RESEARCH ARTICLE

Application of the modified handmade cloning technique to pigs

Eun Ji Lee1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-695X, Kuk Bin Ji1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3144-9746, Ji Hye Lee1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-5632, Hyun Ju Oh2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-8857, Tae Young Kil3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4143-449X, Min Kyu Kim1,2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9259-8219
Author Information & Copyright
1Division of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
2MK Biotech, Daejeon 34134, Korea
3Department of Social Welfare, Joongbu University, Geumsan 32713, Korea
*Corresponding author: Min Kyu Kim, Division of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea. Tel: +82-42-821-5773, E-mail: kminkyu@cnu.ac.kr

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

© Copyright 2021 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Dec 21, 2020; Revised: Jan 28, 2021; Accepted: Jan 28, 2021

Published Online: Mar 31, 2021

Abstract

Although somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is frequently employed to produce cloned animals in laboratories, this technique is expensive and inefficient. Therefore, the handmade cloning (HMC) technique has been suggested to simplify and advance the cloning process, however, HMC wastes many oocytes and leads to mitochondrial heteroplasmy. To solve these problems, we propose a modified handmade cloning (mHMC) technique that uses simple laboratory equipment, i.e., a Pasteur pipette and an alcohol lamp, applying it to porcine embryo cloning. To validate the application of mHMC to pig cloning, embryos produced through SCNT and mHMC are compared using multiple methods, such as enucleation efficiency, oxidative stress, embryo developmental competence, and gene expression. The results show no significant differences between techniques except in the enucleation efficiency. The 8-cell and 16-cell embryo developmental competence and Oct4 expression levels exhibit significant differences. However, the blastocyst rate is not significantly different between mHMC and SCNT. This study verifies that cloned embryos derived from the two techniques exhibit similar generation and developmental competence. Thus, we suggest that mHMC could replace SCNT for simpler and cheaper porcine cloning.

Keywords: Somatic cell nuclear transfer; In vitro culture; Modified handmade cloning; Porcine embryo

INTRODUCTION

Assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) are used to preserve the genomic source of endangered species and produce disease research models. Among existing ARTs, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) has been widely employed in agriculture and biomedical research fields in many countries and laboratories. After the first successful birth of Dolly [1], SCNT has become popular worldwide and been applied to produce many species, including cattle [2], mice [3], goats [4], pigs [5], cats [6], and rabbits [7]. However, SCNT has several limitations to its general implementation, specifically, high cost and low efficiency. Primarily, the micromanipulator required for SCNT is highly priced and difficult to handle. Therefore, the cloning efficiency depends on the competence of the experimenter.

As an alternative to the SCNT technique, a handmade cloning (HMC) technique has been developed that can clone animals without a micromanipulator [8]. The HMC method, which was established in cattle, involves removing the nucleus by bisection using a microblade [9], thus, minimal equipment and skill is required for cloning. After bisection, all halved oocytes without chromatin are reconstructed by fusing two enucleated oocytes into one cytoplast. However, this method is disadvantageous in two ways: 1) it results in mitochondria heteroplasmy of recombinant embryos and 2) half of the oocyte starting material is wasted during enucleation. In addition, the cytoplasmic lysis rate is increased during the bisection of zona-free oocytes [10]. The cytoplasmic volume of oocytes is an important factor affecting the cleavage rate and developmental competence of recombinant embryos [11], therefore, the problem of cytoplasmic loss requires a solution.

To solve this problem, a modified HMC (mHMC) method that does not involve bisection has been proposed for sheep [11,12]. The mHMC method removes a tiny fraction of cytoplasm containing the maternal chromosome using the sharp end of a Pasteur pipette under an optical microscope instead of a micromanipulator. The enucleation of mHMCs can produce cloned embryos into one oocyte by minimizing cytoplasmic loss, enabling the efficient use of experimental resources and overcoming mitochondrial heterogeneity. In practice, this method has been used to produce cloned animals including calves [13], camels [14], and goats [15]. The cytoplasm of porcine oocytes has higher lipid content than that of other animals [10], and oocytes at the MII stage are more fragile. Although pig cloning using HMC has been successfully reported [10,16,17], there are still obstacles to the widespread use of this technology.

Therefore, this study develops and evaluates a porcine mHMC method by establishing a pulled Pasteur pipette suitable for pigs, which reduces the occurrence of cytoplasmic loss and mitochondrial heterogeneity. When performing HMC and SCNT, hypertonic treatment with sucrose is used to induce the formation of protrusions around chromosomes and spindle regions in oocytes [18]. This treatment arrests chromosomes in metaphase and leads to cytoplasmic membranes containing the oocyte nucleus [19], which can help improve the enucleation efficiency [20]. Demecolcine (DEM)-assisted enucleation of oocytes has been applied to the production of bovine [21] and porcine [20,22] embryos derived from SCNT, but has not yet been applied in porcine mHMC. Therefore, this study determines the DEM treatment conditions for optimal enucleation and applies the mHMC method to pigs for the first time. Furthermore, we compare the efficiency of enucleation and in vitro developmental competence for embryos derived using SCNT and mHMC techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and reagents

Chemicals for the experimental procedure were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise stated.

Preparation of donor cells

The donor cell line was established using porcine fetal fibroblasts (PFFs) from a 35 day-old fetus. Briefly, the fetus was recovered and minced 4–7 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA). Then, the head, limbs, and internal organs were removed from the fetus. The remaining tissues were chopped into small pieces and placed in PBS supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) and 0.5% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S). The chopped tissues were centrifuged, resuspended, and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% P/S at 38.5°C in a 5% CO2 and humidified atmosphere in air. When the cultured cells were confluent, they were trypsinized, washed, and stored in liquid nitrogen. For both SCNT and HMC, PFFs were thawed, cultured, and subsequently used for 4–7 passages.

Preparation of oocytes

Ovaries used for experimental procedures were collected from a local slaughterhouse and transported to the laboratory in physiological saline with 1% P/S sulfate at 28°C–32°C within 3 h of collection. After the ovaries arrived in the laboratory, they were washed with saline as soon as possible, cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were collected from antral follicles (3–8 mm in diameter) using an 18-gauge needle with a 10-mL disposable syringe. Aspirated fluids were deposited in a 37°C water bath. The sediments were then washed twice with saline. COCs were surrounded by at least three layers of cumulus cells and a uniform cytoplasm. Selected COCs were washed in in vitro maturation (IVM) media, which consisted of tissue culture medium 199 (TCM-199; Gibco) supplemented with 2.5 mM fructose, 0.4 mM L-cysteine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.13 mM kanamycin, 10 ng/mL epidermal growth factor, 500 IU/mL gonadotropin hormone, and 10% (v/v) porcine follicular fluid. The COCs were cultured in maturation media for 22 h at 39°C in a 5% CO2 and humidified atmosphere in air. After 22 h of maturation, COCs were washed and moved into fresh IVM media, which was follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) - and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) -free, and further cultured for 22 h under the same conditions.

Inducement of cytoplasmic protrusion

In order to determine the optimal time required to treat the DEM, COCs were cultured with 0.4 μg/mL DEM for 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, and 120 min after IVM. The DEM-treated COCs were transferred to the culture medium with 0.1% hyaluronidase dissolved in North Carolina State University (NCSU) media and cumulus cells were removed by repeated and gentle pipetting. After denuding, mature oocytes with first polar bodies and DEM-induced cytoplasmic protrusions were selected (Fig. 1).

jast-63-2-281-g1
Fig. 1. Oocyte with cytoplasmic protrusions treated with demecolcine (DEM) after IVM. DEM, demecolcin; IVM, in vitro maturation.
Download Original Figure
Preparation of Pasteur pipettes for modified handmade cloning (mHMC)

Commercial glass Pasteur pipettes were used as tools for enucleation. Briefly, after sterilizing the Pasteur pipettes, the narrow tip of the pipettes was heated on a flame by an alcohol lamp until slightly melted, then pulled rapidly until the inner diameter was close to that of the oocytes, and left for 10 s until the tip was cooled. After cooling, the tip of the pulled pipette was heated and pulled again to obtain a narrower inner diameter. Finally, the end part of the tip was cut, the cross-section of the tip was evaluated under a microscope, and aspiration pipettes were selected that had a fine and smooth tip section with a slightly larger diameter than the protrusion part of the DEM-treated oocyte cytoplasm (Fig. 2). Before use, the opposite side of the tip was filled with 1.5 mL of mineral oil to prevent capillary action.

jast-63-2-281-g2
Fig. 2. Comparison of commercial pasteur pipette (above) and aspiration pipette (below) for mHMC enucleation. mHMC, modified handmade cloning.
Download Original Figure
Modified handmade cloning (mHMC) method

The mature oocytes with first polar bodies and DEM-induced cytoplasmic protrusions were moved into N33 (NCSU medium with 33% FBS), then 3.3 mg/mL pronase in N33 for 30 s to partially remove the zona pellucida (ZP) that were quickly washed in N20 (NCSU medium with 20% FBS) and N2 (NCSU medium with 2% FBS) drops. Subsequently, the partially digested ZP was completely removed in N10 (NCSU medium with 10% FBS) drops using repeated pipetting. During the removal of ZP, the first polar body was also removed.

The entire process of mHMC was performed in drops covered with mineral oil. After removal of the ZP, oocytes were enucleated using aspiration pipettes. Ten to fifteen oocytes were transferred into 5 μL of N10 drop and gently rolled to find the protrusion of the MII chromosome. The tip of the aspiration pipette was attached to the surface of the protrusion area, and slight pressure was applied to the opposite side of the oocyte. When the protrusion part of the cytoplasm flowed into the inside of the aspiration pipette, the pipette was moved out from the drop while maintaining the pressure to separate the aspirated cytoplasm due to tension between the medium and mineral oil. Most of the cytoplasm remained in the drop, except for the protrusion part of the cytoplasm containing MII chromosomes. After enucleation, each oocyte was quickly transferred into N10 supplemented with cytochalasin B to prevent cytoplasmic degeneration of the oocytes.

Prior to cell attachment, 10–15 enucleated cytoplasm samples were grouped and transferred to the NCSU drop supplemented with 1 mg/mL polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) for 5 s. Each cytoplasm sample was then rapidly transferred into N2 drops containing fibroblasts. After attachment of cytoplasm and fibroblasts, the couplets were transferred into a fusion medium (0.28 mol/L mannitol supplemented with 0.1 mM MgSO4 and 0.05 mM CaCl2) and equilibrated.

Fusion and activation were performed in a one-step process, which was modified according to a previously described procedure. Using a cell fusion generator (LF101; NepaGene, Chiba, Japan), couplets were aligned on the wire of the BTX fusion chamber with fusion media and exposed to electrical stimulation using an alternating current (AC) of 6 V and 700 kHz. The fibroblast part of the couplet was oriented toward the end farther from the wire, after which a single direct current (DC) of 200 V/cm was fused for 9 μs. After the pulse, the couplets were detached carefully from the wire, transferred to N10 drops, and incubated for 30 s. After incubation, reconstructed embryos were washed in porcine zygote medium (PZM)-3, then incubated in 1.9 mM 6 dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP) dissolved in PZM-3 for 3 h at 39°C in a 5% CO2 and humidified atmosphere in air. After fusion and activation, the reconstructed embryos were cultured in 400 μL PZM-3 of 4-well dish (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) and covered with the same amount of mineral oil as the modified Well of well (WOW) system. The WOW system was suggested for zona free embryo culture [23]. In the modified WOW system used to culture individual embryos, a small well was produced in one well of a 4-well dish by pressing a sharp steel needle heated gently by hand. Wells were filled with PBS and 5% FBS, and inner air bubbles were removed and flushed by repeated rigid pipetting. Then, PBS was replaced with PZM-3, and the wells were again covered with mineral oil. After 3 h of fusion and activation, reconstructed embryos were washed with PZM-3 and cultured in groups of 20–25 oocytes per large well at 39°C in a 5% CO2 and humidified atmosphere in air. The cleavage and blastocyst formation rates were evaluated on days 2 and 7 after culture (Fig. 3).

jast-63-2-281-g3
Fig. 3. In vitro culture of zona-free embryos after mHMC. (a) Immediately after fusion and, (b) split into two cells, (c) four cells, (d) eight cells, (e) more than 16 cells, and (f) a blastocyst. mHMC, modified handmade cloning.
Download Original Figure
Somatic cell nuclear transfer

After treatment with DEM for 90 min, mature oocytes with extruded first polar bodies and DEM-induced cytoplasmic protrusions were placed in a microdrop of NCSU containing Hoechst 33342 and cytochalsin B. Under UV light, the first polar body and small portion of cytoplasm containing metaphase II chromosomes of oocytes were aspirated using an enucleation pipette. Enucleated oocytes were transferred to NCSU media without Hoechst 33342 and cytochalsin B, and a single donor cell with a smooth membrane was injected into the enucleated oocyte. The oocyte-cell couplets were equilibrated in 0.28 M mannitol media then placed between copper wire electrodes equipped with a micromanipulator. A single direct pulse of 200 V/mm was applied for 30 μs using a cell fusion generator. After fusion, oocytes were washed three times and kept in porcine zygote medium-3 (PZM-3) for 30 min. Thereafter, oocytes were transferred and cultured in PZM-3 containing 1.9 mM 6-DMAP. After 3 h, the oocytes with no donor cells in the perivitelline space were considered as reconstructed oocytes.

The reconstructed embryos were cultured in 40 μL of PZM-3 droplets covered by 3 mL of mineral oil in a 35-mm embryo culture dish at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. The cleavage rate and blastocyst rate were determined after day 7.

Measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS)

To measure the levels of ROS in enucleated oocytes in each group, the ROS levels were investigated using the Image-iTTM LIVE Green Reactive Oxygen Species Detection Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA ). In short, enucleated oocytes were transferred into Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS, Gibco) containing 25 μM carboxy-H2 DCFDA, then incubated for 30 min at 39°C and in 5% CO2, protected from light. After incubation, the oocytes were washed in DPBS. The emission of fluorescence from oocytes was recorded using a camera combined with a fluorescence microscope with UV filters (460 nm for ROS). The recorded fluorescent images were analyzed using NIS-Elements BR software 3.00 (Nikon, Minato, Tokyo, Japan).

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

The expression of genes related to apoptosis (Bcl-xL; anti-apoptotic gene and Bax; pro-apoptotic gene), pluripotency (Oct4 [POU5F1], Sox2), and DNA methylation (DNMT1 and DNMT3α) were investigated. The primers used for investigation are specified in Table 1. Using the β-actin gene as a housekeeping gene, the abundance of each gene was investigated. Total mRNA was extracted from 30 blastocysts per group, using the RNeasy® Micro Kit (QIAGEN). Complementary DNA synthesis from extracted RNA was performed using the ExcelRT™ Reverse Transcription Kit (SMOBIO, Hsinchu, Taiwan). The reaction mixture (total 20 μL) consisted of 8 μL of total RNA, 1 μL of dNTP mix and 1 μL of oligo DT for denaturing, 4 μL of 5 × RT buffer, 4 μL of DEPC-treated H2O, 1 μL of RNase inhibitor, and 1 μL of Reverse Transcriptase as a first strand cDNA buffer. The mixture was subjected to PCR amplification (95°C for 4 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 73°C for 5 min). PCR products were electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels. A 100 base pair DNA ladder was used as a marker to check the molecular weight. Stained gels with loading dye were visible under UV light and the mRNA abundance was measured with the intensity of each band represented by the Image J program (Figs. 4 and 5).

Table 1. Primers used for reverse transcription PCR
Genes Primer sequences (5‘-3‘) Accession number
Oct4 F- AGAGAAAGCGGACAAGTATCG
R- ATCCTCTCGTTGCGAATAGTC
XM_021097869.1
Sox2 F- CGTGGTTACCTCTTCTTCC
R- CTGGTAGTGCTGGGACAT
NM_001123197.1
DNMT1 F- GTGAGGACATGCAGCTTTCA
R- AACTTGTTGTCCTCCGTTGG
XM_021082064.1
DNMT3α F- CTGAGAAGCCCAAGGTCAAG
R- CAGCAGATGGTGCAGTAGGA
XM_021085534.1
Bcl-xL F- ACAGCGTATCAGAGCTTTGA
R- CGTCAGGAACCATCGGTTG
XM_021099593
Bax F- AAGCGCATTGGAGATGAACT
R- GGCCTTGAGCACCAGTTTAC
XM_013998624
β-Actin F- CTCGATCATGAAGTGCGACG
R- GTGATCTCCTTCTGCATCCTGTC
XM_003357928.4

PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Download Excel Table
jast-63-2-281-g4
Fig. 4. Electrophoresis band of apoptosis-related genes. NT, untreated control; mHMC, modified handmade cloning.
Download Original Figure
jast-63-2-281-g5
Fig. 5. Electrophoresis band of pluripotency-related genes and reprogramming-related genes. NT, untreated control; mHMC, modified handmade cloning.
Download Original Figure
Statistical analysis

All data were replicated at least three times, and statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA, the Bonferroni post-test, and GraphPad Prism software version 5 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate significantly different data.

RESULTS

Optimal DEM treatment time required to induce cytoplasmic protrusion of porcine oocytes

As shown in Table 2, the rates of oocytes exhibiting cytoplasmic protrusions were significantly higher at 90 min than at 30 min. There was no significant difference among the groups treated with DEM for 60 min, 90 min, and 120 min. However, the cytoplasmic protrusions of the oocyte group treated with DEM for 60 min were difficult to identify without sucrose, and had to be checked under UV light to ascertain whether the oocyte nucleus was extruded with a part of the cytoplasm. The oocyte group treated with DEM for 120 min did not show a significant difference from the other groups. However, DEM treatment for 90 min was considered more efficient than DEM treatment for 120 min because of the reduced experimental time.

Table 2. Incidence of oocytes with cytoplasmic protrusions according to demecolcine treatment time
Treatment time (min) No. of oocytes examined No. of oocytes with cytoplasmic protrusions (%, mean ± SEM)1)
30 125 65 (51.84 ± 3.80)a
60 127 86 (67.64 ± 2.15)ab
90 114 90 (78.89 ± 1.84)b
120 122 84 (68.79 ± 3.49)ab

1) Percentage per oocyte examined. The experiments were repeated three times.

a,b Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.

Download Excel Table
Optimal status of oocytes for DEM treatment

As shown in Table 3, the oocyte group treated with DEM after IVM showed a significantly higher proportion of cytoplasmic protrusions than the other groups. Similar to the previous finding that the oocytes treated with DEM for 90 min showed the highest rate of cytoplasmic protrusion, all oocyte groups in Table 3 were treated with 0.4 μg/mL DEM for 90 min.

Table 3. Incidence of oocytes with cytoplasmic protrusions according to demecolcine treatment in oocyte status
Oocyte status No. of oocytes examined No. of oocytes with cytoplasmic protrusions (%, mean ± SEM)1)
After IVM 114 90 (78.89 ± 1.84)a
Denuded oocyte 131 60 (45.75 ± 0.54)b
ZP removed oocyte 125 64 (51.09 ± 1.77)b

After IVM, 44 h after oocyte maturation, cumulus cells were removed.; Denuded oocytes, those immediately after removing the cumulus cells; ZP removed oocyte, those immediately after removing the zona pellucida.

1) Percentage per oocyte examined. The experiments were repeated three times.

a,b Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.

IVM, in vitro maturation; ZP, zona pellucida.

Download Excel Table
Comparison of enucleation efficiency of porcine oocyte between mHMC and SCNT

As shown in Table 4, the accuracy of enucleation was significantly higher in the SCNT group than in the mHMC group (98.01 ± 0.57 vs. 83.83 ± 2.47, respectively). In addition, the number of surviving oocytes after enucleation was significantly higher in the SCNT group than in the mHMC group (96.50 ± 0.84 vs. 90.10 ± 2.11, respectively). The relative amount of removed cytoplasm after enucleation was approximately two times higher in the mHMC group than in the SCNT group.

Table 4. Comparison of oocyte enucleation efficiency between SCNT and mHMC groups
Cloning method No. of oocytes examined No. of oocytes enucleated (%, mean ± SEM)1) No. of intact oocytes (%, mean ± SEM)2)
SCNT 673 659 (98.01 ± 0.57)a 636 (96.50 ± 0.84)a
mHMC 740 610 (83.83 ±2.47)b 544 (90.10 ± 2.11)b

1) Percentage per oocyte examined.

2) Percentage per oocyte enucleated. The experiments were repeated three times.

a,b Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.

SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer; mHMC, modified handmade cloning.

Download Excel Table
Comparison of ROS levels in enucleated oocytes between mHMC and SCNT

The results of ROS levels are shown in Fig. 6. ROS levels increased after enucleation in both mHMC and SCNT groups, and no significant difference was observed.

jast-63-2-281-g6
Fig. 6. Relative level of ROS in enucleated oocytes. (a) SCNT and mHMC under a bright field and fluorescence, respectively. ROS in cytoplasm were measured using a detection kit (b) Relative level of ROS for SCNT and mHMC groups quantified using the Image J program. SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer; mHMC, modified handmade cloning; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Download Original Figure
jast-63-2-281-g7
Fig. 7. Relative mRNA abundance for blastocyst stage embryos in SCNT (left) and mHMC (right) groups. Experiments were repeated three times. SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer; mHMC, modified handmade cloning.
Download Original Figure
Comparison of the in vitro developmental competence of oocytes between mHMC and SCNT

Table 5 shows that the in vitro developmental competence of embryos produced by SCNT and mHMC differed depending on the cloning method. The fusion rate was significantly higher in mHMC than SCNT (86.3 ± 2.44 vs 57.1 ± 5.87, respectively). The embryos at 8-cell and 16-cell stages showed significant differences (80.4 ± 2.31 vs 69.6 ± 5.37, in 8 cell, 54.9 ± 5.00 vs. 43.0 ± 3.75, in 16 cells, respectively). However, blastocyst rates did not show significant differences between mHMC and SCNT (17.9 ± 1.44 vs. 13.6 ± 1.99, respectively).

Table 5. Comparison of fusion and embryonic developmental rates of oocytes produced using conventional SCNT or modified HMC
Group No. of oocytes (%, mean ± SEM) No. of embryos developed (%, mean ± SEM)
Injected Fused 8 cell (%) 16 cell (%) Blastocyst (%)
SCNT 322 184 (57.1 ± 5.8)a 148 (80.4 ± 2.31)a 101 (54.9 ± 5.00)a 25 (13.6 ± 1.99)
HMC 240 207 (86.3 ± 2.4)b 144 (69.6 ± 5.37)b 89 (43.0 ± 3.75)b 37 (17.9 ± 1.44)

Proportions calculated on the number of oocytes in each group.

The experiments were repeated seven times.

a,b Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.

SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer; HMC, handmade cloning.

Download Excel Table
Expression levels of apoptosis-related genes, pluripotency genes, and genes related to cell reprogramming in SCNT and mHMC

The expression of apoptosis and pluripotency-related genes (Bcl-xL; anti-apoptotic gene and Bax; pro-apoptotic gene) were evaluated by RT-PCR. The expression level of Bcl-xL was higher in mHMC embryos than in SCNT embryos, but with no significant difference. In addition, the expression of the pro-apoptotic gene Bax was higher in mHMC embryos than in SCNT embryos, but with no significant difference. The pluripotency gene Oct4 was significantly increased in mHMC embryos (p < 0.05), but Sox2 was similar between groups. DNMT1 and DNMT3α levels did not differ between the groups.

DISCUSSION

In this study, HMC was modified to simplify the cloning method by minimizing the loss of cytoplasm during enucleation using a pulled Pasteur pipet. The efficiency of enucleation and embryonic developmental competence were compared between mHMC and SCNT, for which a manipulator is essential. The embryos produced by SCNT and HMC exhibit similar replacement of the donor cell with their nucleus. However, the first difference is the existence of ZP. ZP has a role in protecting the oocyte from deleterious conditions in the culture medium and is an integral part of successful embryo development [24,25]. In this study, the existence of ZP did not have a significant impact on embryonic development. In a previous study, no significant difference in developmental competence was observed between zona-free and zona-intact embryos [26]. On the other hand, there were significant differences in enucleation efficiency. A cytoplasmic membrane is composed of phospholipid bilayers and can be recovered by fluid movement even with slight damage [27], however, it can be ruptured under high compressive stress [28]. Pulled Pasteur pipettes were made by hand by the researcher, therefore, they are wider in diameter than micromanipulator enucleation needles, which can further damage the cytoplasm by inconsistent pressure. In future studies, it will be necessary to standardize the pulled Pasteur pipette production process to reduce the pressure stress applied to the cytoplasmic membrane of oocytes.

In this study, DEM with a concentration of 0.4 μg/mL was applied for various times and oocyte statuses. A previous study reported that the ideal treatment time for DEM was 60 min [20], and added sucrose to increase osmoles in the medium in order to expand the perivitelline space in oocytes for easier observation of nucleus protrusions in mice and cows. However, porcine oocytes were not significantly affected by the presence or absence of sucrose [20]. In a previous goat study, oocytes treated with 0.8 ng/mL DEM for 30 min showed the highest protrusion rate. According to our results, the highest nuclear extrusion was observed in oocytes treated with DEM for 90 min without sucrose. The differences in the results of DEM concentration and treatment time may be due to the different species [29]. Our results showed that oocytes treated with DEM immediately after IVM showed a higher protrusion rate than other oocytes. DEM interferes with meiosis and is a microtubule depolymerizing agent, which destroys the 3D structure of the spindle, causing chromosome condensation [18], thus, for maternal chromosome protrusion, it is considered that the spindle must be stably arrested near the cytoplasmic membrane immediately after the first polar body is released. In addition, the oocytes were exposed to chemical stress during the removal of the cumulus cell and ZP, which could affect the stability of the oocyte. Therefore, we recommend treating DEM before denuding and after completion of the IVM stage to maintain the stable condition of oocyte cytoplasm.

ROS occur directly through the metabolic activity of the embryo [30] or environmental stress in in vitro conditions [31], causing adverse effects on the embryo. We assumed that the ROS level would be higher in mHMCs because the cytoplasm of oocytes without ZP is exposed directly in vitro in mHMC, unlike in SCNT. However, the ROS level in enucleated oocytes showed no significant difference between mHMC and SCNT, nor did the blastocyst formation rate. This study confirmed that the difference between mHMC and SCNT did not have a detrimental effect on enucleated oocytes.

Regarding the quality of blastocysts in mHMC and SCNT, we measured the expression levels of apoptosis-related genes, pluripotency-related genes, and reprogramming-related genes. The apoptotic pathway is maintained by the balance between the expression of pro- and anti-apoptotic genes in somatic cells [32,33]. The expression levels of Bcl-xl, an anti-apoptosis-related gene, and Bax, a pro-apoptotic gene, were measured in this study. Apoptosis is also observed in good and/or poor quality embryos during development [34]. In our results, high expression of Bax in mHMC was observed but was not significantly different between groups. The mHMC results confirmed that the oocytes were directly exposed to chemicals at various steps without the ZP, however, this did not have a detrimental effect on embryonic developmental competence.

We also investigated whether the expression levels of pluripotency-related genes Oct4 and Sox2 differed in mHMC and SCNT blastocysts. In many species, including pigs, this factor plays an important role in the preimplantation embryonic development stage [35]. The abnormal expression of Oct4 in porcine blastocysts derived from SCNT is related to low developmental competence of embryos. Thus, the abundance expression of the Oct4 gene indicates the developmental potential of embryos [36]. Sox2 expression is essential during embryogenesis and is the earliest marker of inner cells prior to ICM formation [37,38]. Although there was no significant difference in blastocyst formation rate between mHMC and SCNT, the expression level of Oct4 was significantly higher in the blastocysts of mHMC than in those of SCNT, and no difference was observed in the expression level of Sox2. These results confirmed that gene expression can vary depending on the cloning method.

DNA methylation is an important genetic marker that controls transcription. DNMT1 and DNMT3 α are enzymes that play a role in the transfer of methyl groups to cytosine nucleotides of the DNA sequence [39]. Although DNMT3 α encodes a DNA methyltransferase to perform de novo methylation, DNMT1 maintains the methylation pattern [40], which is one of the most important molecular activities in mammalian epigenetic gene regulation. Abnormal development of mammalian embryos is associated with aberrant activity of DNA methyltransferases. However, this study did not show any significant differences in methylation between the two groups. The results suggest that a difference in the cloning method did not have a significant influence on the methylation pattern of the embryos.

In conclusion, this study is the first to report porcine mHMC using the pulled Pasture pipette method instead of bisection to enucleate oocytes. The mHMC technique is preferable to the SCNT technique as it does not require the use of a micromanipulator and involves a simpler process. Moreover, the efficiency of enucleation and developmental competence of mHMC was found to be comparable to that of traditional SCNT. Thus, we demonstrate that porcine mHMC can be a cheaper and simpler alternative to SCNT.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This research was funded by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea (grant number: HI18C0660)

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Lee EJ, Ji KB.

Data curation: Lee EJ, Ji KB.

Formal analysis: Lee EJ, Oh HJ.

Methodology: Lee EJ, Ji KB.

Sotfware: Kil TY.

Validation: Lee EJ, Ji KB.

Investigation: Lee EJ, Ji KB.

Writing - original draft: Lee EJ, Ji KB.

Writing - review & editing: Lee EJ, Lee JH, Oh HJ, Kim MK.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

REFERENCES

1.

Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature. 1997; 385:810-3

2.

Cibelli JB, Stice SL, Golueke PJ, Kane JJ, Jerry J, Blackwell C, et al. Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science. 1998; 280:1256-8

3.

Wakayama T, Perry ACF, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature. 1998; 394:369-74

4.

Baguisi A, Behboodi E, Melican DT, Pollock JS, Destrempes MM, Cammuso C, et al. Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nature Biotechnol. 1999; 17:456-61

5.

Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, et al. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature. 2000; 407(6800):86-90

6.

Shin T, Kraemer D, Pryor J, Liu L, Rugila J, Howe L, et al. A cat cloned by nuclear transplantation. Nature. 2002; 415:859

7.

Chesné P, Adenot PG, Viglietta C, Baratte M, Boulanger L, Renard JP. Cloned rabbits produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2002; 20:366-9

8.

Vajta G. Handmade cloning: the future way of nuclear transfer?. Trends Biotechnol. 2007; 25:250-3

9.

Vajta G, Lewis IM, Trounson AO, Purup S, Maddox-Hyttel P, Schmidt M, et al. Handmade somatic cell cloning in cattle: analysis of factors contributing to high efficiency in vitro. Biol Reprod. 2003; 68:571-8

10.

Du Y, Kragh P, Zhang Y, Li J, Schmidt M, Bøgh IB, et al. Piglets born from handmade cloning, an innovative cloning method without micromanipulation. Theriogenology. 2007; 68:1104-10

11.

Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Moulavi F, Asgari V, Forouzanfar M, Nasr-Esfahani M. Cloned sheep blastocysts derived from oocytes enucleated manually using a pulled pasteur pipette. Cellular Reprogramming. 2013; 15:15-23

12.

Hosseini SM, Moulavi F, Asgari M, Shirazi A, Abazari-Kia A, Ghanaei H, et al. Simple, fast, and efficient method of manual oocyte enucleation using a pulled Pasteur pipette. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2013; 49:569-75

13.

Cortez JV, Vajta G, Valderrama NM, Portocarrero GS, Quintana JM. High pregnancy and calving rates with a limited number of transferred handmade cloned bovine embryos. Cell Reprogram. 2018; 20:4-8

14.

Moulavi F, Hosseini SM. Development of a modified method of handmade cloning in dromedary camel. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14e0213737

15.

Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Forouzanfar M, Ostadhosseini S, Moulavi F, Ghanaei H, et al. Chemically assisted somatic cell nuclear transfer without micromanipulator in the goat: effects of demecolcine, cytochalasin-B, and MG-132 on the efficiency of a manual method of oocyte enucleation using a pulled Pasteur pipette. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015; 158:11-8

16.

Lagutina I, Lazzari G, Duchi R, Turini P, Tessaro I, Brunetti D, et al. Comparative aspects of somatic cell nuclear transfer with conventional and zona-free method in cattle, horse, pig and sheep. Theriogenology. 2007; 67:90-8

17.

Kragh PM, Vajta G, Corydon TJ, Purup S, Bolund L, Callesen H. Production of transgenic porcine blastocysts by hand-made cloning. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2004; 16:315-8

18.

Gao Y, Ren J, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wu X, Jiang H, et al. The effects of demecolcine, alone or in combination with sucrose on bovine oocyte protrusion rate, MAPK1 protein level and c-mos gene expression level. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014; 34:1974-82

19.

Howe K, FitzHarris G. Recent insights into spindle function in mammalian oocytes and early embryos. Biol Reprod. 2013; 89:71

20.

Miyoshi K, Mori H, Yamamoto H, Kishimoto M, Yoshida M. Effects of demecolcine and sucrose on the incidence of cytoplasmic protrusions containing chromosomes in pig oocytes matured in vitro. J Reprod Dev. 2008; 54:117-21

21.

Tani T, Shimada H, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Demecolcine-assisted enucleation for bovine cloning. Cloning Stem Cells. 2006; 8:61-6

22.

Li S, Kang JD, Jin JX, Hong Y, Zhu HY, Jin L, et al. Effect of demecolcine-assisted enucleation on the MPF level and cyclin B1 distribution in porcine oocytes. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9e91483

23.

Vajta G, Peura T, Holm P, Páldi A, Greve T, Trounson A, et al. New method for culture of zona-included or zona-free embryos: the Well of the Well (WOW) system. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000; 55:256-64

24.

Suzuki H, Togashi M, Adachi J, Toyoda Y. Developmental ability of zona-free mouse embryos is influenced by cell association at the 4-cell stage. Bio Reprod. 1995; 53(1):78-83

25.

Elsheikh AS, Takahashi Y, Hishinuma M, Nour MSM, Kanagawa H. Effect of encapsulation on development of mouse pronuclear stage embryos in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci. 1997; 48:317-24

26.

Oback B, Wiersema AT, Gaynor P, Laible G, Tucker FC, Oliver JE, et al. Cloned cattle derived from a novel zona-free embryo reconstruction system. Cloning Stem Cells. 2003; 5:3-12

27.

McNeil PL, Steinhardt RA. Loss, restoration, and maintenance of plasma membrane integrity. J Cell Biol. 1997; 137:1-4

28.

Gonzalez-Rodriguez D, Guillou L, Cornat F, Lafaurie-Janvore J, Babataheri A, de Langre E, et al. Mechanical criterion for the rupture of a cell membrane under compression. Biophys J. 2016; 111:2711-21

29.

Lan GC, Wu YG, Han D, Ge L, Liu Y, Wang HL, et al. Demecolcine-assisted enucleation of goat oocytes: protocol optimization, mechanism investigation, and application to improve the developmental potential of cloned embryos. Cloning Stem Cells. 2008; 10:189-202

30.

Circu ML, Aw TY. Reactive oxygen species, cellular redox systems, and apoptosis. Free Rad Biol Med. 2010; 48:749-62

31.

Rhoads DM, Umbach AL, Subbaiah CC, Siedow JN. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Contribution to oxidative stress and interorganellar signaling. Plant Physiol. 2006; 141:357-66

32.

Kim S, Lee SH, Kim JH, Jeong YW, Hashem MA, Koo OJ, et al. Anti-apoptotic effect of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and its receptor in porcine preimplantation embryos derived from in vitro fertilization and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006; 73:1523-30

33.

Hardy K. Apoptosis in the human embryo. Rev Reprod. 1999; 4:125-34

34.

Yang MY, Rajamahendran R. Expression of Bcl-2 and Bax proteins in relation to quality of bovine oocytes and embryos produced in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci. 2002; 70:159-69

35.

Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K, Niwa H, Klewe-Nebenius D, Chambers I, et al. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell. 1998; 95:379-91

36.

Cervera RP, Martí-Gutiérrez N, Escorihuela E, Moreno R, Stojkovic M. Trichostatin A affects histone acetylation and gene expression in porcine somatic cell nucleus transfer embryos. Theriogenology. 2009; 72:1097-110

37.

Guo G, Huss M, Tong GQ, Wang C, Sun LL, Clarke ND, et al. Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. Dev Cell. 2010; 18:675-85

38.

Liu S, Bou G, Sun R, Guo S, Xue B, Wei R, et al. Sox2 is the faithful marker for pluripotency in pig: evidence from embryonic studies. Dev Dyn. 2015; 244:619-27

39.

Fuks F, Burgers WA, Brehm A, Hughes-Davies L, Kouzarides T. DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1 associates with histone deacetylase activity. Nat Genet. 2000; 24:88-91

40.

Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell. 1999; 99:247-57

2019 JCR Impact Factor: 1.685

The 2019 Journal Citation Reports (JCR) was announced, and the impact factor of JAST was determined to be 1.685.

We would like to ask for your continued interest and support in our journal.

Thank you.

JAST Editorial Office


I don't want to open this window for a day.