RESEARCH ARTICLE

Silybum marianum seed extract supplementation positively affects the body weight of weaned piglets by improving voluntary feed intake

De Xin Dang1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9672-8922, Sungbo Cho2,#https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2593-2758, In Ho Kim1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6652-2504
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
2School of Mongolian Medicine, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao 028000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
*Corresponding author: In Ho Kim, Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea. Tel: +82-41-550-3652, E-mail: inhokim@dankook.ac.kr

# These authors contributed equally to this work.

© Copyright 2022 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Dec 23, 2021; Revised: Mar 09, 2022; Accepted: May 10, 2022

Published Online: Jul 31, 2022

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary supplementation of Silybum marianum seed (SMS) extract on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal noxious gas emission, and hematology parameters in weaned piglets. A total of 120, 21-day-old weaned piglets ([Yorkshire × Landrace] × Duroc) were randomly assigned to 3 groups based on the average initial body weight (6.46 ± 0.45 kg). There were 8 replicate pens per treatment and 5 pigs (mixed sex) per pen. The experimental period was 42 days. Dietary groups included a basal diet, and a basal diet supplemented with 0.05% or 0.10% SMS extract. Feeding weaned piglets with SMS extract containing diet significantly increased average daily gain and average daily feed intake. Additionally, the supplementation of SMS extract had no significant effects on nutrient digestibility, serum hematology, and fecal noxious gas emission parameters. We considered that the supplementation of SMS extract had positive effects on the voluntary feed intake in weaned piglets, thus improving growth performance.

Keywords: Weaned piglet; Growth performance; Voluntary feed intake; Silybum marianum

INTRODUCTION

Silybum marianum, also known as milk thistle [1]. It has been employed as therapeutic agents for centuries in various pathologies due the unique flavonoid complex as its bioactive component [2]. The beneficial effects of Silybum marianum extract on human diseases are manifolds, including hepatocytes and lung tissue protection [3,4], anti-cancer [5], diabetes mellitus curation [6], asthmatic disorder alleviation [7], intestinal fibrosis avoidance [8], and cardiac lipotoxicity modulation [1]. In addition, it also has antioxidant [9], immunostimulatory [10], anti-inflammatory [11], and antibacterial [12] properties.

The bioactivity component in Silybum marianum extract is silymarin, an isomeric mixture of unique flavonoid complexes [13]. Dietary supplementation of Silybum marianum extract has been reported to increase milk production and milk nutrients in cows [14], ameliorate the toxic effects of toxic substances on poultry organs [9,15], and improve the development of mammary gland and reproductive performance in gilts [16], which was attributed to the antioxidant effects of flavonoid presented in the Silybum marianum extract [13]. Similarly, Cui et al. [17] reported that feeding weaned piglets with Tartary Buckwheat flavonoids containing diet positively increased nutrient digestibility, thus improving growth performance. You et al. [18] noted that dietary supplementation of flavonoid derived from the licorice improved the growth performance of weaned piglets by regulating intestinal health. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated the effects of Silybum marianum extract on the performance in weaned piglets.

We hypothesized that feeding weaned piglets with diets supplemented with Silybum marianum seed (SMS) extract may improve the growth performance and reduce the fecal noxious gas emission by increasing nutrient digestibility. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of dietary supplementation of SMS extract on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal noxious gas emission, and hematology parameters in weaned piglets.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 120, 21-day-old weaned piglets ([Yorkshire × Landrace] × Duroc) with the average initial body weight of 6.46 ± 0.45 kg were randomly assigned into 3 groups based on the initial body weight. There were 8 replicate pens per treatment and 5 pigs (mixed sex) per pen. The experimental period was 42 days. Dietary groups included a basal diet, and a basal diet supplemented with 0.05% or 0.10% SMS extract. Production processes of SMS extract were as follows: Dried SMS were pulverized and sieved through a 60-mesh size screen to produce a fine powder from which an ethyl alcohol extract (Silymarin) was made. In a nutshell, twenty grams of powder were defatted by soxhlation in three hundred milliliters of petroleum ether for sixteen hours. The defatted powder was then soaked in ethanol (300 mL) for ten hours before being evaporated in a vacuum drying oven (Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany) at 39°C. This product was composed of 10.8% silybin, 16.3% silydianin, and 7.0% silychristin, and coated by chitosan, with an effective content of 250 g/kg. Experimental diets were formulated to meet the nutrient requirements recommended by the National Research Council [19] (Table 1). All pigs were housed in an environmentally controlled room. The one-side stainless steel self-feeder and nipple drinker were installed in pens so as to give pigs free access to feed and water. The temperature during week 1 was maintained at 30°C and then gradually reduced by 1°C every week to maintain in 24°C. The humidity within the room was 60%. The protocol in this study (DK-1-2106) was reviewed and approved by the Dankook University Animal Care and Use Committee (Cheonan, Korea).

Table 1. Ingredients and calculated chemical composition of diets (%, as fed)
Items Feeding phases
Days 1–7 Days 8–21 Days 22–42
Ingredients (%) 100.00 100.00 100.00
 Extruded corn 40.29 51.91 59.48
 Soybean meal 9.74 17.05 22.46
 Fermented soybean meal 10.00 5.50 3.10
 Fish meal 7.45 2.00 -
 Soybean oil 2.30 2.91 2.80
 Monocalcium phosphate 0.66 1.10 1.23
 Limestone 0.58 1.02 1.23
 Sugar 3.00 2.00 2.00
 Whey protein 11.00 7.00 3.00
 Lactose 13.46 7.78 3.18
 L-Lysine 0.56 0.71 0.63
 DL-Methionine 0.15 0.13 0.09
 L-Threonine 0.21 0.29 0.20
 Choline Chl 0.10 0.10 0.10
 Salt 0.10 0.10 0.10
 Mineral mix1) 0.20 0.20 0.20
 Vitamin mix2) 0.20 0.20 0.20
Calculated value (%)
 Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg) 14.40 14.20 14.00
 Dry matter 91.00 88.00 99.00
 Crude protein 20.00 18.00 18.00
 Crude fat 4.67 5.25 5.26
 Neutral detergent fiber 9.22 9.08 9.14
 Acid detergent fiber 3.58 3.36 3.45
 Ash 5.80 5.80 5.90
 Lysine 1.60 1.50 1.40
 Methionine 0.48 0.40 0.35
 Calcium 0.80 0.80 0.80
 Phosphorus 0.60 0.60 0.60
 Lactose 20.00 12.00 5.00

1) Provided per kg of complete diet: 80 mg Fe (as FeSO4·7H2O); 12mg Cu (as CuSO4·5H2O); 85mg Zn (as ZnSO4); 8mg Mn (as MnO2); 0.28 mg I (as KI); 0.15mg Se (as Na2SeO3·5H2O).

2) Provided per kg of complete diet: 11,025 IU vitamin A; 1,103 IU vitamin D3; 44 IU vitamin E; 4.4 mg vitamin K; 8.3 mg riboflavin; 50 mg niacin; 4 mg thiamine; 29 mg d-pantothenic; 166 mg choline; 33 μg vitamin B12.

Download Excel Table
Experimental parameters measurement
Growth performance

Pigs were weighed individually on days 1, 8, 22, and 42 to measure their body weight. The value of average daily gain (ADG) was calculated based on the data of body weight. Daily feed intake was measured on a pen-basis to calculate the average daily feed intake (ADFI). The feed efficiency (gain to feed ratio) was calculated based on the values of ADG and ADFI.

Apparent nutrient digestibility

The chromium oxide at the dosage of 2 g/kg was supplemented to the diet of pigs during days 35–42 for determining the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter (DM) and nitrogen, and the apparent energy retention. Representative feed samples in each dietary group were taken after mixing homogenously. On day 42, two pigs were randomly selected from each pen to take the fecal samples via the rectal massage method. All feed and fecal samples were stored at −20°C until analysis. Before chemical analysis, samples were dried and further grinding as powder, which was smaller than 1-mm, following the description of Dang et al. [20]. The contents of DM and nitrogen in feed and fecal samples were determined by following the procedure of Association of Official Analytical Chemists [21] by using the method 930.15 and 968.06, respectively. In addition, the energy in feed and feces were determined by a bomb calorimeter (Parr 6100, Parr Instrument, Moline, IL, USA). The chromium levels were analyzed via UV absorption spectrophotometry (UV-1201, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The ATTD was calculated relative to chromium concentrations [20].

Fecal gas emission

Fresh fecal samples were randomly collected from two pigs in each pen via the method of rectal massage on days 1, 7, 21, and 42 to measure fecal ammonia (NH3), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), total mercaptans (R-SH), carbon dioxide (CO2), and acetic acid emission by the method provided by Dang et al. [20]. In brief, Samples from the same pen were mixed and stored into 2.6-L sealed plastic boxes, which had a small hole in the middle and were sealed by adhesive plaster. The fecal samples were then stored at room temperature (25°C) for fermented 24 h. Subsequently, air samples (100 mL) were taken from the head-space above the surface of excreta through the small hole by a gas-sampling pump (model GV-100S, Gastec, Kanagawa, Japan), the sampling height was about 2.0 cm.

Hematology parameters

On days 1, 7, 21, and 42, two pigs per pen were selected randomly and were bled for collecting blood samples via anterior vena cava puncture into K3EDTA vacuum tubes or clot activator vacuum tubes (Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The blood samples were collected during 11:00 to 12:00 h in order to exclude the circadiurnal fluctuations in hormone concentrations and stored at −4°C. Blood samples from clot activator vacuum tubes were centrifuged (3,000×g) for 15 min at 4°C to obtain serum samples and then stored at −20°C until analysis. The concentrations of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine in serum were analyzed by an automatic biochemical blood analyzer (HITACHI 747, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The concentrations of immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin A (IgA), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) in serum were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (ELISA Starter Accessory Package, Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA). In addition, whole blood samples from the K3EDTA vacuum tube were analyzed for white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), and lymphocyte concentrations using an automatic blood analyzer (ADVIA 120, Bayer, Tarrytown, NY, USA).

Statistical analysis

All data were subjected to the MIXED procedures of SAS (SAS Inst, Cary, NC, USA), with the following statistical model: Yijk = μ+ti+rk+eijk, where Yijk was an observation on the dependent variable ij, μ was the overall population mean, ti was the fixed effect of SMS extract treatments, rk was the pen as a random effect, and eijk was the random error associated with the observation ijk. Orthogonal polynomials were used to assess the linear and quadratic effects of increasing dietary concentrations of supplemental SMS extract. The replicate pen was used as the experimental unit. Variability in the data was expressed as the SEM, p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Dietary supplementation of SMS extract linearly increased ADG during days 1–7 (p = 0.029), 8–21 (p = 0.005), 22–42 (p = 0.023), and 1-42 (p = 0.012), as well as ADFI during days 1–7 (p = 0.021), 8–21 (p = 0.049), 22–42 (p = 0.019), and 1-42 (p = 0.029), whereas had no significant effects on feed efficiency (Table 2).

Table 2. Effect of dietary supplementation of Silybum marianum seed (SMS) extract on the growth performance in weaned piglets1)
Items SMS extract (%) SEM p-value
0 0.05 0.10 Linear Quadratic
ADG (g)
 Days 1–7 261.32 269.36 274.86 4.078 0.029 0.802
 Days 8–21 442.50 461.68 468.82 5.992 0.005 0.421
 Days 22–42 487.76 508.18 516.00 8.145 0.023 0.535
 Days 1–42 521.92 543.45 552.10 7.764 0.012 0.506
ADFI (g)
 Days 1–7 292.86 299.64 305.72 4.701 0.021 0.938
 Days 8–21 597.50 612.50 619.11 9.392 0.049 0.647
 Days 22–42 892.14 914.28 921.79 10.679 0.019 0.484
 Days 1–42 697.86 706.01 718.21 7.925 0.029 0.794
Feed efficiency
 Days 1–7 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.006 0.470 0.681
 Days 8–21 0.74 0.75 0.76 0.008 0.181 0.697
 Days 22–42 0.55 0.56 0.56 0.009 0.338 0.868
 Days 1–42 0.75 0.77 0.77 0.009 0.112 0.326

1) Values represent the means of eight pens with 5 pigs per replicate pen (n = 40) per treatment for body weight and eight pens (n = 8) per treatment for ADG, ADFI, and feed efficiency.

ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake.

Download Excel Table

Feeding weaned piglets on SMS extract containing diet had no significant effects on apparent DM digestibility, nitrogen digestibility, and energy retention (Table 3).

Table 3. Effect of dietary supplementation of Silybum marianum seed (SMS) extract on the nutrient digestibility in weaned piglets1)
Items (%) SMS extract (%) SEM p-value
0 0.05 0.10 Linear Quadratic
Dry matter 80.26 80.89 81.19 1.716 0.707 0.938
Nitrogen 78.60 79.31 79.61 1.766 0.691 0.925
Energy 79.28 80.15 80.50 1.714 0.618 0.902

1) Values represent the means of eight pens with 2 pigs per replicate pen (n = 16) per treatment.

Download Excel Table

Weaned piglets fed the diet supplemented with SMS extract did not affect the fecal NH3, H2S, R-SH, acetic acid, and CO2 emission during all experimental period (Table 4).

Table 4. Effect of dietary supplementation of Silybum marianum seed (SMS) extract on the fecal gas emission in weaned piglets1)
Items (ppm) SMS extract (%) SEM p-value
0 0.05 0.10 Linear Quadratic
NH3
 Day 1 1.50 1.50 1.00 0.312 0.286 0.529
 Day 7 1.13 1.25 1.13 0.395 1.000 0.802
 Day 21 1.88 1.63 1.38 0.410 0.411 1.000
 Day 42 2.88 2.25 2.13 0.460 0.279 0.668
H2S
 Day 1 1.30 1.20 1.35 0.183 0.851 0.591
 Day 7 1.65 1.48 1.63 0.134 0.898 0.348
 Day 21 2.00 1.73 1.78 0.231 0.508 0.579
 Day 42 2.28 2.30 2.10 0.171 0.487 0.603
R-SH
 Day 1 2.50 3.25 3.00 0.301 0.270 0.207
 Day 7 3.13 3.25 3.50 0.232 0.283 0.831
 Day 21 3.25 3.00 3.13 0.232 0.712 0.526
 Day 42 3.75 3.00 3.38 0.331 0.443 0.198
Acetic acid
 Day 1 6.25 6.88 6.50 1.195 0.886 0.741
 Day 7 7.63 7.13 7.25 1.249 0.837 0.843
 Day 21 7.75 7.38 7.13 1.203 0.722 0.967
 Day 42 7.75 7.63 7.50 1.142 0.880 1.000
CO2
 Day 1 9,625.00 9,675.00 9,100.00 658.18 0.587 0.707
 Day 7 9,850.00 9,250.00 9,850.00 487.34 1.000 0.341
 Day 21 10,225.00 9,800.00 9,625.00 625.72 0.515 0.874
 Day 42 9,775.00 10,100.00 10,050.00 516.33 0.715 0.774

1) Values represent the means of eight pens with 2 pigs per replicate pen (n = 16) per treatment.

NH3, ammonia; H2S, hydrogen sulfide; R-SH, methyl mercaptans; CO2, carbon dioxide.

Download Excel Table

The concentrations of WBC, RBC, lymphocyte, IgG, IgM, IgA, BUN, creatinine in blood were not affected by SMS extract supplementation (Table 5).

Table 5. Effect of dietary supplementation of Silybum marianum seed (SMS) extract on the hematology parameters in weaned piglets1)
Items SMS extract (%) SEM p-value
0 0.05 0.10 Linear Quadratic
WBC (103/μL)
 Day 1 14.32 14.05 14.62 1.896 0.911 0.862
 Day 7 13.76 14.20 15.40 2.353 0.635 0.896
 Day 21 14.53 15.15 15.61 1.886 0.693 0.972
 Day 42 17.44 16.40 18.16 2.202 0.822 0.616
RBC (106/μL)
 Day 1 5.47 5.75 5.90 0.540 0.585 0.925
 Day 7 5.12 6.52 5.86 0.432 0.256 0.084
 Day 21 6.12 5.31 6.40 0.479 0.694 0.141
 Day 42 7.18 7.16 6.97 0.474 0.767 0.890
Lymphocyte (%)
 Day 1 29.48 30.33 29.93 2.814 0.913 0.860
 Day 7 32.03 35.85 31.08 1.657 0.695 0.063
 Day 21 32.68 30.65 30.45 2.343 0.519 0.758
 Day 42 35.98 32.63 33.25 1.648 0.272 0.351
IgG (mg/dL)
 Day 1 0.44 0.55 0.48 0.036 0.395 0.076
 Day 7 0.47 0.55 0.48 0.042 0.901 0.209
 Day 21 0.42 0.55 0.48 0.056 0.489 0.207
 Day 42 0.45 0.55 0.48 0.053 0.672 0.238
IgM (mg/dL)
 Day 1 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.034 0.653 0.885
 Day 7 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.034 1.000 1.000
 Day 21 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.034 1.000 1.000
 Day 42 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.034 1.000 1.000
IgA (mg/dL)
 Day 1 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.026 0.895 0.761
 Day 7 0.20 0.12 0.14 0.028 0.143 0.182
 Day 21 0.13 0.20 0.14 0.030 0.955 0.118
 Day 42 0.20 0.12 0.14 0.028 0.143 0.182
BUN (mg/dL)
 Day 1 5.75 6.50 6.25 0.677 0.614 0.561
 Day 7 6.00 6.75 6.75 0.656 0.440 0.652
 Day 21 6.25 6.75 6.50 0.635 0.787 0.641
 Day 42 7.00 6.00 7.00 0.408 1.000 0.077
Creatinine (mg/dL)
 Day 1 1.04 1.03 1.03 0.026 1.000 0.705
 Day 7 1.13 1.15 1.09 0.018 0.170 0.130
 Day 21 1.20 1.21 1.20 0.017 0.918 0.679
 Day 42 1.40 1.44 1.44 0.029 0.357 0.684

1) Values represent the means of eight pens with 2 pigs per replicate pen (n = 16) per treatment.

WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; IgA, immunoglobulin A; BUN, blood urea nitrogen.

Download Excel Table

DISCUSSION

In this study, dietary supplementation of SMS extract increased ADG and ADFI of weaned piglets in a dose-dependent manner. Excellent voluntary feed intake promotion and body weight improvement properties of SMS extract have been demonstrated in experimentally induced toxic responses in poultry [22,23]. In addition, Jiang et al. [24] noted that feeding sows with an SMS extract containing diet significantly increased the feed intake, and subsequently improved the reproductive performance. The increase in ADFI means animals intake more nutrients, which is beneficial to the improvement of growth performance [25]. Aromatic components in plants as natural supplements in nutrition have been shown to improve the growth of animals by promoting feed intake [26]. Indeed, the supplementation of SMS has been reported to regulate the digestive process, it could stimulate the production of bile acids in the liver, increase the secretion of digestive juice, thus improving the appetite [13]. Hashem et al. [27] noted that dietary supplementation of silymarin improved appetite and feed intake, thus ameliorate the decrease of body weight induced by the chemical liver injury. Study in β-thalassemia intermedia treated with silymarin indicated that treated patients with silymarin increased the appetite [28]. Therefore, we considered that increased ADG as the result of dietary SMS extract supplementation was related to the greater ADFI.

In addition, the mechanism in growth performance improvement in pigs by dietary manipulation was also related to the nutrient digestibility enhancement and subsequently increase in feed efficiency [20]. However, in this study, dietary supplementation of SMS extract had no significant effects on nutrient digestibility and feed efficiency. Similarly, some researchers reported that dietary supplementation of SMS extract did not affect the dry matter and nitrogen digestibility in dogs [29], buffalos [30], and broiler chicks [23]. However, studies that evaluated the effects of dietary supplementation of SMS extract on the nutrient digestibility in pigs were still limited, no study can be used for comparison with our study. In this study, the supplementation of SMS extract neither had beneficial effect nor adverse effects in nutrient digestibility.

Fecal noxious gas is generated by the unabsorbed nutrients fermented by the microbiota in the intestine [31]. The improvement in nutrient digestibility is considered to be one of the strategies for decreasing the contents of unabsorbed nutrients, thus reducing the noxious gas emission [32]. Liu et al. [33] reported that feeding growing pigs with herbal extract containing diet limited the emission of fecal noxious gases by improving nutrient digestibility. Zhao et al. [34] found the fecal noxious gas emission of weaned piglets was decreased by fermented medicinal plants supplementation, which was related to the increase of nutrient digestibility. However, in the present study, feeding weaned piglets with SMS extract containing diet had no positive effects on the nutrient digestibility, which was considered the reason for SMS extract supplementation did not affect the fecal noxious gas emission.

BUN and creatinine as metabolic waste products are discharged by the kidneys [35], thus the concentration of BUN and creatinine in the blood was used as an indicator of nephrotoxicity [20]. The renal histological damage protection effect of SMS extract has been demonstrated by Jaggi et al. [5]. In addition, plenty of studies have demonstrated that dietary supplementation of SMS extract had no significant effects on the serum creatinine levels in ducks [36], horses [37], and dogs [29]. Therefore, the results of this study indicated that dietary supplementation of SMS extract had no adverse effects on the renal function in weaned piglets.

The WBC, lymphocytes, IgG, IgA, and IgM in the blood play important roles in the immune system of animals [20,38]. High levels of the above parameters mean an improvement of immunity [38,39]. RBC are important cell types that transport oxygen [20]. The immunostimulatory properties of SMS extract have been reported in human [5,40]. However, the levels of RBC, WBC, IgA, and IgM in blood were not affected by SMS extract supplementation in the diet of dogs [29], broiler chicks [41], and rabbit bucks [42]. At present study, feeding weaned piglets with SMS extract containing diet had no significant effects on the blood immune parameters.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that dietary supplementation of SMS extract improved the ADG of weaned piglets by promoting voluntary feed intake. In addition, the supplementation of SMS extract had no adverse effects on nutrient digestibility, renal function, and immune status. However, further experiments were needed to evaluate the mechanisms of SMS extract supplementation on the improvement of voluntary feed intake, which will be an interesting point for improving the growth of pigs.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2022R1I1A3063332).

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Kim IH.

Data curation: Dang DX.

Formal analysis: Dang DX, Cho S.

Methodology: Kim IH.

Software: Dang DX. Cho S.

Validation: Dang DX, Cho S, Kim IH.

Investigation: Kim IH.

Writing - original draft: Dang DX. Cho S.

Writing - review & editing: Dang DX, Cho S, Kim IH.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This experiment was processed under the supervision of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Dankook University (Cheonan, Korea). The relevant protocol has been approved by the above committee (DK-1-2106).

REFERENCES

1.

Vilahur G, Sutelman P, Mendieta G, Ben-Aicha S, Borrell-Pages M, Peña E, et al. Triglyceride-induced cardiac lipotoxicity is mitigated by Silybum marianum. Atherosclerosis. 2021; 324:91-101

2.

Mohammad BI, Alzamely H, Al Gharrawi F, Al-Aubaidy HA. Milk thistle seed extract favorably affects lactation and development of mammary gland in female rats. Egypt J Vet Sci. 2019; 50:27-36

3.

Mohamed AK. The possible rescue effect of vitamin E or Silymarin on lung tissue of male albino rats exposed to electro-magnetic field. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2014; 57:470-81

4.

Vivekanandan L, Sheik H, Singaravel S, Thangavel S. Ameliorative effect of silymarin against linezolid-induced hepatotoxicity in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infected Wistar rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018; 108:1303-12

5.

Neha, Jaggi AS, Singh N. Silymarin and its role in chronic diseases.In In: Gupta S, Prasad S, Aggarwal B, editors.editors Drug discovery from mother nature. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Cham: Springer. 2016; p p. 25-44

6.

Le QU, Lay HL, Wu MC, Joshi RK. Phytoconstituents and pharmacological activities of Silybum marianum (Milk Thistle): a critical review. Am J Essent Oil Nat Prod. 2018; 6:41-7

7.

Breschi MC, Martinotti E, Apostoliti F, Nieri P. Protective effect of silymarin in antigen challenge- and histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in in vivo guinea-pigs. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002; 437:91-5

8.

Kim JS, Han NK, Kim SH, Lee HJ. Silibinin attenuates radiation-induced intestinal fibrosis and reverses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:69386-97

9.

Egresi A, Süle K, Szentmihályi K, Blázovics A, Fehér E, Hagymási K, et al. Impact of milk thistle (Silybum marianum) on the mycotoxin caused redox-homeostasis imbalance of ducks liver. Toxicon. 2020; 187:181-7

10.

Johnson VJ, He Q, Osuchowski MF, Sharma RP. Physiological responses of a natural antioxidant flavonoid mixture, silymarin, in BALB/c mice: III. Silymarin inhibits T-lymphocyte function at low doses but stimulates inflammatory processes at high doses. Planta Med. 2003; 69:44-9

11.

Canikli S, Bayraktar N, Turkoglu S, Ozen O, Unlukaplan M, Pirat A. Increased epithelial apoptosis and decreased oxidant injury in silymarin-treated rats with sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Crit Care. 2009; 13:P336

12.

Wang X, Zhang Z, Wu SC. Health benefits of Silybum marianum: phytochemistry, pharmacology, and applications. J Agric Food Chem. 2020; 68:11644-64

13.

Bijak M. Silybin, a major bioactive component of milk thistle (Silybum marianum L. Gaernt.)—chemistry, bioavailability, and metabolism. Molecules. 2017; 22:1942

14.

Potkański A, Kowalczyk J, Nowak W, Czauderna M, Michalak S. Effect of milk thistle (Sylibum marianum L.) endosperm in the diet for cows on milk yield and fatty acid profiles. J Anim Feed Sci. 2001; 10Suppl 2:83-9

15.

Stoev SD, Njobeh P, Zarkov I, Mircheva T, Zapryanova D, Denev S, et al. Selected herbal feed additives showing protective effects against ochratoxin A toxicosis in broiler chicks. World Mycotoxin J. 2019; 12:257-68

16.

Farmer C, Lapointe J, Palin MF. Effects of the plant extract silymarin on prolactin concentrations, mammary gland development, and oxidative stress in gestating gilts. J Anim Sci. 2014; 92:2922-30

17.

Cui K, Wang Q, Wang S, Diao Q, Zhang N. The facilitating effect of tartary buckwheat flavonoids and Lactobacillus plantarum on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant capacity, and fecal microbiota of weaned piglets. Animals. 2019; 9:986

18.

You T, Tang J, Yin S, Jia G, Liu G, Tian G, et al. Effect of dietary licorice flavonoids powder on performance, intestinal immunity and health of weaned piglets. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2022

19.

NRC [National Research Council]. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th rev. ed. Washington, DC: National Academic Press. 2012

20.

Dang DX, Chung YH, Kim IH. Effects of dietary supplementation of herbal active ingredients promoting insulin-like growth factor-1 secretion on production performance, egg quality, blood hematology, and excreta gas emission in laying hens. Anim Biosci. 2021; 34:1802-10

21.

AOAC [Association of Official Analytical Chemists] International. Official method of analysis of the AOAC. 17th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC International. 2000

22.

Jahanian E, Mahdavi AH, Asgary S, Jahanian R. Effects of dietary inclusion of silymarin on performance, intestinal morphology and ileal bacterial count in aflatoxin‐challenged broiler chicks. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2017; 101:e43-54

23.

Shahsavan M, Salari S, Ghorbani M. Effect of dietary inclusion of Silybum marianum oil extraction byproduct on growth performance, immune response and cecal microbial population of broiler chicken. Biotechnol Anim Husb. 2021; 37:45-64

24.

Jiang X, Lin S, Lin Y, Fang Z, Xu S, Feng B, et al. Effects of silymarin supplementation during transition and lactation on reproductive performance, milk composition and haematological parameters in sows. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2020; 104:1896-903

25.

Boddicker N, Gabler NK, Spurlock ME, Nettleton D, Dekkers JCM. Effects of ad libitum and restricted feed intake on growth performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake. J Anim Sci. 2011; 89:40-51

26.

Christaki E, Giannenas I, Bonos E, Florou-Paneri P. Innovative uses of aromatic plants as natural supplements in nutrition. In In: Florou-Paneri P, Christaki E, Giannenas I, editors. editors Feed additives. Cambridge, MAAcademic Press 2020; p:19-34

27.

Hashem AS, Taha NM, Mandour AEA, Lebda MA, Balbaa ME, El-Morshedy AS. Hepatoprotective effect of silymarin and propolis in chemically induced chronic liver injury in rats. Alex J Vet Sci. 2016; 49:35-43

28.

Reisi N, Esmaeil N, Gharagozloo M, Moayedi B. Therapeutic potential of silymarin as a natural iron‐chelating agent in β‐thalassemia intermedia. Clin Case Rep. 2022; 10e05293

29.

Gogulski M, Cieslak A, Grabska J, Ardois M, Pomorska-Mól M, Kołodziejski P, et al. Effects of silybin supplementation on nutrient digestibility, hematological parameters, liver performance, and liver-specific mi-RNA concentration in dogs. BMC Vet Res. 2021

30.

Nikzad Z, Chaji M, Mirzadeh K, Mohammadabadi T, Sari M. Effect of different levels of milk thistle (Silybum marianum) in diets containing cereal grains with different ruminal degradation rate on rumen bacteria of Khuzestan buffalo. Iran J Appl Anim Sci. 2017; 7:401-9

31.

Ospina-Rojas IC, Murakami AE, Duarte CRA, Eyng C, Oliveira CAL, Janeiro V. Valine, isoleucine, arginine and glycine supplementation of low-protein diets for broiler chickens during the starter and grower phases. Br Poult Sci. 2014; 55:766-73

32.

Siegert W, Wild KJ, Schollenberger M, Helmbrecht A, Rodehutscord M. Effect of glycine supplementation in low protein diets with amino acids from soy protein isolate or free amino acids on broiler growth and nitrogen utilisation. Br Poult Sci. 2016; 57:424-34

33.

Liu X, Lee SI, Kim IH. Achyranthes japonica extracts supplementation to growing pigs positively influences growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial shedding, and fecal gas emission. Anim Biosci. 2021; 34:427-33

34.

Zhao P, Li H, Lei Y, Li T, Kim S, Kim I. Effect of fermented medicinal plants on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal noxious gas emissions, and diarrhea score in weanling pigs. J Sci Food Agric. 2016; 96:1269-74

35.

Cluitmans JCA, Geutjes PJ, van den Ouweland JMW. Urine-to-plasma contamination mimicking acute kidney injury: small drops with major consequences. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021; 59:e213-4

36.

Elnaggar A, El-Said EA, Ali R. Physiological and immunological responses of ducks (Cairina moschata domestica) to silymarin supplementation. Egypt Poult Sci J. 2021; 40:895-913

37.

Dockalova H, Zeman L, Horky P. Influence of milk thistle (Silybum marianum) seed cakes on biochemical values of equine plasma subjected to physical exertion. Animals. 2021; 11:210

38.

Sun HY, Kim IH. Coated omega-3 fatty acid from linseed oil positively affect sow immunoglobulin G concentration and pre-weaning performance of piglet. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020; 269:114676

39.

Devi SM, Park JW, Kim IH. Effect of plant extracts on growth performance and insulin-like growth factor 1 secretion in growing pigs. Rev Bras Zootec. 2015; 44:355-60

40.

Saeed M, Babazadeh D, Arif M, Arain MA, Bhutto ZA, Shar AH, et al. Silymarin: a potent hepatoprotective agent in poultry industry. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2017; 73:483-92

41.

Bagno O, Shevchenko S, Shevchenko A, Prokhorov O, Shentseva A, Vavin G, et al. Physiological status of broiler chickens with diets supplemented with milk thistle extract. Vet World. 2021; 14:1319-23

42.

Hamed RS, Attia YA, Abd EL-Hamid AEH, Shahban HA. Impact of supplementation with milk thistle seeds and rosemary leaves on semen quality, antioxidants status and reproductive performance of rabbit bucks. Egypt Poult Sci J. 2016; 36:279-98