84

43.

Klijn N, Nieuwenhof FF, Hoolwerf JD, van der Waals CB, Weerkamp AH. Identification of Clostridium tyrobutyricum as the causative agent of late blowing in cheese by species-specific PCR amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995; 61:2919-24

44.

Cocolin L, Innocente N, Biasutti M, Comi G. The late blowing in cheese: a new molecular approach based on PCR and DGGE to study the microbial ecology of the alteration process. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004; 90:83-91

45.

Driehuis F, Hoolwerf J, Rademaker JLW. Concurrence of spores of Clostridium tyrobutyricum, Clostridium beijerinckii and Paenibacillus polymyxa in silage, dairy cow faeces and raw milk. Int Dairy J. 2016; 63:70-7

46.

Vissers MMM, Driehuis F, Te Giffel MC, De Jong P, Lankveld JMG. Concentrations of butyric acid bacteria spores in silage and relationships with aerobic deterioration. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 90:928-36

47.

Vissers MMM, Driehuis F, Te Giffel MC, De Jong P, Lankveld JMG. Minimizing the level of butyric acid bacteria spores in farm tank milk. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 90:3278-85